Cannot Retrieve Properties of Node after adding Additional Specificity to Query - cypher

I'm very new to cypher and just trying to launch some simple queries to get myself situated. Right away, I came across a case which seems strange to me.
Note that nodes labeled as person each have property: dateOfBirth
Start by asking for all nodes labeled as person that are identified by a node labeled as Identifier which is in turn an instance of a node labeled as an IdentifierClass.
MATCH (p:person)-[:is_identified_by]->
(id:Identifier)-[:is_instance_of]->(idClass:IdentifierClass)
RETURN p
Results in, as expected:
p
{
"dateOfBirth": "11/13/2008"
}
{
"dateOfBirth": "11/13/2008"
}
{
"dateOfBirth": "11/13/2008"
}
Now this is the query I really want to run. We're now specifying that the IdentifierClass must have a property name with value id_type_1.
MATCH (p:person)-[:is_identified_by]->
(id:Identifier)-[:is_instance_of]->(idClass:IdentifierClass{name:'id_type_1'})
RETURN p
Results in:
p
{
}
{
}
{
}
So the same number of results were returned, but now the properties of p are not accessible. Why would adding this extra specificity result in a change in variable p "upstream"?

This issue was resolved. The query was working well and in fact there was unexpected data in the graph which led to these results. Several "person" nodes were missing properties.

Related

use include with associations in shopware store-api

I'm fetching all the parent products from the store-api including children/variants.
In my shop the only difference between the parent and the children/variants is the stock and the name.
For the children i add the following association, and it returns the children ( with api_alias product)
{
"page":1,
"limit" : 100,
"filter":[
{
"type":"equals",
"field":"product.parentId",
"value":null
}],
"associations":{
"children":{
"associations":{
"options":{}
}
},
"properties":{
"associations":{
"group":{}
}
}
},
"total-count-mode":1
}
I only need the stock and variant name, but it returns all the data like price, images etc.
I can use includes to define what i want back based on the api_alias. But this is product as well. So when i add the stock and options the rest also dissapears on the parent product.
"includes": {
"product" : ["children", "stock", "options"]
}
I also tried dot notation
"includes": {
"product" : ["children.options", "children.stock"]
}
That doesn't work either
How can i combine associations with includes, so that on the children i only get stock and options back. ( if this is even possible)
Sadly that is not possible. The includes are applied to all object of that type in the response, and there is not distinction where they appear in the response.
So the workaround for you would be to include all fields for products that you need on the parent and the children and combine them.
The includes collection refers to every instance of the given entity within the serialized json. You can't differentiate whether the entity was serialized in the context of a relation or not.
You could fetch parents only (where parentId is null) check if their childCount is greater 0 to find whether they have variants and then fetch the variants with their respective parentId and use the include in that separate query.

Merging data from different graphql resolvers in vue.js client side for simple outputting

I do query cars from an api with a single query but two resolvers (listing and listings)(hopefully resolver is the right name for it). One car I get by the id via listing and the other cars I get without filters by listings. The resolvers output the data i a little different structure on the server-side but I do get the same fields just at different „places“. I want to merge the structure in order to get a single array I can simply loop over in vue.js. For the apicalls I do use vue-apollo.
Couldn't find any information to merge data client-side inside graphqlqueries. All I found is about handling it serverside with resolvers but it's an api I do not own.
Is it possible with graphql or do I have to merge it inside my vuecomponent and if so what would be the best way to do so?
The output will be a grid of cars where I show the car of the week (requested by id) together with the newest cars of the regarding cardealer.
Full screenshot including response: https://i.imgur.com/gkCZczY.png
Stripped down example with just the id to show the problem:
query CarTeaser ($guid: String! $withVehicleDetails: Boolean!) {
search {
listing(guid: $guid){
details{
identifier{
id #for example: here I get the id under details->identifier
}
}
}
listings( metadata: { size: 2 sort:{ field: Age order: Asc}}) {
listings{
id #here it's right under listings
details{
…
}
}
}
}
}
}
Ideally you're right, it should be handled server-side, but if it's not your API the only solution is to manipulate the data on the client side, meaning in your component.
It's probably a lot simpler to leave the listings array untouched and to just merge the listing element with it, like this for instance:
// assuming 'search' holds the entire data queried from the api
const fullListing = [
// car of the week, data reformatted to have an identical structure as
// the 'other' cars
{
id: search.listing.details.identifier.id,
details: {
vehicle: search.listing.details.vehicle,
},
},
...search.listings.listings, // the 'other' cars
]

How can I access columns.roles in Power BI development?

