I want to use the local repo provided by IntelliJ to add several jar files to a Maven project, but I have no clue how. I tried to look at the guides on apache.org but they were extremely unclear to me.
What I gathered from the guides was that I had to put something like this in the pom.xml...
...
<build>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-install-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>cb-1.12</id>
<goals>
<goal>install-file</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<file>F:\path\to\file.jar</file>
<groupId>agroup</groupId>
<artifactId>anartifact</artifactId>
<version>1.12</version>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>cb-1.11</id>
<goals>
<goal>install-file</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<file>F:\path\to\file.jar</file>
<groupId>agroup</groupId>
<artifactId>anartifact</artifactId>
<version>1.11</version>
</configuration>
</execution>
...the same thing several more times...
</executions>
</plugin>
</build>
...
I added that and tried adding the dependencies but IntelliJ was unable to resolve them. I tried running it anyway thinking maybe the plugin had to add them first and nothing happened except for the wall of errors about classes not being found. The local repo folder didn't have the new group either. I'm not sure what else to try.
Related
I want to run my scripts parallel so I have added the cucumber-jvm-parallel-plugin to my pom file. At the <execution> step I get the following error,
Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration: com.github.temyers:cucumber-jvm-parallel-plugin:4.2.0:generateRunners (execution: generateRunners, phase: generate-test-sources)
Does anyone know what is causing the issue?
I have the same error. Here is an edited snippet of my pom. Please let me know if you would like more than this.
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.temyers</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-jvm-parallel-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>generateRunners</id>
<phase>generate-test-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>generateRunners</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<glue>com.myclientname.element.loanage</glue>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/generated-test-sources</outputDirectory>
<featuresDirectory>src/test/resources/features</featuresDirectory>
<cucumberOutputDir>${project.build.directory}/JSON</cucumberOutputDir>
<format>json</format>
<!--<tags>${cucumber.options}</tags>-->
<strict>true</strict>
<monochrome>true</monochrome>
<tags>"#BusinessProcess,#B-63033_loanage_scenario1,#B-63033_loanage_scenario2,#B-63033_loanage_scenario3,#B-63033_loanage_scenario4"</tags>
<useTestNG>false</useTestNG>
<namingScheme>simple</namingScheme>
<parallelScheme>FEATURE</parallelScheme>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Can I download some files from http while maven lifecycle? any plugin?
If the file is a Maven dependency, you could use the Maven Dependency Plugin which has a get goal.
For any file, you could use the Antrun plugin to call Ant's Get task.
Another option would be the maven-download-plugin, it has been precisely created to facilitate this kind of things. It's not very actively developed and the documentation only mentions an artifact goal that does exactly the same thing as dependency:get but.. If you look at the sources, you'll see that is has a WGet mojo that will do the job.
Use it like this in any POM:
<plugin>
<groupId>com.googlecode.maven-download-plugin</groupId>
<artifactId>download-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<!-- the wget goal actually binds itself to this phase by default -->
<phase>process-resources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>wget</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<url>http://url/to/some/file</url>
<outputFileName>foo.bar</outputFileName>
<!-- default target location, just to demonstrate the parameter -->
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Key benefits of this plugin are caching of the download and checking against a signature, such as MD5.
Note that this answer has been heavily updated to reflect changes in the plugin as noted in the comments.
Seems like wagon-maven-plugin from CodeHaus allows to download files over HTTP (though this is not is original goal).
Here is an example downloading GlassFish zip before integration tests:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>download-glassfish</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>download-single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<url>http://download.java.net</url>
<fromFile>glassfish/3.1/release/glassfish-3.1.zip</fromFile>
<toDir>${project.build.directory}/glassfish</toDir>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The maven-antrun-plugin is a more direct solution:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>download-files</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<target>
<!-- download file -->
<get src="http://url/to/some/file"
dest="${project.build.directory}/downloads/"
verbose="false"
usetimestamp="true"/>
</target>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I'd like to add a few thing about the download-maven-plugin:
Project is now hosted on GitHub https://github.com/maven-download-plugin/maven-download-plugin
Its releases are available on Maven Central, and the SNAPSHOTs are available on the oss.sonatype.org snapshot repository
Compared to other suggestions mentioned here, the download-maven-plugin adds the following interesting feature: caching of files (to avoid always redownloading big files) and signature verification to make sure download got the right bits.
