When I go to https://dojotoolkit.org/, I get, "Unable to connect". In some browsers I get "You have reached a domain that is pending ICANN verification".
I've used a number of dojo libraries in my code. Does anyone know what happened to the owner and whether this is likely to be fixed in the near future?
If it isn't fixed, what is my best option for replacing it?
This seems to be a temporary administrative DNS issue, based on their Twitter response:
We apologize for the issues accessing the Dojo 1 web site. We’re
working on it as fast as possible. In the mean time, you can add the
IP address directly to /etc/hosts. 104.16.205.241
There are also some workarounds on the dojo gitter.im channel:
Reference guide content is also at https://github.com/dojo/docs/ And
tutorials are at
https://github.com/dojo/dojo-website/tree/master/src/documentation/tutorials
Also, as mentioned in this related question, you can use the Archive.org Wayback Machine.
The site now appears to be back up. I was able to access it and get information on features I'm using.
Related
What is the issue with Cloudflare custom URL purge caching not working on different accounts? Bascially I have the account, and this functionality does work, but my colleague who lives in USA, I live in Europe, for her this does not work.
Can the issues be with account settings? Basically she gets the error or sometimes the cache does not want to work
I've faced issues in the past where features in Cloudflare was not working due to plugins or browser configuration. First you should confirm if the error is indeed coming from Cloudflare or from the browser.
Ask her to try to use a different browser and also a different device to confirm the issue is either tied to the account or to her location.
Try to inspect the page when performing the action to try and find out what's happening behind the scenes.
Recently our website went from http to https. I, and others, are randomly getting "The Site Can't Provide a Secure Connection" page. Upon refresh, the page loads just fine. Why are we getting this initial page randomly?
FYI... We have http to https redirects in place.
Impossible to say without more details, but some things I can suggest are:
You have multiple servers and some are configured correctly and some incorrectly.
You are not including the full certificate chain. Sometimes your browser has the missing intermediary cached and sometimes not (see this answer for more info here: https://serverfault.com/questions/826100/ca-certificate-trouble-with-squid-on-centos7/826321#826321)
A bug in browser/software. I had this issue on Chrome when using Apache HTTP/2. Never did figure it out but a Chrome update fixed it.
Run https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ on your site to confirm not a problem with your https set up and, if that doesn't work, or you don't understand the results it gives, then update your question with more details (what Server and Browser you are using and what version, if you have any proxy in place between your Browser and the site and, ideally the website name) if you want people to help you.
Also be aware this is a programming site and some people don't like these questions here and will suggest other Stack Exchange sites but honestly don't know where this question is best placed: serverfault.com maybe, but is for professional SysAdmins only, Unix and Linux seems a little generic (not even sure if you are using a Linux webserver!), Webmasters is more for content and SEO questions, Information and Security is more for theoretical SSL/TLS questions...
I have a Domino site that is getting highs for cross site scripting on app scan.
We don't have a license to run appscan. Another group needs to do that (yeah big corporations :) ). But I have noticed that the IE browser will complain too with a url as such:
http://myserver.com/cld/cldg.nsf/vwTOC?OpenView&Start=28
(ie will warn you on crosssite scripting with such a url).
I noticed the notes.net forum site does not come up with such an error in IE, when I try to inject script tags. I guess it must scrub the url before the page is rendered? How is this being done in the notes.net forum? Is it done at server level or a database level?
I did found this thread
How to avoid a XSP/Domino Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability?
where Steve mentions his blog and web rules but the blog mentions that they are not needed in 8.5.4. and above. Am I understanding that right? If so we are at 8.5.4. Is there something I still need to do to scrub my url?
Edit: We are at 8.5.3. Not 8.5.4. I was mistaken. Our admin is going to try Steves's suggestions
Background:
One of my clients' websites has become a malware infested hotbed.
Disposing of the malware has proven difficult and time consuming, and, in the meantime, we still have had to do work on the site.
For now, we went to some trouble to do our work - creating a disposable VM to just run a web browser, so we can see what the site looks like for the designers' work, for example.
I'm wondering if there's an easier (and faster) way to get an idea what the design of the site looks like. Not everyone on the project is tech savvy enough to be trusted with, for example, properly handling switching VMs.
Question:
Is there a method for safely seeing what a malware infested website looks like (for example, a service which will browse the site for me and send a screenshot), one which ideally is easy and simple enough to use that I can trust our non-tech-savvy designers to user?
You might take at look at Internet Archive: Wayback Machine to see if the site has been archived.
If a screenshot is all you need, there are several online browser simulators, such as Net Renderer (which will run any inputted web URL in a given version of Internet Explorer and then supply a screenshot). You might also try BrowserStack, which requires an account, and is not free, but does have a free trial period, and offers more than Internet Exploder.
You could also try running a browser in Sandboxie, which is simpler to set up and use than a VM (you just install it, and then use the windows right-click menu to launch any program in a sandbox of your choosing). However, it isn't free for commercial use.
I don't know if exist a standalone tool to parse a website for malwares, but I think this can help you, it's a google tool that you can you with a request and they will send you a response.
Follow the link:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=168328
Hope it helped.
I have bought a ipad website and it's moved to my server.
Now i have tried to make an addon domain, but it does not work on my first hosting account.
On my second hosting account it works, but on that server there is another ipad website so i don't think this is smart to do because of the same ip adresses.
So adding an addon domain does not work and the site is down now!
I have added a service ticket, but i think this will cost at least 8 hours before i get an answer.
Can anyone tell me how bad this is for my serp position in google.
The website has always been on the first page.
Will this 404 error do bad to my site?cOr is it better to place the site on the same server as the other ipad website?
EDIT:
It is not ideal to serve a 404/timeouts, however your rankings should recover. You mentioned that the sites are different. Moving the site to a different server/IP shouldn't matter too much as long as you can minimize the down time of the said process performed (and should probably be preferred over downtime, if possible). I want to ensure this is communicated, but do NOT show site #2 as site #1 in the short term as you will experience duplicate content issues.
If you don't already have it, you might open up a Google Webmaster Tools account. It will provide you with some diagnostics about your outage (e.g. how many attempts Google tried, the returned response codes, etc..) and if something major happens, which is unlikely, you can request re-inclusion.
I believe it is very bad if the 404 is a result of an internal link.
I cannot tell you anything about which server you should host it on though, as i have no idea if that scenario is bad. Could you possibly host it on the one server, then when the next is up, host it from there?