I have a table with an ID and a date column. It's possible (likely) that when a new record is created, it gets the next larger ID and the current datetime. So if I were to sort by date or I were to sort by ID, the resulting data set would be in the same order.
How do I write a SQL query to verify this?
It's also possible that an older record is modified and the date is updated. In that case, the records would not be in the same sort order. I don't think this happens.
I'm trying to move the data to another location, and if I know that there are no modified records, that makes it a lot simpler.
I'm pretty sure I only need to query those two columns: ID, RecordDate. Other links indicate I should be able to use LAG, but I'm getting an error that it isn't a built-in function name.
In other words, both https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/42985/running-total-to-the-previous-row and Is there a way to access the "previous row" value in a SELECT statement? should help, but I'm still not able to make that work for what I want.
If you cannot use window functions, you can use a correlated subquery and EXISTS.
SELECT *
FROM elbat t1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM elbat t2
WHERE t2.id < t1.id
AND t2.recorddate > t1.recorddate);
It'll select all records where another record with a lower ID and a greater timestamp exists. If the result is empty you know that no such record exists and the data is like you want it to be.
Maybe you want to restrict it a bit more by using t2.recorddate >= t1.recorddate instead of t2.recorddate > t1.recorddate. I'm not sure how you want it.
Use this:
SELECT ID, RecordDate FROM tablename t
WHERE
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tablename WHERE tablename.ID < t.ID)
<>
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tablename WHERE tablename.RecordDate < t.RecordDate);
It counts for each row, how many rows have id less than the row's id and
how many rows have RecordDate less than the row's RecordDate.
If these counters are not equal then it outputs this row.
The result is all the rows that would not be in the same position after sorting by ID and RecordDate
One method uses window functions:
select count(*)
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (order by id) as seqnum_id,
row_number() over (order by date, id) as seqnum_date
from t
) t
where seqnum_id <> seqnum_date;
When the count is zero, then the two columns have the same ordering. Note that the second order by includes id. Two rows could have the same date. This makes the sort stable, so the comparison is valid even when date has duplicates.
the above solutions are all good but if both dates and ids are in increment then this should also work
select modifiedid=t2.id from
yourtable t1 join yourtable t2
on t1.id=t2.id+1 and t1.recordDate<t2.recordDate
Related
When I join to the right table I am getting way too many duplicates. I am trying to grab the most recent record from the right table however, it does not matter what I try it does not work.
So Far I have tried:
PROC SQL;
CREATE TABLE fs1.sample AS
SELECT A.*,
B.xx1,
max(B.time_s)
FROM lx1.results a left join (Select Distinct C.id, c.per FROM lx2.results c
Where c.id = a.id
and COMPGED(a.txt1, c.txt1,'i') < 100
and c.dt > a.dt
and c.ksv = 37
and datepart(c.lsg) >= '12DEC2020'd ) b
ON a.id = b.id
group by a.id, a.txt1
QUIT;
Unfortunately, I get an error. I also tried using case when exists, but that takes way too long. Essentially I am trying to grab the most recent record from the right table based on time_s. I also want to make sure the record I grab from the right table somewhat matches a.txt1.
Cheers
When you perform a join, you attach all records from the table that match your join conditions.
If the table is indexed appropriately, a subquery could achieve the goal of obtaining the most recent value, however, if the query uses the wrong index, TOP or equivalent functions may return the wrong result.
There are a number of ways to accomplish the task of retrieving the most recent record but they are contingent on a couple of things.
Firstly, you need to be able to identify what the most recent row is, usually by a column called CreatedDate or something similar against the IDs. (You should know what that business logic is, it may be that the table is chronologically entered [as most tables are] and therefore, SubID might be a thing. We're going to assume it is CreatedDate.)
Secondly, you need to rank the rows in terms of the CreatedDate in a descending order so that the newest matching ID is ranked 1.
Finally, you filter your results by 1 to return the newest result, but you could also filter by <= x if you are interested in the top x newest return results per ID.
To use more mathematical language: We are deriving a value from the CreatedDate and ID values and then using that derivative value to sort and filter the data. In this case we are deriving the RowNumber from the CreatedDate in descending order for each ID.
In order to accomplish this, you can use the Windowed Function ROW_NUMBER(),
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY CreatedDate DESC) as RankID
This windowed function will return a row value for each ID relative to the CreatedDate in descending order, where the newest created date is equal to 1.
