I am not pretty sure if in web development this kind of thing is called as a 'bookmark' layout. I'll explain on below screen.
I would like to achieve something like this and missing a knowledge of how to do that. Could someone point me where should I anchore ? I could not find anything in web / probably looking with using bad phrases.
This component would be part of the application, after we push to the router path it's going to display this kind of layout. Basically I could achieve this buy keep pushing a different route for each page, but what if those pages belongs to "one model comoponent" I wouldn't like to reload them all of the time while switching them, just once after we entry to each. It would work like a tab bar in mobile apps (iOS).
In many UI contexts (e.g. browsers, macOS applications, etc.) and in Web Development, what you refer to as "bookmark layout" is simply called tabs (like the iOS tab bar that you also mention).
I wouldn't like to reload them all of the time while switching them
Vue offers you the built-in component <keep-alive> for such use case:
When wrapped around a dynamic component, <keep-alive> caches the inactive component instances without destroying them.
See the Vue guide: https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/components-dynamic-async.html#keep-alive-with-Dynamic-Components
When switching between these components though, you’ll sometimes want to maintain their state or avoid re-rendering for performance reasons. […]
To solve this problem, we can wrap our dynamic component with a <keep-alive> element
Related
I'm new to Nuxt and Vue in general, so I'm not sure, what would be the best solution for this use case.
I want to change the text (like "Home", "Settings", "Favourites" etc.) inside my Header.vue (always fixed on top of the page) from another component. like Favourites.vue for example.
Sometimes I want to hide the header completely or hide the title and display buttons instead,
so I need to pass more props than just the title.
I tried using different layouts, but that breaks the animation transitions (I haven't found the solution for this yet), but I think it's still better to have control from the page in what I'm passing into this component.
Should I pass props from Page.vue to parent and read it from there in Header.vue component?
Should I use Vuex to pass this through the store and update it when the route changes? Or is that too complex for this use case?
Maybe there's a simpler solution that I'm not aware of.
Folder structure:
/components
├──Header.vue
└──Nav.vue
/pages
├──Index.vue
├──Profile.vue
├──Settings.vue
└──Favourites.vue
Vuex is the answer here— don’t worry about the 'simple' use case. As soon as you notice you’re creating data that other components may rely on (is the header visible on this page? Is the text different? etc) it’s a good idea to move into Vuex and maintain a single source of truth.
Your app may seem simple to begin with, but it’ll inevitably grow and at that point you’ll appreciate having a single source of truth vs. trying to pass things between components via props.
Nuxt also makes implementing Vuex very straight forward. No doubt you’re capable of pulling up the docs!
The Goal: Have two separate, independently navigateable routes with vue-router.
Details:
How can I have two parts of a page that are independently routed with vue router? Say you have a page split into a main view and a sidebar. The main view is what you would normally expect from a view, you click on links and it changes the path and loads a new component. The sidebar is completely separate, no matter where you are in the main view the sidebar does not change, but the sidebar also has links that let you go to different components within itself.
With vue-router, I can have named views, but these seem to be tied to whatever the current path/route is, and cannot be controlled separately.
Example Annotation:
Question
Can vue-router have two separate, and independent routes/views that are not tied to each other? If so, is there documentation on this, are there router code examples?
Note: There is no code here, it doesn't seem necessary as this isn't a code issue, it's a vue-router use-case issue.
You can achieve separate independent routes if you use 2 Vue apps each with its own router.
A small demo in this fiddle.
I've used 2 routes, one with history mode and one abstract.
The biggest problem I see with this is that, at least out of the box, you cannot have a URL that points the user to the same view(s), as now you are managing 2 different routers.
The other is related to communication, you now have 2 different Vue app instances so you need to do something about communication between them.
But this shouldn't be that hard
if you are using Vuex you can set the same store object on both of them
If you are just using a plain data object you can pass the same object to both instances and that will become reactive or
you can always communicate over the same bus
I have started to build apps with vuejs recently and have one small issue that I can't get around:
I am using vue-router to jump between pages and lets say I have a huge list where additional items may be injected with ajax, user has to scroll, he click on item, see the details (is in new route) and when gets back list is reinitialized and has to scroll again to be at the point he was previously. Do I have some possibility to keep the state of given component (and view like scroll position) while using vue-router or do I have to keep some cache-instance in main app component and then map it on init?
Thank you.
Essentially, the issue is that your component stores state internally. Navigating away clears the state. There are two ways I see this could be handled.
