grails code-coverage cannot acces to method - testing

I´m trying to do test in grails 2 with Coverage, but I cannot acces to method:
It said that:
"java.lang.IllegalStateException: No thread-bound request found: Are you referring to request attributes outside of an actual web request, or processing a request outside of the originally receiving thread? If you are actually operating within a web request and still receive this message, your code is probably running outside of DispatcherServlet/DispatcherPortlet: In this case, use RequestContextListener or RequestContextFilter to expose the current request..."
class UserController implements ResourceLoaderAware{
def index(Integer max) {
params.max = Math.min(max ?: 10, 100)
respond User.list(params), model:[userInstanceCount: User.count()]
}
}
import grails.test.mixin.Mock
import grails.test.mixin.TestMixin
import grails.test.mixin.support.GrailsUnitTestMixin
import spock.lang.Specification
import com.snt.olucarodashboard.UserController
import grails.test.mixin.TestFor
#TestMixin(GrailsUnitTestMixin)
class UserControllerSpec extends Specification {
UserController controller=new UserController()
void "Test the index action returns the correct model"() {
when: "The index action is executed"
controller.index(0)
}
}
What is the problem?
Thanks

Instead of instantiating the controller yourself, use the #TestFor annotation at the class level
import grails.test.mixin.TestFor
#TestMixin(GrailsUnitTestMixin)
#TestFor( UserController )
class UserControllerSpec extends Specification {
void "Test the index action returns the correct model"() {
when: "The index action is executed"
controller.index(0)
}
}

Related

Resiliency4j CircuitBreaker tried to call circuitBreaker logic in AOP in order to achieve not to call circuit breaker when it is disabled in config