If available, wget can be used directly with exec-maven-plugin:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>exec</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<executable>wget</executable>
<arguments>
<argument>http://example.com/file.zip</argument>
<argument>destination.zip</argument>
</arguments>
</configuration>
</plugin>
You can use the download-single goal in the wagon plugin. Here is an example to download an HTML page (notice that the URL have to be split in a "directory" url and a "file name")
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>validate</phase>
<goals><goal>download-single</goal></goals>
<configuration>
<url>http://www.mojohaus.org/wagon-maven-plugin</url>
<fromFile>download-single-mojo.html</fromFile>
<toFile>[my dir]/mojo-help.html</toFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I'm setting up an integration test module for a good sized web project. The integration test module is separated from the web project itself, and it has it's own pom.
The idea is to use the maven-soapui-plugin to send requests and verify the response. Setting up the soapui-plugin is no hassle. However, I'm having trouble with figuring out how I can tell the jetty-maven-plugin to deploy a war from a remote repository.
If I have understood correctly, the jetty-maven-plugin has a property called '<webApp>/<webApp>' which lets me specify the war file to deploy. The problem is that the war file is not present in the module itself.
I have heard that I can use the maven assembly plugin to retrieve the war from a repository via the projects artifactId, but I am yet to figure out how I would go about doing so.
Here's a summary of what I want:
Retrieve a specific war from a repository or the like, in example via its artifactId.
Deploy this war to the jetty-maven-plugin (goal deploy-war?)
get maven-soapui-plugin to run tests and report the results back in the integration-test phase.
I am pretty sure I've got step 3 covered, but I am very unsure how to achieve step 1 and 2.
Any help is greatly appreciated
It is maybe possible to use dependency:copy to retrieve the war, unpack it and to get the whole thing working with the maven jetty plugin, but this would be hacky and kinda ugly. A cleaner solution would be to use the Maven Cargo plugin and this is my suggestion. Below, a sample POM showing how to retrieve a WAR artifact using its coordinates and how to deploy it on an embedded Jetty container using Cargo:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>war group id</groupId>
<artifactId>war artifact id</artifactId>
<type>war</type>
<version>war version</version>
</dependency>
...
</dependencies>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<!-- Container configuration -->
<container>
<containerId>jetty6x</containerId>
<type>embedded</type>
</container>
<!-- Configuration to use with the container or the deployer -->
<configuration>
<deployables>
<deployable>
<groupId>war group id</groupId>
<artifactId>war artifact id</artifactId>
<type>war</type>
<properties>
<context>war context</context>
</properties>
</deployable>
</deployables>
</configuration>
<!-- Don't wait, execute the tests after the container is started -->
<wait>false</wait>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-container</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-container</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
...
</plugins>
...
</build>
Finally, just bind the soapui plugin on the integration-test phase.
I'm doing the same thing, John, but I took a different approach with the Jetty plugin. I think the end result is the same. I'm developing an integration-test suite to run against several web service WARs. I'm using dependency:copy in the package phase and then a list of <contextHandler/>s configured for maven-jetty-plugin:
<project>
…
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>copy-wars</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>copy</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/wars-to-be-tested</outputDirectory>
<stripVersion>true</stripVersion>
<artifactItems>
…
<artifactItem>
<groupId>groupId</groupId>
<artifactId>artifactId</artifactId>
<version>version</version>
<type>war</type>
</artifactItem>
…
</artifactItems>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>7.1.3.v20100526</version>
<configuration>
…
<contextHandlers>
…
<contextHandler implementation="org.mortbay.jetty.plugin.JettyWebAppContext">
<war>${project.build.directory}/wars-to-be-tested/artifactId.war</war>
<contextPath>/context</contextPath>
</contextHandler>
</contextHandlers>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-jetty</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<scanIntervalSeconds>0</scanIntervalSeconds>
<daemon>true</daemon>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-jetty</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
I would prefer to declare the various wars as dependencies and then use dependency:copy-dependencies to set up the wars-to-be-tested directory; this would allow the Maven reactor to figure out that it needs to build my integration-test module after the wars it'll be testing. The problem I ran into was that the Jetty plugin thought that I wanted to "overlay" all of the wars that were listed as dependencies (a concept that I'd never even heard of until I saw it happen); I don't know if allowing that to happen would have hurt anything, but I didn't like it, so I went with the dependency:copy method.
