I'm trying to create webhooks receiver for bigcommerce webhooks.
public override Task ExecuteAsync(string receiver, WebHookHandlerContext
context)
{
string action = context.Actions.First();
JObject data = context.GetDataOrDefault<JObject>();
var dataAsString = Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.SerializeObject(data);
return Task.FromResult(true);
}
my function not hit.
Related
In ASP.NET Core 5 I had a custom Action Result as follows:
public class ErrorResult : ActionResult {
private readonly IList<Error> _errors;
public ErrorResult(IList<Error> errors) {
_errors = errors;
}
public override async Task ExecuteResultAsync(ActionContext context) {
// Code that creates Response
await result.ExecuteResultAsync(context);
}
}
Then on a Controller action I would have:
return new ErrorResult(errors);
How to do something similar in NET 6 Minimal APIs?
I have been looking at it and I think I should implement IResult.
But I am not sure if that is the solution or how to do it.
I have recently been playing around with minimal APIs and and working on global exception handling. Here is what I have come up with so far.
Create a class implementation of IResult
Create a constructor which will take an argument of the details you want going into your IResult response. APIErrorDetails is a custom implementation of mine similar to what you'd see in ProblemDetails in MVC. Method implementation is open to whatever your requirements are.
public class ExceptionAllResult : IResult
{
private readonly ApiErrorDetails _details;
public ExceptionAllResult(ApiErrorDetails details)
{
_details = details;
}
public async Task ExecuteAsync(HttpContext httpContext)
{
var jsonDetails = JsonSerializer.Serialize(_details);
httpContext.Response.ContentType = MediaTypeNames.Application.Json;
httpContext.Response.ContentLength = Encoding.UTF8.GetByteCount(jsonDetails);
httpContext.Response.StatusCode = _details.StatusCode;
await httpContext.Response.WriteAsync(jsonDetails);
}
}
Return result in your exception handling middleware in your Program.cs file.
app.UseExceptionHandler(
x =>
{
x.Run(
async context =>
{
// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/error-handling?view=aspnetcore-6.0
var exceptionFeature = context.Features.Get<IExceptionHandlerPathFeature>();
// Whatever you want for null handling
if (exceptionFeature is null) throw new Exception();
// My result service for creating my API details from the HTTP context and exception. This returns the Result class seen in the code snippet above
var result = resultService.GetErrorResponse(exceptionFeature.Error, context);
await result.ExecuteAsync(context); // returns the custom result
});
}
);
If you still want to use MVC (Model-View-Controller), you still can use Custom ActionResult.
If you just want to use Minimal APIs to do the response, then you have to implement IResult, Task<IResult> or ValueTask<IResult>.
app.MapGet("/hello", () => Results.Ok(new { Message = "Hello World" }));
The following example uses the built-in result types to customize the response:
app.MapGet("/api/todoitems/{id}", async (int id, TodoDb db) =>
await db.Todos.FindAsync(id)
is Todo todo
? Results.Ok(todo)
: Results.NotFound())
.Produces<Todo>(StatusCodes.Status200OK)
.Produces(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound);
You can find more IResult implementation samples here: https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/tree/main/src/Http/Http.Results/src
Link: Minimal APIs overview | Microsoft Docs
How to use Volley to fetch recipes from spoonacular API for an android application. I am new to APIs and would like some help in fetching recipes from the spoonacular api for a list of ingredients specified in an android app.
Step 1
dependencies {
...
