I have seen and used applications that are "all in one". where just launching the application would be running application.exe, but when you launch the same application with a switch for example: application.exe /settings the settings page would be launched.
I do not have any code as I don't even know where to begin researching the hurdle.
I would like my program to launch a specific form (and maybe limit the user to THAT form) depending on the switch used.
FYI I was testing the new “Ask a Question Wizard” prototype, I didn't realise it was going to post an actual question.
Ah well I figured I'll leave it up, hopefully myself & others too, might learn something.
if you can make change in this using the switch then your requirement can be fulfilled easily...
static void Main()
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new YourStartupfFormHere());
}
Related
I was wondering how one would create proper test evidence of Selenium UI tests.
I was thinking about screenshots but they do not actually cover everything you have done as it is difficult to determine when to screenshot. (Every click or every wait or every pageload).
Another option I thought about was screen recording, but this makes it rather difficult to work with parallelism as you record the whole screen and not a specific chrome window.
However, you could possibly also take a screenshot every second via the webdriver and turn this into a video. Then one would have to work with a separate thread which can be quite challenging considering the condition you have to provide to stop the thread from taking screenshots. Else the test will run forever.
As I was not able to draw a convincing conclusion based on my own thoughts about creating a test evidence report for UI tests I was hoping someone could explain to me how to properly do this.
I had similar issue and I've introduced in my automation framework ExtentReports + klov server with Testrail as tool for test-management.
I think that nobody would ask of You to show testcases via video or screenshot, but if that is necessary, You can check out several libraries for taking 'video', because this is not actual video, than rather bunch of screenshots that are mashed into one video.
What has actually proven really good investment of time is to take fallen tests cases screenshot and attach it in testcase result (Testrail, Bugzila, Extentreports whatever).
Actualy if using selenium/appium You can check this repo
[https://github.com/groupon/Selenium-Grid-Extras] they make 'video' like mentioned and stored on local hub/node.
But best menthod that has been real good method was report with detail steps of each testcase:
Screenshot testcase with detailed steps and action:
The way I handled the reporting in my application goes in the line of what Kovacic said.
I also used ExtentReports as a way to generate metrics and having a step by step record of what happened.
I created a method reponsible for recording a step ( clicked that, navigated there, asserting that... ) with the option of taking a screenshot if needed, and another one for starting a new test.
Then , it's a matter of calling those methods in the PageObject style testing framework and pretty much having those method called in every action made by your framework.
To better illustrate here are some implementation examples (c#) :
Log a step method
public void LogStep(Status status,string MessageToLog, bool hasScreenshot)
{
//we leave the possibility of taking the screenshot with the step or not
if (hasScreenshot)
{
Test.Log(logstatus, messageToLog)
.AddScreenCaptureFromPath(GetScreenshot());
}
else
Test.Log(logstatus, messageToLog);
}
Screenshot capture method
public static string GetScreenshot()
{
ITakesScreenshot ts;
//Browser.Driver here is the instance of the Driver you want to take screenshots with
ts = (ITakesScreenshot)Browser.Driver;
var screenshot = ts.GetScreenshot();
// Here just input the name you want your screenshot to have, with path
var screenshotPath = ScreenShotFolder + #"\" + _screenshotcount + ".bmp";
screenshot.SaveAsFile(screenshotPath);
// I've introduced a variable to keep track of the screenshot count (optional)
return (ScreenShotFolder.Substring(_reportRoot.Length) +"/"+ _screenshotcount + ".bmp");
}
Example of call in the framework
public void BlockAccount()
{
try
{
_blockAccBtn.Click();
_confirmBtn.Click();
ExtentReportGenerator.LogStep(Status.Info, "Blocking Account");
}
catch (NoSuchElementException)
{
ExtentReportGenerator.LogStep(Status.Fail, "Could not find block button", true);
}
}
A NunitTest using the whole system
[TestCase, Order(1)]
public void CanBlockCard()
{
//Creates a new test in the report
ExtentReportGenerator.Test = ExtentReportGenerator.Extent.CreateTest(GetCurrentMethod());
//Each one of these calls to the framework has logged steps
CashlessPages.CashlessAffiliationsPage.AccessAccount(1, 1);
CashlessPages.CashlessAccountsPage.BlockAccount();
Assert.IsTrue(CashlessPages.CashlessAccountsPage.IsAccBlocked());
}
Example of generated Report
Hope this helps
Question
How to use these private functions on other windows? It would be nice to have this knowledge back in the wild. I am specifically trying to get CGSOrderWindow and CGSSetWindowLevel to work.
I was trying in the direction of:
temporarily register as the dock and then register the dock as the dock again immediately afterwards
or
code injection into the Dock process per this comment:
Also, the author of the above project seems determined to make all core functionality available as a framework. It seems to be implemented as code injection into the Dock process.
Reason I know this is possible
I have been doing work on trying to setLevel on window of another app, and focus window of another app if focused. I am posting this again with the info I learned because from my searching online, I know this was done in the past, its just the knowledge is not publicly out there anymore. The sourceforge pages are no longer there. So I was wondering if you could help me make this information public again.
