I'm using junit 4.12 and would like to ignore all test cases in class at once instead of adding ignore annotation before each method marked as test.
According to documentation it is possible to add #Ignore on class level.
#Ignore
public class BasicOperationsTest extends TestBaseClass{
I did it like above but it doesn't work - all test methods are executed.
When I add ignore before #Test method in this case annotation works and test is not executed.
Related
I'm using DynamicNode very successfully in a framework that dynamically generates tests and executes them.
Now I have a need to execute some code after all DynamicNode collections have executed. This can mean that I have a single JUnit5 class with multiple methods that return Iterable<DynamicNode>, but I want to run something only after all the test methods have completed.
Is there a way to do this automatically ?
EDIT: ideally I would like my framework to inject the code to be executed automatically, without the user needing to add a #AfterAll annotation on a method and write some extra code.
Each method that is annotated with #TestFactory takes part in the default lifecycle. That means in your case an #AfterAll annotated method should do the trick.
#AfterAll
Denotes that the annotated method should be executed after all
#Test, #RepeatedTest, #ParameterizedTest, and #TestFactory
methods in the current class; analogous to JUnit 4’s #AfterClass.
Such methods are inherited (unless they are hidden or overridden) and
must be static (unless the "per-class" test instance lifecycle is
used).
Copied from https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#writing-tests-annotations
I have about 5 different classes with JUnit tests (selenium tests).
I need a way to teardown the webdriver at the end of the program.
So I need to know where to put the #AfterClass and how to pass the driver to it so it can be closed.
I thought of creating a test suit and implement the &AfterClass tearDownClass() there. But I'm not sure how to pass the driver to it to close.
You can use below code
[OneTimeTearDown]
public void SetupTestTeardown()
{
KillDriver();
Assert.AreEqual("", verificationErrors.ToString());
}
The OneTimeTearDown attribute is inherited from any base class. Therefore, if a base class has defined a OneTimeTearDown method, that method will be called after any test methods in the derived class.
You may define a OneTimeTearDown method in the base class and another in the derived class. NUnit will call base class OneTimeTearDown methods after those in the derived classes.
Add #BeforeClass to your superclass. Initiate the driver in that. Due to this, the test classes will also inherit the driver.
Add the driver teardown in your superclass in #AfterClass
JUnit4 has #FixMethodOrder annotation which allows to use alphabetical order of test methods execution. Is there analogous JUnit5 mechanism?
Edit: JUnit 5.4 is officially released now, so no need to use snapshots anymore.
This is now possible with JUnit 5.4.
https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#writing-tests-test-execution-order
To control the order in which test methods are executed, annotate your
test class or test interface with #TestMethodOrder and specify the
desired MethodOrderer implementation. You can implement your own
custom MethodOrderer or use one of the following built-in
MethodOrderer implementations.
Alphanumeric: sorts test methods alphanumerically based on their names
and formal parameter lists.
OrderAnnotation: sorts test methods numerically based on values
specified via the #Order annotation.
No, not yet. For unit tests, execution order should be irrelevant. For more complex tests, JUnit is aiming to provide explicit support - test ordering would be part of that.
With version 5.8.0 onwards, test classes can be ordered too.
src/test/resources/junit-platform.properties:
# ClassOrderer$OrderAnnotation sorts classes based on their #Order annotation
junit.jupiter.testclass.order.default=org.junit.jupiter.api.ClassOrderer$OrderAnnotation
Other Junit built-in class orderer implementations:
org.junit.jupiter.api.ClassOrderer$ClassName
org.junit.jupiter.api.ClassOrderer$DisplayName
org.junit.jupiter.api.ClassOrderer$Random
For other ways (beside junit-platform.properties file) to set configuration parameters refer here.
You can also provide your own orderer. It must implement ClassOrderer interface:
package foo;
public class MyOrderer implements ClassOrderer {
#Override
public void orderClasses(ClassOrdererContext context) {
Collections.shuffle(context.getClassDescriptors());
}
}
junit.jupiter.testclass.order.default=foo.MyOrderer
Note that #Nested test classes cannot be ordered by a ClassOrderer.
Refer to JUnit 5 documentations and ClassOrderer api docs to learn more about ordering test classes.
I am writing a test class in java using spring and junit (actually I have "#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)" at the bottom of my class).
there is a method with #Before annotation that I want it not to be run before a particular test method(but not the rest). how can I do this?
thanks
You have a few options:
Refactor to put that one test in a new test class which doesn't have #Before.
Refactor to put that one test in a new test class extending the original one that overrides #Before to do nothing.
Refactor to have all the other methods call the before method explicitly and remove the #Before annotation (I don't recommend you go with this one)
I have a bit of a special situation. Basically I have a unit test, annotated with #Test, and inside that test I need to execute a Cucumber JVM test class.
Why? Long story. Something to do with classloaders and RoboGuice, it's not very important but it does impose limits on what I can and cannot do.
Here's the test method:
#Test
public void runCucumberFeature() throws Exception {
Cucumber cucumber = new Cucumber(MyCucumberTest.class);
cucumber.run(new RunNotifier());
}
MyCucumberTest is a class I have created, and annotated like this:
//#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#Cucumber.Options(format = {"pretty", "html:target/cucumber"}, strict=true)
public class MyCucumberTest {
// Empty, as required by Cucumber JVM
}
Why have I commented out the #RunWith annotation? Because if I don't, the Cucumber test runner will pick up the test and run it, which I don't want because I am running the test manually.
The problem is that the above doesn't work. It looks like Cucumber is finding the feature files, it is verifying that MyCucumberTest contains the #Givens etc, it even prints out the test as if it was running it.
But it doesn't. No code is executing inside the #Given, #When and #Then methods. I'm not sure why this is, but I have a vague idea that the Cucumber JVM test runner doesn't want to execute the code because the class isn't annotated with #RunWith.
Can anyone help?
I can't provide the solution you're looking for, but....
... have you considered tagging the test that you want to run manually (e.g. with #Manual)?
Then you could uncomment your #RunWith annototation and exclude the manual test by adding --tags ~#Manual to your Cucumber-JVM invocation.
In your manual JUnit invocation you could add --tags #Manual