implementation 'com.android.volley:volley:1.0.0'
}
Step 2
In AndroidManifest file add permission
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET"/>
Step 3 Add following in MyApplication class
private RequestQueue requestQueue;
public RequestQueue getRequestQueue() {
if (requestQueue == null)
requestQueue = Volley.newRequestQueue(getApplicationContext());
return requestQueue;
}
public void addToRequestQueue(Request request, String tag) {
request.setTag(tag);
getRequestQueue().add(request);
}
public void cancelAllRequests(String tag) {
getRequestQueue().cancelAll(tag);
}
Step 4 Final Step
//URL of the request we are sending
String url = "https://api.spoonacular.com/food/products/22347";
/*
JsonObjectRequest takes in five paramaters
Request Type - This specifies the type of the request eg: GET,
URL - This String param specifies the Request URL
JSONObject - This parameter takes in the POST parameters.null in case of
GET request
Listener -This parameter takes in a implementation of Response.Listener()
interface which is invoked if the request is successful
Listener -This parameter takes in a implemention of Error.Listener()
interface which is invoked if any error is encountered while processing
the request
*/
JsonObjectRequest jsonObjReq = new JsonObjectRequest(Request.Method.GET,
url, null,
new Response.Listener() {
#Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response) {
//Success Callback
}
},
new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
//Failure Callback
}
});
// Adding the request to the queue along with a unique string tag
MyApplication.getInstance().addToRequestQueue(jsonObjectReq, "getRequest");
Something like that. Let's try. Thanks
I'm passing a model to an API action with a property called eventType which is a nullable custom enum.
If I pass a random value for eventType, such as 'h', it fails to serialise which is correct.
However, the error I get from the ModelState is not something I would want a public caller to see. It includes the line number and position (see below).
I've tried a number of options including a custom data annotation with no success.
Does anyone know how I could define a nicer custom message?
"Error converting value \"h\" to type
'System.Nullable`1[Custom.EventTypes]'. Path 'eventType', line 1,
position 80."
Most times the first error is usually the most important error or rather one that describes the situation properly. You can use this way to manipulate to get the first error message from the first key or change it to whatever you want if you wish to get all the error messages.
public ActionResult GetMyMoney(MyModel myModel)
{
string nss = ModelState.First().Key;
ModelError[] ern = ModelState[nss].Errors.ToArray();
string ndd = ern.First().ErrorMessage;
}
public class CustomFilter: IAsyncActionFilter
{
public async Task OnActionExecutionAsync(ActionExecutingContext context, ActionExecutionDelegate next)
{
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
{
// You can pass custom object to BadRequestObjectResult method
context.Result = new BadRequestObjectResult(customObject);
}
}
}
You can write a custom filter like above mentioned and pass a custom object with your message.
Ref: this
IF you just want the error messages you can simply create a custom class of response and then
var response = new ResponseApi{
StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.BadRequest,
Message = "Validation Error",
Response = ModelState.Values.SelectMany(x => x.Errors).Select(x =>
x.ErrorMessage)
};
then just return the response or create a validation filter to handle validations globally.
/// <summary>
/// Validatation filter to validate all the models.
/// </summary>
public class ValidationActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute
{
/// <inheritdoc/>
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
ModelStateDictionary modelState = actionContext.ModelState;
if (!modelState.IsValid)
{
actionContext.Response = SendResponse(new ResponseApi
{
StatusCode= 400,
Message = "Validation Error",
Response = modelState.Values.SelectMany(x =>
x.Errors).Select(x => x.ErrorMessage)
});
}
}
private HttpResponseMessage SendResponse(ResponseApiresponse)
{
var responseMessage = new HttpResponseMessage
{
StatusCode = (HttpStatusCode)response.StatusCode,
Content = new StringContent(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(response)),
};
responseMessage.Content.Headers.ContentType = new MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json");
return responseMessage;
}
}
I try to call my AWS Lambda function (serverless backend) with my Android mobile app client. The AWS lambda function returns an ArrayList of POJO objects (as JSON).
The problem is that the android client AWS Lambda(JSON)DataBinder does not deserialize to my ArrayList of POJOs. I get an ArrayList of LinkedTreeMap (see code at onPostExecute() below).
