We have a SQL Azure database and enabled VNET service endpoint. The service endpoint is listed in our VNET and the Azure SQL lists our VNET. According to documentation found here, connections applications inside our VNET should use the Azure backbone and not travel through the public internet.
There was another stack overflow article asking a similar question but I still didn't see an answer (maybe I missed it). That article is here
This is great, but I don't see how to build the connection string to utilize this internal network path since the only name available is the public DNS name (which we can still use with SSMS to manage the server from our on-premise location).
Is Azure smart enough to know that this public DNS name is routed differently when used inside the VNET versus when its used from our on-premise site?
Is Azure smart enough to know that this public DNS name is routed differently when used inside the VNET versus when its used from our on-premise site?
Yes. And that doesn't even require a VNET service endpoint. Connections within Azure, even across Regions never leave Microsoft private networks.
A Virtual Network Service Endpoint is mostly just a firewall rule on your SQL Instance, so you can cut off all public IP access if you want.
Related
I have tried these:
Data Source=/cloudsql/*****:asia-southeast2:*****;Initial Catalog=*****;Integrated Security=False;User ID=sqlserver;Password=MyPassword0!;MultipleActiveResultSets=True
that /cloudsql/*****:asia-southeast2:***** is my instance connection name described in here.
I tried public IP too like this:
Data Source=***.***.***.***;Initial Catalog=*****;Integrated Security=False;User ID=sqlserver;Password=MyPassword0!;MultipleActiveResultSets=True
with IP address my SQL instance public IP, but it is not working.
I have enabled the sql instance connection from the Cloud Run:
How can I fix the connection string using EF Core?
This is the error I got:
Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): A network-related
or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to
SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify
that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to
allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 25 - Connection string is not valid)
You are trying to use Cloud SQL SQL server with Cloud Run. But if you have a look to the documentation, this connexion is not supported.
In reality, the connexion is supported, but Cloud Run service open a Unix socket to connect the SQL Server instance. And there is no SQL Server client compliant with Unix Socket and therefore, you can't access it.
To solve your issue, I recommend you to use the Private IP section of this page. You can also achieve the same configuration with the public IP (don't use a serverless VPC connector and go to your Cloud SQL instance, and authorized the network 0.0.0.0/0 to access to your instance), but, because you need to open broadly the authorized network, I don't recommend you this option, for security reason.
EDIT 1
Because of my bad english, let me explain more!!
The best way is to follow the documentation page: Connect Cloud SQL private IP to your VPC, use a serverless VPC connector with Cloud Run, and in your code you can use the private IP in your connection string to access the database.
But, you can also use the public IP, that I don't recommend (see below why), at least in its first naive use. In fact, you can use the pubic IP instead of the private IP in your code. Because you use the pubic IP, you no longer need the serverless VPC connector on your Cloud Run service (you don't use the VPC but the internet to reach the internet).
However, because you use the internet and Cloud Run is a multi-customer shared service, you don't know your source IP. On Cloud SQL, you need to allow any IP (0.0.0.0/0) in the authorized network section to access to your database, which is not a very secure configuration.
Alternatively, you can create a more complex configuration on Cloud Run to use securely the Cloud SQL public IP (but it becomes really complex). let me dig into it.
I said previously that Cloud Run is a shared service, and you don't manage the source IP when you initiate outgoing call (like connection to the database). It's true, but you can control that!
Firstly, you need (again) a serverless VPC connector on your Cloud Run. And you need to set your egress to ALL (route public and private traffic to the serverless VPC connector).
Then, create a Cloud NAT in your VPC and select, at least, your serverless VPC connector subnet to be NATed when going to the internet
Reserve a public IP on your Cloud NAT configuration
Now you have a public, static IP defined on your Cloud Run service. You can only grant it on your Cloud SQL authorized Network, to improve the security and don't let anybody access to your Cloud SQL instance.
I have an Azure SQL Managed instance with public endpoint disabled (we store sensitive data and do not want an exposed endpoint on the DB). We have a VNET and when we need to access our SQL managed instance from an administrator's machine, we use a VPN. How do I connect Power BI to my SQL Managed instance for reporting? I've been digging and am surprised that the only way I can see is to either:
Create a virtual machine and host a data gateway
Expose the public endpoint on the SQL Managed instance.
I may accept 2 if I can limit access to Power BI itself but I'm not convinced that's possible.
Any suggestions are welcome!
You can also secure the public endpoint allowing access to powerBI only using Azure Service Tags. Documentation can be found here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/admin/service-premium-service-tags
I'm confused with some of these supposed solutions since I'm looking at PowerBI.com and it only has 4 options and managed instance is not one of them....
See: Create Dataset - Databases & More option and there's only 4 options for connecting to a database... That's it folks.
Sure you can connect from desktop but that won't do you any good once you publish it to powerbi.com unless that site supports connecting to the source.
Yes you can create a gateway which I believe is currently the only solution. Why oh why isn't Managed Instance one of the options for databases when you create a dataset on powerbi.com? That tells me they do not support it, regardless of whether you've enabled public endpoint. As far as I know you still would have to use a gateway to access it if it's not one of these options. Or...something silly like create Azure REST services just to talk to your database.