You can then put brackets around the whole query to make it into a table so you will be able to filter the results of that Windowed Function.
SELECT id, txt
(SELECT id, txt
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY CreatedDate DESC) as RankID
FROM SourceTable) A
WHERE RankID = 1
This should achieve your goal of returning the "newest result".
What ever your column is that determines the age of the data relative to the ID, it can be multiple, should be placed within the ORDER BY.
In order to make this query perform faster, you should index your data appropriately, whereby ID is the the first column, and CreatedDate Desc is your next column. This means your system will not have to perform a costly sort every time this runs, but that depends on whether you plan on using this query often and how much overhead it is grabbing.
This is a follow-up question to Retrieving last record in each group from database - SQL Server 2005/2008
In the answers, this example was provided to retrieve last record for a group of parameters (example below retrieves last updates for each value in computername):
select t.*
from t
where t.lastupdate = (select max(t2.lastupdate)
from t t2
where t2.computername = t.computername
);
In my case, however, "lastupdate" is not unique (some updates come in batches and have same lastupdate value, and if two updates of "computername" come in the same batch, you will get non-unique output for "computername + lastupdate").
Suppose I also have field "rowId" that is just auto-incremental. The mitigation would be to include in the query another criterion for a max('rowId') field.
NB: while the example employs time-specific name "lastupdate", the actual selection criteria may not be related to the time at all.
I, therefore, like to ask, what would be the most performant query that selects the last record in each group based both on "group-defining parameter" (in the case above, "computername") and on maximal rowId?
If you don't have uniqueness, then row_number() is simpler:
select t.*
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by computername order by lastupdate, rowid desc) as seqnum
from t
) t
where seqnum = 1;
With the right indexes, the correlated subquery is usually faster. However, the performance difference is not that great.
I have a table as follows:
ParentActivityID | ActivityID | Timestamp
1 A1 T1
2 A2 T2
1 A1 T1
1 A1 T5
I want to select unique ParentActivityID's along with Timestamp. The time stamp can be the most recent one or the first one as is occurring in the table.
I tried to use DISTINCT but i came to realise that it dosen't work on individual columns. I am new to SQL. Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
DISTINCT is a shorthand that works for a single column. When you have multiple columns, use GROUP BY:
SELECT ParentActivityID, Timestamp
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY ParentActivityID, Timestamp
Actually i want only one one ParentActivityID. Your solution will give each pair of ParentActivityID and Timestamp. For e.g , if i have [1, T1], [2,T2], [1,T3], then i wanted the value as [1,T3] and [2,T2].
You need to decide what of the many timestamps to pick. If you want the earliest one, use MIN:
SELECT ParentActivityID, MIN(Timestamp)
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY ParentActivityID
Try this:
SELECT [ParentActivityId],
MIN([Timestamp]) AS [FirstTimestamp],
MAX([Timestamp]) AS [RecentTimestamp]
FROM [Table]
GROUP BY [ParentActivityId]
This will provide you the first timestamp and the most recent timestamp for each ParentActivityId that is present in your table. You can choose the ones you need as per your need.
"Group by" is what you need here. Just do "group by ParentActivityID" and tell that most recent timestamp along all rows with same ParentActivityID is needed for you:
SELECT ParentActivityID, MAX(Timestamp) FROM Table GROUP BY ParentActivityID
"Group by" operator is like taking rows from a table and putting them in a map with a key defined in group by clause (ParentActivityID in this example). You have to define how grouping by will handle rows with duplicate keys. For this you have various aggregate functions which you specify on columns you want to select but which are not part of the key (not listed in group by clause, think of them as a values in a map).
Some databases (like mysql) also allow you to select columns which are not part of the group by clause (not in a key) without applying aggregate function on them. In such case you will get some random value for this column (this is like blindly overwriting value in a map with new value every time). Still, SQL standard together with most databases out there will not allow you to do it. In such case you can use min(), max(), first() or last() aggregate function to work around it.
Use CTE for getting the latest row from your table based on parent id and you can choose the columns from the entire row of the output .
;With cte_parent
As
(SELECT ParentActivityId,ActivityId,TimeStamp
, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY ParentActivityId ORDER BY TimeStamp desc) RNO
FROM YourTable )
SELECT *
FROM cte_parent
WHERE RNO =1
What is the most efficient way to select the first and last element only, from a column in SQLite?
The first and last element from a row?
