Rendering components are showing up twice when clicked on Add Here button in Sitecore Experience editor - rendering

In experience editor, whenever clicking on "Add here" button, getting duplicate entries of renderings.
Below is the image for reference. I am using Sitecore 8.2

Use Rendering id's to see if the both are same or different. Add the two renderings to the item in two different placeholders and then check the raw values in the presentation details of the item.
1.If both are same, Then it is caching issue. just clear the cache.
2.If both are different, then there is rendering available with the same name. If it is a duplicate then copy the rendering id from the presentation details and search it in the sitecore content tree and once you have a hit. delete it.

Related

Adobe LiveCycle Flowed Form page margins

I am using Adobe LiveCycle Designer ES 8.2 to create a PDF for a survey. I've managed to create the form from scratch using Flowed content boxes to allow the fields to dynamically expand so that I can print out the survey later.
The issue I am having right now though is that if a field is expanded and it pushes other fields below it beyond the page range, it will create a new page consisting of what couldn't fit on the previous page. This is fine, but I would also like the form to automatically move the content below the last page up. Basically, anytime a page is moved into a new page there is a lot of white space and id like the next page to be moved up under the newly positioned fields.
Thank you
You will need to configure the pagination of your Subforms using the Object > Pagination palette. You can also use the Keep With Next/Previous option to control the grouping of the objects on page break. Also make sure that your top level subform is set to Flowed.

LiveCycle Designer ES 4 Master Page Assistance

I am a new user to LiveCycle (LiveCycle ES4 to be exact) and am having an issue with my second Master Page. I only want the second Mast Page to appear if the content from Page 1 overflows onto Page 2. I have tried changing the "Presence" on the second MasterPage to Hidden but the program won't allow me to choose any option other than Visible.
I have tried Google and Adobe and both have basic information regarding Master Pages but nothing specific enough to help me in this situation. Actually, I haven't been able to find a source with any real helpful information regarding LiveCycle.
On the main page that represents your flowed page, in the Object properties tab, if you select the Pagination tab, you can set overflow properties of this page to use your second master page (ensure it is named so you can reference it). If your first page never overflows, then you should never see the other master page.

How do i find the location of a page break in SSRS in RDL source?

I have a report with a page break in it that I want to remove, but I don't know where the break is being added. It could be on a table, a group, or I don't know where else.
I checked the tablix properties and group properties for each portion of the report to see if "add a page break before" or "add a page break after" were checked, but didn't find anything.
Is there something i can search for in the RDL source code that will help?
I usually find this occurs when the item (tablix, chart etc) will fit entirely on a new page but not entirely on the page where the control starts. For example if you have a header on page 1 but not on page 2 or you have a chart before your tablix and the tablix will not fit entirely on Page 1 but will fit entirely on Page 2 it chooses to put the tablix on Page 2 instead of half on Page 1 and half on Page 2.
If this is your issue try placing all elements inside another element (such as a rectangle, list or another tablix).
We would need more information to give a more specific answer. Can you post screens of the pages either side of the elusive page break?
I was exporting to report type Web Archive (MHTML) and the page break was coming from the interactive height of the report. Once I set it to zero I no longer got the page breaks.

Hide few fields in EditForm.asx of Picture Library in sharepoint 2010

I have a picture library and added few fields to it. When i click add new item from picture library, the EditForm.aspx appears after uploading the picture. This form contains many fields of which I want to hide Title, Date Picture Taken, Description, and Keyword. In short the EditForm should contain only Name, Preview and the columns that I have added. Is it possible to hide the other columns? I want to perform this out of the box.
Several possibilities.
You can use SharePoint Designer to manipulate the NewForm, EditForm and DisplayForm. Edit the existing form, use CSS to set the out of the box HTML form to hidden, then add a new custom form to the page and remove the columns you don't want to see.
If you don't want to use these columns at all, just delete them in the Library settings
If you don't want to delete the columns, click the parent content type in the Library settings, then edit each column and set it to "hidden"
Check this out: http://sarangasl.blogspot.in/2009/10/hide-column-in-edit-new-or-display-mode.html
I found this solution to be really simple and effective. Very well documented and descriptive.

What is an alternative to nesting remote forms in rails?

I have a User that can have multiple images. I would like to allow the user to add images while updating their user page and have those images dynamically updated so that they can see the images on their profile as they edit it. I currently have the images set as sortable using jQuery-ui. I would like the user to be able to add images, sort them, and edit their profile info and only need to click the submit button once.
I know that it is not possible to nest remote=>true forms and do not believe it's possible to submit files via ajax. Is there some other way this can upload the files and then use jquery to append them back to my div?
Unfortunately, from a user experience standpoint, the image section makes the most since being pretty much in the middle of the form. Moving it to the top or below the original form is less than ideal. I might be able to use CSS to make the remote form appear as if it is middle of the parent form, but this seems like a pretty bad solution.