Conditionally I want to switch the circuit breaker switch off/on by setting spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled=false. My logic should stay intact from circuit-breaker logic.
I tried using the below demo example to extend to my requirements, I am trying to bind circuit breaker call on target method based on circuit breaker flag spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled=true in application.property, true and false case. There could be a simpler way to achieve this, help me if any other solution than what I tried.
Example:
spring cloud circuit-breaker-resiliency4j example
Tried calling happy path - Work fine when there is no exception [response comes within 3 seconds as time limiter set to 3seconds in bean creation]
application.properties:
spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled=true
spring.cloud.config.enabled=false
spring.cloud.config.import-check.enabled=false
spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true
Controller:
#GetMapping("/delay/{seconds}")
public Map delay(#PathVariable int seconds) {
return mockService.delay(seconds);
}
MockService:
#ApplyCircuitBreaker
public Map delay(int seconds) {
return rest.getForObject("https://httpbin.org/delay/" + seconds, Map.class);
}
Config class:
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnProperty(name = { "spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled"}, matchIfMissing = true)
public class ResiliencyConfig {
#Bean
public Customizer<Resilience4JCircuitBreakerFactory> defaultCustomizer() {
return factory -> factory.configureDefault(id -> new Resilience4JConfigBuilder(id)
.timeLimiterConfig(TimeLimiterConfig.custom().timeoutDuration(Duration.ofSeconds(3)).build())
.circuitBreakerConfig(CircuitBreakerConfig.ofDefaults())
.build());
}
}
ApplyCircuitBreaker - Custom annotation to Apply circuit breaker only for required methods:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public #interface ApplyCircuitBreaker {
}
AOP: CircuitBreakerAroundAspect:
#Aspect
#Component
#ConditionalOnProperty(name = { "spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled",
"spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.reactive.enabled" }, matchIfMissing = true)
public class CircuitBreakerAroundAspect {
#Autowired
CircuitBreakerFactory circuitBreakerFactory;
#Around("#annotation(com.ravibeli.circuitbreaker.aspects.ApplyCircuitBreaker)")
public Object aroundAdvice(final ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
log.info("Arguments passed to method are: {}", Arrays.toString(joinPoint.getArgs()));
AtomicReference<Map<String, String>> fallback = new AtomicReference<>();
Object proceed = circuitBreakerFactory.create(joinPoint.getSignature().toString())
.run(() -> {
try {
log.info("Inside CircuitBreaker logic in Aspect");
return joinPoint.proceed();
} catch (Throwable t) {
log.error(t.getMessage());
}
return null;
}, Throwable::getMessage);
log.info("Result from method is: {}", proceed);
return proceed;
}
}
My requirement:
circuitBreakerFactory.create(joinPoint.getSignature().toString()) .run(() -> ....) at this line, when target method throws exception, controll should go to fallback mechanism call. Since joinPoint.proceed() throws exception, it is forcing to handle exception - So I am doing wrong here, need suggestion to fix this to solve the requirement.
Error log:
{
"timestamp": "2021-07-10T01:33:10.558+00:00",
"status": 500,
"error": "Internal Server Error",
"trace": "java.lang.ClassCastException: class java.lang.String cannot be cast to class java.util.Map (java.lang.String and java.util.Map are in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap')\r\n\tat com.ravibeli.circuitbreaker.service.MockService$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$3e293bd0.delay(<generated>)\r\n\tat com.ravibeli.circuitbreaker.controllers.DemoController.delay(DemoController.java:53)\r\n\tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\r\n\tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)\r\n\tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)\r\n\tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.method.support.InvocableHandlerMethod.doInvoke(InvocableHandlerMethod.java:197)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.method.support.InvocableHandlerMethod.invokeForRequest(InvocableHandlerMethod.java:141)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.ServletInvocableHandlerMethod.invokeAndHandle(ServletInvocableHandlerMethod.java:106)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.invokeHandlerMethod(RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.java:894)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.handleInternal(RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.java:808)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.AbstractHandlerMethodAdapter.handle(AbstractHandlerMethodAdapter.java:87)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:1063)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:963)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:1006)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doGet(FrameworkServlet.java:898)\r\n\tat javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:655)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.service(FrameworkServlet.java:883)\r\n\tat javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:228)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:163)\r\n\tat org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:190)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:163)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter.doFilterInternal(RequestContextFilter.java:100)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:119)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:190)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:163)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.FormContentFilter.doFilterInternal(FormContentFilter.java:93)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:119)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:190)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:163)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:201)\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:119)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:190)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:163)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:202)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:542)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:143)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78)\r\n\tat org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:357)\r\n\tat org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:382)\r\n\tat org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65)\r\n\tat org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:893)\r\n\tat org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1723)\r\n\tat org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)\r\n\tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)\r\n\tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)\r\n\tat org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)\r\n\tat java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)\r\n",
"message": "class java.lang.String cannot be cast to class java.util.Map (java.lang.String and java.util.Map are in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap')",
"path": "/delay/3"
}
You seem to be asking a couple different questions here.
The title seems to be asking why the aspect is still present when
spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled=false
The problem is with your conditional
#ConditionalOnProperty(name = { "spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.enabled",
"spring.cloud.circuitbreaker.resilience4j.reactive.enabled" }, matchIfMissing = true)
It's simply requiring the property be present, it's not checking what it's set to. You need to set havingValue=true as well.
That said, I would strongly suggest not making your own pointcut for circuit breakers. Use the annotations provided by Resiliancy4j and just specify the fallback method there. I would expect that to clear up any other issues you're having with fallbacks.
#Bulkhead(name = 'myService', fallbackMethod = "myFallback")
#CircuitBreaker(name = 'myService', fallbackMethod = "myFallback")
#RateLimiter(name = 'myService', fallbackMethod = "myFallback")
#TimeLimiter(name = 'myService', fallbackMethod = "myFallback")
For enabling the circuit breaker dynamically you can use Profiles or Externalized Configuration (preferred approach would be to use Profiles and you can google more about them)
As far as your aspect's code goes, it looks and runs fine for me. Link to Code. It would be better if you could share the link to the code-base so that the issue can be investigated a bit further. Nevertheless, it seems a minor issue.
Thanks, guys for your comments, got the simple idea to fix this.
I resolved it with a custom factory implementation to make enable/disable feature working.
My GitHub example code: spring-cloud-resiliency4j

Can Spring-Data-Rest handle associations to Resources on other Microservices?

