I have a table that stores personnel assigned to a project and if they are removed from the project.
Each project has several people filling roles.
Several of the roles can be filled by multiple simultaneously but a few can only be filled by one person at a time.
If a person gets removed from the project, their record gets tagged with a date of removal in a specified date field.
[projectNumber][employee][role][removedDate]
[employee] and [roles] are lookup fields
I have a query that identifies the roles that should have one individual filling that role at a time.
SELECT first(projectNumber) AS pn, employee, role
FROM [Table]
WHERE projectNumber = "NUMBER" and removeddate is null and (role = 9 or role = 10 or role =2 or role =3 or role =1)
GROUP BY pn, role;
This returns the roles that can only have one person in that role, for a specific project number. If that role is not filled then nothing is returned for that record in this query.
I am trying to get the form to reference the query with a dlookup but I am not sure what I am doing.
How can I create a validation rule that checks to see if the roles are filled, per project, and returns an error if yes?
Example Table:
[projectNumber][employee][role][removedDate]
1111111 A 1
1111111 B 2
1111111 C 3
1111111 D 4
1111111 E 5
1111111 F 9 2/20/19
1111111 G 4
1111111 H 5
1111111 I 9
1111111 J 10
Here would the result of the query identifying all the roles that can only have one individual assigned to that role that have not been removed.
[projectNumber][employee][role][removedDate]
1111111 A 1
1111111 B 2
1111111 C 3
1111111 I 9
From these results I want the validation checker to reference these results if someone were to add: Employee M to project 1111111 to role 1, 2, 3, 9. It should return an error since those roles are assigned.
The validation checker would NOT return an error if someone tried to add: Employee N to project 1111111 for role 10.
Related
I have been pulling my hair on how to translate my business requirement into a SQL query.
The case in itself is not that complex. I have two main tables user and list and a many to many relationship between the 2 of them though the userList table, where a user can be connected to a list by having a specific role, like being the owner or a collaborator.
Relevant properties for that example:
user -> id
list -> id | isPublic (BOOL)
userList -> id | userId | listId | role (OWNER|COLLABORATOR)
I have an API endpoint that allows for a user (requester) to retrieve all the lists of another user (target). I have the following 2 cases:
Case 1: requester = target
I have that under control with:
`SELECT
"list".*,
"userList"."id" AS "userList.id",
"userList"."listId" AS "userList.listId"
FROM
"list" AS "list"
INNER JOIN
"userList" AS "userList"
ON "list"."id" = "userList"."listId" AND "userList"."userId" = '${targetUserId}'`;
Case 2: requester =/= target
This is where I'm stuck as I have the following additional constraints:
a user can only see other users' lists that are public
OR lists for which they have the role of COLLABORATOR or OWNER
So I'm looking to do something like:
Get all the lists for which target is connected to (no matter the role) AND for which, EITHER the list is public OR the requester is also connected to that list.
Sample Data
user table
id
----------
john
anna
list table
id | isPublic
------------------
1 false
2 true
3 false
userList table
id | userId | listId | role
- john 1 OWNER
- john 2 OWNER
- john 3 OWNER
- anna 1 COLLABORATOR
Anna requests to see all of John's lists
desired result:
[{
id: 1,
isPublic: false
}, {
id: 2,
isPublic: true
}]
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Many thanks
Does this do what you want?
select l.*
from list
inner join userlist ul on ul.listid = l.id
group by l.id
having
bool_or(ul.role = 'OWNER' and ul.userid = 'john') -- owned by John
and (l.ispublic or bool_or(ul.userid = 'anna') -- public or allowed to Anna
I have a table ClientContacts, which holds basic information about a pairing of clients. Some of the details held in this table include P1Title, P2Title, P1FirstName, P2FirstName. For each row in this table there may be details of one or two clients, with a CustomerId that represents the pairing. Within this table is also ContactId, which is used to link to the table described below.
In a second table ContactDetails which contains rows that hold a specific contact detail that is associated with a client. Each client may have a number of rows in this table, each row holding a different detail such as HomeNumber, MobileNumber and Email. This table also contains a Type field which represents the type of contact detail held in the row. 1 = Home number, 2 = Mobile number and 3 = email. The Note field is also included, which may hold either Mr or Mrs denoting whether the mobile number held belongs to Person1 or Person2 in the client pairing.
Here is a visual structure of the tables.
ClientContacts
CustomerId ContactId Person1Title Person1FirstName Person1LastName Person2Title Person2FirstName Person2LastName
1 100 Mr Bob BobLastname Mrs Bobette BobetteLastname
2 101 Mr John JohnLastname Mrs Johnette JohnetteLastname
ContactDetails
ContactId Detail Type Note
100 012345 1
100 077777 2 P1
100 012333 1
100 088888 2 P2
101 099999 1
101 012211 1
101 066666 2
101 email#email.com 3
I want to construct a query that allows me to pull back the information of both of the clients, as well as figure out whether any of the mobile numbers stored in the ContactDetails table belongs to either of the two clients, if it does, I need to be able to tell which belongs to Person1 or Person2 in the pairing.
In addition, if the note field is null for a particular mobile number (type = 2), the first mobile number should be used for Person1 and the second should be used for Person2.
