redux-observable you provided 'undefined' where a stream was expected - react-native

I'm using the fbsdk to get user details in an ajax request. So it makes sense to do this in a redux-observable epic. The way the fbsdk request goes, it doesn't have a .map() and .catch() it takes the success and failure callbacks:
code:
export const fetchUserDetailsEpic: Epic<*, *, *> = (
action$: ActionsObservable<*>,
store
): Observable<CategoryAction> =>
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => {
getDetails(store)
})
const getDetails = store => {
console.log(store)
let req = new GraphRequest(
'/me',
{
httpMethod: 'GET',
version: 'v2.5',
parameters: {
fields: {
string: 'email,first_name,last_name'
}
}
},
(err, res) => {
if (err) {
store.dispatch(fetchUserDetailsRejected(err))
} else {
store.dispatch(fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(res))
}
}
)
return new GraphRequestManager().addRequest(req).start()
}
It gives the error:
TypeError: You provided 'undefined' where a stream was expected. You
can provide an Observable, Promise, Array, or Iterable.
How do I return an observable from the epic so this error goes away?
Attempt at bindCallback from this SO answer:
const getDetails = (callBack, details) => {
let req = new GraphRequest(
'/me',
{
httpMethod: 'GET',
version: 'v2.5',
parameters: {
fields: {
string: 'email,first_name,last_name'
}
}
},
callBack(details)
)
new GraphRequestManager().addRequest(req).start()
}
const someFunction = (options, cb) => {
if (typeof options === 'function') {
cb = options
options = null
}
getDetails(cb, null)
}
const getDetailsObservable = Observable.bindCallback(someFunction)
export const fetchUserDetailsEpic: Epic<*, *, *> = (
action$: ActionsObservable<*>
): Observable<CategoryAction> =>
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => {
getDetailsObservable()
.mergeMap(details => {
return Observable.of(fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(details))
})
.catch(error => Observable.of(fetchUserDetailsRejected(error)))
})
Getting the same error

Looking into source code of GraphRequestManager .start:
start(timeout: ?number) {
const that = this;
const callback = (error, result, response) => {
if (response) {
that.requestCallbacks.forEach((innerCallback, index, array) => {
if (innerCallback) {
innerCallback(response[index][0], response[index][1]);
}
});
}
if (that.batchCallback) {
that.batchCallback(error, result);
}
};
NativeGraphRequestManager.start(this.requestBatch, timeout || 0, callback);
}
As you can see it does return nothing, so effectively undefined. Rx mergeMap requires an instance of Observable or something compatible with it (more info).
Since you dispatch further actions, you can modify your original code like that:
export const fetchUserDetailsEpic: Epic<*, *, *> = (
action$: ActionsObservable<*>,
store
): Observable<CategoryAction> =>
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).do(() => { // .mergeMap changed to .do
getDetails(store)
})
const getDetails = store => {
console.log(store)
let req = new GraphRequest(
'/me',
{
httpMethod: 'GET',
version: 'v2.5',
parameters: {
fields: {
string: 'email,first_name,last_name'
}
}
},
(err, res) => {
if (err) {
store.dispatch(fetchUserDetailsRejected(err))
} else {
store.dispatch(fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(res))
}
}
)
return new GraphRequestManager().addRequest(req).start()
}
To be honest I find your second attempt bit better / less coupled. To make it working you could do something like:
const getDetails = Observable.create((observer) => {
let req = new GraphRequest(
'/me',
{
httpMethod: 'GET',
version: 'v2.5',
parameters: {
fields: {
string: 'email,first_name,last_name'
}
}
},
(error, details) => {
if (error) {
observer.error(error)
} else {
observer.next(details)
observer.complete()
}
}
)
new GraphRequestManager().addRequest(req).start()
})
export const fetchUserDetailsEpic: Epic<*, *, *> = (
action$: ActionsObservable<*>
): Observable<CategoryAction> =>
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => {
getDetails()
.map(details => fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(details)) // regular .map should be enough here
.catch(error => Observable.of(fetchUserDetailsRejected(error)))
})