This is the topic I read that gave me this information - http://cocoadev.com/HowtoControlOtherAppsWindows
Here you see comments like:
You cannot control an another app's windows from a user-level process, unfortunately.
SlavaKarpenko
You can, Slava, you just need to register as the Dock. It might be possible to temporarily register as the dock and then register the dock as the dock again immediately afterwards, not sure. I think the call you'd be wanting to investigate as CoreDockRegisterDockOwner in HIServices.framework.
FinlayDobbie
You could also use APE or similar to do control the windows, or (as mentioned above) register as the Dock (look for the private APIs with Universal Connection in their name). Has anyone found a polite way of getting the Dock to give up its universal connection? The only way I can find is to force quit the Dock and grab the universal connection when it's not looking (which prevents the dock reloading).
SamTaylor
There's an open source project up on sourceforge.net that looks much more like the window managers I've used on Unix boxes than Space.app (or Space.dock): http://wsmanager.sourceforge.net/
SteveCook
Verifying things work
This is what I learned, from the sources at bottom of this post, we see all these functions work with CGWindowIds, so how do I get that, this is how:
Get all windows with CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo. Then access each element from that array with CFArrayGetValueAtIndex and then get the CGWindowId with objectForKey:, kCGWindowNumber, and then integerValue.
Now if I try to focus or set level of a window that is OWNED by the app running the code, it works fantastic. For instance:
MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID = 179;
rez_CGError = CGSOrderWindow(_CGSDefaultConnection, MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID, kCGSOrderAbove, 0);
Will focus it, rez_CGError is 0. Even if the window is minimized, it is unminimized, without animation, and shown.
Now however, if I try this on a window of a different app we get some errors:
MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID_of_other_app = 40;
rez_CGError = CGSOrderWindow(_CGSDefaultConnection, MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID_of_other_app, kCGSOrderAbove, 0);
This fails and rez_CGError is 1000, which I suspect means "cid (CGSConnection) used does not have permission to modify target window". The same happens if I first do [app activateWithOptions: (NSApplicationActivateIgnoringOtherApps | NSApplicationActivateAllWindows)] before making the call above.
So I first get the cid of that owning window like this:
var rez_CGError = CGSGetWindowOwner(_CGSDefaultConnection, MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID_of_other_app, &ownerCid);
This works good and I get ownerCid is set to a value. Then I do the focus command with this new connection:
rez_CGError = CGSOrderWindow(ownerCid, MY_TARGET_CGWINDOW_ID_of_other_app, kCGSOrderAbove, 0);
However this gives rez_CGError of 268435459, which I suspect means "current app does not have permission to use this ConnectionId (cid)". (Same happens if I call activateWithOptions first.
My Sources for the Private Functions
Here is the sources for some private functions I found - https://code.google.com/p/undocumented-goodness/source/browse/trunk/CoreGraphics/CGSPrivate.h
This one source here contains a function that is not in the above link - CGSGetConnectionIDForPSN - i test it and it exists - from - https://github.com/mnutt/libqxt/blob/767498816dfa1742a6f3aee787281745afec11b8/src/gui/qxtwindowsystem_mac.h#L80
My company wants me to develop a "Visual" GUI style BDD function using JBehave and Selenium, which uses javascript alert/confirm popup window to prompt user what is the exact step the running test reaches, eg:
Given I goto "www.google.com"
When I login
So we want to add Javascript alert window to popup during the automation test, the popped up window has the "OK" button, so when user click the OK button, the test will continue to the next step, and so on...
My issue is: I wrote a javascript func using Selenium's executeScript API which invoke the pop up alert window:
public void stepText(String step) {
executeScript("alert('"+step+"');");
}
So I expect when I click the OK button, the popped up window will disappear and test will continue to next step... But what shocked me is that when I click it, the test throw exception and crashed...
The exception is: selenium.WebDriverException
But I found if I add the following code to make the test automatically detect the alert window and accept it by using the following usual selenium alert handle function:
Alert alert=switchTo().alert();
alert.accept();
This can make the test runs well, so it looks I can NOT manually click the alert (after I manually click, the selenium still can NOT go back to the browser...lost connection to browser?), but the automation alert handle code works...
Of course, we want to let user to manually to click alert window to control the test execution, not the automation handle alert.
I really got stuck here for a while, and did a lot googling to search, but can not find similar example online, I hope you can shed me light on it, since you are much more guru than me on JBehave and Selenium.
I will be much grateful if you can help me out.
Selenium is a browser automation tool, it does not anticipate user's interactions.
Therefore, I'd use a simple Java GUI window to present the user with messages/options. Afterall, you are testing a web application in a browser, but the program itself is Java and has nothing to do with the browser. A usual Swing option dialog should be enough.
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Login successful.");
String loginAs = JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Login as:", "admin");
int choice = JOptionPane.showConfirmDialog(null, "Use production data?");
(note that you don't want to invoke this in the EventQueue.invokeLater() block, because you want the dialogs to be blocking)
This way, you won't interact with Selenium or the browser in any way, you won't confuse it and you'll get the user input cleanly.