For a new project i'm building a rest api that references resources from a second service. For the sake of client convenience i want to add this association to be serialized as an _embedded entry.
Is this possible at all? i thought about building a fake CrudRepository (facade for a feign client) and manually change all urls for that fake resource with resource processors. would that work?
a little deep dive into the functionality of spring-data-rest:
Data-Rest wraps all Entities into PersistentEntityResource Objects that extend the Resource<T> interface that spring HATEOAS provides. This particular implementation has a list of embedded objects that will be serialized as the _embedded field.
So in theory the solution to my problem should be as simple as implementing a ResourceProcessor<Resource<MyType>> and add my reference object to the embeds.
In practice this aproach has some ugly but solvable issues:
PersistentEntityResource is not generic, so while you can build a ResourceProcessor for it, that processor will by default catch everything. I am not sure what happens when you start using Projections. So that is not a solution.
PersistentEntityResource implements Resource<Object> and as a result can not be cast to Resource<MyType> and vice versa. If you want to to access the embedded field all casts have to be done with PersistentEntityResource.class.cast() and Resource.class.cast().
Overall my solution is simple, effective and not very pretty. I hope Spring-Hateoas gets full fledged HAL support in the future.
Here my ResourceProcessor as a sample:
#Bean
public ResourceProcessor<Resource<MyType>> typeProcessorToAddReference() {
// DO NOT REPLACE WITH LAMBDA!!!
return new ResourceProcessor<>() {
#Override
public Resource<MyType> process(Resource<MyType> resource) {
try {
// XXX all resources here are PersistentEntityResource instances, but they can't be cast normaly
PersistentEntityResource halResource = PersistentEntityResource.class.cast(resource);
List<EmbeddedWrapper> embedded = Lists.newArrayList(halResource.getEmbeddeds());
ReferenceObject reference = spineClient.findReferenceById(resource.getContent().getReferenceId());
embedded.add(embeddedWrappers.wrap(reference, "reference-relation"));
// XXX all resources here are PersistentEntityResource instances, but they can't be cast normaly
resource = Resource.class.cast(PersistentEntityResource.build(halResource.getContent(), halResource.getPersistentEntity())
.withEmbedded(embedded).withLinks(halResource.getLinks()).build());
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Something went wrong", e);
// swallow
}
return resource;
}
};
}
If you would like to work in type safe manner and with links only (addition references to custom controller methods), you can find inspiration in this sample code:
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.hateoas.EntityModel;
import org.springframework.hateoas.server.RepresentationModelProcessor;
import static org.springframework.hateoas.server.mvc.WebMvcLinkBuilder.linkTo;
import static org.springframework.hateoas.server.mvc.WebMvcLinkBuilder.methodOn;
#Configuration
public class MyTypeLinkConfiguration {
public static class MyType {}
#Bean
public RepresentationModelProcessor<EntityModel<MyType>> MyTypeProcessorAddLifecycleLinks(MyTypeLifecycleStates myTypeLifecycleStates) {
// WARNING, no lambda can be passed here, because type is crucial for applying this bean processor.
return new RepresentationModelProcessor<EntityModel<MyType>>() {
#Override
public EntityModel<MyType> process(EntityModel<MyType> resource) {
// add custom export link for single MyType
myTypeLifecycleStates
.listReachableStates(resource.getContent().getState())
.forEach(reachableState -> {
try {
// for each possible next state, generate its relation which will get us to given state
switch (reachableState) {
case DRAFT:
resource.add(linkTo(methodOn(MyTypeLifecycleController.class).requestRework(resource.getContent().getId(), null)).withRel("requestRework"));
break;
case IN_REVIEW:
resource.add(linkTo(methodOn(MyTypeLifecycleController.class).requestReview(resource.getContent().getId(), null)).withRel("requestReview"));
break;
default:
throw new RuntimeException("Link for target state " + reachableState + " is not implemented!");
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
// swallowed
log.error("error while adding lifecycle link for target state " + reachableState + "! ex=" + ex.getMessage(), ex);
}
});
return resource;
}
};
}
}
Note, that myTypeLifecycleStates is autowired "service"/"business logic" bean.

