I have a Select statement that gets the items based on the greatest date. it works but these are selected value from asp.net controls and one of the controls is a multiselect listbox
as you can see DynamicAtrributeID 937766 is show one time:
I need it to show all the rows that were in 937766 as well as the other rows which could be just one row. Is this possible
SELECT VotingValueDynamicId,
DecisionValueID,
DynamicAttributeID,
VotingValue,
DecisionSurveyID,
VALUEDATEUPDATED,
RECORDSTATUS,
FROM Adjudicate.ONCOLOGY_DynamicDecisionValuesForCaseManager AS a
WHERE (VALUEDATEUPDATED =
(SELECT MAX(VALUEDATEUPDATED) AS Expr1
FROM Adjudicate.ONCOLOGY_DynamicDecisionValuesForCaseManager AS b
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND a.DynamicAttributeID = DynamicAttributeID) ) AND (RECORDSTATUS <> 'D')
In the example shown, all the rows with DynamicAtrributeID = 937766 have different values on VALUEDATEUPDATED, so the query is showing one row for that DynamicAtrributeID because that's what you're doing, filtering and getting only the row wich has the max VALUEDATEUPDATED.
In other words, you can't get more than one row for a DynamicAtrributeID if you're filtering by his max(VALUEDATEUPDATED).
As #necoflecap1 said , the issue is your filter condition, For VALUEDATEUPDATED , you are filtering max(VALUEDATEUPDATED) which any way going to give 1 value per DynamicAttributeID and DecisionValueID combination,since your filter in subquery is
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND (a.DynamicAttributeID =
DynamicAttributeID)
I can see two possibilities here , either add one more filter for VotingValue column
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND (a.DynamicAttributeID =
DynamicAttributeID) and (a.VotingValue=b.VotingValue)
or Do a
group By VotingValue
inside filter subquery for max(VALUEDATEUPDATED) so that aggregation will perform for every VotingValue (which is the column I can see coming with a different value for DynamicAtrributeID 937766)
Related
This is what I currently have (it doesn't work):
select MOCKSTEMS.WORD_ID,
MOCKSTEMS.STEM_ID,
MOCKSTEMS.LABSTEM,
MOCKSTEMS.LABSTEMCATEGORY,
MOCKLEMMAS.LEMMAFORM,
MOCKSTEMS.LEMMA_ID,
MOCKWORDS.ORIGINALWORD,
MOCKSTEMS.CONTAINEDIN,
COUNT(*) as SAMEVALUE from MOCKSTEMS where CONTAINEDIN=STEM_ID
from MOCKSTEMS
inner join MOCKWORDS on MOCKSTEMS.WORD_ID = MOCKWORDS.WORD_ID
inner join MOCKLEMMAS on MOCKSTEMS.LEMMA_ID = MOCKLEMMAS.LEMMA_ID
Basically, I wish to create a column called 'SAMEVALUE' that shows the number of rows in this query with 'CONTAINEDIN' values equal to the 'STEM_ID' value of each row. Is this possible, and if so, how can I do it with SQL?
EDITED:
This is what I get when I run the query without the 'COUNT(*) as SAMEVALUE from MOCKSTEMS where CONTAINEDIN=STEM_ID' row:
image of a few rows returned by the query.
For example, for the row with STEM_ID='stem-003' and LABSTEM='owotan okitz', I would like the SAMEVALUE column to have value 2, because there are 2 rows with CONTAINEDIN='stem-003', as circled in this image.
It would also be fine if the SAMEVALUE column just indicates true/false (or 0/1) depending on whether there are rows with CONTAINEDIN values equal to the STEM_ID of each row.
To get overall count alongside the query results, you need an analytic function. So to count only rows with some condition, we put this condition in case expression, which returns something in case of "true", and null in other cases. Then count will ignore nulls.
select MOCKSTEMS.WORD_ID,
MOCKSTEMS.STEM_ID,
MOCKSTEMS.LABSTEM,
MOCKSTEMS.LABSTEMCATEGORY,
MOCKLEMMAS.LEMMAFORM,
MOCKSTEMS.LEMMA_ID,
MOCKWORDS.ORIGINALWORD,
MOCKSTEMS.CONTAINEDIN,
COUNT(
case
when CONTAINEDIN=STEM_ID
then 1
end
) over() as SAMEVALUE
/*Over is empty to consider all the result set as a single window*/
from MOCKSTEMS
inner join MOCKWORDS on MOCKSTEMS.WORD_ID = MOCKWORDS.WORD_ID
inner join MOCKLEMMAS on MOCKSTEMS.LEMMA_ID = MOCKLEMMAS.LEMMA_ID
I want to hide rows in SSRS report having Zero Quantity.
