I have create a simple user login WCF Services.I have using large number of datamember properties in one datacontract class.so i have split the datamember properties in different class. for example (Userdetails class with using userid,usertype,username,password,address,city,state,phoneno,mobileno,country,pincode,etc...)so i have split on the two Datacontract classes into userdetails as Userinfo and contactdetails class.The userinfo class only define the userdetails only and contactdetails class defined contact details as. how to use on the multiple datacontact class in WCF services can you please explain them.
I'm not sure what exactly you want. but i hope you could use something like this:
[DataContract]
public class User
{
[DataMember]
public userdetails Userinfo { set; get; }
[DataMember]
public contactdetails contactdetails { set; get; }
}
[DataContract]
public class userdetails
{
[DataMember]
public long userid { set; get; }
[DataMember]
public string usertype { set; get; }
}
[DataContract]
public class contactdetails
{
[DataMember]
public long mobileNumber { set; get; }
[DataMember]
public string phoneNumber { set; get; }
}
Related
I am working on a wcf webservice. This service uses a third party webservice which I have added as a service reference.
Now I want to publish some properties of this proxyclient to clients who uses my wcfservice, without defining an own class and doing the mapping.
The auto generated code is done as partial class.
public partial class Person : object,
System.ComponentModel.INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public string FirstName;
public string LastName;
...
}
I tried to override these properties by using the MetadataType-Attribute and adding the [DataMember]-Attribute to properties. But this seams to work only for EF.
[DataContract]
[MetadataType(typeof(PersonMetaData))]
public partial class Person
{
[DataMember]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
public class PersonMetaData
{
[DataMember]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
Trying to implement an interface didn't help, the properties are invisible on client.
[DataContract]
public partial class Person : IPerson
{}
public interface IPerson
{
[DataMember]
string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
string LastName { get; set; }
}
Any idea?
Guido
On my service XmlSerializer failed to serialize the auto-generated class cause of PropertyChanged-event.
If I work with DataContractSerializer and decorate my auto-generated class with [DataContract], I'm not able to decorate the properties by inheritance with [DataMember] because the attibute is not inheritable.
So I extended this partial class by wrapper properties.
[DataContract]
public partial class Person
{
[DataMember]
public string FirstNameWrapper
{
get
{
return this.FirstName;
}
set
{
this.FirstName = value;
}
}
}
The title is pretty self-explanatory.
I have a base WCF DataContract, let's call it the PersonContract, which covers all fields of the Person entity in my database.
I have a number of client applications that call the same service through endpoints of different interfaces implemented by that service. This is because (amongst other differences) I want every of those applications to be able to access and edit only a specific subset of the Person entity.
Now if I want to define a contract with all the properties of PersonContract except one, can I subclass PersonContract and ignore a single property in the subclass?
Or is my only option building contracts from the smallest subset (but I doubt I can fully avoid repeating code then)?
Out of curiosity I did a couple tests and it doesn't look like it'll work.
Here are the data contracts I used:
[DataContract]
public class Person
{
[DataMember]
public virtual string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual string MidName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual string LastName { get; set; }
}
[DataContract]
public class Person2 : Person
{
[IgnoreDataMember]
public override string MidName { get; set; }
}
And my service contract:
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract]
Person GetPerson();
[OperationContract]
Person2 GetPerson2();
}
Both operations return the same result.
Another way that you might be able to produce the results you're looking for could be to define your minimal contract (the one with missing the excluded properties) and inherit from it adding the field needed by the other operation.
The equivalent data contracts would look something like:
[DataContract]
public class Person2 : Person
{
[DataMember]
public virtual string MidName { get; set; }
}
[DataContract]
public class Person
{
[DataMember]
public virtual string FirstName { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual string LastName { get; set; }
}
And I've verified that the results are as I would expect.
I do have a simple WCF service in which If I put the method with simple Data Type then I can access that service in the MVC project which is in same Solution. But if I change the Data Type of the Service method even to array or list of string or any other simple Data Type, I cannot access the service. Do I need to make any config changes.
[DataContract]
public class Property
{
[DataMember]
public int Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string PropertyPost { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string PropertyType { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string DealType { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Department { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string ProjectName { get; set; }
}
I actually want to return the List from the WCF service for which I have created the Datacontract, but it is not working even with simple List Type.
Do we need to specify anything in Service like WebInvoke?
Can any one help?
I am a newbie in WCF. I was wondering if we can retrive properties from base interface in the REST output.
Please consider following structure. Product includes IVenueView not Venue. Is it possible to only have Venue.Id in Product JSON response?
[DataContract]
public class Product {
[DataMember]
public Guid? Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public IVenueView Venue { get; set; }
}
public interface IVenueView {
[DataMember]
Guid? Id { get; set; }
}
[DataContract]
public class Venue : IVenueView
{
[DataMember]
public Guid? Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Data contracts are all about data - interfaces define behaviors, so they don't really mix up well. The data contract that you have likely will not work (because the serializer doesn't "know" about the Venue type (it only knows about IVenueView), it won't be able to serialize / deserialize instances of Product.
No it is not possible because serialization and deserialization works with the implementation (actual data) not with interfaces. Moreover for pure serialization you will have to use something like:
[DataContract]
[KnownType(typeof(Venue))]
public class Product
{
[DataMember]
public Guid? Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public IVenueView Venue { get; set; }
}
I'm working on a Silverlight 4.0 application and am using RIA services. I have created a class on the server-side which has DataContract and DataMember attributes applied to it.
A DomainService exposes this class as a query result and as such, generates code for it on the client. But somehow it doesn't generate code for all properties of the class. Primitive properties of type guid, string, int, bool etc are generated just fine, but if I have a property of my own complex type, that property isn't created on the client.
Here's the class in question:
[DataContract]
[KnownType(typeof(SummaryGroup))]
public class SummaryDataSet
{
public SummaryDataSet()
{
}
[KeyAttribute]
[DataMember]
public Guid Guid { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public SummaryGroup SummaryGroup { get; set; }
}
The Guid property is created on the client just fine. The SummaryGroup property isn't created on the client. Here's the code for the SummaryGroup:
[DataContract]
public class SummaryGroup
{
public SummaryGroup()
{
}
[KeyAttribute]
[DataMember]
public Guid Guid { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public int Sequence { get; set; }
}
Both classes are in the same namespace.
Question: why isn't the SummaryGroup property of SummaryDataSet created on the client and what should I do to fix this?
WCF RIA cannot handle complex types, but you could try this:
[DataContract]
[KnownType(typeof(SummaryDataSet))]
public class SummaryDataSet
{
public SummaryDataSet()
{ }
[KeyAttribute]
[DataMember]
public Guid Guid { get; set; }
[DataMember]
[Association("SummarySet_SummaryGrp_FK", "Guid", "Guid")]
public SummaryGroup SummaryGroup { get; set; }
}
This gives RIA the information to connect from the SummaryDataSet to the SummaryGroup.
This assumes that you can request both the SummaryDataSet and SummaryGroup from the serverside service.