The TensorFlow documentation for MNIST recommends multiple different ways to load the MNIST dataset:
https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/layers
https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r1.2/get_started/mnist/beginners
https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r1.2/get_started/mnist/pros
All ways described in the documentation throw many deprecated warnings with TensorFlow 1.8.
The way I'm currently loading MNIST and creating batches for training:
class MNIST:
def __init__(self, optimizer):
...
self.mnist_dataset = input_data.read_data_sets("/tmp/data/", one_hot=True)
self.test_data = self.mnist_dataset.test.images.reshape((-1, self.timesteps, self.num_input))
self.test_label = self.mnist_dataset.test.labels
...
def train_run(self, sess):
batch_input, batch_output = self.mnist_dataset.train.next_batch(self.batch_size, shuffle=True)
batch_input = batch_input.reshape((self.batch_size, self.timesteps, self.num_input))
_, loss = sess.run(fetches=[self.train_step, self.loss], feed_dict={self.input_placeholder: batch_input, self.output_placeholder: batch_output})
...
def test_run(self, sess):
loss = sess.run(fetches=[self.loss], feed_dict={self.input_placeholder: self.test_data, self.output_placeholder: self.test_label})
...
How could I do exactly the same thing, just with the current method of doing this?
I couldn't find any documentation on this.
It seems to me that the new way is something in the lines of:
train, test = tf.keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
self.mnist_train_ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(train)
self.mnist_test_ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(test)
But how can I use these datasets in my train_run and test_run method?
An example of loading the MNIST dataset using TF dataset API:
Create a mnist dataset to load train, valid and test images:
You can create a dataset for numpy inputs, either using Dataset.from_tensor_slices or Dataset.from_generator. Dataset.from_tensor_slices adds the whole dataset to the computational graph, so we will use Dataset.from_generator instead.
#load mnist data
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = tf.keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
def create_mnist_dataset(data, labels, batch_size):
def gen():
for image, label in zip(data, labels):
yield image, label
ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_generator(gen, (tf.float32, tf.int32), ((28,28 ), ()))
return ds.repeat().batch(batch_size)
#train and validation dataset with different batch size
train_dataset = create_mnist_dataset(x_train, y_train, 10)
valid_dataset = create_mnist_dataset(x_test, y_test, 20)
A feedable iterator that can toggle between training and validation
handle = tf.placeholder(tf.string, shape=[])
iterator = tf.data.Iterator.from_string_handle(
handle, train_dataset.output_types, train_dataset.output_shapes)
image, label = iterator.get_next()
train_iterator = train_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
valid_iterator = valid_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
A sample run:
#A toy network
y = tf.layers.dense(tf.layers.flatten(image),1,activation=tf.nn.relu)
loss = tf.losses.mean_squared_error(tf.squeeze(y), label)
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
# The `Iterator.string_handle()` method returns a tensor that can be evaluated
# and used to feed the `handle` placeholder.
train_handle = sess.run(train_iterator.string_handle())
valid_handle = sess.run(valid_iterator.string_handle())
# Run training
train_loss, train_img, train_label = sess.run([loss, image, label],
feed_dict={handle: train_handle})
# train_image.shape = (10, 784)
# Run validation
valid_pred, valid_img = sess.run([y, image],
feed_dict={handle: valid_handle})
#test_image.shape = (20, 784)
Related
I used this code from the tutorial:
def get_train_dataset(file_path, **kwargs):
dataset = tf.data.experimental.make_csv_dataset(
file_path,
batch_size=10, # Artificially small to make examples easier to show.
label_name=LABEL_COLUMN,
na_value="?",
num_epochs=1,
ignore_errors=True,
select_columns= CSV_COLUMNS,
**kwargs)
return dataset
Then I created the train set:
raw_train_data = get_train_dataset(train_file_path)
to train the model.
The question is how to get the encoder used for the training data for encoding new text?
I loaded the new data, but this doesn't use the same encoder as the training data:
raw_test_data = get_test_dataset(new_data_file_path)
How to obtain the original encoder when using tf.data.experimental.make_csv_dataset?