At the android client side I'm using Android AWS SDK: com.amazonaws:aws-android-sdk-core:2.6
Here is some code:
public void readSurveyList(String strUuid, int intLanguageID) {
// Create an instance of CognitoCachingCredentialsProvider
// You have to configure at least an AWS identity pool to get access to your lambda function
CognitoCachingCredentialsProvider credentialsProvider = new CognitoCachingCredentialsProvider(
this.getApplicationContext(),
IDENTITY_POOL_ID,
Regions.EU_CENTRAL_1);
LambdaInvokerFactory factory = LambdaInvokerFactory.builder()
.context(this.getApplicationContext())
.region(Regions.EU_CENTRAL_1)
.credentialsProvider(credentialsProvider)
.build();
// Create the Lambda proxy object with default Json data binder.
myInterface = factory.build(MyInterface.class);
//create a request object (depends on your lambda function)
SurveyListRequest surveyListRequest = new SurveyListRequest(strUuid, intLanguageID);
// Lambda function in async task with definiton of
// request object (-> SurveyListRequest)
// response object (-> ArrayList<SurveyListItem>>)
new AsyncTask<SurveyListRequest, Void, ArrayList<SurveyListItem>>() {
#Override
protected ArrayList<SurveyListItem> doInBackground(SurveyListRequest... params) {
try {
return myInterface.ReadSurveyList(params[0]);
} catch (LambdaFunctionException lfe) {
Log.e("TAG", String.format("echo method failed: error [%s], details [%s].", lfe.getMessage(), lfe.getDetails()));
return null;
}
}
#Override
protected void onPostExecute(ArrayList<SurveyListItem> surveyList) {
// PROBLEM: here i get a ArrayList of LinkedTreeMap
}
}.execute(surveyListRequest);
}
Here is the code of my lambda function Interface:
public interface MyInterface {
#LambdaFunction
ArrayList<SurveyListItem> ReadSurveyList (SurveyListRequest surveyListRequest);
}
I would expect to get a list of my POJO objects. I found a lot of discussions about Gson and ArrayList type and solutions based on TypeToken (e.g. Gson TypeToken with dynamic ArrayList item type). Maybe same problem ...
I found a solution using a custom LambdaDataBinder. I have specified the type of my POJO-class "SurveyListItem" in deserialize function. The Gson uses the TypeToken definition and converts the JSON string correct to the list of POJOs (in my case "SurveyListItem" objects).
Here is the sourcecode of MyLambdaDataBinder:
public class MyLambdaDataBinder implements LambdaDataBinder {
private final Gson gson;
Type mType;
//CUSTOMIZATION: pass typetoken via class constructor
public MyLambdaDataBinder(Type type) {
this.gson = new Gson();
mType = type;
}
#Override
public <T> T deserialize(byte[] content, Class<T> clazz) {
if (content == null) {
return null;
}
Reader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream(content)));
//CUSTOMIZATION: Original line of code: return gson.fromJson (reader, clazz);
return gson.fromJson(reader, mType);
}
#Override
public byte[] serialize(Object object) {
return gson.toJson(object).getBytes(StringUtils.UTF8);
}
}
Here is how to use the custom MyLambdaDataBinder. Use your POJO instead of "SurveyListItem":
myInterface = factory.build(LambdaInterface.class, new MyLambdaDataBinder(new TypeToken<ArrayList<SurveyListItem>>() {}.getType()));
I am learning about Spring-Integration and have a basic understanding about Gateway and Service-Activators. I love the concept of Gateway. Spring Integration generates the proxy for gateway at run-time. This proxy hides all the messaging details from the consumer of the gateway. In addition, the generated proxy might also be co-relating request and reply.
With the objective of learning, I set out to implement request and reply correlation using raw Spring Integration features and not using Gateway. I am able to set the correlation identifier in the request header, but not able to specify correlation identifier while receiving reply for the channel. The following (at the end of the question) is the code snippet for the same. Also how does the correlation stuff works against a message broker (e.g. RabbitMQ)? Does RabbitMQ provides an ability to retrieve a message with a specific header (correlation identifier) in it?
public class RemoteProxyCalculatorService implements CalculatorService
{
public int Square(int n)
{
UUID uuid = SendRequest(n, "squareRequestChannel");
int squareOfn = ReceiveReply("squareReplyChannel", uuid);
return squareOfn;
}
private <T> UUID SendRequest(T payload, String requestChannel)
{
UUID requestID = UUID.randomUUID();
Message<T> inputMessage = MessageBuilder.withPayload(payload)
.setCorrelationId(requestID)
.build();
MessageChannel channel = (MessageChannel)context.getBean(requestChannel, MessageChannel.class);
channel.send(inputMessage);
return requestID;
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private <T> T ReceiveReply(String replyChannel, UUID requestID)
{
//How to consume requestID so as to receive only the reply related to the request posted by this thread
PollableChannel channel = (PollableChannel)context.getBean(replyChannel);
Message<?> groupMessage = channel.receive();
return (T)groupMessage.getPayload();
}
private ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context;
}
Thanks.
The simplest way to correlate within an app doesn't even require a correlationId header. Instead you can create a QueueChannel instance (that you don't share) and provide that as s the replyChannel header on the Message you send. Whatever downstream component ultimately responds, it will find that header in the Message.
Regarding RabbitMQ, our outbound-gateway simply applies a similar technique, but using the replyTo property of the AMQP Message.
Hope that helps.
-Mark
Problem is with common reply channel. The solution (Mark suggested the similar) will look like this.
public class RemoteProxyCalculatorService
{
public int Square(int n)
{
PollableChannel replyChannel = SendRequest(n, "squareRequestChannel");
int squareOfn = ReceiveReply(replyChannel);
return squareOfn;
}
private <T> PollableChannel SendRequest(T payload, String requestChannel)
{
UUID requestID = UUID.randomUUID();
QueueChannel replyQueueChannel = new QueueChannel();
Message<T> inputMessage = MessageBuilder.withPayload(payload)
.setCorrelationId(requestID)
.setReplyChannel(replyQueueChannel)
.build();
MessageChannel channel = context.getBean(requestChannel, MessageChannel.class);
channel.send(inputMessage);
return replyQueueChannel;
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private <T> T ReceiveReply(PollableChannel replyChannel)
{
Message<?> groupMessage = replyChannel.receive();
return (T) groupMessage.getPayload();
}
private ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context;
}
If you want to use common reply channel then I think this is what you are looking for.
public class RemoteProxyCalculatorService
{
public int Square(int n)
{
PollableChannel replyChannel = SendRequest(n, "squareRequestChannel");
int squareOfn = ReceiveReply(replyChannel);
return squareOfn;
}
private <T> PollableChannel SendRequest(T payload, String requestChannel)
{
UUID requestID = UUID.randomUUID();
Message<T> inputMessage = MessageBuilder.withPayload(payload)
.setCorrelationId(requestID)
.setReplyChannel(myMessageHandler.getSubscribedChannel())
.build();
// Create a Pollable channel for two things
// 1. Pollable channel is where this thread should look for reply.
QueueChannel replyQueueChannel = new QueueChannel();
// 2. Message Handler will send reply to this Pollable channel once it receives the reply using correlation Id.
myMessageHandler.add(requestID, replyQueueChannel);
MessageChannel channel = context.getBean(requestChannel, MessageChannel.class);
channel.send(inputMessage);
return replyQueueChannel;
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private <T> T ReceiveReply(PollableChannel replyChannel)
{
Message<?> groupMessage = replyChannel.receive();
return (T) groupMessage.getPayload();
}
private ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context;
#Autowired
private MyMessageHandler myMessageHandler;
}
/**
* Message Handler
*
*/
public class MyMessageHandler implements MessageHandler
{
private final Map<Object, MessageChannel> idChannelsMap = new TreeMap<>();
private final Object lock = new Object();
private final SubscribableChannel subscribedChannel;
public MyMessageHandler(SubscribableChannel subscribedChannel)
{
this.subscribedChannel = subscribedChannel;
}
#Override
public void handleMessage(Message<?> message) throws MessagingException
{
synchronized (lock)
{
this.idChannelsMap.get(message.getHeaders().getCorrelationId()).send(message);
this.idChannelsMap.remove(message.getHeaders().getCorrelationId());
}
}
public void add(Object correlationId, MessageChannel messageChannel)
{
synchronized (lock)
{
this.idChannelsMap.put(correlationId, messageChannel);
}
}
public SubscribableChannel getSubscribedChannel()
{
return subscribedChannel;
}
}