I'm trying to display details from two rows into one using MDX. If I execute the MDX below, it returns 2 rows, one containing the 998 Key and one containing the 999 Key
SELECT NON EMPTY {
[Measures].[FactTableCount] } ON COLUMNS,
NON EMPTY { ([DimXXXX].[XXXXKey].[XXXXKey].ALLMEMBERS
* ([DimAAAA].[AAAAKey].[AAAAKey],{[DimBBBB].[Key].&[998],[DimBBBB].[Key].&[999]},[DimCCCC].[CCCCKey].[CCCCKey])
) } ON ROWS
FROM ( SELECT ( { [DimXXXX].[XXXXKey].&[MyValue] } ) ON COLUMNS
FROM [FactTable])
It returns something like this
(columns [DimXXXX].[XXXXKey], [DimAAAA].[AAAAKey], [DimBBBB].[Key], [DimCCCC].[CCCCKey], [Measures].[FactTableCount])
MyValue, MyAAAAKey1, 998, MyCCCCKey1, 1
MyValue, MyAAAAKey2, 999, MyCCCCKey2, 1
However I want to return one row like this
`(columns [DimXXXX].[Key], [DimAAAA].[AAAAKey], [DimAAAA].[AAAAKey], [DimBBBB].[Key], [DimBBBB].[Key], [DimCCCC].[CCCCKey], [DimCCCC].[CCCCKey], [Measures].[FactTableCount])
MyValue, MyAAAAKey1, MyAAAAKey2, 998, 999, MyCCCCKey1, MyCCCCKey2, 1
Among other things (such as using SETs, putting the 998/999 logic after the ROWS/COLUMNS, etc) I've tried
SELECT NON EMPTY {
[Measures].[FactTableCount] } ON COLUMNS,
NON EMPTY { ([DimXXXX].[XXXXKey].[XXXXKey].ALLMEMBERS
* ([DimAAAA].[AAAAKey].[Key],[DimBBBB].[Key].&[998],[DimCCCC].[CCCCKey].[CCCCKey])
* ([DimAAAA].[AAAAKey].[Key],[DimBBBB].[Key].&[999],[DimCCCC].[CCCCKey].[CCCCKey])
) } ON ROWS
FROM ( SELECT ( { [DimXXXX].[XXXXKey].&[MyValue] } ) ON COLUMNS
FROM [FactTable])
...however because the AAAAKey hierarchy is repeated I receive the error message "The AAAAKey hierarchy is used more than once in the Crossjoin function"
Is there a way to do do this ?
Based on your comment below I have a sample.Let me know if it works.
I think I can see what you're saying however the measures are one
thing, but the dimension values are another - say Record1:MyValue,
MyAAAAKey1, 998, MyCCCCKey1, 2 and Record2: MyValue, MyAAAAKey2, 999,
MyCCCCKey2, 5 - I would like to output MyValue, MyAAAAKey1,
MyAAAAKey2, 998, 999, MyCCCCKey1, MyCCCCKey2, 2, 5
So in the query below I am trying to simulate your problem.
select
{[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]}
on columns,
non empty
([Customer].[City].[City],{[Product].[Category].&[1],[Product].[Category].&[3]},[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory])
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Result
Now onw way is to take the changing values to columns, "{[Product].[Category].&1,[Product].[Category].&2}" in my case and "{[DimBBBB].[Key].&[998],[DimBBBB].[Key].&[999]}" in your case
select
{
({[Product].[Category].&[1],[Product].[Category].&[3]},[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]),
([Product].[Category].defaultmember,[Measures].[Internet Order Quantity])
}
on columns,
non empty
([Customer].[City].[City],[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory])
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Result:
Note how the values are only repeated for the relevent column. This does add an extra column but you rows are now half the orignal count.
Edit: to handle the requirement based on the comment
1st row of the grid would be Ballard, Bikes, Mountain Bikes, Road
Bikes. The 2nd: Ballard, Clothing, Caps, Gloves. The 3rd: Barstow,
Bikes, Road Bikes, null. I want to merge/list the actual dimension
values
So to achieve above we have two options. But in either case some manipulation on UI would be required.
1)First option
with member
measures.t
as (nonempty(existing([Customer].[City].currentmember,[Product].[Category].currentmember,[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory].members),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])).item(0).item(2).name
member measures.t1
as (nonempty(existing([Customer].[City].currentmember,[Product].[Category].currentmember,[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory].members),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])).item(1).item(2).name
select
{measures.t,measures.t1}
on columns,
nonempty(([Customer].[City].[City],{[Product].[Category].&[1],[Product].[Category].&[3]}),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
2)The second option,
with member
measures.t1
as
[Customer].[City].currentmember.name
member measures.t2
as
[Product].[Category].currentmember.name
member measures.t3
as (nonempty(existing([Customer].[City].currentmember,[Product].[Category].currentmember,[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory].members),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])).item(0).item(2).name
member measures.t4
as (nonempty(existing([Customer].[City].currentmember,[Product].[Category].currentmember,[Product].[Subcategory].[Subcategory].members),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])).item(1).item(2).name
select
{measures.t1,measures.t2,measures.t3,measures.t4}
on columns,
nonempty(([Customer].[City].[City],{[Product].[Category].&[1],[Product].[Category].&[3]}),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Related
I am facing very strange issue with MDX (SSAS 2014), on which simplest calculated member is taking forever to execute. Could someone please help me to understand why i am facing this issue. If i not use calculated member everything works fast and result comes in seconds. When i remove Producer attribute, query performances well.