This is just an alternative to using Cargo. I'll be looking into that myself, but I just wanted to provide another way of doing it.
I'm trying to add the svn.revision to project version as a build number and can't seem to do so. My jar has the correct name durin packaging, but its installed in the my local repository it is as if ${buildNumber} is/was undefined when the version was set.
I get foo-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-${buildNumber} instead of foo-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-304
Any idea what I'm doing wrong or is adding a revision to the project version a bad idea? Thanks for the help.
<project>
...
<version>1.0.0-${release.identifier}-${buildNumber}</version>
<properties>
<release.identifier>SNAPSHOT</release.identifier>
</properties>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>buildnumber-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>useLastCommittedRevision</id>
<goals>
<goal>create</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<useLastCommittedRevision>true</useLastCommittedRevision>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
...
</project>
The problem has two parts:
You're trying to set the buildNumber into the version before it is resolved so it will always be ${buildNumber} rather than the resolved value.
Instead of trying to dynamically change the version, you should set the buildNumber into the finalName element in the build. This will create the artifacts with the intended name in the local repository.
The install plugin will ignore the finalName and deploy it as 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT regardless, I don't know of a way to address that. The buildNumber is added to the Manifest if you configure the plugin as below.
So your configuration would be something like:
<version>1.0.0-${release.identifier}</version>
...
<build>
<finalName>${project.artifactId}-${project.version}-${buildNumber}</finalName>
...
</build>
I would avoid using build numbers on SNAPSHOT projects.
Maven provides the SNAPSHOT keyword to signify a volatile project in active development. So if you reference a project with a SNAPSHOT dependency version, Maven will automatically check for updates and keep your dependencies in sync.
If you then add a build number to the end of that version, you will have to manually update the dependencies, so you lose any benefit of having the SNAPSHOT suffix.
I personally avoid using build numbers where possible anyway. If I have to update a project, I just bump the version number, or use a suffix like beta-2 or RC2. If you need to track the revision in the SNAPSHOT, I'd recommend adding it to the Manifest so you can check where the build originated, but use the standard SNAPSHOT suffix to allow Maven to resolve the versions normally. The configuration below shows how to add the revision to the Manifest.
As far as your configuration is concerned, it looks OK to me assuming your SCM url is set up correctly. If you have no SCM configuration in your POM that may be the problem.
Can you run with -X and check for any output from the plugin indicating why it isn't setting the property?
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>buildnumber-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.9.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>useLastCommittedRevision</id>
<phase>validate</phase>
<goals>
<goal>create</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
<configuration>
<archive>
<manifest>
<addDefaultImplementationEntries>true</addDefaultImplementationEntries>
</manifest>
<manifestEntries>
<Implementation-Build>${buildNumber}</Implementation-Build>
</manifestEntries>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Add this after the buildnumber-maven-plugin:
<plugin>
<groupId>io.github.michaldo</groupId>
<artifactId>nashorn-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>validate</phase>
<goals>
<goal>eval</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<script>
$project.artifact.version = "${buildNumber}";
</script>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
And the buildNumber will be recognized by packaging and deploy.
I have a case where I want to run the cobertura plugin in both the verify phase and the reporting phase. I have two profiles and they should both be running the cobertura plugin, but in profile A, I only want to create the xml/html output, but in profile B, I will be generating full site documentation that includes these results.
I have cobertura configured as a plugin that runs as part of the verify phase, but if I do that, even if I run mvn verify site, the cobertura report does not appear in the site documentation. It seems as though I need to have it listed in both the plugins and the reporting section (since I won't be running site in profile A, it won't get called in that profile if I only have it in the plugins). So far the plugins section of my POM includes:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin </artifactId>
<version>2.2</version>
<configuration>
<instrumentation>
<excludes>
<exclude>com/somepkg/**</exclude>
</excludes>
</instrumentation>
<formats>
<format>xml</format>
<format>html</format>
</formats>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>cobertura</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I don't want to copy this into the reporting section too since this is a lot to duplicate. Is there a good way to accomplish this otherwise?
Thanks,
Jeff
Define this:
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>cobertura</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<phase>pre-site</phase>
<goals>
<goal>cobertura</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>