I am trying to merge integer and numeric values from different SQL rows within the same table into one row so that they are summarized.
| ID | Count | Total Payment
1 | 1 | 5 | 10.99
2 | 1 | 3 | 4.86
3 | 2 | 8 | 19.88
4 | 2 | 2 | 15.99
5 | 2 | 5 | 8.45
6 | 3 | 4 | 12.98
7 | 3 | 10 | 40.42
As such I want to summarize the above rows into the below rows.
| ID | Count | Total Payment
1 | 1 | 8 | 15.85
2 | 2 | 15 | 44.32
3 | 3 | 14 | 53.40
How do I do this?
Thank you HonyBadger and Mathieu Guindon.
The correct code was:
SELECT [id], SUM([count]), SUM([total_payment])
FROM [table_name]
GROUP BY [id]
ORDER BY [count], [total_payment];
I have problems approaching the following task.
Given a table like
| user_id | hit_id | new_session |
|---------------|--------------|--------------|
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1 | 4 | 0 |
| ... | ... | ... |
| 5 | 19 | 0 |
where
the combination of user_id and hit_id is unique
new_session is a boolean that determines if the hit started a new session or not for this particular user
I want to create a new column, session_number that splits hit_ids into sessions, taking into account that:
the first row for each user_id, once ordered by hit_id asc gets a value of 1 for the new column session_number
as long as new_session is 0, the value of session_number stays the same
when new_session is 1, I have to sum up 1 to the actual session count
the logic works over a partition by user_id ordered by hit_id asc, and therefore once the user_id changes, the session count is reset
I have created a db-fiddle with some example data
The expected output for user_id = 1 (which cover multiple corner cases) would be:
| user_id | hit_id | new_session | session_number |
|---------------|--------------|--------------|----------------|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
I have tried with a combination of lag(), rank(), and dense_rank(), but I always find a corner case that makes all the attempts unsuccessful. Additionally, I am totally sure that there is a very easy approach for that that I am not taking into account.
You can use a cumulative sum:
select pv.*,
(1 + sum(new_session) over (partition by user_id order by hit_id)) as session_number
from pageviews pv;
Here is a db-fiddle.
I am using BigQuery, and trying to assign categorical values to each of my records, based on the number of 'splits' assigned to it.
The table has a cumulative count of records, grouped at the STR level - i.e., if there are 4 SKUs at 2 STR, the SKUs will be labeled 1,2,3,4. Each STR is assigned a SPLIT value, so if the STR has a SPLIT value of 2, I want it to split its SKUs into 2 categories. I want to create another column that would assign SKUs labeled 1-2 as '1', and SKUs labeled 3-4 as '2'. (The actual data is on a much larger scale, but thought this would be easier.)
+-----+------+---------------+--------+
| STR | SKU | SKU_ROW_COUNT | SPLITS |
+-----+------+---------------+--------+
| 1 | 1230 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 1231 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 1232 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 | 1233 | 4 | 3 |
| 1 | 1234 | 5 | 3 |
| 1 | 1235 | 6 | 3 |
| 2 | 1310 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 1311 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1312 | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | 1313 | 4 | 2 |
| 3 | 2345 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 2346 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 2347 | 3 | 1 |
+-----+------+---------------+--------+
The SPLITS column is dynamic, ranging from 1 to 3. The number of SKUs in each category should be relatively equal, but that's not a priority as much as just the number of groups that are created. Ideally, the final table with the new column (HOST_NUMBER) would look something like this:
+-----+------+---------------+--------+-------------+
| STR | SKU | SKU_ROW_COUNT | SPLITS | HOST_NUMBER |
+-----+------+---------------+--------+-------------+
| 1 | 1230 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1 | 1231 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 1 | 1232 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 1 | 1233 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| 1 | 1234 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 | 1235 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 2 | 1310 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1311 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1312 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1313 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 2345 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 2346 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 2347 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
+-----+------+---------------+--------+-------------+
You can use window functions and arithmetics:
select
t.*,
1 + floor((sku_row_count - 1) * splits / count(*) over(partition by str)) host_number
from mytable t
order by sku
Actually, ntile() seems to do exactly what you want - and you don't even need the sku_row_count column (which basically mimics row_number() anyway):
select
t.*,
ntile(splits) over(partition by str order by sku) host_number
from mytable t
order by sku
If the ordering of the values in the groups doesn't matter, just use modulo arithmetic:
select t.*, (SKU_ROW_COUNT % SPLITS) as split_group
from t
Below is for BigQuery Standard SQL
#standardSQL
SELECT *, 1 + MOD(SKU_ROW_COUNT, SPLITS) AS HOST_NUMBER
FROM `project.dataset.table`
I want to select from a table if row counts of similar filed is maximum depends on other columns.