I don't remember well how was working redux-observable before using RxJS >= 6 but I'll try to help ;)
First, you don't need to dispatch yourself, redux-observable will do it for you. In this article, they show how it works under the hood, so they call dispatch, but you don't have to. In the new implementation, they removed store as a second argument in favor of a state stream:
const epic = (action$, store) => { ... //before
const epic = (action$, state$) => { ... //after
But most importantly, the problem you experience is that you don't return a stream of actions, but a single (dispatched) action.
From their website:
It is a function which takes a stream of actions and returns a stream of actions.
So I think a quick solution would be to return observables from your callback:
(err, res) => {
if (err) {
return Observable.of(fetchUserDetailsRejected(err))
}
return Observable.of(fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(res))
}
I will update the answer based on your comments. Good luck!

I beleive this seems the possible reason for undefined. You are returning undefined in mergeMap callback.
This
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => {
getDetails(store)
})
should be either
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => getDetails(store))
or
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => {
return getDetails(store)
})

It looks like #artur grzesiak has a correct answer, but for completeness this is how I think bindCallback can be used.
The only issue I have with Artur's answer is I don't think we need to catch the error in the epic, since fetchUserDetailsRejected is an error-handling action (presumably the reducer deals with it appropriately).
I used this reference RxJs Static Public Methods: bindCallback
Give it a function f of type f(x, callback) and it will return a function g that when called as g(x) will output an Observable.
// This callback receives the results and returns one or other action (non-observable)
const callback = (err, res) => {
return err
? fetchUserDetailsRejected(err)
: fetchUserDetailsFulfilled(res)
}
// Here is the graph request uncluttered by concerns about the epic
const getDetails = (store, callback) => {
console.log(store)
let req = new GraphRequest(
'/me',
{
httpMethod: 'GET',
version: 'v2.5',
parameters: {
fields: {
string: 'email,first_name,last_name'
}
}
},
callback
)
new GraphRequestManager().addRequest(req).start()
}
// This bound function wraps the action returned from callback in an Observable
const getDetails$ = Observable.bindCallback(getDetails).take(1)
// The epic definition using bound callback to return an Observable action
export const fetchUserDetailsEpic: Epic<*, *, *> =
(action$: ActionsObservable<*>, store): Observable<CategoryAction> =>
action$.ofType(FETCH_USER_DETAILS).mergeMap(() => getDetails$(store))

Related

Urql config with guest token for SSG on next js

So I have a project using the latest Next js 13, React 18, Urql 3, and using typescript
Currently, I have issues when trying to query the urql from the getstaticprops function. My urql request needs a guest token, and I'm storing the token on session storage(other suggestions ?).
It has no issue when the query is running on the client, but I have it when querying inside the function.
My concern is related to the token reading, so the server cannot read the session storage value.
I'm asking what is the better and simplest way to make this work.
Does use cookies to store guest tokens will make this work?
Or the configuration that doesn't work?
This is my current config for urql.ts
import {
createClient,
ssrExchange,
dedupExchange,
cacheExchange,
fetchExchange,
} from "urql";
import { GRAPH_URL } from "#lib/constant/env";
import type { TypedDocumentNode } from "#urql/core";
const isServerSide = typeof window === "undefined";
const ssrCache = ssrExchange({
isClient: !isServerSide,
});
const client = createClient({
url: GRAPH_URL,
exchanges: [dedupExchange, cacheExchange, ssrCache, fetchExchange],
fetchOptions: () => {
const token = sessionStorage.getItem("accessToken");
return {
headers: {
authorization: token ? `Bearer ${token}` : "",
},
};
},
});
const query = async (
query: TypedDocumentNode<any, object>,
variables?: Record<string, string | string[] | unknown>
) => {
try {
const response = await client.query(query, variables as any).toPromise();
return response;
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof Error) console.error(error.message);
}
};
const mutation = async (
mutation: TypedDocumentNode<any, object>,
variables?: Record<string, string | string[] | unknown>
) => {
try {
const response = await client
.mutation(mutation, variables as any)
.toPromise();
return response;
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof Error) console.error(error.message);
}
};
export { client, query, mutation, ssrCache };
And this some of the code for the blog index page
export const getStaticProps = async () => {
await fetchArticlesSummary();
return {
props: {
urqlState: ssrCache.extractData(),
},
revalidate: 600,
};
};
export default withUrqlClient(() => ({
url: GRAPH_URL,
}))(BlogPage);
This is for the fetchArticlesSummary
export const fetchArticlesSummary = async () => {
try {
const {
data: { listArticles },
}: any = await query(getListArticle);
return listArticles.items;
} catch (error) {
return {
notFound: true,
};
}
};
I also doing a setup on _app.tsx
export default function App({ Component, pageProps }: AppProps) {
if (pageProps.urqlState) {
ssrCache.restoreData(pageProps.urqlState);
}
return (
<Provider value={client}>
<Component {...pageProps} />
</Provider>
);
}
Thank you
I have followed urql documentation about server-side configuration and many others but still don't have any solutions.

