Sometimes I get an error that Nothing in the Xaml-file is not found. This sometimes is fixed by restarting VS, Restore NuGetPackages, re-installing xamarin.forms nuget in combination with clean and removing obj-folders. But this is getting rather tiresome, and non of that works now.
The type 'StackLayout' was not found. Verify that you are not missing
an assembly reference and that all referenced assemblies have been
built.
Is there any universal fix on this or perhaps get a more accurate error message?
As I understand, this has been a problem for a long time with Xamarin forms
Seems to work reasonably well if you make sure the xaml-file´s Build Action is "Embedded resource" and not for example "Page". You can at least build, but you still get Intellisense-errors when you look at the pages
Many thanks in advance
Related
This is a follow-up to my post yesterday. To recap, I received this error message when trying to build my project:
FSC: Error FS2024: Static linking may not use assembly that targets
different profile
I consulted some kind people in the F# fpchat.com channel, and one of them suggested that the error could be due to the fact that I did not have Profile 47, because FSharp.Data uses Profile 47. I tried downloading the target pack for Profile 47, but was redirected to the Microsoft homepage instead. I tried the second answer on this SO page, but that did not work either. As of now, I am still unable to acquire Profile 47.
I consulted the FSharp.Data GitHub page, but it is not clear to me why Profile 47 is needed. I use VS2013 compiling to FSharp.Core 4.3.0.0; shouldn't that be sufficient, since the GitHub page lists it as one of the supported platforms?
I have created a new project, re-added all my source files and references, and tried re-building. I have even tried uninstalling and then re-installing Microsoft VS, even though I know it is likely irrelevant.
I think it is most probable that the problem lies with referencing FSharp.Data.TypeProviders. The error message does not appear insofar as I exclude reference to FSharp.Data.TypeProviders. The strangest thing is that I have not changed my references at all over the past week or so, but the error message only appeared yesterday.
So, my questions are:
Is Profile 47 really required? If so, how may I acquire it?
Even if I do acquire Profile 47, wouldn't I still experience trouble building my project, since my other references do not target Profile 47?
Are there any approaches that I may not have considered?
After tearing my hair out trying a variety of suggested solutions I found online, I discovered that the only way to resolve the issue was to change my Target Framework from 4.5 to 4.0, re-install all of my references to ensure compatibility with .NET 4.0, and then re-build my solution. Using .NET 4.0 means that I am no longer able to use Microsoft.Experimental.Collections, since it is compatible only with .NET 4.5. This means that I will have to re-write all of my code that makes use of Microsoft.Experimental.Collections, but I consider that a lesser evil than not being able to build my project at all.
So, to answer my own question mentioned in the title, Profile 47 is not required to use FSharp.Data.TypeProviders. :-)
EDIT:
I have found another solution to my problem. I created a new project (again), migrated all my source files over, re-installed all the DLLs I need, and this time I have no trouble whatsoever building my project. I think Carsten (who wrote the first comment to this answer) is correct in saying that the versions became messed up in the original solution files.
I'm seeing a strange build bug a lot. Sometimes after typing some code we receive the following build error.
Class 'clsX' must implement 'Event PropertyChanged(sender As Object, e As PropertyChangedEventArgs)' for interface System.ComponentModel.INotifyPropertyChanged'.
And
'PropertyChanged' cannot implement 'PropertyChanged' because there is no matching event on interface 'System.ComponentModel.INotifyPropertyChanged'.
Those error should never go together! Usually we can just ignore the exception and build the solution but often enough this bug stops our build. (this happens a lot using Edit and Continue which is annoying)
We're using Vb.net and c# mixed in one big solution.
Removing the PropertyChanged event and retyping the same code! sometimes fixes this.
Question:
Has anyone else seen this problem and has some suggestions how to prevent his?
We're using a code generator that causes this error to surface but just editing some files manually triggers this exception too. This error occur's on multiple machines using various setups.
Someone had the same exact issue discussed here. It sounds like there is an issue with this build picking up an old version of a binary. I would try the following in order:
Verify all assembly references use project references where possible within the Visual Studio solution.
Disable build parallelization in case there is some weird file locking issue with concurrent project builds. Go to Tools -> Options, Projects and Solutions -> Build and Run, then set "maximum number of parrellel project builds" to 1. Not the best solution but it may help narrow down the problem.
Disable the Hosting Process in case it's locking some file causing an assembly to not get rebuilt correctly. For C# project go to Project Properties, Debug tab, and uncheck "Enable the Visual Studio hosting process". For VB.NET project you'll need to Unload Project, Edit the project file, and add <UseVSHostingProcess>false</UseVSHostingProcess> to the PropertyGroup of each configuration. Again, not the best solution but you probably won't notice a difference.
