I have an HTTP destination in an ABAP system (destination type G) and send sensitive data to the destination.
Before I send the data, I need to check whether the destination has SSL option enabled.
UPDATE: I'm using the destination in cl_http_client=>create_by_destination(...): So, if here is a way to get hold of the protocol, this would be fine as well (I checked interfaces IF_HTTP_CLIENT and IF_HTTP_REQUES, found nothing..)
Thanks!
You can add select option (or hard coded) for RFC destination for type RFCDES-RFCDEST and check it has configuration as "s=" for field RFCOPTIONS in table RFCDES. Then use this RFC destination in HTTP_GET function (or develop your custom).
Related
I have to implement the TFTP protocol in C for a school projet according to the RFC 1782.
When a client send a RRQ paquet with option(s), the serveur reply with a OACK paquet to confirm the recognized option(s). I'm fine with that.
Buf if the client send a RRQ paquet without option, does the server have to send a OACK paquet or does he begin to send the DATA paquet(s) directly?
Thank you.
As specified in the [rfc 1782], you can send the DATA packets directly.
"the server may respond with an Options Acknowledgment "
[rfc 2119]:
5. MAY This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is
truly optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a
particular marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that
it enhances the product while another vendor may omit the same item.
An implementation which does not include a particular option MUST be
prepared to interoperate with another implementation which does
include the option, though perhaps with reduced functionality. In the
same vein an implementation which does include a particular option
MUST be prepared to interoperate with another implementation which
does not include the option (except, of course, for the feature the
option provides.)
[rfc 1782]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1782
[rfc 2119]: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
I've copied two Function Modules QM06_SEND_PAPER_STEP2 and QM06_FM_TASK_CLAIM_SEND_PAPER to similar Z* Function Modules. I've put these FMs into a ZQM06 Function Group which was created by another developer.
I want to use Transaction SCC1 to move my developments from one client to another. In transaction SE01 Transport Organizer I don't find the names of my 2 function modules anywhere.
How can I find out the change request with my work?
I copied the FM in order to modify functionality and I know FMs are client independent.
Function modules, like other ABAP workbench entities, are client-independent. That is, you do not need to copy them between clients on the same instance.
However, you can find the transport request that contains your changes by going to transaction SE37, entering the name of your function module, and then choosing Utilities -> Versions -> Version Management from the menu.
Provided you did not put the changes into a local package (like $TMP) the system will have asked you for a transport request when you saved or activated your changes, that is, unless the function group is in a modifiable transport request, in which case it would have created a new task for your user under that request which will contain you changes. To check the package, use Goto -> Object Directory Entry from the menu in SE37.
Function modules are often added to transports under the function group name, especially if they're new.
The easiest way to fin dhte transport is to go to SE37, display the function module, and then go to Version Management.
The answer from mydoghasworms is correct. Alternatively you can also use transaction SE03 -> Search for Objects in Requests/Tasks (top of the transaction screen) -> check the box next to "R3TR FUGR" and type in your function group name.
I need a search help for my bukrs field. The problem is data should come from different system. There are 2 systems like X and Y. i am in X system and running a program.
At selection screen bukrs field exists. When i click on search help data should come from system Y.
I heard that it is possible to pull data to search help but couldn't find enough info in sites.
Best Regards.
5 month experienced with SAP/ABAP :)
To create a search help with a custom data selection, you can define a search-help exit in your search help. To select data in a custom way and not from a database table, go to the tab "Definition" of the search help, remove the content of the input "Selection Method" and enter a function module into the input "Search help exit". This function module must have the same signature as the example module F4IF_SHLP_EXIT_EXAMPLE. The comments in the sourcecode of this example module will explain you how to implement it. Your implementation of this function module can then perform the data acquisition from another system with a remote function call.
To get data from another system, you have to call a function module in a remote system via RFC (remote function call). To do this you need:
the RFC-capable function module in the remote system which exports the data you need. You can set a tick on the properties tab of a function module to make it RFC-capable.
An RFC connection from the local system to the remote system. RFC destinations can be created and configured with the transaction SM59.
To call a function module via RFC, you just have to add DESTINATION [rfc-destination] to the function call.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_YOUR_RFC_CAPABLE_FUNCTION_MODULE'
DESTINATION 'my_rfc_destination'
IMPORTING [...]
The user will have to log into the remote system in order to call RFC function modules in it, unless you define a username with password in the RFC connection. When you do that, you should create a dedicated system user in the remote system with minimal permissions especially for this RFC connection. When the user has too wide permissions, the RFC connection can be abused for other purposes.
I would like to set up a Code Inspector variant in one system and then be able to copy it to another system. I know that it is possible to transport code inspector variants, but is it possible to copy a variant to a system that is not in the same system landscape?
Just create the transport request as you would normally do and release it via SE10. Then you have to manually copy the transport files from the directories "cofiles" and "data" of your sap system to the destination system, respecting the original file location.
As soon you have done this, go to STMS and attach the request in the transport queue of the destination system. You can find that option in the sapgui menu of STMS. Now you can import the transport request.
Regards,
Christian
I'm trying to send a message to the WCF-WSHttp adapter with a dynamic
send port from an orchestration, but BizTalk seems to always be
reverting back to the HTTP Adapter.
According to the docs that I've been able to find, I should just need
to set the transport type from my expression shape to get BizTalk to
use the WCF-WSHttp adapter, and I AM, but it still seems to be
reverting. Below is an example of my expression shape that's setting
the properties (as you can see, I've tried both
Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.TransportType and
BTS.OutboundTransportType):
Body(BTS.OutboundTransportType) = "WCF-WSHttp";
SendMessagePort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address) =
System.String.Format("{0}/Accept{1}", "http://myserver/myservice/
myservice.svc/Accept{0}", messageInfo.MessageType);
SendMessagePort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.TransportType) = "WCF-
WSHttp";
Probably are Craig :-)
When using a dynamic send port, BizTalk uses the "scheme" part of the url to decide which adapter to use.
When your url starts with "Http://" or "Https://" BizTalk would always use the HTTP adapter.
Similarly url's begining with ftp:// will use the FTP adapter.
Same works for custom adapaters as well - when you install the adapter's configuration you register the moniker to use; for example - the open source Scheduled Task adapter uses schedule:// (I believe).
Using dynamic send ports with WCF is slightly more involved than most other adapaters because of the various configuration that's required but you can find detailed explanation here, just scroll down to the "Dynamic Send Ports" section about half way down.
I ended up resolving my issue, but am still unsure of the reasoning for the behavior I saw.
The Expression shape mentioned in the question was located inside of an Atomic Scope. Once the Orchestration exited the scope containing the Expression shape, the Transport Type was reset back to its original value. Moving the Expression out of the atomic scope resolved the issue, in that the TransportType was set correctly.