Fitnesse wiki unable to call selenium method correctly

I am trying to write a simple fixture that opens the browser and navigates to www.google.com. When I run the wiki page, it passes with all green, but the browser never opens up (I don't think the method even gets called by the wiki). Can someone take a look at my fixture and wiki to see what I am doing wrong? Many thanks in advance,
Here is the Wiki -
!|SeleniumFitness|
|URL |navigateToSite?|
|http://www.google.com| |
After Running -
!|SeleniumFitnesse| java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.openqa.selenium.remote.service.DriverCommandExecutor.<init>(Lorg/openqa/selenium/remote/service/DriverService;Ljava/util/Map;)V
|URL |The instance decisionTable_4.setURL. does not exist|navigateToSite?
|http://www.google.com|!The instance decisionTable_4.navigateToSite. does not exist |
Here is the Fixture -
package FitNesseConcept.fitNesse;
import java.util.Properties;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.openqa.selenium.By;
import org.openqa.selenium.WebDriver;
import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeDriver;
import org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod;
//import com.google.common.base.Preconditions.*;
//import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
import fit.ColumnFixture;
public class SeleniumFitnesse extends ColumnFixture {
public static ChromeDriver driver = null;
private String navigateToSite = "";
public String URL = "";
public SeleniumFitnesse() {
Properties props = System.getProperties();
props.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "/home/ninad/eclipse-workspace/chromedriver");
driver = new ChromeDriver();
}
// SET-GET Methods
public String getURL() {
return URL;
}
public void setURL(String uRL) {
URL = uRL;
}
public String getNavigateToSite() {
return navigateToSite;
}
public void setNavigateToSite(String navigateToSite) {
this.navigateToSite = navigateToSite;
}
// Navigate to URL
public void navigateToSite() throws Throwable {
System.out.println("Navigating to Website");
try {
driver.navigate().to(URL);
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
You are getting some good recommendations as comments - but to answer your question directly, for an old-style ColumnFixture, which is what you have written, the method "navigateToSite" is indeed not going to be called.
These styles of fixtures are not often used anymore, Slim is preferred, and your fitnesse instance in its documentation will show you how to use Slim style. However, for a column fixture as you have written, if you want a method to be called it needs to be a "?" following name of the method in the header row.
See basic docs for column fixture:
http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.FixtureGallery.BasicFitFixtures.ColumnFixture
You are mis-using column fixture, even granted the old style though. Column fixture's pattern is "here is a series of columns that represent inputs, now here is a method call I want to make to get the output and check result". Navigating a website does not often fit that pattern. In old style fitnesse it would probably be approached by an ActionFixture:
http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.FixtureGallery.BasicFitFixtures.ActionFixture
In the newer Slim style, a good fit for navigation and checking where you are would be a Scenario Table.
http://www.fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.WritingAcceptanceTests.SliM.ScenarioTable
In general doing WebDriver / Selenium tests through a wiki is worth extra thought as to whether it's your best medium. Fitnesse is really designed to be a collaborative tool for documenting and verifying business requirements, directly against source code.
Here's an example of how to do with a ColumnFixture, although again ColumnFixture not exactly appropriate:
|url|navigateToUrl?|
|www.google.com| |
java class:
public String url;
public void navigateToUrl() {
}
You could return an "OK" if it navigates alright, or return the title of the page as opposed to void if you wanted.