Configuring a VNet-to-VNet connection is the preferred option to easily connect VNets if you need a secure tunnel using IPsec/IKE. In this case the documentation says that traffic between VNets is routed through the Microsoft backbone infrastructure.
According to the documentation, a Site-to-Site connection is also possible:
If you are working with a complicated network configuration, you may prefer to connect your VNets using the Site-to-Site steps, instead the VNet-to-VNet steps. When you use the Site-to-Site steps, you create and configure the local network gateways manually.
In this case we have control over the configuration of the virtual local network address space, but we need expose public IPs. Documentation don´t says nothing about where the traffic goes (azure internal or public internet)
My question is, in this scenario, S2S between VNets, the traffic is routed through azure infrastructure as in the case of VNet-to-VNet or the comunication is done through public internet?
edit
The traffic in an S2S between VNets is routed through Microsoft backbone network. See this doc.
Microsoft Azure offers the richest portfolio of services and
capabilities, allowing customers to quickly and easily build, expand,
and meet networking requirements anywhere. Our family of connectivity
services span virtual network peering between regions, hybrid, and
in-cloud point-to-site and site-to-site architectures as well as
global IP transit scenarios.
Can anyone suggest some solution for this scenario?:
I have two resources deployed in a VNet: Application Gateway and a VM behind application gateway. (Application gateways in subnet1 and VM in subnet2) There's is no public ip associated with Application Gateway (internal app gateway with only private ip). I have automation scripts in storage account in another tenant and I need to be able to download those inside vm using azure cli. With the given architecture, I want to be able to download the scripts in the vm from storage account. Currently, if I run "az login" from VM, nothing happens. I found some help on Azure documentation :https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configuration-overview#allow-application-gateway-access-to-a-few-source-ips but it's not helpful.
I have also attached network security group with allows VnetInbound for VM. In while architecture, I cannot use any public ip because of customer requirements and they do not want any connectivity to internet.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Since Azure VM does not attach a public IP, the storage account does not directly communicate with your Azure VM over the Internet.
In this scenario, I would like to provide two suggestions:
The one is to use virtual network service endpoints, which allow you to secure Azure Storage accounts to your virtual networks, fully removing public internet access to these resources. You could create service endpoints for Microsoft.Storage in that VM subnet. You VM instance will access the storage account over the Azure backbone network but it has some limitations as below:
The virtual network where the endpoint is configured can be in the
same or different subscription than the Azure service resource. For
more information on permissions required for setting up endpoints and
securing Azure services, see Provisioning.
Virtual networks and Azure service resources can be in the same or
different subscriptions. If the virtual network and Azure service
resources are in different subscriptions, the resources must be under
the same Active Directory (AD) tenant.
Another suggestion is to use private endpoints for Azure Storage. You could create Private endpoint connections for the storage account in a VNet, then peer this VNet with the VNet where your Azure VM create.
For more references, you could get more details and steps on these blogs--https://stefanstranger.github.io/2019/11/03/UsingAzurePrivateLinkForStorageAccounts/
and
https://kvaes.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/hardening-your-azure-storage-account-by-using-service-endpoints/
I have a Web App (Azure App Service) and I have an Azure SQL Database that this Web App talks to. I have two questions regarding communication between the two.
When connecting from the Web App to the Database (using the connection string), does the communication go out to the internet and then back into Azure or does Azure know to keep the traffic locally in Azure?
I have been looking into V-Net Service Endpoints as a possible way to improve speed of communication between the two. It is said that when connecting from a VM on V-Net with Service Endpoints enabled to a SQL Database, that Azure knows to keep the traffic internal to the Azure network and not go out to the internet, is this the same for Azure App Services?
Is it possible to keep traffic between an App Service and SQL Database internal to Azure? If so, how do I go about doing this? Any guidance on this is greatly appreciated.
It knows to keep it local on the "Azure backbone" (as per Azure doco). It doesn't go out to the public internet
Yes
Yes. It is already internal to the "Azure Backbone"
Having said that.... networks are really complicated.
As I understand it the main benefit of V-Net is that you can define your own network and add things to it like firewalls, security groups, subnets, peering between networks. Also it helps when setting up a hybrid network - i.e. connecting Azure resources to an on-premises network. When you can set up the same kind of structures as on premise, it's easier to 'transparently' make it part of the on-premises network. Lastly (rereading the doco), you can remove any incoming public IP firewall rules. These are "Azure backbone" IP addresses but they are also "public internet" addresses
There may be a performance improvement if the App Service and Azure SQL are on the same V-Net.
Azure SQL service endpoints are a bit mysterious. They "connect" to the VNET but you still need to connect to a public address. They don't actually take a up a local IP adress.
Depending on what you are really doing, you might want to look into private endpoint, which actually assigns a private IP to your Azure SQL.
Yes, communication between Azure App Service and Azure SQL Database is "local" within the Azure Virtual Network and does not go out to the public internet.