In julia you can write subscripts by \_ for variable names. I was wondering if there is anything similar for writing fractions in variable names. Something like \frac{}{} in LaTeX. I understand this may be harder as it takes two arguments. If there is none, I will use /. But in this case I would like to use some enclosures to make clear what is being differentiated. I assume () is not usable? [] or {} would be ok?
The subscripts or other non-latin names you see in Julia code are just normal unicodes the same as "regular" names. the LaTeX commands are only a function of Julia REPL to remember and input them.
As for unicode, in principle you can represent some simple fractions like ⁽²⁺ⁱ⁾⁄₍ₛ₊ₜ₎, using the ⁄ (U+2044 Fraction slash) symbol and subscripts and superscripts. The rendering depends on your font, but do not expect a verticle layout in any current fonts.
However, Julia recognizes ⁄ (U+2044 Fraction slash, not the / in your keyboard) as "invalid character" when used along during parsing. The same applies to \not, which can only be used in conjunction with some operators, so it's not an option too.
As for the brackets and the normal /, they are operators and are parsed differently. However, there is an (ugly) way to circumvent this: you can use macros to bypass the parsing and use strings as variable names. For example:
julia> macro n_str(name)
esc(Symbol(name))
end
#n_str (macro with 1 method)
julia> n"∂(2x + 3)/∂x" = 2
2
julia> 2n"∂(2x + 3)/∂x"
4
Related
I found this one liner which joins same lines from multiple files.
How to add a space between two lines?
If line 1 from file A is blue and line 1 from file B is sky, a get bluesky,
but need blue sky.
say $_ for [Z~] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines;
This is using the side-effect of .Str on a List to add spaces between the elements:
say .Str for [Z] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines
The Z will create 2 element List objects, which the .Str will then stringify.
Or even shorter:
.put for [Z] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines
where the .put will call the .Str for you and output that.
If you want anything else inbetween, then you could probably use .join:
say .join(",") for [Z] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines
would put comma's between the words.
Note: definitely don't do this in anything approaching real code. Use (one of) the readable ways in Liz's answer.
If you really want to use the same structure as [Z~] – that is, an operator modified by the Zip meta-operator, all inside the Reduce meta-operator – you can. But it's not pretty:
say $_ for [Z[&(*~"\x20"~*)]] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines
Here's how that works: Z can take an operator, so we need to give it an operator that concatenates two strings with a space in between. But there's no operator like that built in. No problem – we can turn any function into an infix operator by surrounding it with [ ] (the infix form).
So all we need is a function that joins two strings with a space between them. That also doesn't exist, but we can create one: * ~ ' ' ~ *. So, we should be able to shove that into our infix form and pass the whole thing to the Zip operator Z[* ~ ' ' ~ *].
Except that doesn't work. Because Zip isn't really expecting an infix form, we need to give it a hint that we're passing in a function … that is, we need to put our function into a callable context with &( ), which gets us to Z[&(* ~ ' ' ~ *)].
That Zip expression does what we want when used in infix position – but it still doesn't work once we put it back into the Reduce/[ ] operator that we want to use. This time, the problem is due to something that may or may not be a bug – even after discussing it with jnthn on github, I'm still not sure whether this behavior is intended/correct.
Specifically, the issue is that the Reduction meta-operator doesn't allow whitespace – even in strings. Thus, we need to replace * ~ ' ' ~ * with *~"\c[space]"~* or *~"\x20"~* (where \x20 is the hex value of in Unicode/ASCII). Since we've come this far into obfuscated code, I figure we might as well go all the way. And that gets us back to
say $_ for [Z[&(*~"\x20"~*)]] #*ARGS.map: *.IO.lines
Again, I'm not recommending that you do this. (And, if you do, you could at least make it slightly more readable by saving the * ~ ' ' ~ * function as a named variable in the previous line, which at least gets you whitespace. But, really, just use one of Liz's suggestions).
I just thought this gives a useful window into some of the darker and more interesting corners of Raku's strangely consistent behavior.
There are times when you need to input modified variables with diacritical marks, or superscripts.
Seems like declare_index_properties allows doing it at the stage of display print.
But it is neither simple, nor very useful in formulas.
is there a simple way of adding hats, umlauts, and ', "strokes on top of a symbol, making it distinguishable from the symbol without such mark both to interpreter and to human eye?