EDIT:
train_file_path = "./train.csv"
test_file_path = "./test.csv"
LABEL_COLUMN = 'target'
CSV_COLUMNS = ['text', 'target']
def get_train_dataset(file_path, **kwargs):
dataset = tf.data.experimental.make_csv_dataset(
file_path,
batch_size=10, # Artificially small to make examples easier to show.
label_name=LABEL_COLUMN,
na_value="?",
num_epochs=1,
ignore_errors=True,
select_columns= CSV_COLUMNS,
**kwargs)
return dataset
def get_test_dataset(file_path, **kwargs):
dataset = tf.data.experimental.make_csv_dataset(
file_path,
batch_size=10, # Artificially small to make examples easier to show.
na_value="?",
num_epochs=1,
ignore_errors=True,
**kwargs)
return dataset
sample_submission = pd.read_csv("./sample_submission.csv")
raw_train_data = get_train_dataset(train_file_path)
raw_test_data = get_test_dataset(test_file_path)
def extract_train_tensor(example, label):
print(example)
return example['text'], label
def extract_test_tensor(example):
print(example)
return example['text']
test_data = raw_test_data.map(lambda ex: extract_test_tensor(ex))
test_data_size = len(list(test_data))
print("test size: ", test_data_size)
train_data_all = raw_train_data.map(lambda ex, label: extract_train_tensor(ex, label))
train_data_all = train_data_all.shuffle(10000)
print(train_data_all)
train_data_size = len(list(train_data_all))
print("train size: ", train_data_size)
train_size = int(0.7 * train_data_size)
val_size = int(0.3 * train_data_size)
train_data = train_data_all.take(train_size)
val_data = train_data_all.skip(train_size)
embedding = "https://tfhub.dev/google/tf2-preview/gnews-swivel-20dim/1"
hub_layer = hub.KerasLayer(embedding, input_shape=[],
dtype=tf.string, trainable=True)
model = tf.keras.Sequential()
model.add(hub_layer)
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Dense(16, activation='relu'))
model.add(tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.summary()
model.compile(optimizer='adam',
loss='binary_crossentropy',
metrics=['accuracy'])
history = model.fit(train_data,
epochs=20,
validation_data=val_data,
verbose=1)
import numpy as np
predictions = model.predict(test_data)
predictions = np.where(predictions > 0.5, 1, 0)
sample_submission['target'] = predictions
print(predictions)
The two calls to get_train_dataset() and get_test_dataset() to generate train and test data. The train data is split into train and validation sets and the accuracy is great. However, the test data accuracy is very low. Both data sets are strings of text and I didn't do any encoding.
tf.data.experimental.make_csv_dataset does not make any encoding.
It is about:
Reads CSV files into a dataset, where each element is a (features,
labels) tuple that corresponds to a batch of CSV rows. The features
dictionary maps feature column names to Tensors containing the
corresponding feature data, and labels is a Tensor containing the
batch's label data.
So your get_test_dataset() function should not care about the get_train_dataset() function dataset generation procedure.
Regarding the low test performance:
You trained and validated your model with random combination of samples of the same data with repetition:
train_data = train_data_all.take(train_size)
val_data = train_data_all.skip(train_size)
Thus probably you will have identical samples in them, so your validation will not resulted in a real measurement of the accuracy of model.
In contrary the model never saw the test set's samples, so prediction on this set is a reliable measurement of performance.
I went over
a basic example of tf2.0
containing very simple code
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function, unicode_literals
import os
import tensorflow as tf
import cProfile
# Fetch and format the mnist data
(mnist_images, mnist_labels), _ = tf.keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(
(tf.cast(mnist_images[...,tf.newaxis]/255, tf.float32),
tf.cast(mnist_labels,tf.int64)))
dataset = dataset.shuffle(1000).batch(32)
# Build the model
mnist_model = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16,[3,3], activation='relu',
input_shape=(None, None, 1)),
tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16,[3,3], activation='relu'),
tf.keras.layers.GlobalAveragePooling2D(),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(10)
])
for images,labels in dataset.take(1):
print("Logits: ", mnist_model(images[0:1]).numpy())
optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam()
loss_object = tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)
loss_history = []
def train_step(model, images, labels):
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
logits = model(images, training=True)
# Add asserts to check the shape of the output.
tf.debugging.assert_equal(logits.shape, (32, 10))
loss_value = loss_object(labels, logits)
loss_history.append(loss_value.numpy().mean())
grads = tape.gradient(loss_value, model.trainable_variables)
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(grads, model.trainable_variables))
def train(epochs):
for epoch in range(epochs):
for (batch, (images, labels)) in enumerate(dataset):
train_step(mnist_model, images, labels)
print ('Epoch {} finished'.format(epoch))
I trained it and save trainable_variables before and after by the following
t0=mnist_model.trainable_variables
train(epochs = 3)
t1=mnist_model.trainable_variables
diff = tf.reduce_mean(tf.abs(t0[0] - t1[0]))
# whethere indexing [0] or [1] etc. gets the same outcome of diff
print(diff.numpy())
They are the same!!!
So am I checking somethere incorrect? If that is the case, how can I observe those updated variables correctly?