Lastly, try doing a Clean + Build to try and resolve the issue when it occurs (I know this is not a fix but it's easy enough to do), also Rebuild may be slightly different than Clean + Build so try the latter if the former doesn't work.
As I can not comment due to lack of appropriate points.
But I would like to share one of my experience:
In an aspx.cs page I was working, used to compile fine and some time gave mysterious error of a variable not defined or function not defined or sometime variable or the function defined two times. I changed possibly each and every variable and function name but there seemed no effect , but after entering a simple space or a new line at any place in the file used to solve the compile error. At one time I tried to save the file (in a different encoding as i am used to experiments) and found that the file was not saving in the correct encoding (i.e. the ansi encoding because the file had a unicode character ), I removed the unicode character and that compile error didn't bothered me again.
This unicode character problem could be (not a hard and fast rule) there so you could check it.
Nuke & restore using source control (TFS instructions here):
Make sure you have everything checked in
Exit Visual Studio
Rename the project directory to .Bak (effectively deleting it)
Reopen Visual Studio and in source control:
Get Specific Version
check 'Overwrite... not checked out' and 'Overwrite ... even if local version matches'
Re-open project
Another problem: Make sure some source files are not newer than the current date (or your date is set back). Often this happens in apps where you are doing logic that requires certain things to happen differently on certain dates. You change your clock to test it, make a revision to the source with the date advanced, set the date back, and viola, rebuild does not rebuild that file.
You say 'typing it in again' - can you try just saving? After 40 years since MULTIX the .net build still decides what has changed by checking the file timestamp.
good luck!
When you get the error, is it always on the VB calling C# side, or vice-versa, or does it work both ways?
If the answer is either of the first two situations, try building the "callee" project within the solution before building the "caller" project to see if it stops the situation.
Also, just in case it may jog something for you to think about, does this error crop up when you change a VB file or a C# file, or is there no correllation?
Oh, and sorry this looks like an answer instead of a comment, I cannot post comments yet (need 50 rep).
I inherited a VB.Net solution (VS2005) that I've just cleaned up.
I've gotten a clean build except for this warning:
Warning 1 Maximum number of warnings has been exceeded.
I could understand the first error if I actually had 100 warnings, but I don't. I'm a stickler for clean builds. Any ideas why I'd still be getting this message?
Maybe You Have Unloaded file in your Project
if you work in team and use source control like TFS make sure other developer checking in all file like entity model and etc..
if your problem does not solve after this step remove all file in "Temporary ASP.NET files" and close your visual studio
last way for resolve this error is changing target framework in solution and then Return it to previous state
I hope your problem will be resolved after this steps :)
I have a VB.Net solution that another developer created and I'm trying to compile it on our build machine (it compiles on their machine) but with one of the projects I get an error saying something along the lines of:
Imyinterface is ambiguous in the namespace anamespaceassembly.
I have tried with no success:
examined the references to see any obvious errors
removed and re-added the assembly in question
searched the system for the same dll
attempted to compile the original deve's src (.v the source control version)
examined the assembly with ildasm.exe
I usually code in C# and have not seen this error before (in this form at least), not that it is VB.Net specific but the UI for adding/viewing references is slightly different so I thought maybe VB.Net might do something different with references.
I also tried to compile on another machine, and it compiles ok. So I assume it is something with the build machine but I'm not sure what. Other conflicting assemblies somehow not referenced by the project, is that possible??
Any ideas?
Check your references if you have two versions of the same reference (eg. Microsoft.ReportViewer.Webforms version 10.0.0.0 and Microsoft.ReportViewer.Webforms 8.0.0.0) You will get this error. Delete the oldest and you should be good. I do this to myself all of the time.
There can be a few causes for this error. In VB, you should be aware that more names then you're used to from C# are available without class specification. Also, case does not matter in VB, which can further liken the chances on collisions.
Even in the event that you don't find the actual conflicting issue, you can resolve this in the same way you would in C#: rename it in the Imports statement:
Imports IM = yourAssembly.Imyinterface
Then change the code such that uses of Imyinterface are replace with IM.
NOTE: If the error does not point to a particular line, the conflict may be out of your hand. Normally, a full Clean Solution and Rebuild helps a lot, but occasionally a misbehaving file (i.e., another error) causes this error to popup first without clear source. Try to rollback recent changes to the place where it did work.