There are following multiple Quantity Columns like Opening Stock, Gross Dispatched,Transfer Out, Qty Sold, Stock Adjustment and Closing Stock etc.
I am doing this task by using following expression:
=IIF(Fields!OpeningStock.Value=0 AND Fields!GrossDispatched.Value=0 AND
Fields!TransferOutToMW.Value=0 AND Fields!TransferOutToDW.Value=0 AND
Fields!TransferOutToOW.Value=0 AND Fields!NetDispatched.Value=0 AND Fields!QtySold.Value=0
AND Fields!StockAdjustment.Value=0 AND Fields!ClosingStock.Value=0,True,False)
But by using this expression in row visibility, report hides all the rows except Totals Row. Even though report should show rows having Quantities of above mentioned columns.
Total values are shown correct.
Note: I set this row visibility expression on Detail Row.
Without using expression result is as following.
For the first 2 rows all the quantities are 0 (ZERO), i want to hide these 2 rows.
How can I fix this problem, or which expression must I use to get required results?
Could you try this out?
=IIF((Fields!OpeningStock.Value=0) AND (Fields!GrossDispatched.Value=0) AND
(Fields!TransferOutToMW.Value=0) AND (Fields!TransferOutToDW.Value=0) AND
(Fields!TransferOutToOW.Value=0) AND (Fields!NetDispatched.Value=0) AND (Fields!QtySold.Value=0)
AND (Fields!StockAdjustment.Value=0) AND (Fields!ClosingStock.Value=0),True,False)
Note: Setting Hidden to False will make the row visible
You don't need an IIF() at all here. The comparisons return true or false anyway.
Also, since this row visibility is on a group row, make sure you use the same aggregate function on the fields as you use in the fields in the row. So if your group row shows sums, then you'd put this in the Hidden property.
=Sum(Fields!OpeningStock.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!GrossDispatched.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!TransferOutToMW.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!TransferOutToDW.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!TransferOutToOW.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!NetDispatched.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!QtySold.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!StockAdjustment.Value) = 0 And
Sum(Fields!ClosingStock.Value) = 0
But with the above version, if one record has value 1 and one has value -1 and all others are zero then sum is also zero and the row could be hidden. If that's not what you want you could write a more complex expression:
=Sum(
IIF(
Fields!OpeningStock.Value=0 AND
Fields!GrossDispatched.Value=0 AND
Fields!TransferOutToMW.Value=0 AND
Fields!TransferOutToDW.Value=0 AND
Fields!TransferOutToOW.Value=0 AND
Fields!NetDispatched.Value=0 AND
Fields!QtySold.Value=0 AND
Fields!StockAdjustment.Value=0 AND
Fields!ClosingStock.Value=0,
0,
1
)
) = 0
This is essentially a fancy way of counting the number of rows in which any field is not zero. If every field is zero for every row in the group then the expression returns true and the row is hidden.
Here is an example that should give you some idea..
=IIF(First(Fields!Gender.Value,"vw_BrgyClearanceNew")="Female" and
(First(Fields!CivilStatus.Value,"vw_BrgyClearanceNew")="Married"),false,true)
I think you have to identify the datasource name or the table name where your data is coming from.
I have the below query. The problem is the last column productdesc is returning two records and the query fails because of distinct. Now i need to add one more column in where clause of the select query so that it returns one record. The issue is that the column i need
to add should not be a part of group by clause.
SELECT product_billing_id,
billing_ele,
SUM(round(summary_net_amt_excl_gst/100)) gross,
(SELECT DISTINCT description
FROM RES.tariff_nt
WHERE product_billing_id = aa.product_billing_id
AND billing_ele = aa.billing_ele) productdescr
FROM bil.bill_sum aa
WHERE file_id = 38613 --1=1
AND line_type = 'D'
AND (product_billing_id, billing_ele) IN (SELECT DISTINCT
product_billing_id,
billing_ele
FROM bil.bill_l2 )
AND trans_type_desc <> 'Change'
GROUP BY product_billing_id, billing_ele
I want to modify the select statement to the below way by adding a new filter to the where clause so that it returns one record .
(SELECT DISTINCT description
FROM RRES.tariff_nt
WHERE product_billing_id = aa.product_billing_id
AND billing_ele = aa.billing_ele
AND (rate_structure_start_date <= TO_DATE(aa.p_effective_date,'yyyymmdd')
AND rate_structure_end_date > TO_DATE(aa.p_effective_date,'yyyymmdd'))
) productdescr
The aa.p_effective_date should not be a part of GROUP BY clause. How can I do it? Oracle is the Database.
