I have two table with same "id" for companies and i need for "select all" make as minus special companies which do invoice in concrete date.
I tried minus fuctions but its does not work in our ERP systems but i can use "except" but it does not work the way I need it.
SELECT ad.idfirmy FROM aadresar as ad .............\\ (select all)
EXCEPT
SELECT DISTINCT f.idfirmy FROM ddoklfak as f ...... \\ (this i need minus from all sellect)
WHERE modul = 'FAV' and f.datvyst >= '<<datum_od>>' and f.datvyst <=
'<<datum_do>>') db on db.idfirmy = ad.idfirmy
For examble i have "idfirmy value 193451" which is in second select and after except is still this value in result but its so bad.
I need second select subtract from first
I suggest either you delete the db part
SELECT ad.idfirmy
FROM aadresar AS ad
EXCEPT
SELECT DISTINCT f.idfirmy
FROM ddoklfak AS f
WHERE modul = 'FAV' AND f.datvyst >= '<<datum_od>>'
AND f.datvyst <= '<<datum_do>>';
Or use NOT EXISTS instead
SELECT ad.idfirmy
FROM aadresar AS ad
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT 1
FROM ddoklfak AS f
WHERE f.idfirmy = ad.idfirmy
AND modul = 'FAV'
AND f.datvyst >= '<<datum_od>>'
AND f.datvyst <= '<<datum_do>>'
);
Related
Writing a code with two select statements in big query. Not sure why its not recognizing the fields. Getting error Field --> 'd3.fiscal_week_begin_date' not found; did you mean 'fiscal_week_begin_date'?
SELECT
*
FROM
[acquisition.acquisition_program_cost_summary] as test,
(
SELECT
d.fiscal_week_begin_date AS fiscal_week_begin_date,
d.fiscal_week_end_date AS fiscal_week_end_date
FROM
datamart.date_dim as d
WHERE
d.week_of_fiscal_year =30) as d3
WHERE
test.created_timestamp >= d3.fiscal_week_begin_date
AND test.created_timestamp <= d3.fiscal_week_end_date;
In BigQuery comma (,) does not represent JOIN but rather UNION ALL
So, most likely you meant to do JOIN like below
Please note you should switch to BigQuery Standard SQL
SELECT *
FROM acquisition.acquisition_program_cost_summary as test
JOIN (
SELECT
d.fiscal_week_begin_date AS fiscal_week_begin_date,
d.fiscal_week_end_date AS fiscal_week_end_date
FROM datamart.date_dim as d
WHERE d.week_of_fiscal_year = 30
) as d3
ON test.created_timestamp >= d3.fiscal_week_begin_date
AND test.created_timestamp <= d3.fiscal_week_end_date
I'm struggling here trying to write a script that finds where an order was returned multiple times by the same associate (count greater than 1). I'm guessing my syntax with the subquery is incorrect. When I run the script, I get a message back that the "SELECT failed.. [3669] More than one value was returned by the subquery."
I'm not tied to the subquery, and have tried using just the group by and having statements, but I get an error regarding a non-aggregate value. What's the best way to proceed here and how do I fix this?
Thank you in advance - code below:
SEL s.saletran
, s.saletran_dt SALE_DATE
, r.saletran_id RET_TRAN
, r.saletran_dt RET_DATE
, ra.user_id RET_ASSOC
FROM salestrans s
JOIN salestrans_refund r
ON r.orig_saletran_id = s.saletran_id
AND r.orig_saletran_dt = s.saletran_dt
AND r.orig_loc_id = s.loc_id
AND r.saletran_dt between s.saletran_dt and s.saletran_dt + 30
JOIN saletran rt
ON rt.saletran_id = r.saletran_id
AND rt.saletran_dt = r.saletran_dt
AND rt.loc_id = r.loc_id
JOIN assoc ra --Return Associate
ON ra.assoc_prty_id = rt.sls_assoc_prty_id
WHERE
(SELECT count(*)
FROM saletran_refund
GROUP BY ORIG_SLTRN_ID
) > 1
AND s.saletran_dt between '2015-01-01' and current_date - 1
Based on what you've got so far, I think you want to use this instead:
where r.ORIG_SLTRN_ID in
(select
ORIG_SLTRN_ID
from
saletran_refund
group by ORIG_SLTRN_ID
having count (*) > 1)
That will give you the ORIG_SLTRN_IDs that have more than one row.