As example
| user_id | team_id | isOk |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | 1 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | 1 |
| 11 | 3 | 0 |
So i want to select team 1 and 2 because they all have 1 value at isOk Column,
i tried to use this query
SELECT Team
FROM _Table1
WHERE isOk= 1
GROUP BY Team
HAVING COUNT(*) > 3
But still i have to define a row count which can be maximum or not.
Thanks in advance.
Is this what you are looking for?
select team
from _table1
group by team
having min(isOk) = 1;
thank you for attention.
I have a table called "PROD_COST" with 5 fields
(ID,Duration,Cost,COST_NEXT,COST_CHANGE).
I need extra field called "groups" for aggregation.
Duration = number of days the price is valid (1 day=1row).
Cost = product price in this day.
Cost_next = lead(cost,1,0).
Cost_change = Cost_next - Cost.
Now i need to group by Cost_change. It can be
positive,negative or 0 values.
+----+---+------+------+------+
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 8,5 | -1,5 |
| 2 | 1 | 8,5 | 12,2 | 3,7 |
| 3 | 1 | 12,2 | 5,3 | -6,9 |
| 4 | 1 | 5,3 | 4,2 | 1,2 |
| 5 | 1 | 4,2 | 6,2 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 6,2 | 9,2 | 3 |
| 7 | 1 | 9,2 | 7,5 | -2,7 |
| 8 | 1 | 7,5 | 6,2 | -1,3 |
| 9 | 1 | 6,2 | 6,3 | 0,1 |
| 10 | 1 | 6,3 | 7,2 | 0,9 |
| 11 | 1 | 7,2 | 7,5 | 0,3 |
| 12 | 1 | 7,5 | 0 | 7,5 |
+----+---+------+------+------+`
I need to make a query, which will group it by first negative or positive value (+ - + - + -). Last one field is what i want.
Sorry for my English `
+----+---+------+------+------+---+
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 8,5 | -1,5 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 8,5 | 12,2 | 3,7 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 12,2 | 5,3 | -6,9 | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | 5,3 | 4,2 | 1,2 | 4 |
| 5 | 1 | 4,2 | 6,2 | 2 | 4 |
| 6 | 1 | 6,2 | 9,2 | 3 | 4 |
| 7 | 1 | 9,2 | 7,5 | -2,7 | 5 |
| 8 | 1 | 7,5 | 6,2 | -1,3 | 5 |
| 9 | 1 | 6,2 | 6,3 | 0,1 | 6 |
| 10 | 1 | 6,3 | 7,2 | 0,9 | 6 |
| 11 | 1 | 7,2 | 7,5 | 0,3 | 6 |
| 12 | 1 | 7,5 | 0 | 7,5 | 6 |
+----+---+------+------+------+---+`
If you're in SQL Server 2012 you can use the window functions to do this:
select
id, COST_CHANGE, sum(GRP) over (order by id asc) +1
from
(
select
*,
case when sign(COST_CHANGE) != sign(isnull(lag(COST_CHANGE)
over (order by id asc),COST_CHANGE)) then 1 else 0 end as GRP
from
PROD_COST
) X
Lag will get the value from previous row, check the sign of it and compare it to the current row. If the values don't match, the case will return 1. The outer select will do a running total of these numbers, and every time there is 1, it will increase the total.
It is possible to use the same logic with older versions too, you'll just have to fetch the previous row from the table using the id and do running total by re-calculating all rows before the current one.
Example in SQL Fiddle
James's answer is close but it doesn't handle the zero value correctly. This is a pretty easy modification. One tricky approximation uses differences between product changes:
select id, COST_CHANGE, sum(IsNewGroup) over (order by id asc) +1
from (select pc.*,
(case when sign(cost_change) - sign(lag(cost_change) over (order by id)) between -1 and 1
then 0
else 1 -- `NULL` intentionally goes here
end) IsNewGroup
from Prod_Cost
) pc
For clarity, here is a SQL Fiddle with zero values. From my understanding of the question, the OP only wants an actual sign change.
This may still not be correct. The OP simply is not clear about what to do about 0 values.