I've set up a website in VuePress and I found that it supports markdown-it's :::danger, :::tip, :::info etc to generate custom containers.
I was wondering if this could be extended in a way, to use for example :::card or :::example or whatever you want.
I found https://github.com/posva/markdown-it-custom-block, but can't find out how to implement it.
This is what've got in my config.js
markdown: {
// options for markdown-it-anchor
anchor: { permalink: false },
// options for markdown-it-toc
toc: { includeLevel: [1, 2] },
extendMarkdown: md => {
md.use(require("markdown-it-container"), "card", {
validate: function(params) {
return params.trim().match(/^card\s+(.*)$/);
},
render: function(tokens, idx) {
var m = tokens[idx].info.trim().match(/^card\s+(.*)$/);
if (tokens[idx].nesting === 1) {
// opening tag
return (
"<card><summary>" + md.utils.escapeHtml(m[1]) + "</summary>\n"
);
} else {
// closing tag
return "</card>\n";
}
}
});
}
}
Any advice is much appreciated!
The script you have will work with ::: card, in order to get it to work change
extendMarkdown: md => {...
to
config: md => {...
This took me a while to figure out. It's a version conflict - that's why it's currently not working.
Related
I am working on a Shopware 6 Administrative plugin but displaying product images has been a big headache. I went through shopware repositories of 'product_media', 'media', and generally all folder repositories related to media.
I have not been able to decipher how image linking works since I can not get hold of the exact folder names.
How then do I go about this. Note: I have been able to get correct image names and relevant image data like id, folder id etc.
Below is my module/component idex.js file codes
import template from './images-page.html.twig';
const { Component, Context } = Shopware;
const { Criteria } = Shopware.Data;
Component.register('images', {
template,
inject: ['repositoryFactory', 'mediaService', 'acl'],
metaInfo() {
return {
title: 'images'
};
},
computed: {
/**productMediaRepository() {
return this.repositoryFactory.create(this.product.media.entity);
},*/
productRepository() {
return this.repositoryFactory.create('product');
},
mediaFolderRepository() {
return this.repositoryFactory.create('media_folder');
},
mediaRepository() {
return this.repositoryFactory.create('media');
},
rootFolder() {
const root = this.mediaFolderRepository.create(Context.api);
root.name = this.$tc('sw-media.index.rootFolderName');
root.id = null;
return root;
},
logRep(){
console.log(this.productRepository);
// console.log(this.mediaFolderRepository);
// console.log(this.mediaRepository);
// console.log(this.rootFolder);
}
},
methods: {
logProducts(){
const criteria = new Criteria();
this.productRepository
.search(criteria, Shopware.Context.api)
.then(result => {
console.log(result[0]);
});
},
logMediaFolders(){
const criteria = new Criteria();
this.mediaFolderRepository
.search(criteria, Shopware.Context.api)
.then(result => {
console.log(result);
});
}
},
created(){
this.logMediaFolders();
}
});
here's the twig template (nothing really here)
<sw-card title="Watermark">
<img src="" alt="Product Image" />
</sw-card>
The media elements of the products are associations that are not loaded automatically, but you can configure the criteria, so that those associations will be loaded directly when you fetch the products. Refer to the official docs for detailed infos.
In you case that means to load the cover image / or all product images, you would have to adjust the criteria you use for fetching the products the following way
logProducts(){
const criteria = new Criteria();
criteria.addAssociation('cover.media');
criteria.addAssociation('media.media');
this.productRepository
.search(criteria, Shopware.Context.api)
.then(result => {
console.log(result[0]);
});
},
Then to link to the cover image you can use:
<sw-card title="Watermark">
<img src="product.cover.media.url" alt="Product Image" />
</sw-card>
You find all the media elements of the product as an array under product.media and can also use product.media[0].media.url to link to those images.
We use multiple rollup-plugins that parse their input to an AST. As they run on the same files, each file is parsed multiple times. Can this be optimized, so that each file is parsed only once? Minimal example:
// rollup.config.js
import {createFilter} from '#rollup/pluginutils';
import {simple} from 'acorn-walk';
import {attachComments} from 'astravel';
import {generate} from 'astring';
export default {
input: 'src/main.js',
output: {file: 'bundle.js', format: 'cjs'},
plugins: [{
name: 'plugin1',
transform(code, id) {
const comments = [];
const ast = this.parse(code, {onComment: comments});
attachComments(ast, comments);
simple(ast, {
Identifier(n) {
// rewrite wrong to right
if (n.name === 'wrong') n.name = 'right';
}
});
return {
code: generate(ast, {comments: true}),
ast,
map: null /* minimal example, won't create a source map here */
};
}
}, {
name: 'plugin2',
transform(code, id) {
const comments = [];
const ast = this.parse(code, {onComment: comments});
attachComments(ast, comments);
simple(ast, {
CallExpression(n) {
// rewrite mylog(...) to console.log(...)
if (n.callee.type === 'Identifier' && n.callee.name === 'mylog') {
n.callee = {
type: 'MemberExpression',
object: {type: 'Identifier', name: 'console', start: n.start, end: n.end},
property: {type: 'Identifier', name: 'log', start: n.start, end: n.end},
computed: false,
start: n.start,
end: n.end
}
}
}
});
return {
code: generate(ast, {comments: true}),
ast,
map: null /* minimal example, won't create a source map here */
};
}
}]
};
Now I understand that transform() can return an AST, so that parsing doesn't have to happen twice. And I understand that this.parse() uses the rollup-internal acorn instance. My simple mind thought that this.parse() could return the AST created by previous transform() calls, if available. But I assume that all sorts of demons await on that road, e.g. when this.parse() was called with different options.
Is there a different way achieve what I described? A different hook maybe?
I would love to not have all plugins in one and switching them on and off via options (I see that this would be a solution, but a really cumbersome one).
In my Angular project, I want to extend #commitlint/config-conventional with some pre-defined scopes.
The Angular project has a library for UI components (generated via ng generate library) and a default app which consumes the UI library.
In commitlint.config.js I've added the following lines:
module.exports = {
extends: ['#commitlint/config-conventional'],
rules: {
'scope-enum': [
2,
'always',
[
'ui-components',
'ui-components/badge',
'ui-components/button',
'ui-components/tooltip',
'core',
'account',
'plugins',
'settings',
'projects',
'shared',
'styles'
]
]
}
};
However, when I try to commit something with the scope: 'ui-components/tooltip':
fix(ui-components/tooltip): fix border
I get a commitlint error, saying that:
⧗ input: fix(ui-components/tooltip): fix border
✖ scope must be one of [ui-components, ui-components/badge, ui/button, ui-components/tooltip, core, account, plugins, settings, projects, shared, styles] [scope-enum]
✖ found 1 problems, 0 warnings
Unfortunately slashes aren't allowed in scopes.
To get around this I replace / with two dashes (--).
I wrote a script to grab subfolders and return an array:
https://gist.github.com/trevor-coleman/51f1730044e14081faaff098618aba36
[
'ui-components',
'ui-components--badge',
'ui-components--button',
'ui-components--tooltip',
...
]
According to source code, Commitlint use / for multiple scopes.
It means, you can commit like fix(core/account): fix border but you can't commit fix(ui-components/tooltip): fix border because you need to add tooltip in to your scopes first.
Here is source code: https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint/blob/master/%40commitlint/rules/src/scope-enum.ts
Also, it is mentioned in here: https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint/blob/master/docs/concepts-commit-conventions.md#multiple-scopes
You can write your own custom plugin to check scopes, I had the same issue, so I wrote one to solve this problem, see example commitlint.config.js below:
module.exports = {
extends: ["#commitlint/config-conventional"],
rules: {
"enhanced-scope-enum": [
2,
"always",
[
"ui-components",
"ui-components/badge",
"ui-components/button",
"ui-components/tooltip",
"core",
"account",
"plugins",
"settings",
"projects",
"shared",
"styles",
],
],
},
plugins: [
{
rules: {
"enhanced-scope-enum": (parsed, when = "always", value = []) => {
if (!parsed.scope) {
return [true, ""];
}
// only use comma sign as seperator
const scopeSegments = parsed.scope.split(",");
const check = (value, enums) => {
if (value === undefined) {
return false;
}
if (!Array.isArray(enums)) {
return false;
}
return enums.indexOf(value) > -1;
};
const negated = when === "never";
const result =
value.length === 0 ||
scopeSegments.every((scope) => check(scope, value));
return [
negated ? !result : result,
`scope must ${negated ? `not` : null} be one of [${value.join(
", "
)}]`,
];
},
},
},
],
}
I have the following bit of code:
Which prints the following in the console:
I've been bashing my head for a very long time, not sure where to go from here. It was working just fine when I pushed last. Then, I made some changes which broke it as you can see. To try to fix it, I stashed my changes, but I'm still getting this error.
Edit
search: throttle(live => {
let vm = this;
console.log("entered!!!");
console.log("this", this);
console.log("vm", vm);
if (typeof live == "undefined") {
live = true;
}
if (!live) {
// We are on the search page, we need to update the results
if (vm.$route.name != "search") {
vm.$router.push({ name: "search" });
}
}
vm.$store.dispatch("search/get", {
type: vm.searchType,
query: vm.searchQuery
});
}, 500)
Assuming search is in your methods it should not be using an arrow function as that will give you the wrong this binding.
Instead use:
methods: {
search: throttle(function (live) {
// ...
}, 500)
}
Here I'm also assuming that throttle will preserve the this value, which would be typical for implementations of throttling.