You also say it worked on another machine. Chances are that your machine is having a different version of MS Visual Studio or .NET. Check and compare the exact versions.
I was facing same issue. I upgraded my application from vb6 to vb.net and when i change the build configuration from DEBUG to RELEASE then i got AMBIGUOUS errors.
I found dulicate references folder in solution Explorer. I removed those duplicate referecnces and Build sucessfully. I Hope it may help others.
Thanks for the responses! I tried each but still was having issues.
One point of info I left out of the original question was that the VB.net projects are upgrades from VB6 projects. At the time I did not think that was relevant.
After investigating further the build machine was used to build the VB6 projects also. So I ran 'reg32 /u' on the vb6 dlls and that seemed to fix the VB.net issue.
Not exactly sure why this fixed it since I was not referencing the VB6 dlls, I'm guessing something to do with ambiguous entries in the registry confusing the vb.net project.
I've got a really strange error and any light that anyone can shed on this would be greatly appreciated.
I made some changes to some VB6 source which builds a COM object. The automated build which builds our app returned an error. No problem I thought--I'll just back out my changes. Well backing out my changes isn't making the problem go away.
Specifically when I attempt to build the app via a .vbg file, with a command line like path\to\vb6\vb6 ProjectFile.vbg /make
I get a message
"Compile Error in File '', Line : Object library
invalid or contains references to object definitions that could not be
found."
As I said, I reverted the source code so I'm really stumped as to why this error is still occurring. Any VB6 gurus around who might be able to point me at an answer?
I can post the exact code in question but the fact that it was building correctly, stopped building correctly and now refuses to build correctly makes me think this is not a problem with my code but rather some problem in the environment. Like something got put in the registry as a result of the previous build error.
Any tips, hints, or suggestions greatly welcome. I realize my question is a bit sketchy but I'm not even sure what's important to include and what isn't.
EDIT 1:
Thanks for the excellent suggestions guys. I think it is something to do with VB6 doing some sort of auto-registration.
Just to add a bit more detail: this problem does not occur when I build the referenced vbp file from the IDE. It only happens on the make on the .vbg which contains the vbp. Also the build tool in question automatically pulls latest source and the error happens on both my local box and the dedicated build box.
EDIT 2:
Hi again all,
The release engineering fellow figured out how to get this to build in his build environment so it's currently ok. Once we're past this crunch, I'll try to interrogate him about what he did and share the details with everyone.
Thanks again for all the great suggestions. This is what's so great about SO; that is, I asked about a 10-year-old technology and I got several great and on-point ideas.
Make sure that the VBG and all the VBP's got rolled back as well. That error is consistent with a project trying to reference a CLSID that is no longer valid for the dependency. Have you tried loading up the project group and building from the IDE, if that works and you save and check in all the changes to the group and project files, you might be fixed up.
I'm guessing the fact that you mention that it was a COM component might be the source of the problem. If any of the public method's or properties have changed then I seem to remember that VB6 will change the interface GUIDs and auto register the new ones.
My suggestion would be to check the registry to look for any mention of the component name, make a note of any associated CLSIDs, back up the registry, and then delete the references.
As cmsjr mentions it could also be a bad CLSID reference in your .vbp files.
The other option is that the failure has caused a problem with some .tlb (type library) or olb (object library) files.
The best thing to do is move all your compatibility DLL to a separate and combined directory. The reason for this is control over what VB6 is using to check for binary compatibility. In addition the Typelibs that are generated IMPORT the references. So if you using Binary DLL Ver 10 for compatibility however the import is pulling in Binary DLL Ver 9 you will have issues. By keeping all the libraries in a single folder and pointing your projects to the DLLs in that folder you ensure that the respective TypeLib Import the correct version.
Finally if you have multiple levels of DLL reference each other. You may run into mysterious error where the VB6 is unable to compile using binary compatibility. In such cases you need to compile the lowest DLL in the hierarchy (Utility DLL perhaps) copy it over into the compatibility folders. Work your way up the chain until everything compiles in one shot again.
This is because if have DLL A reference DLL B which Reference DLL C. VB6 will get sometimes get confused if you make a change to A and C. will compile fine but A will not until the compatibility libraries are updated.
Hunt down and delete any .obj and .exp files that may be lying around from the previous failed build.
You will have to open the project & re-type in the lines that you changed.
Save the project alongwith VBG and re-compile after that.
I think that will fix it.
EDIT: The idea is that the cls/bas file remember the class (CLSID) that you used. So, if you change the references but don't change the lines in the cls/bas - it is a mismatch of type (what was referenced vs what is typed in cls/bas file).