you don't give enough for a full answer but this is a start
group by s.saletran
, s.saletran_dt SALE_DATE
, r.saletran_id RET_TRAN
, r.saletran_dt RET_DATE
, ra.user_id RET_ASSOC
having count(distinct(ORIG_SLTRN_ID)) > 0
this does return more the an one row
run it
SELECT count(*)
FROM saletran_refund
GROUP BY ORIG_SLTRN_ID
I'm going to select those provinces which intersects any railroad. So I do it like this (Using SQL Spatial):
SELECT * FROM ProvinceTable
WHERE (
SELECT count(*)
FROM RailroadTable
WHERE ProvinceTable.Shape.STIntersects(RailroadTable.Shape) > 1
) > 0
But it is not efficient because it has to check the intersection between every single railroad geometry and province geometry in order to calculate the count. However it is better to stop the where clause as soon as every first intersection detected and there is no need to check others. Here is what I mean:
SELECT * FROM ProvinceTable
WHERE (
--return true if this is true for any row in the RailroadTable:
-- "ProvinceTable.Shape.STIntersects(RailroadTable.Shape) > 1"
)
So is there a better way to rewrite this query for such a goal?
EDIT
Surprisingly This query takes the same time and returns no row:
SELECT * FROM ProvinceTable
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM RailroadTable
WHERE ProvinceTable.Shape.STIntersects(RailroadTable.Shape) > 1
)
You want to use exists:
SELECT pt.*
FROM ProvinceTable pt
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM RailroadTable rt
WHERE pt.Shape.STIntersects(rt.Shape) = 1
);
Is it possible to use COUNT in place of EXISTS?
I have following query:
SELECT *
FROM Goals G
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT NULL FROM tfv_home_last6(G.Date, G.Home) WHERE GameNumber <= 6 AND
HomeGoals >= 3)
Instead of returning the row if at least one row exists in the subquery, I'd like to specify a number of rows that need to be returned in the subquery, something like
SELECT *
FROM Goals G
WHERE ROWCOUNT(*) >= 2 (SELECT NULL FROM tfv_home_last6(G.Date, G.Home) WHERE GameNumber <= 6 AND
HomeGoals >= 3)
I'm not sure how to go about it?
I'm using SQL Server 2012.
You can do the subquery pretty much just like you describe:
SELECT *
FROM Goals G
WHERE (SELECT count(*)
FROM tfv_home_last6(G.Date, G.Home)
WHERE GameNumber <= 6 AND HomeGoals >= 3
) > 0;
However, this requires calculating the entire count. The exists form is more efficient, because it stops at the first matching record.
In SQL Server 2012, you could also use `cross apply:
SELECT *
FROM Goals G cross apply
(select count(*) as cnt
FROM tfv_home_last6(G.Date, G.Home)
WHERE GameNumber <= 6 AND HomeGoals >= 3
) a
WHERE a.cnt > 0;
I do not know which would have better performance, the correlated subquery in the where clause or the
cross apply version.
Probably it has been asked before but I cannot find an answer.
Table Data has two columns:
Source Dest
1 2
1 2
2 1
3 1
I trying to come up with a MS Access 2003 SQL query that will return:
1 2
3 1
But all to no avail. Please help!
UPDATE: exactly, I'm trying to exclude 2,1 because 1,2 already included. I need only unique combinations where sequence doesn't matter.
For Ms Access you can try
SELECT DISTINCT
*
FROM Table1 tM
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Table1 t WHERE tM.Source = t.Dest AND tM.Dest = t.Source AND tm.Source > t.Source)
EDIT:
Example with table Data, which is the same...
SELECT DISTINCT
*
FROM Data tM
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Data t WHERE tM.Source = t.Dest AND tM.Dest = t.Source AND tm.Source > t.Source)
or (Nice and Access Formatted...)
SELECT DISTINCT *
FROM Data AS tM
WHERE (((Exists (SELECT 1 FROM Data t WHERE tM.Source = t.Dest AND tM.Dest = t.Source AND tm.Source > t.Source))=False));
your question is asked incorrectly. "unique combinations" are all of your records. but i think you mean one line per each Source. so it is:
SELECT *
FROM tab t1
WHERE t1.Dest IN
(
SELECT TOP 1 DISTINCT t2.Dest
FROM tab t2
WHERE t1.Source = t2.Source
)
SELECT t1.* FROM
(SELECT
LEAST(Source, Dest) AS min_val,
GREATEST(Source, Dest) AS max_val
FROM table_name) AS t1
GROUP BY t1.min_val, t1.max_val
Will return
1, 2
1, 3
in MySQL.
To eliminate duplicates, "select distinct" is easier than "group by":
select distinct source,dest from data;
EDIT: I see now that you're trying to get unique combinations (don't include both 1,2 and 2,1). You can do that like:
select distinct source,dest from data
minus
select dest,source from data where source < dest
The "minus" flips the order around and eliminates cases where you already have a match; the "where source < dest" keeps you from removing both (1,2) and (2,1)
Use this query :
SELECT distinct * from tabval ;