Maxima doesn't have a notion of declaring a symbol to have diacritical marks or other combining marks on it. However, Maxima allows Unicode characters in symbol names if the underlying Lisp implementation allows Unicode; almost all of them allow Unicode. GCL is the only Lisp implementation, so far as I know, which doesn't handle Unicode correctly.
WxMaxima appears to allow Unicode characters to be input. At least, it worked that way when I tried some examples. Command-line Maxima allows Unicode if the terminal it is running in allows Unicode.
I think any Unicode character should be OK in a string. For symbols, any character which passes ALPHA-CHAR-P (a build-in Lisp function) can be part of a symbol name. Also, any character which is declared to be alphabetic (via declare("x", alphabetic) where x is the character in question) can be part of a symbol name.
I think wxMaxima has some capability to allow the user to select characters with diacritical marks from a menu; I haven't tried it. When I want to use Unicode characters, I end up just pasting them from a web page or something. I have used https://www.w3.org/2001/06/utf-8-test/UTF-8-demo.html as a source of characters in the past.
I'm trying to make a console-based program that makes use of ANSI escape codes with GNU Smalltalk. I can't seem to figure out how to go about printing a string object formatted with ANSI escape codes. I've tried the following.
'\x1b[31mHi' displayNl
This prints the entire string, including the escape code, without any formatting. I would have expected this to print "Hi" in red (and then everything else in the console after that, as I didn't reset the color.)
After googling a bit, I was able to find a couple issues on mailing lists where people were trying to produce things like newlines using "\n". Most of the answers were using the Transcript object's cr method, but I didn't find anything about colors in the textCollector class.
It looks like it shouldn't be all that hard to create my own module in C to achieve this functionality, but I'd like to know if there's a better way first.
I'm aware of the ncurses bindings, but I'm not sure that'd be practical for just making certain pieces of text in the program colored. So, is there a standard way of outputting colored text to the terminal in GNU Smalltalk using ANSI escape sequences?
Ended up getting an answer on the GNU Smalltalk mailing list. Looks like you can use an interpolation operator to achieve this.
For example ('%1[31mHi' % #($<16r1B>)) displayNl. would change the color to red, and ('%1[34mHi' % #($<16r1B>)) displayNl. would change the color to blue.
Basically, the % operator looks for a sequences that look like "%(number)" and replaces them with the objects in the array to the right of the operator. In our case, the array has one item, which is the ascii escape character in hexadecimal. So the "%1" in "%1[31mHi' is being replaced with the escape character, and then printed.
(This answer was stolen almost verbatim from Paolo on the GNU Smalltalk mailing list.)
I have made a program which takes a 1000 digit number as input.
It is fixed, so I put this input into the code file itself.
I would obviously be storing it as Integer type, but how do I do it?
I have tried the program by having 1000 digits in the same line. I know this is the worst possible code format! But it works.
How can assign the variable this number, and split its lines. I read somewhere something about eos? Ruby, end of what?
I was thinking that something similar to comments could be used here.
Help will be appreciated.
the basic idea is to make this work:
a=3847981438917489137897491412341234
983745893289572395725258923745897232
instead of something like this:
a=3847981438917489137897491412341234983745893289572395725258923745897232
Haskell doesn't have a way to split (non-String) literals across multiple lines. Since Strings are an exception, we can shoehorn in other literals by parsing a multiline String:
v = read
"32456\
\23857\
\23545" :: Integer
Alternately, you can use list syntax if you think it's prettier:
v = read . concat $
["32456"
,"24357"
,"23476"
] :: Integer
The price you pay for this is that some work will be done (once) at runtime, namely, the parsing (e.g. read).
I have seen DEBUGLOG(x,...) syntax. It supports DEBUGLOG(x,...) or DEBUGLOG(x...).
If we alter dots like DEBUGLOG(x,..), it gives an error. Can anyone explain this?
Thanks in advance..........
This is a "variadic" macro, meaning it takes multiple arguments. It's the macro equivalent of a C variadic function like printf. The ... means "and any other arguments beyond here are OK too".
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html
When the macro is invoked, all the
tokens in its argument list after the
last named argument (this macro has
none), including any commas, become
the variable argument. This sequence
of tokens replaces the identifier
VA_ARGS in the macro body wherever it appears.
(I'm not certain why "x..." works without a comma. That's not a form you'd usually see.)