So there are multiple RES.tariff records for a given product_billing_id/billing_ele, differentiated by the start/end dates
You want the description for the record that encompasses the 'p_effective_date' from bil.bill_sum. The kicker is that you can't (or don't want to) include that in the group by. That suggests you've got multiple rows in bil.bill_sum with different effective dates.
The issue is what do you want to happen if you are summarising up those multiple rows with different dates. Which of those dates do you want to use as the one to get the description.
If it doesn't matter, simply use MIN(aa.p_effective_date), or MAX.
Have you looked into the Oracle analytical functions. This is good link Analytical Functions by Example
I have a totals query (one where I clicked the totals button, and it has "group by" columns) in Access 2007. Most of the columns are fine... group by columns, max columns, min columns, etc. For some of them though, I want to extract only the last non-blank (not "" or null) value of a string column.
Here's a sample of what my SQL looks like:
SELECT Min(Duplicates.AttendedODBefore) AS AttendedODBefore,
Min(Duplicates.ContactByPost) As ContactByPost,
Last(Duplicates.PlannedStart) As PlannedStart,
Min(Duplicates.AccessibilityRequirements) AS AccessibilityRequirements,
Last(Duplicates.UcasNumber) As UcasNumber
-- ^^^^
FROM DuplicateStudents As Duplicates
GROUP BY
Duplicates.ID
The expression highlighted is the one I want changing to the last non-blank field. Is there an Access-specific or plain SQL expression which will do this?
Edit: Turns out that Min() and Max() work on string values and ignores null values, taking the first and last values alphabetically. It's not perfect, because it doesn't guarantee that the value selected is the last one, but it's better than just a load of nulls which is what using Last() might give.
Access seems resistant to the idea of returning the last non-null value in a query using GROUP BY. Even if your FROM clause were modified to be something like
FROM (
SELECT allfieldsyouneed
FROM DuplicateStudents
ORDER BY PlannedStart
) AS SortedDuplicates
and the rest of your query were modified to use SortedDuplicates instead, Access doesn't seem to return the last value based on the order you specify. I tested on a table with exactly one blank row and specific orders that I could verify (both an auto-increment field and a value that I checked by using Min and Max), and Access chose to return some other value as Last.
Based on your comment it seems like your definition of "Last" is: the most recently added record, based on an auto-incrementing ID. As such, some form of the following should work (it uses a subquery to return the most recent non-null UcasNumber):
SELECT Min(Duplicates.AttendedODBefore) AS AttendedODBefore,
Min(Duplicates.ContactByPost) As ContactByPost,
Last(Duplicates.PlannedStart) As PlannedStart,
Min(Duplicates.AccessibilityRequirements) AS AccessibilityRequirements,
(SELECT TOP 1 D.UcasNumber FROM Duplicates AS D
WHERE D.UcasNumber Is Not Null
ORDER BY D.ID DESC) As UcasNumber
FROM DuplicateStudents As Duplicates
I have the following query:
SELECT a.field_eventid_key_value, a.field_showdate_value, b.nid , c.nid AS CNID
FROM content_type_vorfuehrung AS a
LEFT JOIN content_type_movies as b ON a.field_eventid_key_value = b.field_eventid_value
LEFT JOIN content_type_sonderveranstaltung as c ON a.field_eventid_key_value = c.field_sonderveranstaltungid_value
WHERE /* something */
GROUP BY a.field_eventid_key_value, a.field_showdate_value,
ORDER BY a.field_showdate_value ASC,a.field_showtime_value ASC
(where clause removed since it's irrelevant to the question)
This pulls data from 3 different tables and sorts it according to the "showdate" field in the first table. This is used in a PHP function that returns an array with the results.
Now there is a new requirement: The table "content_type_movies" in this query has a field that's supposed to be a boolean (actually it's an int with a value of either "0" oder "1"). This field is supposed to override the chronological ordering - that is, results where the field is "true" (or "1" respectively) should appear at the beginning of the result array (with the remaining entries ordered chronologically as before).
Is this at all possible with a single query ?
Thank you in advance for your time,
eike
You can use:
ORDER BY b.MyIntField DESC,
a.field_showdate_value,
a.field_showtime_value
where MyIntField is the field that is either 1 or 0 that you want to sort first.
ORDER BY a.content_type_movies DESC, /*then other fields*/ a.field_showdate_value ASC,a.field_showtime_value ASC
that should place all rows with content_type_movies=1 first then others.