You aren't creating new arrays of variables, just 2 pointers on the same object
Try to do so
t0 = np.array(mnist_model.trainable_variables)
Tensorflow's feature_columns API is quite useful for non-numerical feature processing. However, the current API doc is more about using feature_columns with tensorflow Estimator. Is there a possible way to use feature_columns for categorical features representation and then build a model based on tf.keras?
The only reference I found is the following tutorial. It shows how to feed feature columns to a Keras Sequential model: Link
The code snippet is as follows:
from tensorflow.python.feature_column import feature_column_v2 as fc
feature_columns = [fc.embedding_column(ccv, dimension=3), ...]
feature_layer = fc.FeatureLayer(feature_columns)
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
feature_layer,
tf.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation=tf.nn.relu),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(64, activation=tf.nn.relu),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation=tf.nn.sigmoid)
])
...
model.fit(dataset, steps_per_epoch=8) # dataset is created from tensorflow Dataset API
The question is how to use a customed model with keras functional model API. I tried the following, but it did not work (tensorflow version 1.12)
feature_layer = fc.FeatureLayer(feature_columns)
dense_features = feature_layer(features) # features is a dict of ndarrays in dataset
layer1 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation=tf.nn.relu)(dense_features)
layer2 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(64, activation=tf.nn.relu)(layer1)
output = tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation=tf.nn.sigmoid)(layer2)
model = Model(inputs=dense_features, outputs=output)
The error log:
ValueError: Input tensors to a Model must come from `tf.layers.Input`. Received: Tensor("feature_layer/concat:0", shape=(4, 3), dtype=float32) (missing previous layer metadata).
I don't kown how to transform feature columns to keras model's input.
The behavior you desire could be achieved and it's able to combine tf.feature_column and keras functional API. And, actually, is not mentioned in TF docs.
This works at least in TF 2.0.0-beta1, but may being changed or even simplified in further releases.
Please check out issue in TensorFlow github repository Unable to use FeatureColumn with Keras Functional API #27416. There you will find useful comments about tf.feature_column and Keras Functional API.
Because you ask about general approach I would just copy the snippet with example from the link above. update: the code below should work
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
#!pip install tensorflow==2.0.0-alpha0
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import feature_column
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras import layers
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
csv_file = tf.keras.utils.get_file('heart.csv', 'https://storage.googleapis.com/download.tensorflow.org/data/heart.csv')
dataframe = pd.read_csv(csv_file, nrows = 10000)
dataframe.head()
train, test = train_test_split(dataframe, test_size=0.2)
train, val = train_test_split(train, test_size=0.2)
print(len(train), 'train examples')
print(len(val), 'validation examples')
print(len(test), 'test examples')
# Define method to create tf.data dataset from Pandas Dataframe
# This worked with tf 2.0 but does not work with tf 2.2
def df_to_dataset_tf_2_0(dataframe, label_column, shuffle=True, batch_size=32):
dataframe = dataframe.copy()
#labels = dataframe.pop(label_column)
labels = dataframe[label_column]
ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((dict(dataframe), labels))
if shuffle:
ds = ds.shuffle(buffer_size=len(dataframe))
ds = ds.batch(batch_size)
return ds
def df_to_dataset(dataframe, label_column, shuffle=True, batch_size=32):
dataframe = dataframe.copy()
labels = dataframe.pop(label_column)
#labels = dataframe[label_column]
ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((dataframe.to_dict(orient='list'), labels))
if shuffle:
ds = ds.shuffle(buffer_size=len(dataframe))
ds = ds.batch(batch_size)
return ds
batch_size = 5 # A small batch sized is used for demonstration purposes
train_ds = df_to_dataset(train, label_column = 'target', batch_size=batch_size)
val_ds = df_to_dataset(val,label_column = 'target', shuffle=False, batch_size=batch_size)
test_ds = df_to_dataset(test, label_column = 'target', shuffle=False, batch_size=batch_size)
age = feature_column.numeric_column("age")
feature_columns = []
feature_layer_inputs = {}
# numeric cols
for header in ['age', 'trestbps', 'chol', 'thalach', 'oldpeak', 'slope', 'ca']:
feature_columns.append(feature_column.numeric_column(header))
feature_layer_inputs[header] = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,), name=header)
# bucketized cols
age_buckets = feature_column.bucketized_column(age, boundaries=[18, 25, 30, 35])
feature_columns.append(age_buckets)
# indicator cols
thal = feature_column.categorical_column_with_vocabulary_list(
'thal', ['fixed', 'normal', 'reversible'])
thal_one_hot = feature_column.indicator_column(thal)
feature_columns.append(thal_one_hot)
feature_layer_inputs['thal'] = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,), name='thal', dtype=tf.string)
# embedding cols
thal_embedding = feature_column.embedding_column(thal, dimension=8)
feature_columns.append(thal_embedding)
# crossed cols
crossed_feature = feature_column.crossed_column([age_buckets, thal], hash_bucket_size=1000)
crossed_feature = feature_column.indicator_column(crossed_feature)
feature_columns.append(crossed_feature)
feature_layer = tf.keras.layers.DenseFeatures(feature_columns)
feature_layer_outputs = feature_layer(feature_layer_inputs)
x = layers.Dense(128, activation='relu')(feature_layer_outputs)
x = layers.Dense(64, activation='relu')(x)
baggage_pred = layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')(x)
model = keras.Model(inputs=[v for v in feature_layer_inputs.values()], outputs=baggage_pred)
model.compile(optimizer='adam',
loss='binary_crossentropy',
metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(train_ds)
If you use tensorflow dataset API, that code could do well.