Below is the complete query.
WITH
MEMBER Measures.AsOfDate AS ("[Policy Effective Date].[Year-Month].[Date].&[2018-01-04T00:00:00]")
MEMBER Measures.YTDPremium AS AGGREGATE (YTD(STRTOMEMBER(Measures.AsOfDate)), [Measures].[Written Premium])
SELECT NON EMPTY
{
Measures.YTDPremium
} ON COLUMNS, NON EMPTY
{
(
[Program].[Program Name].[Program Name]
,[Insuring Company].[Insuring Company Name].[Insuring Company Name]
,[Line Of Business].[Line Of Business].[Line Of Business]
,[Producer].[Producer Name].[Producer Name]
)
} ON ROWS
FROM [Premium]
Try understand what the following part does in your query
NON EMPTY { ( [Program].[Program Name].[Program Name]
,[Insuring Company].[Insuring Company Name].[Insuring Company Name]
,[Line Of Business].[Line Of Business].[Line Of Business]
,[Producer].[Producer Name].[Producer Name]
) } ON ROWS
In the above MDX you are telling the server to take a cross product of all values of "Programs", "Line Of Business" and "Producer Name". So lets say you have 4 values of programs , 3 values of line of business and 2 values of producer name. The total combinations are 4*3*2=24
Now the "Non empty" removes any combinations that are not present in your dataset. This is done by removing all rows that have "Null" value in column value.
Your measure is returning value irrespective if that combination exists or not. You can modify your Calculatedmeasure to return value only in the case if the combination is valid. This can be achived by checking an actual measure for that combination
Edit: based the below example is based on the comment
In the below example i am trying to get the internet sales amount categories and components
select
{ [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] }
on columns,
(
[Product].[Category].[Category],
[Customer].[Country].[Country]
)
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Result
Now add "Non empty" to the query and observe the results.
Results
Now lets add calculted measure that returns "hello". Notice how the non empty clause is ineffective.
Now modify the code make the calculated measure check other measures for null
with member measures.t as
case when [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] = null then null else "hello" end
select
{ [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] ,measures.t }
on columns,
non empty
(
[Product].[Category].[Category],
[Customer].[Country].[Country]
)
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Result
The bottom line: Because of cross product your result is so huge that SSAS is having hard time handling it.
I Need UniqueName in row level dimension instead of column level.
WITH MEMBER [Measures].[CurrMemID] AS [Product].[Product Line].CurrentMember.UniqueName
SELECT
{[Measures].[CurrMemID]} ON COLUMNS,
{[Product].[Product Line].Members} ON ROWS
FROM [Adventure Works]
enter image description here
I have a feeling what you might be asking for is not possible: as soon as you swap rows and column analysis services will expand the cellset out to several columns - one for each product.
If your aim is to have two parallel columns - the first with the uniqueName and the second with the caption, then you could do something like this and then in the client just ignore the first column:
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[CurrMemID] AS
[Product].[Product Line].CurrentMember.UniqueName
MEMBER [Measures].[CurrMemCaption] AS
[Product].[Product Line].CurrentMember.MEMBER_CAPTION
SELECT
{
[Measures].[CurrMemID],
[Measures].[CurrMemCaption]
} ON 0,
{[Product].[Product Line].Members} ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works];
Can any one tell me how to get the record count that is a result of a MDX query?I have tried various methods and I haven't really got a solution for that.I am a beginner in MDX queries.
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[amount] as
COUNT(
[your_dimension].[your_dimension_property].Members
)
SELECT {[Measures].[amount]} ON COLUMNS
FROM [your_awesome_cube]
A code like this will return to you the amount of members in your dimension, the COUNT method have this syntax
Count(Set_Expression [ , ( EXCLUDEEMPTY | INCLUDEEMPTY ) ] )
so you can do a lot of things, like filter your search
Create a measure in the cube that is a count or distinct count.
1) open the cube
2) Right click on the fact table on which that measure sits
3) Select New Measure...
4) Dropdown the list and select the aggregation
5) In the source column section, select the column you want the aggregation on (if u cant find it, click on show all columns on the bottom- this depends on what you are aggregating)
with member
Measures.Counts as
[your_dimension].[your_dimension_property].Children.COUNT
select Measures.Counts on 0
FROM [your_awesome_cube]
When you say record count, you basicly are saying the valid combinations of your row axis.
Lets take a basic example, the query returns 3637 rows, of which 1 row is parctically the column name row.
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
(
[Customer].[Country].[Country],
[Product].[Product].[Product]
) on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Now to get the row count without running the query, lets put the combinations in count function and put the count function in a runtime measure
This Returns 3636 row.