1) (quickfix) instead of redirecting use another way of displaying the item details (modal, or expand come to mind). This way the state of the component is not lost
2) (the "proper way") store the state. Inevitably, you'll come up against this sooner or later and the best way to deal with storing a state is vuex. https://vuex.vuejs.org/en/intro.html Initially, this will require a bit of learning and add some complexity, but it is a worthwhile investment
As the title implies, I need solid SEO and thus I need to have all the HTML loaded on my site on initial load. However, because the backend is written in PHP, and because it would be more work to write my Vue components with the server in mind, I don't want to use server-side rendering (SSR).
That leaves me with the option to send HTML over the wire, the "old school" way. What I am thinking of doing is writing each page's HTML like normal, but make one of the root html elements a Vue element in order to "upgrade" it. So the initial load downloads the finalized HTML, with all the data (tables, lists, etc already populated), but then after all the scripts are loaded, javascript can take over to make things easier and give a better UI experience. This poses a few questions, however:
Am I limited to a single component, the root? It'd be nice to still have many sub-components that would each have their own state. Perhaps inline templates can be used somehow?
Vue templates have their own templating system, like the mustache braces for displaying variables {{ myVar }}. Will I not be able to use them? The one way I can think of is to create a Vue template (that can be loaded from an external script) that is identical to the part of the HTML that it "takes over". The downside is that I'd have to maintain that component both in the original HTML and in the vue template.
Are there any good examples of what I'm trying to accomplish here?
Edit: I want to clarify that I'm aware I can put in various components here and there throughout the page. This still poses the question of how to make those components already start out rendered. Better yet would be to turn the whole page into Vue, much like an SPA.
I need solid SEO and thus I need to have all the HTML loaded on my site on initial load.
This is not entirely true. Google (80% of search traffic) easily parses SPAs now, so SSR purely for SEO isn't required anymore.
But to answer your question in general, you should check out Laracast's Vue.js series. They go in-depth on how to use PHP with Vue.js (including templating and variables).
I'd ask what it is you want to achieve with Javascript/Vue.js in your page. If everything is already rendered in PHP, does Vue provide a simple UX enhancement or takes over most of the page's heavy lifting (navigation, etc.)? If you have no reactive data and want Vue to simply be a controller for rendered components, then knock yourself out, although it might be approaching an 'overkill' scenario.
Have you looked into Prerender SPA Plugin ( https://github.com/chrisvfritz/prerender-spa-plugin )?
It is offered in the Vue documentation as a viable alternative to server side rendering ( https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/ssr.html#SSR-vs-Prerendering )
Recently I've developed a multi-page application using Vue, here is how i tried to solve the SEO (Maybe this can help you ):
Htmls of header and footer (and other main common components) are packed to the page.html(eg: home.html, search.html).
Script and style are of header and footer imported in page.js(eg: home.js, search.js).
Add div.seo-zone to page.html's div#app, which includes the main SEO data(using some h1,h2,p,div and so on), and add
.seo-zone {
display: none;
}
in your css.
4. Make sure your app's root component's el is '#app'(each page's main content can be a Vue app).
Develop your app as usual.
After Vue rendered, the div.seo-zone will be replaced with your Vue components (although it can not be seen)
It's easy to get a reference to navigator in the renderScene function, so calling navigator.push(newRoute) is simple when responding to an event that happens from within the JSX tree.
In my case, though, I want to call navigator.push(newRoute) from an external event. My app signs the user in with Google and fires an event when the sign-in is complete, and I want to navigate to a new route in that case.
How can I get a reference to the navigator? Is there any way to get it besides as a parameter to renderScene?
You can get the navigator through refs property: https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/more-about-refs.html. It's part of react (not specific to react native). It's not obvious from the react-native docs that there is a number of 'react' features that can be used in react-native, so i'd really advise to take a close look at react in general.
Note however, there is a good reason Facebook does not mention refs explicitly and loudly. Refs is really not a "go-to" way of accessing component. Your case might be of course different, but it's likely that the Google sign-up is not in-fact "external". It might actually be part of one of the components in the hierarchy tree above the navigator (in which case you can pass the state change down the tree).
Quoting from the summary of the "More about refs" document above:
If you have not programmed several apps with React, your first
inclination is usually going to be to try to use refs to "make things
happen" in your app. If this is the case, take a moment and think more
critically about where state should be owned in the component
hierarchy. Often, it becomes clear that the proper place to "own" that
state is at a higher level in the hierarchy. Placing the state there
often eliminates any desire to use refs to "make things happen" –
instead, the data flow will usually accomplish your goal.
Again - your case might be different and using refs might be perfectly justified, but if you are tempted (for example) to separate out all the Google-related stuff to separate object and if that makes the sign-up "external" - think twice. React really encourages putting all things related to a "component" logic in one place (the component) - even if that includes various technologies and external APIs.