Execute some action when Spock test fails

I'd like to execute some action when Spock test fails. Specifically, take a screenshot. Is it possible? How to do it?
Create a listener class
class ExampleListener extends AbstractRunListener {
def void error(ErrorInfo error) {
println "Actual on error logic"
}
}
then add it to each specification using implementation of IGlobalExtension that is executed for each Spec
class GlobalSpecExtension implements IGlobalExtension {
#Override
void visitSpec(SpecInfo specInfo) {
specInfo.addListener(new ExampleListener())
}
}
and finally create file named org.spockframework.runtime.extension.IGlobalExtension in your META-INF/services directory (typically it will be under src/test/resources if you are using Maven) with the full name of your IGlobalExtension implementation e.g.
com.example.tests.GlobalSpecExtension
The best way to achieve this is to write a (global or annotation-driven) Spock extension that implements and registers an AbstractRunListener. For an example, see OptimizeRunOrderExtension. For how to register a global extension, see the IGlobalExtension descriptor.
There isn't much documentation on extensions because the APIs are still subject to change. If you want to play it safe (and can live with some restrictions), you can implement a JUnit Rule instead.
One problem that you may encounter in both cases is that they don't provide access to the current spec instance. If you need this, you may have to use both an AbstractRunListener (to be notified of the failure) and an IMethodInterceptor (to get hold of the spec instance), both registered by the same extension. (Shouldn't be this hard, but that's what's currently there.)
I've managed to do it this way:
class ExampleTest extends GebSpec{
static boolean success = false
def setup(){
success = false
}
def cleanup(){
assert success == true, someAction()
}
def someAction(){
}
def "TestCase"(){
expect:
/*What you expect here*/
(success = true) != null
}
}
Before each test case "success" is set to false by the setup() method.
At the end of each test case you add the "(success = true) != null" statement. Therefore "success" will only be true if the test case has passed.
After each test case the cleanup() method will verify if "success" is true. If it isn't the method someAction() will be called.
I can't upvote or comment on user3074543's answer, but it's simpler than creating an extension. I want easy. So I shortened user*'s a little (I don't mean the 1-line methods). You can make the logic simpler by recording failure instead of success, and reduce typing with a done() helper.
class Test extends spock.lang.Specification {
def fail
def setup(){ fail = true }
def done(){ !(fail = false) }
def cleanup(){ fail && doStuffWhenFail() }
def 'test things'(){
expect:
stuff
done()
}
}

Grails integration test failing with MissingMethodException

I'm attempting to test a typical controller flow for user login. There are extended relations, as with most login systems, and the Grails documentation is completely useless. It doesn't have a single example that is actually real-world relevant for typical usage and is a feature complete example.
my test looks like this:
#TestFor(UserController)
class UserControllerTests extends GroovyTestCase {
void testLogin() {
params.login = [email: "test1#example.com", password: "123"]
controller.login()
assert "/user/main" == response.redirectUrl
}
}
The controller does:
def login() {
if (!params.login) {
return
}
println("Email " + params.login.email)
Person p = Person.findByEmail(params?.login?.email)
...
}
which fails with:
groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: immigration.Person.methodMissing() is applicable for argument types: () values: []
The correct data is shown in the println, but the method fails to be called.
The test suite cannot use mocks overall because there are database triggers that get called, the result of which will need to be tested.
The bizarre thing is that if I call the method directly in the test, it works, but calling it in the controller doesn't.
For an update: I regenerated the test directly from the grails command, and it added the #Test annotation:
#TestFor(UserController)
class UserControllerTests extends GroovyTestCase {
#Test
void testLogin() {
params.login = [email: "test1#example.com", password: "123"]
Person.findByEmail(params.login.email)
controller.login()
}
}
This works if I run it with
grail test-app -integration UserController
though the result isn't populated correctly - the response is empty, flash.message is null even though it should have a value, redirectedUrl is null, content body is empty, and so is view.
If I remove the #TestFor annotation, it doesn't work even in the slightest. It fails telling me that 'params' doesn't exist.
In another test, I have two methods. The first method runs, finds Person.findAllByEmail(), then the second method runs and can't find Person.findAllByEmail and crashes with a similar error - method missing.
In another weird update - it looks like the response object is sending back a redirect, but to the application baseUrl, not to the user controller at all.
Integration tests shouldn't use #TestFor. You need to create an instance of the controller in your test, and set params in that:
class UserControllerTests extends GroovyTestCase {
void testLogin() {
def controller = new UserController()
controller.params.login = [email:'test1#example.com', password:'123']
controller.login()
assert "/user/main" == controller.response.redirectedUrl
}
}
Details are in the user guide.
The TestFor annotation is used only in unit tests, since this mocks the structure. In the integration tests you have access of the full Grails environment, so there's no need for this mocks. So just remove the annotation and should work.
class UserControllerTests extends GroovyTestCase {
...
}