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(([Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product]))
select [Measures].[rowCount] on columns from [Adventure Works]
Notice I have not eleminated the null combinations on rows. Lets do that next
The query returns 2101 rows , again one row from column headers.
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
non empty
(
[Customer].[Country].[Country],
[Product].[Product].[Product]
) on rows
from [Adventure Works]
Now lets count the rows
This returns 2100 rows.
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(nonempty(( [Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product])
,{[Measures].[Sales Amount]}
))
select [Measures].[rowCount]
on columns from [Adventure Works]
Till now we had measure from just one measure group, now lets try with multiple measure groups.
select {[Measures].[Sales Amount],[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]} on columns,
non empty
(
[Customer].[Country].[Country],
[Product].[Product].[Product]
) on rows
from [Adventure Works]
//Cell set consists of 2101 rows and 3 columns.
//Wrong way
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(nonempty(( [Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product])
,{[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]}
))
select [Measures].[rowCount] on columns from [Adventure Works]
//935
//Right way
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(nonempty(( [Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product])
,{[Measures].[Sales Amount],[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]}
))
select [Measures].[rowCount]
on columns from [Adventure Works]
///2100
Notice when we use just a single measure the result may not be correct . If the measure we use has a null value then the combination would be removed. Where as in our rows the other measure will ensure that the combination appears.
Now Lets add a filter to the picture.
select {[Measures].[Sales Amount],[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]} on columns,
non empty
filter(
(
[Customer].[Country].[Country],
[Product].[Product].[Product]
)
,[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]>5000) on rows
from [Adventure Works]
//Cell set consists of 586 rows and 3 columns.
//Wrong way
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(nonempty(( [Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product])
,{[Measures].[Sales Amount],[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]}
))
select [Measures].[rowCount]
on columns from [Adventure Works]
//2100
//Right way
with member [Measures].[rowCount]
as
count(nonempty(
filter(([Customer].[Country].[Country],[Product].[Product].[Product]),[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]>5000)
,{[Measures].[Sales Amount],[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]}
))
select [Measures].[rowCount]
on columns from [Adventure Works]
///585
Again till i gave the RowCount measure the exact senario that I have on my row axis it fails.
I want to get two plant's oee per month in a specific year (2013), probably it's pretty trivial but I don't know how to do it:
with member [Measures].[OEE] as 'OEE'
select
{
[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT],
[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT2]
} on columns,
{
[Time].[Month]
} on rows
from ExpertPlan
where [Time].[Year].&[2013-01-01T00:00:00]
the select is ok (plants on columns and months on rows), but i'm not sure about the "with" usage to get the values be the [Measures].[OEE]
With is for custom calculated members and custom sets.
Add your measure to the slicer (WHERE clause)
SELECT
{
[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT]
,[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT2]
} ON COLUMNS
,{[Time].[Month]} ON ROWS
FROM ExpertPlan
WHERE
(
[Time].[Year].&[2013-01-01T00:00:00]
,[Measures].[OEE]
);
Here are a couple of prototyped ways of approaching this in AdvWrks cube:
SELECT
[Customer].[Country].&[United States] ON COLUMNS
,[Date].[Calendar].[Month] ON ROWS
FROM [Adventure Works]
WHERE
(
[Date].[Calendar Year].&[2007]
,[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]
);
SELECT
[Customer].[Country].&[United States] ON COLUMNS
,Descendants
(
[Date].[Calendar].[Calendar Year].&[2007]
,[Date].[Calendar].[Month]
) ON ROWS
FROM [Adventure Works]
WHERE
[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount];
Both of the above result in this result cell set:
Adding on to the other answer, you can also employ a subselect.
SELECT
{
[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT]
,[Equipment].[Plant Hierarchy].[Group].[DEMO_PLANT2]
} ON COLUMNS
,{[Time].[Month]} ON ROWS
FROM
(
SELECT [Time].[Year].&[2013-01-01T00:00:00] ON 0
FROM [ExpertPlan]
)
WHERE
{[Measures].[OEE]}
In MDX, WHERE is the 3rd axis, although it is not too apparent. Think it to be like excel, where you have the rows, columns and values. You can put the hierarchies(attribute) on any of the axes([Measures] also behaves like any regular hierarchy). It will just change the way your final output will look like.
I want to display levels of the same hierarchy in the same axis separate entities. For example I want [Customer].[State] and [Customer].[County] to be displayed in separate columns.
I tried the following query:
select NON EMPTY
{[Customer].[State].Members * [Customer].[County].Members}
ON ROWS
from [Search]
but get Mondrian Error: Tuple contains more than one member of hierarchy.
Is possible to do what I want to do, essentially flatten the hierarchy?
i don't know if the following will work in mondrian:
SELECT
{[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount]} ON 0
,NON EMPTY
{
(
[Customer].[Gender].[Gender].MEMBERS
,[Customer].[Marital Status].[(All)]
)
,(
[Customer].[Gender].[(All)]
,[Customer].[Marital Status].[Marital Status].MEMBERS
)
} ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works];
Philip,