SELECT column1, columnN
FROM mytable;
I think you must mean the first and last element from a column:
SELECT MIN(column1) AS First,
MAX(column1) AS Last
FROM mytable;
See http://www.sqlite.org/lang_aggfunc.html for MIN() and MAX().
I'm using First and Last as column aliases.
if it's just one column:
SELECT min(column) as first, max(column) as last FROM table
if you want to select whole row:
SELECT 'first',* FROM table ORDER BY column DESC LIMIT 1
UNION
SELECT 'last',* FROM table ORDER BY column ASC LIMIT 1
The most efficient way would be to know what those fields were called and simply select them.
SELECT `first_field`, `last_field` FROM `table`;
Probably like this:
SELECT dbo.Table.FirstCol, dbo.Table.LastCol FROM Table
You get minor efficiency enhancements from specifying the table name and schema.
First: MIN() and MAX() on a text column gives AAAA and TTTT results which are not the first and last entries in my test table. They are the minimum and maximum values as mentioned.
I tried this (with .stats on) on my table which has over 94 million records:
select * from
(select col1 from mitable limit 1)
union
select * from
(select col1 from mitable limit 1 offset
(select count(0) from mitable) -1);
But it uses up a lot of virtual machine steps (281,624,718).
Then this which is much more straightforward (which works if the table was created without WITHOUT ROWID) [sql keywords are in capitals]:
SELECT col1 FROM mitable
WHERE ROWID = (SELECT MIN(ROWID) FROM mitable)
OR ROWID = (SELECT MAX(ROWID) FROM mitable);
That ran with 55 virtual machine steps on the same table and produced the same answer.
min()/max() approach is wrong. It is only correct, if the values are ascending only. I needed something liket this for currency rates, which are random raising and falling.
This is my solution:
select st.*
from stats_ticker st,
(
select min(rowid) as first, max(rowid) as last --here is magic part 1
from stats_ticker
-- next line is just a filter I need in my case.
-- if you want first/last of the whole table leave it out.
where timeutc between datetime('now', '-1 days') and datetime('now')
) firstlast
WHERE
st.rowid = firstlast.first --and these two rows do magic part 2
OR st.rowid = firstlast.last
ORDER BY st.rowid;
magic part 1: the subselect results in a single row with the columns first,last containing rowid's.
magic part 2 easy to filter on those two rowid's.
This is the best solution I've come up so far. Hope you like it.
We can do that by the help of Sql Aggregate function, like Max and Min. These are the two aggregate function which help you to get last and first element from data table .
Select max (column_name ), min(column name) from table name
Max will give you the max value means last value and min will give you the min value means it will give you the First value, from the specific table.
Simply put, I have a table with, among other things, a column for timestamps. I want to get the row with the most recent (i.e. greatest value) timestamp. Currently I'm doing this:
SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY timestamp DESC LIMIT 1
But I'd much rather do something like this:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE timestamp=max(timestamp)
However, SQLite rejects this query:
SQL error: misuse of aggregate function max()
The documentation confirms this behavior (bottom of page):
Aggregate functions may only be used in a SELECT statement.
My question is: is it possible to write a query to get the row with the greatest timestamp without ordering the select and limiting the number of returned rows to 1? This seems like it should be possible, but I guess my SQL-fu isn't up to snuff.
SELECT * from foo where timestamp = (select max(timestamp) from foo)
or, if SQLite insists on treating subselects as sets,
SELECT * from foo where timestamp in (select max(timestamp) from foo)
There are many ways to skin a cat.
If you have an Identity Column that has an auto-increment functionality, a faster query would result if you return the last record by ID, due to the indexing of the column, unless of course you wish to put an index on the timestamp column.
SELECT * FROM TABLE ORDER BY ID DESC LIMIT 1
I think I've answered this question 5 times in the past week now, but I'm too tired to find a link to one of those right now, so here it is again...
SELECT
*
FROM
table T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN table T2 ON
T2.timestamp > T1.timestamp
WHERE
T2.timestamp IS NULL
You're basically looking for the row where no other row matches that is later than it.
NOTE: As pointed out in the comments, this method will not perform as well in this kind of situation. It will usually work better (for SQL Server at least) in situations where you want the last row for each customer (as an example).
you can simply do
SELECT *, max(timestamp) FROM table
Edit:
As aggregate function can't be used like this so it gives error. I guess what SquareCog had suggested was the best thing to do
SELECT * FROM table WHERE timestamp = (select max(timestamp) from table)