featurlayer = keras.layers.DenseFeatures(feature_columns=feature_columns)
train_dataset = train_dataset.map(lambda x, y: (featurlayer(x), y))
test_dataset = test_dataset.map(lambda x, y: (featurlayer(x), y))
model.fit(train_dataset, epochs=, steps_per_epoch=, # all_data/batch_num =
validation_data=test_dataset,
validation_steps=)
tf.feature_column.input_layer
user this function, and this api doc has a sample .
you can transform featur_columns into Tensor, and then use it into Mode()
I have been recently reading this document in TensorFlow 2.0 alpha version. It has examples using Keras together with the feature column API. Not sure if TF 2.0 is what you are going to use
I am training GANs model. For loading the dataset, I am using Dataset API of TensorFlow.
# train_dataset has image and label. z_train dataset has noise (z).
train_dataset = tf.data.TFRecordDataset(train_file)
z_train = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(tf.random_uniform([total_training_samples, seq_length, z_dim],
minval=0, maxval=1, dtype=tf.float32))
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.zip((train_dataset, z_train))
Creating Iterator:
iter = tf.data.Iterator.from_structure(train_dataset.output_types, train_dataset.output_shapes)
Using the iterator:
(img, label), z = iter.get_next()
train_init_op = iter.make_initializer(train_dataset)
While training the GAN in session:
Training Discriminator first:
_, disc_loss = sess.run([disc_optim, disc_loss])
then training Generator:
_, gen_loss = sess.run([gen_optim, gen_loss])
Here is the catch. Since, I am using label as condition (CGAN) in both, discriminator and generator graph, using two sess.run produces two different set of batch of label during the same run of batch.
for epoch in range(num_of_epochs):
sess.run([tf.global_variables_initializer(), train_init_op.initializer])
for batch in range(num_of_batches):
_, disc_loss = sess.run([disc_optim, disc_loss])
_, gen_loss = sess.run([gen_optim, gen_loss])
Since, I have to feed the same batch of label in the generator's session run as in discriminator's session run, how shall I prevent Dataset API to produce two different batches in the same loop of a batch?
Note: I am using TensorFlow v1.9
Thanks in advance.
You can create 2 iterators for the same dataset. If you need to shuffle the dataset, you can even do that by specifying the seed as a tensor. See example below.
import tensorflow as tf
seed_ts = tf.placeholder(tf.int64)
ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices([1,2,3,4,5]).shuffle(5, seed=seed_ts, reshuffle_each_iteration=True)
it1 = ds.make_initializable_iterator()
it2 = ds.make_initializable_iterator()
input1 = it1.get_next()
input2 = it2.get_next()
with tf.Session() as sess:
for ep in range(10):
sess.run(it1.initializer, feed_dict={seed_ts: ep})
sess.run(it2.initializer, feed_dict={seed_ts: ep})
print("Epoch" + str(ep))
for i in range(5):
x = sess.run(input1)
y = sess.run(input2)
print([x, y])
So I am using tensorboard within keras. In tensorflow one could use two different summarywriters for train and validation scalars so that tensorboard could plot them in a same figure. Something like the figure in
TensorBoard - Plot training and validation losses on the same graph?
Is there a way to do this in keras?
Thanks.