Express how to append queries with the same property?

Right now im trying to write a query deconstruction, it should look like this
describe("Deconstruct query params", () => {
it("should deconstruct the desired query param such as id=1,2,3,4 into id=1&id=2&id=3&id=4", async () => {
const req: RequestCustom = {
extra : {
user: {}
},
query: {
id: "1,2,3,4",
},
};
const res = {};
const next = jest.fn();
await deconstructQueryParams(["id"])(
(req as unknown) as express.Request,
res as express.Response,
next
);
expect(req.query).toEqual(
"id=1&id=2&id=3&id=4"
);
});
});
For this I try and use
export const deconstructQueryParams = (params: Array<string>) => async (
req: Request,
res: Response,
next: NextFunction
) => {
params.forEach((param) => {
if (req.query[param]) {
const paramArr = req.query[param].split(",");
delete req.query[param]
paramArr.forEach((value: string) => {
req.query.append(param, value); //append doesnt exist
});
}
});
next();
}
The problem with this, is that I cant use
req.query.id=1
req.query.id=2
.....
Because those queries will be replaced, when I need "id=1&id=2&id=3&id=4"
But apparently req.query.append doesnt exist, so I cant duplicate the query properties? How can I do so?

How to encode and parse / decode a nested query string Javascript

I'm sending form data from React Hook Form to Netlify via their submission-created function. I don't have any problem with encoding individual form field values, but now I'm trying to encode an array of objects.
Here is an example of my form data:
{
_id: "12345-67890-asdf-qwer",
language: "Spanish",
formId: "add-registration-form",
got-ya: "",
classType: "Private lessons",
size: "1",
days: [
{
day: "Monday",
start: 08:00",
end: "09:30"
},
{
day: "Wednesday",
start: "08:00",
end: "09:30"
}
]
}
The only problem I have is with the "days" array. I've tried various ways to encode this and this is the function I've currently been working with (which isn't ideal):
const encode = (data) => {
return Object.keys(data).map(key => {
let val = data[key]
if (val !== null && typeof val === 'object') val = encode(val)
return `${key}=${encodeURIComponent(`${val}`.replace(/\s/g, '_'))}`
}).join('&')
}
I tried using a library like qs to stringify the data, but I can't figure out how to make that work.
And here is the function posting the data to Netlify:
// Handles the post process to Netlify so I can access their serverless functions
const handlePost = (formData, event) => {
event.preventDefault()
fetch(`/`, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: encode({ "form-name": 'add-registration-form', ...formData }),
})
.then((response) => {
if(response.status === 200) {
navigate("../../")
} else {
alert("ERROR!")
}
console.log(response)
})
.catch((error) => {
setFormStatus("error")
console.log(error)
})
}
Finally, here is a sample of my submission-created file to receive and parse the encoded data:
const sanityClient = require("#sanity/client")
const client = sanityClient({
projectId: process.env.GATSBY_SANITY_PROJECT_ID,
dataset: process.env.GATSBY_SANITY_DATASET,
token: process.env.SANITY_FORM_SUBMIT_TOKEN,
useCDN: false,
})
const { nanoid } = require('nanoid');
exports.handler = async function (event, context, callback) {
// Pulling out the payload from the body
