Field name: CSST Test Set Category. The custom field under Test sets, I want query using that custom field to generate custom reports. query: ((CSST Test Set Category).Name = " Prod Cert "), when I try to save the query getting "invalid expression starting at "CSST"". Can any one please help me
Perhaps the query should be:
(c_CSSTTestSetCategory = "Prod Cert")
Related
Please forgive me if my question does not make sense.
What im trying to do is to inject in values for query parameters
GET1 File
Scenario:
Given path 'search'
And param filter[id] = id (default value or variable from another feature file)
POST1 File
Scenario:
def newid = new id made by a post call
def checkid = read call(GET1) {id : newid}
like if one of my feature files creates a new id then i want to do a get call with the above scenario. therefore i need a parameter there which takes in the new id.
On the other hand if i do not have an id newly created or the test creating it is not part of the suite. i want to still be able to run the above mentioned scenario but this time it has a default value to it.
Instead of param use params. It is designed so that any keys with null values are ignored.
After the null is set on the first line below, you can make a call to another feature, and overwrite the value of criteria. If it still is null, no params will be set.
* def criteria = null
Given path 'search'
And params { filter: '#(criteria)' }
There are multiple other ways to do this, also refer to this set of examples for data-driven search params: dynamic-params.feature
The doc on conditional logic may also give you some ideas.
in odoo you can get value of field by it's str name:
exm:
name = getattr(self, 'name')
what i want now is to know the type of field name is it :
fields.Char, fields.Many2one, fields.Many2many .....
so what i need is something like this
gettype(self, 'user_id')
is there a way to now what is the type of field in odoo?
You can search from ir.model.fields model.
ir_model_obj=self.env['ir.model.fields']
ir_model_field=ir_model_obj.search([('model','=',model),('name','=',field)])
field_type=ir_model_field.ttype
if field_type=='many2one':
print "do operation"
This may help you.
Odoo provides this information in the _fields attribute, I think It's better because every thing happens In the Python side no need for contacting the database, especially In my case my model have more than 30 fields :
for name, field in self._fields.iteritems():
if not isinstance(field, (fields.Many2one, fields.Many2many, fields.One2many)):
# logic go here
If you you want to verify just one fields:
if not isinstance(self._fields[field_name], (fields.Many2one, ...)): # do something
I am trying to create a new field on the sale.order.line model. This field is called x_all_route_ids, and is meant to contain all of the available stock.location.route for an Order Line.
It should look up the product_id.route_ids and product_id.routes_from_categ_ids for the Order Line, and join them together into a single set of Routes.
I am trying to set this field up through the Odoo UI, but getting error related to my "Dependencies".
I have Dependencies defined as:
product_id, product_id.route_ids, product_id.routes_from_categ_ids
I have Compute defined as:
for record in self:
record['x_all_route_ids'] = record.product_id.route_ids
To start I am just trying to get the field to show the same value as product_id.route_ids, but it's not working. When I save, I get the following error:
Error while validating constraint
Unknown field u'product_id' in dependency u'product_id'
Any idea what I'm doing wrong here?
I was able to get this working. I think the issue was just a bug in the UI that came about because I had been trying so many different things. After refreshing the page, the following worked:
Dependency = product_id
Field type = many2many
Compute method:
for record in self:
full = record.product_id.route_ids | record.product_id.route_from_categ_ids
record['x_all_route_ids'] = full.filtered('sale_selectable')
Trying to wrap my head around zoho creator, its not as simple as they make it out to be for building apps… I have an inventory database, and i have four fields that I call to fill a field called Inventory Number (Inv_Num1) –
First Name (First_Name)
Last Name (Last_Name)
Year (Year)
Number (Number)
I have a Custom Function script that I call through a Custom Action in the form report. What I am trying to do is upload a CSV file with 900 entries. Of course, not all of those have those values (first/last/number) so I need to bulk edit all of them. However when I do the bulk edit, the Inv_Num1 field is not updated with the new values. I use the custom action to populate the Inv_Num1 field with the values of the other 4 fields.