Could not find this answer online, so decided to post the question then the answer.
I created a table in the capabilities.json file:
"dataRoles": [
{
"displayName": "Stakeholders",
"name": "roleIwant",
"kind": "GroupingOrMeasure"
}
...
"dataViewMappings": [
{
"table": {
"rows": {
"select": [
{
"for": {
"in": "roleIwant"
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
I realized that I could not simply set, for instance, legend data from the first category, because the first category comes from the first piece of data the user drags in, regardless of position. So if they set a bunch of different pieces of data in Power BI online, for instance, then remove one, the orders of everything get messed up. I thought the best way to settle this would be to identify the role of each column and go from there.
When you click on show Dataview, the hierarchy clearly shows:
...table->columns[0]->roles: { "roleIwant": true }
So I thought I could access it like:
...table.columns[0].roles.roleIwant
but that is not the case. I was compiling using pbiviz start from the command prompt, which gives me an error:
error TYPESCRIPT /src/visual.ts : (56,50) Property 'roleIwant' does not exist on type '{ [name: string]: boolean; }'.
Why can I not access this in this way? I was thinking because natively, roles does not contain the property roleIwant, which is true, but that shouldn't matter...
The solution is actually pretty simple. I got no 'dot' help (typing a dot after roles for suggestions), but you can use regular object properties for roles. The command for this case would be:
...table.columns[0].roles.hasOwnProperty("roleIwant")
And the functional code portion:
...
columns.forEach((column) =>{
if(column.roles.hasOwnProperty("roleIwant")){
roleIwantData = dataview.categorical.categories[columns.indexOf(column)].values;
})
If it has the property, it belongs to that role. From here, the data saved will contain the actual values of that role! The only thing I would add on here is that if a column is used for multiple roles, depending on how you code, you may want to do multiple if's to check for the different roles belonging to a column instead of if else's.
If anyone has any further advice on the topic, or a better way to do it, by all means. I searched for the error, all over for ways to access columns' roles, and got nothing, so hopefully this topic helps someone else. And sorry for the wordiness - I tend to talk a lot.

ObjectFilter in SoftLayer doesn't work

I find ObjectFilter doesn't work in SoftLayer.
I even tried the example provided in the SoftLayer webpage here:
https://sldn.softlayer.com/article/object-filters
REST:
List the ID and hostname of all servers in dal05
https://api.softlayer.com/rest/v3/SoftLayer_Account/getVirtualGuests?objectMask=mask[id,hostname]&objectFilter={"datacenter":{"name":{"operation":"dal05"}}}
When I ran this command, it still returns all the virtual guests, regardless what data center that virtual guest belongs to.
try this request:
GET https://api.softlayer.com/rest/v3/SoftLayer_Account/getVirtualGuests?objectMask=mask[id,hostname,datacenter]&objectFilter={"virtualGuests":{"datacenter":{"name":{"operation":"dal05"}}}}
The issue with your request is that you are missing the "virtualGuests" property, keep in mind that the objectFilter is filtering over the data in the database, so you need to tell it over what table work and over what record of the table work. e.g. using the "SoftLayer_Account" that implies that all the work will be over the "SoftLayer_Account" table now you need to tell id over what property/record of that table work in this case you need to work over the "virtualGuests" and so on. Please keep in mind that and you review the documentation about the valid properties/records e.g. these are the valid properties/record for Softlayer_Account:
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/datatypes/SoftLayer_Account
Regards
Maybe you can try adding virtualGuestsin the filter, something like this:
objectFilter={ "virtualGuests": { "datacenter": { "longName": { "operation": "Dallas 6" } } } }
or please see the first examples of https://sldn.softlayer.com/article/object-filters, like this:
object_filter = {
'virtualGuests': {
'datacenter': {
'name': {'operation': 'dal05'}
}
}
}

ElasticSearch mapping for nested enumerable objects (i18n)

I'm at a loss as to how to map a document for search with the following structure:
{
"_id": "007ff234cb2248",
"ids": {
"source1": "123",
"source2": "456",
"source3": "789"
}
"names": [
{"en":"Example"},
{"fr":"exemple"},
{"es":"ejemplo"},
{"de":"Beispiel"}
],
"children" : [
{
"ids": {
"source1": "CXXIII",
"source2": "CDLVI",
"source3": "DCCLXXXIX",
}
names: [
{"en":"Example Child"},
{"fr":"exemple enfant"},
{"es":"Ejemplo niño"},
{"de":"Beispiel Kindes"}
]
}
],
"relatives": {
// Typically no "ids" at this level.
"relation": 'uncle',
"children": [
{
"ids": {
"source1": "0x7B",
"source2": "0x1C8",
"source3": "0x315"
},
"names": [
{"en":"Example Cousin"},
{"fr":"exemple cousine"},
{"es":"Ejemplo primo"},
{"de":"Beispiel Cousin"}
]
}
]
}
}
The child object may appear in the children section directly, or further nested in my document as uncle.children (cousins, in this case). The IDs field is common to levels one (the root), level two (the children and the uncle), and to level three (the cousins), the naming structure is also common to levels one and three.
My use-case is to be able to search for IDs (nested objects) by prefix, and by the whole ID. And also to be able to search for child names, following an (as yet undefined) set of analyzer rules.
I haven't been able to find a way to map these in any useful way. I don't believe I'll have much success using the same technique for ids and names, as there's an extra level of mapping between names and the document root.
I'm not even certain that it is even mappable. I believe at least in principle that the ids should be mappable as terms, and perhaps that if I index the names as terms in some way, too.
I'm simply at a loss, and the documentation doesn't seem to cover anything like this level of complex mapping.
I have limited (read: no) control of the document as it's coming from the CouchDB river, and the upstream application already relies on this format, so I can't really change it.
I'm looking for being able to search by the following pseudo conditions, all of which should match:
ID: "123"
ID by source (I don't know how best to mark this up in pseudo language)
ID prefix: "CDL"
Name: "Example", "Example Child"
Localized name (I don't even know how best to pseudo-mark this up!
The specifics of tokenising and analysis I can figure out for myself, when I at least know how to map
Objects when both the key and the value of the object properties are important
Enumerable objects when the key and value are important.
If the mapping from an ID to its children is 1-to-many, then you could store the children's names in a child field, as a field can have multiple values. Each document would then have an ID field, possibly a relation field, and zero or more child fields.