Like I said in my comment, I suspect this is a scoping issue.
Perhaps if you return the throttle function with the Vue component passed in, you might see better results:
search: function() {
let vm = this;
return throttle(live => {
console.log("entered!!!");
console.log("this", this);
console.log("vm", vm);
if (typeof live == "undefined") {
live = true;
}
if (!live) {
// We are on the search page, we need to update the results
if (vm.$route.name != "search") {
vm.$router.push({ name: "search" });
}
}
vm.$store.dispatch("search/get", {
type: vm.searchType,
query: vm.searchQuery
});
}, 500)
}
In my laravel 5.8 / vue 2.5.17 / vuex^3.1.0 I have a problem that with dialog opened I have event duplication.
I have an event for item deletion :
In my vue file:
...
mounted() {
bus.$on('dialog_confirmed', (paramsArray) => {
if (paramsArray.key == this.deleteFromUserListsKey(paramsArray.user_list_id)) {
this.runDeleteFromUserLists(paramsArray.user_list_id, paramsArray.index);
}
})
bus.$on('onUserListDeleteSuccess', (response) => {
this.is_page_updating = false
this.showPopupMessage("User lists", 'User\'s list was successfully deleted!', 'success');
})
bus.$on('onUserListDeleteFailure', (error) => {
this.$setLaravelValidationErrorsFromResponse(error.message);
this.is_page_updating = false
this.showRunTimeError(error, this);
this.showPopupMessage("User lists", 'Error adding user\'s list !', 'error');
})
}, // mounted() {
methods: {
confirmDeleteUserList(user_list_id, user_list_title, index) {
this.confirmMsg("Do you want to exclude '" + user_list_title + "' user list ?", {
key: this.deleteFromUserListsKey(user_list_id), user_list_id: user_list_id, index: index
}, 'Confirm', bus);
}, //confirmDeleteUserList(id, user_list_title, index) {
deleteFromUserListsKey(user_list_id) {
return 'user_list__remove_' + user_list_id;
},
runDeleteFromUserLists(user_list_id, index) {
this.$store.dispatch('userListDelete', { logged_user_id : this.currentLoggedUser.id, user_list_id : user_list_id } );
}, // runDeleteFromUserLists() {
and in resources/js/store.js :
state : {
...
userLists: [],
...
actions : {
userListDelete(context, paramsArray ) {
axios({
method: ( 'delete' ),
url: this.getters.apiUrl + '/personal/user-lists/' + paramsArray.user_list_id,
}).then((response) => {
let L = this.getters.userLists.length
for (var I = 0; I < L; I++) {
if (response.data.id == this.getters.userLists[I].id) {
this.getters.userLists.splice(this.getters.userLists.indexOf(this.getters.userLists[I]), 1)
context.commit('refreshUserLists', this.getters.userLists);
break;
}
}
bus.$emit( 'onUserListDeleteSuccess', response );
}).catch((error) => {
bus.$emit('onUserListDeleteFailure', error);
});
}, // userListDelete(context, paramsArray ) {
confirmMsg (based on https://github.com/euvl/vue-js-modal )is defined in my mixing :
confirmMsg: function (question, paramsArray, title, bus) {
this.$modal.show('dialog', {
title: title,
text: question,
buttons: [
{
title: 'Yes',
default: true, // Will be triggered by default if 'Enter' pressed.
handler: () => {
bus.$emit('dialog_confirmed', paramsArray);
this.$modal.hide('dialog')
}
},
{
title: '', // Button title
handler: () => {
} // Button click handler
},
{
title: 'Cancel'
}
]
})
},
it worked ok, until I moved userListDelete method from my vue file into store.js.
As a result on 1st event item is deleted ok, the the second item raise error that item was not found and I do not know event is doubled...
How to fix it ?
UPDATED BLOCK :
I still search for valid decision :
I uploaded live demo at :
http://178.128.145.48/login
demo#demo.com wdemo
http://178.128.145.48/websites-blogs will be opened.
Please, try to go to “User's lists” by link at top left menu https://prnt.sc/nq4qiy
and back several times. When on “User's lists” page I try to delete 1 user list it is deleted, but I got several messages
and url in “network” section of my browser : https://imgur.com/a/4ubFB0g
Looks like events are duplicated. And looks like that is move between pages number of guplications is raised.
Why and how to fix it ?
I use #click.prevent in triggering the event to show confirm delete message.
There is “ Add Demo Data” to add more demo rows.
Thanks!
Well, it is quite obvious.
Take a closer look at the Vue component lifecycle diagram.
Your component is mounted each time you enter a route.
So, bus.$on inside your mounted block executed each time you enter this route.
I suggest you move bus event handlers to some other location. For example app.js/ App.vue mounted hook or directly into the store. Since all you do inside handler is calling store actions.