const { payload } = JSON.parse(event.body)
// Checking which form has been submitted
const isAddRegistrationForm = payload.data.formId === "add-registration-form"
// Build the document JSON and submit it to SANITY
if (isAddRegistrationForm) {
// How do I decode the "days" data from payload?
let schedule = payload.data.days.map(d => (
{
_key: nanoid(),
_type: "classDayTime",
day: d.day,
time: {
_type: "timeRange",
start: d.start,
end: d.end
}
}
))
const addRegistrationForm = {
_type: "addRegistrationForm",
_studentId: payload.data._id,
classType: payload.data.classType,
schedule: schedule,
language: payload.data.language,
classSize: payload.data.size,
}
const result = await client.create(addRegistrationForm).catch((err) => console.log(err))
}
callback(null, {
statusCode: 200,
})
}
So, how do I properly encode my form data with a nested array of objects before sending it to Netlify? And then in the Netlify function how do I parse / decode that data to be able to submit it to Sanity?
So, the qs library proved to be my savior after all. I just wasn't implementing it correctly before. So, with the same form data structure, just make sure to import qs to your form component file:
import qs from 'qs'
and then make your encode function nice and succinct with:
// Transforms the form data from the React Hook Form output to a format Netlify can read
const encode = (data) => {
return qs.stringify(data)
}
Next, use this encode function in your handle submit function for the form:
// Handles the post process to Netlify so we can access their serverless functions
const handlePost = (formData, event) => {
event.preventDefault()
fetch(`/`, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: encode({ "form-name": 'add-registration-form', ...formData }),
})
.then((response) => {
reset()
if(response.status === 200) {
alert("SUCCESS!")
} else {
alert("ERROR!")
}
console.log(response)
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log(error)
})
}
Finally, this is what your Netlify submission-created.js file should look like more or less:
const sanityClient = require("#sanity/client")
const client = sanityClient({
projectId: process.env.GATSBY_SANITY_PROJECT_ID,
dataset: process.env.GATSBY_SANITY_DATASET,
token: process.env.SANITY_FORM_SUBMIT_TOKEN,
useCDN: false,
})
const qs = require('qs')
const { nanoid } = require('nanoid');
exports.handler = async function (event, context, callback) {
// Pulling out the payload from the body
const { payload } = JSON.parse(event.body)
// Checking which form has been submitted
const isAddRegistrationForm = payload.data.formId === "add-registration-form"
// Build the document JSON and submit it to SANITY
if (isAddRegistrationForm) {
const parsedData = qs.parse(payload.data)
let schedule = parsedData.days
.map(d => (
{
_key: nanoid(),
_type: "classDayTime",
day: d.day,
time: {
_type: "timeRange",
start: d.start,
end: d.end
}
}
))
const addRegistrationForm = {
_type: "addRegistrationForm",
submitDate: new Date().toISOString(),
_studentId: parsedData._id,
classType: parsedData.classType,
schedule: schedule,
language: parsedData.language,
classSize: parsedData.size,
}
const result = await client.create(addRegistrationForm).catch((err) => console.log(err))
}
callback(null, {
statusCode: 200,
})
}