Below is my desired output:
Output
CustomerId Person1Firstname
Person1Lastname Person2Firstname Person2Lastname Home Person1Mobile Person2Mobile Person2Email
1 Bob BobLastname Bobette BobetteLastname 012211 077777 088888 null
I have a partially working query that manages to extract the mobile numbers and relates them to P1 or P2, however this only works if the Note field is not null.
select
cc.CustomerId,
cc.Person1Forename,
cc.Person1Surname,
cc.Person2Forename,
cc.Person2Surname,
max(case when cd.Type = 3 then cd.Detail end) as 'Home',
max(case when cd.Type = 4 and cd.Note = cc.P1Title then cd.Detail end) as 'Person1Mobile',
max(case when cd.Type = 4 and cd.Note = cc.P2Title then cd.Detail end) as 'Person2Mobile',
max(case when cd.Type = 5 then cd.Detail end) as 'Email'
from ClientContacts cc join
ContactDetails
cd on cc.ContactId = cd.ContactId
I'm unsure how to proceed from here. Any help would be appreciated.
I'd like to pick some of your glorious minds for an optimal solution to my dilemma.
Scenario:
Schools have children and children take tests.
The tests point to the child, not the school.
If the child moves school, the test records are taken to the new school and the previous school has no record of the test being done as they are linked to the child.
Obviously, this isn't ideal and is the result of the database not being designed with this in mind. What would the correct course of action be; I’ve currently identified the 3 possibilities listed below which would solve the current problem. However, i cannot be sure which is best for the issue at hand - and if any better solutions exist.
Have each test store the school & student within the test records (requiring current records to be updated & increasing the size of the database)
Create a new child record, duplicating the existing data for the new school with a new ID so the test remains linked to the previous school (complicating the ability to identify previous test scores)
Separately keep track of moves to other schools, then use this additional table to identify current and previous using the timestamps (increased complexity and computational requirements)
EDIT:
So i tried to use a basic example, but requests for the task at hand have been requested.
Here's the DB Schema for the tables (simplified for problem, note: Postnatal is not important):
Patients: ID, MidwifeID, TeamID
Midwives: ID
Groups: ID
GroupsMidwives: MidwifeID, GroupsID
PatientObservations: ID, MidwifeID, PatientID
Using a query as follows:
SELECT Some Information
from Postnatals
JOIN Midwives on Postnatals.MidwifeID = Midwives.ID
JOIN Patients on Patients.PatientID = Postnatals.PatientID
JOIN GroupsMidwives on GroupsMidwives.MidwifeID = Midwives.ID
JOIN Groups on Groups.ID = GroupsMidwives.GroupID
JOIN PatientObservations on PatientObservations.PatientID =
Postnatals.PatientID
WHERE groups.Name = ?
*some extra checks*
GROUP BY Midwives.Firstname, Midwives.Surname, Midwives.ID
However, in the event that a midwife is moved to a different team, the data associated with the previous team is now owned by the newly assigned team. As described in the example detailed previously.
Thus a modification (which modification is yet to be realised) is required to make the data submitted - prior to a team change - assigned to the previous team, as of current, because of the way the records are owned by the midwife, this is not possible.
You should below suggestion as per you concern.
Step 1 ) You need to create School Master Table
ID | School | IsActive
1 | ABC | 1
2 | XYZ | 1
Step 2 ) You need to create Children Master having school id as foreign key
ID | School | Children Name| IsActive
1 | 2 | Mak | 1
2 | 2 | Jak | 1
Step 3 ) You need to create test table having children id as foreign key
ID | Children_id | Test Name | IsActive
1 | 2 | Math | 1
2 | 2 | Eng | 1
Now whenever child moves school then make child record inactive and create another active record with new school. This will help you to bifurcate the old test and new test.
do let me know in case morehelp required
I have a database table which contains the following fields (amoung others)
Person 1
Person 2
Person 3
I need to group by Person. Unfortunately the same person can appear in any one of the above three fields. I can't simply concatenate the 3 fields as there may be a name in each field ie 3 names in a particular entry. For example
Record 1 Joe Bloggs (Person 1), Person 2 null, Person 3 null
Record 2 Jane Black (Person 1), Joe Bloggs (Person 2), Person 3 null
Record 3 Jane Black (Person 1), James Blue (person 2), Joe Bloggs (person 3)
Yes I know the database table is set up incorrectly - ideally there should be 1 field for Person's name and multiple entries but this is not the case and this is what I have to work with.
How on earth can I group by name when the answer is in one of several fields ?
Please note I am not looking to pull out a particular name (that would be easy as I would search for the name in either of the 3 fields). I need to group by name to show a report containing everyone. The report would look like:
Group 1: Joe Bloggs
Record 1 fields
Record 2 Fields
Record 3 fields
Group 2: Jane Black
Record 2 Fields
Record 3 Fields
Group 3: James Blue
Record 3 fields
Any help would be much appreciated thank you !
I have an account dimension where the same account can have multiple account numbers. So I setup a durable key to group these accounts. So for example
Durablekey AccountNum
1 1
1 2
1 3
2 4
3 5
The durablekey has no business meaning. I would like to have an attribute in cube that displays the accountnum but would essentially have the durablekey as the key. So if I selected accountnum 2 it would pull all the information for everything with a durablekey of 1. If I simply set the accountnum as the name and durablekey as the key I get a duplicate error during processing as expected.
Is this possible to do?
Hi there is sample data http://msftdbprodsamples.codeplex.com/releases/view/55330
You need to make Parent->Child Hierarchie, that Account key was normal integer key and other Accounts will have Parent Account key, which show to Parent Account. Parrent Account can have multiple other Accounts:
AccountKey | ParentAccount | Code
1 - 102
2 1 10255
3 1 10266
4 3 13444
5 3 13555
There is a lot of examples in internet just type - SSAS Parent - Child :
http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/databases/microsoft-sql-server/9780735626201/creating-dimensions/creating_a_parent-child_dimension
Also you can use sample database and SSAS projects, there is everything done on working Cube...