That said, if you insist on using alerts, I think it's definitely doable, but as of now (June 2013, Selenium 2.33.0), I don't know how:
The issue is not reproducible on IE8. After the executeScript("alert('Something.')"); call, Selenium waits for the call to return something and then proceeds normally. So you're good on IE.
However, with FF21, Selenium fails immediatelly with UnhandledAlertException just as you said.
I tried two obvious solutions:
js.executeScript("alert('something')");
new WebDriverWait(driver, 10)
.pollingEvery(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
.ignoring(UnhandledAlertException.class)
.until(ExpectedConditions.not(ExpectedConditions.alertIsPresent()))
.wait();
and
js.executeScript("alert('something')");
boolean alertVisible = true;
while (alertVisible) {
try {
driver.switchTo().alert();
} catch (NoAlertPresentException ignored) {
alertVisible = false;
}
}
Both make FF fail horribly with an internal JavaScript exception. Possibly a bug that might get fixed (please test it, check whether it had been reported and report it if you're interested in it), so I'll leave the solutions here for future generations.
But as I said before, it's possible that it won't get fixed, since Selenium doesn't count on manual user interactions.
Not sure how this behaves in other browsers.
I am running through an internal site with Behat and for the most part it is going really well. But the problem is that on certain parts of the site we have popup windows that come up to complete an action. In this case we hit a "Withdraw" button and a popup comes up to have you select a reason and save it.
In an ideal world, and if I had actually designed this app, the site wouldn't be using any popup windows. But I am the new guy who is supposed to implement automated functional tests (and I am learning how to do that from the ground up). So I don't really have any say over the site design at this point (though I will push for a lot of changes as time goes by).
I am running Behat with Mink and the Selenium 2 driver on an Ubuntu 12.10 system (will eventually have to run some tests on a Windows environment for testing in IE). I am also using PhantomJS for some of the tests I have setup.
Anyway, does Behat/Mink support working with popup windows somehow through the Selenium 2 driver (or through PhantomJS)? I am early in all of this automation setup and really I am just experimenting with tools. If there is a better tool that can handle this then please let me know.
My primary question is how do I get Behat/Mink to work with the popup window, check a box, fill in a field, and click the save button? I know how to do everything except get it to interact directly with the newly popped up window. Any ideas/suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks!
So it turns out that Mink includes some window switching features, but no way to identify said windows. So I wrote two functions getWindowName() and getWindowNames() that identify the current window and all open windows respectively. I committed these changes to the project in GitHub it seems that my fixes will get implemented soon into the code base.
But with these changes I am able to switch windows no problem.
Link: https://github.com/Behat/Mink/pull/341
By setting the focus of the window we can also name these windows so we can access them again in the future.
Using this method we can easily switch between popup windows and continue testing...
/**
* #Then I switch to popup :name
*
* #param $name
*/
public function iSwitchToPopup($name)
{
$this->iSetMainWindowName();
$this->getSession()->switchToWindow($name);
}
/**
* #Then I set main window name
*/
public function iSetMainWindowName()
{
$window_name = 'main_window';
$script = 'window.name = "' . $window_name . '"';
$this->getSession()->executeScript($script);
}
/**
* #Then I switch back to main window
*/
public function iSwitchBackToMainWindow()
{
$this->getSession()->switchToWindow('main_window');
}
I always wondered what's the best way of handling a cancel button in a more OO way. In the hurry I always end up putting the ugly checking of a boolean form property if the button was canceled of not.
The thing is that way makes the code dirty, having a lot of "cancel checks" between logic that matters.
I always get to something like this:
void doLogic()
{
checkIfIsCancelled();
callOtherFunction();
checkIfIsCancelled();
callAnotherFunction();
checkIfIsCancelled();
callAnotherFunction();
checkIfIsCancelled();
callAnotherFunction();
}
I hope I was clear enough. I just want a neater way to do this :)
A proper way to handle this is the strategy pattern, where you have a default strategy where you do the normal processing and you have a Cancelled strategy.
Canceling changes the strategy to the cancelledStrategy that does nothing but some cleanup. The next call will go to the cancelledStrategy.
In this way even the cleanup is pretty straight forward because you know exactly where in the flow it was cancelled.
Another possible solution (but very dependent on your situation) would be the state pattern, but if you only need it for canceling it creates a lot of overhead.
it would REALLY help to know what GUI kit you're using here. Just from this it's impossible to know if you're taking about a windows, linux or mac machine. Add to that I can't think of a single GUI that that would function in this manner.
Most GUI's operate with a 'callback' pattern Widgets(buttons, menus, listboxes etc) are created and your code attaches a 'callback', a piece code or object&method that is executed when an action is performed on a widget.
In java for example:
Button b = JButton("Push") ;
listener = new ActionListener()_ {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
System.out.println("I was pushed!") ;
}
} ;
b.addActionListener(listener)
Arranges for the message "I was pushed!" to be printed when the button is pressed. Of course this thin examples omits all of the work you need to do to setup your window, populate this widget etc.
1st what comes to mind is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain-of-responsibility_pattern but I'm not sure, it's good here.
You can use the command pattern alongwith a stack to implement multi level undo support.