Testing a cloudflare worker with HTMLRewriter fails as its undefined

I have a test to test my cloudflare worker that looks like this:
const workerScript = fs.readFileSync(
path.resolve(__dirname, '../pkg-prd/worker.js'),
'utf8'
);
describe('worker unit test', function () {
// this.timeout(60000);
let worker;
beforeEach(() => {
worker = new Cloudworker(workerScript, {
bindings: {
HTMLRewriter
},
});
});
it('tests requests and responses', async () => {
const request = new Cloudworker.Request('https://www.example.com/pathname')
const response = await worker.dispatch(request);
console.log(response);
// const body = await response.json();
expect(response.status).to.eql(200);
// expect(body).to.eql({message: 'Hello mocha!'});
});
});
In my worker I do something like this:
const response = await fetch(BASE_URL, request);
const modifiedResponse = new Response(response.body, response);
// Remove the webflow badge
class ElementHandler {
element(element) {
element.append('<style type="text/css">body .w-webflow-badge {display: none!important}</style>', {html: true})
}
}
console.log(3);
return new HTMLRewriter()
.on('head', new ElementHandler()).transform(modifiedResponse);
Now when i run my test I get this error message:
● worker unit test › tests requests and responses
TypeError: Cannot read property 'transform' of undefined
at evalmachine.<anonymous>:1:1364
at FetchEvent.respondWith (node_modules/#dollarshaveclub/cloudworker/lib/cloudworker.js:39:17)
What seems to be wrong?
HTMLRewriter i created looks like this:
function HTMLRewriter() {
const elementHandler = {};
const on = (selector, handler) => {
if (handler && handler.element) {
if (!elementHandler[selector]) {
elementHandler[selector] = [];
}
elementHandler[selector].push(handler.element.bind(handler));
}
};
const transform = async response => {
const tempResponse = response.clone();
const doc = HTMLParser.parse(await tempResponse.text());
Object.keys(elementHandler).forEach(selector => {
const el = doc.querySelector(selector);
if (el) {
elementHandler[selector].map(callback => {
callback(new _Element(el));
});
}
});
return new Response(doc.toString(), response);
};
return {
on,
transform
};
}
Since HTMLRewriter() is called with new, the function needs to be a constructor. In JavaScript, a constructor function should set properties on this and should not return a value. But, your function is written to return a value.
So, try changing this:
return {
on,
transform
};
To this:
this.on = on;
this.transform = transform;

How to test Axios reject condition using Jest

I wrote a unit test for some Axios calls in my component. I verified the success path, where the call resolves successfully, but I am not able to verify the failure path, where the call rejects. How do I use mocks to verify this?
Here's a snippet of my FetchImage.vue component:
methods: {
preparedFetch() {
axios.get(this.imageurl).then(result => {
this.imageInformation.title = result.data.title;
this.imageInformation.copyright = result.data.copyright;
this.imageInformation.detailExplanation = result.data.explanation;
this.imageInformation.date = result.data.date;
this.imageInformation.urlinfo = result.data.url;
this.resultArrived = true;
this.$emit('imagefetched',this.imageInformation);
})
.catch( error => {
this.errorMessage = "Information not found";
this.resultArrived = true;
});
}
}
And my test for when the call rejects (for an invalid URL):
describe('Invalid response',async () => {
beforeEach(() => {
axios.get.mockClear();
axios.get.mockReturnValue(Promise.reject({}));
});
it('Invalid URL verfication', async () => {
// Given
const result = {
errorMessage : "Information not found",
resultArrived : true,
fetchStatus : true
};
// Fetch the error result
axios.get.mockReturnValue(Promise.resolve(result));
const fetchwrapper = mount(FetchImage);
fetchwrapper.vm.imageurl = "https://invalid.request.gov";
fetchwrapper.vm.preparedFetch();
await fetchwrapper.vm.$nextTick();
// Validate the result
expect(axios.get).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('https://api.nasa.gov/planetary/apod?api_key=vME6LAMD7IhEiy7rDmjfIaG6MhiKbu1MNIqxtqd1');
expect(axios.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith("https://invalid.request.gov");
expect(axios.get).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(fetchwrapper.vm.errorMessage.length).not.toEqual(0);
expect(fetchwrapper.vm.errorMessage).toBe("Information not found");
});
});
Your catch block isn't running because the mock return value is using Promise.resolve() when it actually should be Promise.reject():
describe('Invalid response',async () => {
it('Invalid URL verfication', async () => {
// axios.get.mockReturnValue(Promise.resolve(result)); // DON'T DO THIS
axios.get.mockReturnValue(Promise.reject(result));
});
});
You have to reject the value by using the built-in jest method.
describe('Invalid response', async () => {
it('Invalid URL verfication', async () => {
axios.get.mockRejectedValue(result);
});
});