how to connect more than one system authentication using single credential in orangehrm?
I have add one user in system1 and that user will be automatic added into system2 using orangehrm. How I do that? Please Reply me if any one know answer about it.
I assume you are referring to two OrangeHRM systems. If you can sync the ohrm_user table in both systems, you can achieve this.
You can write an external script/app which syncs the two tables periodically (eg: every 5 minutes).
Related
I'm working on a project where multiple users work on for example Documents. Every user can own one or more document, edit them and release them again. A Central database handle what user own what documents.
Initial i started with SQLAlchemy and i thought the following workflow:
An user table
A Role table with corresponding allowed actions
Couple the users and the roles
Every user start an engine on the server.
But then i saw the following sentence in the tutorial(SQLAlchemy 1.4 tutorial - Enginehttps://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/14/tutorial/engine.html)
The engine is typically a global object created just once for a particular database server, and is configured using a URL string which will describe how it should connect to the database host or backend.
Since then i start running in circles when it goes about login / logout and multiple user that have access to the database.
My first question is: What are normal workflows for this kind of situations?
Have a single 'Admin' login that handle all the actions and handle the user login as separate python functionality
start as what i thought that is logical but move the engine to the user (not sure if this is possible since it looks like just move the same problem to another place)
A Webserver? (Most examples i see use one... but except for logging in i don't need it currently)
Something else. because i don't know it
My Second question: Please link to some source that can me help bring up my knowledge
I have no software background so forgive me if my question is almost basic knowledge...
I would like to have two separate Parse servers (configured with a different app ID) connect to the same mongodb, so they can see the same set of users, so that I can create 2 different apps that share the same userbase.
Is this something Parse would support? Are there any expected conflicts or config caveats? I was unable to find info about this on Parse's github..
thanks
There's nothing to do, besides setting the database URL option to the same value on both servers, and that your database is accessible from both servers.
I'm not sure why you would need two different applicationId's as you want the same data and likely, logic running on both apps.
No, Parse Server does not support sharing classes between applications.
What you could do is have one of the instances or maybe a third one handle authentication and store your user information. I am pretty sure this would mean you will have to manually set user info on your requests and objects to save on the other two instances.
Another option is for each of the instances have an afterSave hook on the user class that saves and updates the info at the other instance. This seems easier to do and maintain.
I would choose the second option.
I already have access to Google analytics provided by my client and the bigquery has been configured to the project. But i want to know if i can create jobs. How do i find the role assigned to my id ?
i want to know if i can create jobs
Below is simple way to get this:
Just open Web UI and try to switch to project of your interest
a. If you do have it in the list of available projects – just select it and then run (just in case) some simple query (SELECT 1)
If it is run successfully - you can create jobs in this project (because any query is in reality a job)
b. If it is not in the initial list – select “Display Project” and enter project of your interest and also check “Make this my current project” box. If result is successful – most likely you again lucky and can create jobs in this project (but still – run some simple query to be 110% sure
How do i find the role assigned to my id
This would be more involved – you will need to use respective IAM (Google Identity and Access Management) APIs
For example you can use testIamPermissions() API that allows you to test Cloud IAM permissions on a user for a resource. It takes the resource URL and a set of permissions as input parameters, and returns the set of permissions that the caller is allowed.
The permission you should look for is bigquery.jobs.create, but yo can pass to this API list of any permissions you want to check if you have
What I'm trying to do is seperate my existing MS Access application into a front-end (which will run locally on a user's machine) and backend (which will be hosted on a networked file server) and allow users to choose between "read-only" and "write" modes. The idea is that only one user can use the "write" mode at a time, thus preventing the same piece of inventory being allocated to mutliple customers. My problem is that the application currently handles concurrency by requiring users to open a .bat file which only allows them to enter application if a .ldb file does not already exist (there is no read-only mode currently), so I need to prevent users accessing the production data in "read-only" mode from creating a .ldb file and unessarily blocking out other users.
The biggest challenge to implemnting this is that users must have write access to the temporary tables in the MS Access (.mdb) file installed locally. I have tried to implement this using a linked table, but I'm not sure how I can control when records become locked using linked tables (which creates a .ldb file).
You could change the sharing setting back to Exclusive Mode. Then only one person can access the file at a time. Check out this link and the other sharing options you have.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/set-options-for-a-shared-access-database-mdb-HP005188297.aspx
Side note: Yikes. Using Access in a shared network environment is not fun. I hope nothing important/time sensitive/secure is in this file. The .ldb file not being deleted and blocking other users is something that I use to see happen regularly in this situation. I believe splitting the Access file into a front-end and back-end like you've done is the first step. Then using linked tables to a SQL Server database can help resolve these issues. But if you're going to this level of effort you may want to consider dumping Access and get a COTS product or create a new application.
Depending on which version of Access you are using, theres alot of flexibility in the UI developement. In other words, this sounds more like an "interface" issue as apposed to a "database" issue. Given everybody is able write to a table, you should be able to check in somewhat real time (performance can be an issue with larger datasets), whether a particular has been added to inventory or not.
They I handled this problem is have two tables, an incomming and outgoing log, and set up a query that did the math against the inventory list on the amount of products. And like a general ledger, select set amount of time to "close the log" (monthly, quarterly) so that the query is not taking into account stuff that happened two years ago.
If you need more help with Access related stuff, Access Monster is a good forum site that deal with nothing but access.
My problem is that the application currently handles concurrency by requiring users to open a .bat file which only allows them to enter application if a .ldb file does not already exist (there is no read-only mode currently), so I need to prevent users accessing the production data in "read-only" mode from creating a .ldb file and unessarily blocking out other users.
--> If every user has his own copy of the front-end on his own machine, you'd have to check the .ldb file of the back-end.
I guess it would be easier to give everyone write access to the backend and manage the actual writing programmatically with a "locked by User X" field in the backend:
You said:
preventing the same piece of inventory being allocated to mutliple customers
If this is the only reason for putting all users but one in read-only mode, you could put a "locked by User X" field on the inventory table. If someone starts to modify (or even opens) a piece of inventory, update the record with his user name, and delete the user name again when he's done.
If another user tries to open the same piece of inventory as well, the name of the first user will already be in the "locked by User X" field, so you can put the second user in read-only mode.
If the inventory pieces are not the only problem and all the other users really are not allowed to change anything as soon as someone else already is editing, you can create a new table with only one column and one row and use this as the "locked by User X" field. As soon as there is a user name inside, you can put everyone else in readonly mode.
No matter how you do it, you will have to provide some kind of admin menu, so if someone's front-end crashes while editing, someone else needs to be able to unlock this user's locked data (=delete his username from the "locked by User X" field).
I have made an application which is reading domino server mailboxes and saving it on another location.
I am able to read and access all mailboxes.
Now to test product i want to create about 100 to 200 user's.
I am able to create user's but but in order to add mails,calendar e.t.c.
I need to physically configure user on machine then creating all items.
Is there any other alternative? Which allow me to add mails or other data into these nsf files?
Take a look at the RegisterNewUser in NotesRegistration class
Here is the documentation --> http://www-12.lotus.com/ldd/doc/domino_notes/7.0/help7_designer.nsf/f4b82fbb75e942a6852566ac0037f284/7604e322d563f2618525704a0040ee80?OpenDocument