Heres is my script:
void onetime.UpdateInv()
{
for each Inventory_Record in Management
{
FN = Inventory_Record.First_Name.subString(0,1);
LN = Inventory_Record.Last_Name.subString(0,1);
YR = Inventory_Record.Year.subString(2,4);
NO = Inventory_Record.Number;
outputstr = FN + LN + YR + NO;
Inventory_Record.Inv_Num1 = outputstr;
}
}
I get this error back when I try to run this function
Error.
Error in executing UpdateInv workflow.
Error in executing For Each Record task.
Error in executing Set Variable task. Unable to update template variable FN.
Error evaluating STRING expression :
Even though there is a First Name for example, it still thinks there is none. This only happens on the fields I changed with Bulk Edit. If I do each one by hand, then the custom action works—but of course then the Inv_Num1 is already updated through my edit on success functions and makes the whole thing moot.
this may be one year late, you might have found the solution but just to highlight, the error u were facing was just due to the null value in first name.
you just have put a null check on each field and u r good to go.
you can generate the inv_number on the time of bulk uploading also by adding null check in the same code on and placing the code on Add> On Submt.( just the part inside the loop )
the Better option would be using a formula field, you just have to put this formula in that formula field and you'll get your inventory_number autogenerated , you can rename the formula_field to Inv Number or whaterver u want.
Since you are using substring directly in year Field, I am assuming the
year field as string.else you would have to user Year.tostring().substring(2,4) & instead of if(Year=="","",...) you have to put if(Year==null , null,...);
so here's the formula
if(First_Name=="","",First_Name.subString(0,1))+if(Last_Name =="","",Last_Name.subString(0,1)) + if(Year=="","",Year.subString(2,4)+Number
Let me know ur response if u implement this.
Without knowing the datatype its difficult to fix, but making the assumption that your Inventory_Record.number is a numeric data item you are adding a string to a number:
The "+" is used for string Concatenation - Joiner but it also adds two numbers together so think "a" + "b" = "ab" for strings but for numbers 1 + 2 = 3.
All good, but when you do "a" + 2 the system doesn't know whether to add or concatenate so gives an error.
I am trying to get the ID under "General" from a feature item in rally. This is my query:
body = { "find" => {"_ProjectHierarchy" => projectID, "_TypeHierarchy" => "PortfolioItem/Feature"
},
"fields" => ["FormattedID","Name","State","Release","_ItemHierarchy","_TypeHierarchy","Tags"],
"hydrate" => ["_ItemHierarchy","_TypeHierarchy","Tags"],
"fetch"=>true
}
I am not able to get any value for FormattedID, I tried using "_UnformattedID" but it pulls up an entirely different value than the FormattedID. Any help would be appreciated.
LBAPI does not have FormattedID field. You are correct using _UnformattedID. It is the FormattedID without the prefix. For example, this query:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/1111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",_ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}},sort:{_ValidFrom:-1}}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State"]&hydrate=["State"]&compress=true&pagesize:200
shows _UnformattedID that correspond to FormattedID as this screenshot shows:
I noticed your are using fields and fetch . Per LBAPI's documentation, it uses fields rather than fetch. If you want to get all fields, use fields=true
As far as the missing custom fields, make sure that the custom field value was set within the dates of the query.
Compare these almost identical queries: the first query does not return a custom field, the second query does.
Query #1:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/1111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",_ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}}}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State","c_PiCustomField"]&hydrate=["State","c_PiCustomField"]
Query #2:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/11111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",__At: "current"}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State","c_PiCustomField"]&hydrate=["State","c_PiCustomField"]
The first query uses time period: _ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}
The second query uses __At: "current"
Let's say I just create a new custom field on PortfolioItem. It is not possible to create a custom field on PorfolioItem/Feature, so the field is created on PI, but both queries still use "_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature".
After I created this custom field, called PiCustomField, I set a value of that field for a specific Feature, F4.
The first query does not have a single snapshot that includes that field because that field did not exist in the time period we lookback. We can't change the past.
The second query returns this field for F4. It does not return it for other Features because all other Features do not have this field set.
Here is the screenshot: