I'm new to symfony, how can I acces a service that is synthetic? I've tried with code below apprently service doesn't exist:
Symfony3.
service.yml
app_coder:
my_provider:
acme:
factory: factory_path
synthetic : true
public: true
controller
$this->container->get('app_coder.my_provider.acme')
sorry for bad english.
If you are using synthetic service, you should first set the service instance into the container as it is stated in docs.
To make things more flexible, you may first check if instance already exists and set if not. So something like this may help you:
if ($container->hasDefinition('app_coder.my_provider')) {
$container->set('app_coder.my_provider', new MyProviderService());
}
And after it was setted, you may get it:
$this->container->get('app_coder.my_provider')
Related
According to Phillip Riand (see: discussion on openNTF) this is not possible... They need to know the design element to find out who signed it. Therefore, it is only available in SSJS.
There are 2 ways that I know of to use the sessionAsSigner object in Java beans:
1 By resolving the sessionAsSigner object:
FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
Session sessionAsSigner = context.getApplication().getVariableResolver().
resolveVariable(context, "sessionAsSigner");
2 By using the getCurrentSessionAsSigner() function from the com.ibm.xsp.extlib.util.ExtLibUtil class in the Extension Library.
To be able to use it (in Java as wel as SSJS) you'll want to make sure that all design elements were signed by the same user ID. If that's not the case, the sessionAsSigner object will not be available ('undefined').
I found that the solution is right at hand :-)
I changed my XPage (in this example an XAgent) to:
<xp:view xmlns:xp="http://www.ibm.com/xsp/core" rendered="false">
This is an xAgent returning json data...
<xp:this.afterRenderResponse><![CDATA[#{javascript:Controller.verify(sessionAsSigner)}]]></xp:this.afterRenderResponse>
and in the bean I simply used the session in the argument when I needed to open a database/document as signer. Sometimes the solution is so simple :-)
/John
This is quite an old post that I just stumbled upon. Tried some of the solutions mentioned above:
resolveVariable did not work for me, at least not for sessionAsSigner as this throws a runtime error (I can resolve plain old session, though...)
to be honest I didn't quite understand the Controller.verify(sessionAsSigner) method; is Controller something specific to XAgents? If so, I don't have an XAgent here, so can't use it
didn't feel like importing extra ExtLib classes here...
So I came up with another solution that appears to be very simple:
created a method in my javaBean that takes a session object as argument; since sessionAsSigner belongs to the same class as session I don't have to import something new.
Javacode is:
public void testSession(Session s) throws Exception{
System.out.println(" > test effective user for this session = "
+ s.getEffectiveUserName());
}
This is called from SSJS as either
mybean.testSession(session);
or
myBean.testSession(sessionAsSigner);
Maybe helps others, too
I have a dependency with parameters constructor. When I call the action more than 1x, it show this error:
Error activating IValidationPurchaseService
More than one matching bindings are available.
Activation path:
1) Request for IValidationPurchaseService
Suggestions:
1) Ensure that you have defined a binding for IValidationPurchaseService only once.
public ActionResult Detalhes(string regionUrl, string discountUrl, DetalhesModel detalhesModel)
{
var validationPurchaseDTO = new ValidationPurchaseDTO {...}
KernelFactory.Kernel.Bind<IValidationPurchaseService>().To<ValidationPurchaseService>()
.WithConstructorArgument("validationPurchaseDTO", validationPurchaseDTO)
.WithConstructorArgument("confirmPayment", true);
this.ValidationPurchaseService = KernelFactory.Kernel.Get<IValidationPurchaseService>();
...
}
I'm not sure what are you trying to achieve by the code you cited. The error is raised because you bind the same service more than once, so when you are trying to resolve it it can't choose one (identical) binding over another. This is not how DI Container is supposed to be operated. In your example you are not getting advantage of your DI at all. You can replace your code:
KernelFactory.Kernel.Bind<IValidationPurchaseService>().To<ValidationPurchaseService>()
.WithConstructorArgument("validationPurchaseDTO", validationPurchaseDTO)
.WithConstructorArgument("confirmPayment", true);
this.ValidationPurchaseService = KernelFactory.Kernel.Get<IValidationPurchaseService>();
With this:
this.ValidationPurchaseService = new ValidationPurchaseService(validationPurchaseDTO:validationPurchaseDTO, confirmPayment:true)
If you could explain what you are trying to achieve by using ninject in this scenario the community will be able to assist further.
Your KernelFactory probably returns the same kernel (singleton) on each successive call to the controller. Which is why you add a similar binding every time you hit the URL that activates this controller. So it probably works the first time and starts failing after the second time.
I am trying to do the following bootstrapping:
x.For(Of IErrorLogger).Use(Of ErrorLogger.SQLErrorLogger)().
Ctor(Of IErrorLogger)("backupErrorLogger").Is(ObjectFactory.GetNamedInstance(Of IErrorLogger)("Disk"))
x.For(Of IErrorLogger).Add(
Function()
Return New ErrorLogger.DiskErrorLogger(
CreateErrorFileName(ServerMapPath(GetAppSetting("ErrorLogFolder"))))
End Function).Named("Disk")
But it shows this error:
StructureMap Exception Code: 200
Could not find an Instance named "Disk" for PluginType Logging.IErrorLogger
I sort of understand why this is happening.. the question is, how do I utilize a named instance within the registry? Maybe something like lazy initialization for the ctor argument for the SQLErrorLogger? I am not sure how to make it happen.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
I found the correct way to do it in the latest version (2.6.1) of StructureMap:
x.For(Of IErrorLogger).Use(Of ErrorLogger.SQLErrorLogger)().
Ctor(Of IErrorLogger)("backupErrorLogger").Is(
Function(c) c.ConstructedBy(Function() ObjectFactory.GetNamedInstance(Of IErrorLogger)("Disk"))
)
x.For(Of IErrorLogger).Add(Function() _
New ErrorLogger.DiskErrorLogger(
CreateErrorFileName(ServerMapPath(GetAppSetting("ErrorLogFolder"))))
).Named("Disk")
Notice for the Is method of Ctor, we need to provide a func(IContext), and use the IContext.ConstructedBy(Func()) to call ObjectFactory.Get... to successfully register the IErrorLogger in this case.
This is the only way to do it as far as I know. The other Icontext methods such as IsThis and Instance will only work with already registered type.
Your problem is that you are trying to access the Container before it's configured. In order to make structuremap evaluate the object resolution after the configuration you need to provide a lambda to the Is function. The lambda will be evaluated when trying to resolve the type registered.
x.[For](Of ILogger)().Add(Of SqlLogger)().Ctor(Of ILogger)("backupErrorLogger")_
.[Is](Function(context) context.GetInstance(Of ILogger)("Disk"))
x.[For](Of ILogger)().Add(Of DiskLogger)().Ctor(Of String)("errorFileName")_
.[Is](CreateErrorFileName(ServerMapPath(GetAppSetting("ErrorLogFolder"))))_
.Named("Disk")
Disclaimer: I'm not completely up-to-date with the lambda syntax in VB.NET, but I hope I got it right.
Edit:
The working C# version of this I tried myself before posting was this:
ObjectFactory.Initialize(i =>
{
i.For<ILogger>().Add<SqlLogger>()
.Ctor<ILogger>("backup").Is(
c => c.GetInstance<ILogger>("disk"))
.Named("sql");
i.For<ILogger>().Add<DiskLogger>().Named("disk");
});
var logger = ObjectFactory.GetNamedInstance<ILogger>("sql");
I am working on WCF Data service which imported stored procedure, as below.
[WebGet]
public List<GetMTSearchResultTest_Result> GettMTSearchResultTest()
{
MediaMarketResearch_PRODEntities ent = new MediaMarketResearch_PRODEntities();
return ent.GetMTSearchResultTest().ToList();
}
when i consuming this in my client application it says error as "The closed type MMRClient.MMRServiceReference.GetMTSearchResultTest_Result does not have a corresponding element settable property."
I am getting this error while bind to the grid view as below.
DataServiceContext context = new DataServiceContext(new Uri("http://localhost:4131/MMRDataService.svc/"));
IEnumerable<GetMTSearchResultTest_Result> empResult = context.Execute<GetMTSearchResultTest_Result>(new Uri("http://localhost:4131/MMRDataService.svc/GettMTSearchResultTest"));
GridView1.DataSource = empResult;
GridView1.DataBind();
Note: I imported this stored proc as complex type.
Please advice me on this.
Regards,
Jaydeep
I think this link may help you (see the selected answer).
Essentially, what the solution may be is to create a partial class for GetMTSearchResultTest_Result and decorate it with a DataServiceKey attribute, providing a non-nullable column that acts as a primary key (although I don't think it has to be unique).
So your partial class would look something like:
[DataServiceKey("YourKeyColumnName")]
public partial class GetMTSearchResultTest_Result {
}
If you're just doing reads, I don't think you'll need any implementation.
Hopefully this works. Let me know if there are issues/questions and I'll update accordingly.
You can always make a new service reference to a non data service. That is to a normal WCF service. You can simply have a [ContractOperation] returning a list of the troubled "complex types" and that's it.
This way you would have two services the original data service and a new normal WCF service. But this shouldn't be such an issue. You don't have to make the troubled "complex type" as a Entity.
I am trying to fix a bug with SSL in a product and noticed that although the code sets SSL to be true, in the next line in the code SSL is still at false. I wrote a unit test for this and the unit test confirms my suspicions.
[TestMethod]
public void SecureSocketLayerSetToTrue( )
{
var ldapConnection = new LdapConnection(
new LdapDirectoryIdentifier( "ldap.test.com", 636 ));
ldapConnection.SessionOptions.SecureSocketLayer = true;
Assert.IsTrue( ldapConnection.SessionOptions.SecureSocketLayer );
}
The test fails. Is there something here that I am missing?
It turns out that the way that the DirectoryServices.Protocols implements it's LDAP calls is by passing them through to a low-level LDAP API. This LDAP API is what is queried when a get is done on the property.
The low-level API is only updated when the methods are executed. You can think about this like it is building command-line arguments for an executable that hasn't been launched yet.
When a call like Bind() is made, then the executable is launched and the properties will report the correct value.
So, just because the property was saying that the value was false, it was using the true when necessary.