To handle the validation logs with a separate writer, you can write a custom callback that wraps around the original TensorBoard methods.
import os
import tensorflow as tf
from keras.callbacks import TensorBoard
class TrainValTensorBoard(TensorBoard):
def __init__(self, log_dir='./logs', **kwargs):
# Make the original `TensorBoard` log to a subdirectory 'training'
training_log_dir = os.path.join(log_dir, 'training')
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).__init__(training_log_dir, **kwargs)
# Log the validation metrics to a separate subdirectory
self.val_log_dir = os.path.join(log_dir, 'validation')
def set_model(self, model):
# Setup writer for validation metrics
self.val_writer = tf.summary.FileWriter(self.val_log_dir)
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).set_model(model)
def on_epoch_end(self, epoch, logs=None):
# Pop the validation logs and handle them separately with
# `self.val_writer`. Also rename the keys so that they can
# be plotted on the same figure with the training metrics
logs = logs or {}
val_logs = {k.replace('val_', ''): v for k, v in logs.items() if k.startswith('val_')}
for name, value in val_logs.items():
summary = tf.Summary()
summary_value = summary.value.add()
summary_value.simple_value = value.item()
summary_value.tag = name
self.val_writer.add_summary(summary, epoch)
self.val_writer.flush()
# Pass the remaining logs to `TensorBoard.on_epoch_end`
logs = {k: v for k, v in logs.items() if not k.startswith('val_')}
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).on_epoch_end(epoch, logs)
def on_train_end(self, logs=None):
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).on_train_end(logs)
self.val_writer.close()
In __init__, two subdirectories are set up for training and validation logs
In set_model, a writer self.val_writer is created for the validation logs
In on_epoch_end, the validation logs are separated from the training logs and written to file with self.val_writer
Using the MNIST dataset as an example:
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.datasets import mnist
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
x_train = x_train.reshape(60000, 784)
x_test = x_test.reshape(10000, 784)
x_train = x_train.astype('float32')
x_test = x_test.astype('float32')
x_train /= 255
x_test /= 255
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(64, activation='relu', input_shape=(784,)))
model.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=10,
validation_data=(x_test, y_test),
callbacks=[TrainValTensorBoard(write_graph=False)])
You can then visualize the two curves on a same figure in TensorBoard.
EDIT: I've modified the class a bit so that it can be used with eager execution.
The biggest change is that I use tf.keras in the following code. It seems that the TensorBoard callback in standalone Keras does not support eager mode yet.
import os
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import TensorBoard
from tensorflow.python.eager import context
class TrainValTensorBoard(TensorBoard):
def __init__(self, log_dir='./logs', **kwargs):
self.val_log_dir = os.path.join(log_dir, 'validation')
training_log_dir = os.path.join(log_dir, 'training')
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).__init__(training_log_dir, **kwargs)
def set_model(self, model):
if context.executing_eagerly():
self.val_writer = tf.contrib.summary.create_file_writer(self.val_log_dir)
else:
self.val_writer = tf.summary.FileWriter(self.val_log_dir)
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).set_model(model)
def _write_custom_summaries(self, step, logs=None):
logs = logs or {}
val_logs = {k.replace('val_', ''): v for k, v in logs.items() if 'val_' in k}
if context.executing_eagerly():
with self.val_writer.as_default(), tf.contrib.summary.always_record_summaries():
for name, value in val_logs.items():
tf.contrib.summary.scalar(name, value.item(), step=step)
else:
for name, value in val_logs.items():
summary = tf.Summary()
summary_value = summary.value.add()
summary_value.simple_value = value.item()
summary_value.tag = name
self.val_writer.add_summary(summary, step)
self.val_writer.flush()
logs = {k: v for k, v in logs.items() if not 'val_' in k}
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self)._write_custom_summaries(step, logs)
def on_train_end(self, logs=None):
super(TrainValTensorBoard, self).on_train_end(logs)
self.val_writer.close()
The idea is the same --
Check the source code of TensorBoard callback
See what it does to set up the writer
Do the same thing in this custom callback
Again, you can use the MNIST data to test it,
from tensorflow.keras.datasets import mnist
from tensorflow.keras.models import Sequential
from tensorflow.keras.layers import Dense
from tensorflow.train import AdamOptimizer
tf.enable_eager_execution()
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
x_train = x_train.reshape(60000, 784)
x_test = x_test.reshape(10000, 784)
x_train = x_train.astype('float32')
x_test = x_test.astype('float32')
x_train /= 255
x_test /= 255
y_train = y_train.astype(int)
y_test = y_test.astype(int)
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(64, activation='relu', input_shape=(784,)))
model.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=AdamOptimizer(), metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=10,
validation_data=(x_test, y_test),
callbacks=[TrainValTensorBoard(write_graph=False)])
If you are using TensorFlow 2.0, you now get this by default using the Keras TensorBoard callback. (When using TensorFlow with Keras, make sure you're using tensorflow.keras.)
See this tutorial :
https://www.tensorflow.org/tensorboard/scalars_and_keras