SQL Server Row_number in ORDER BY CASE - sql

EDITED THE WHOLE TOPIC.
I need to create a view that sort article per type.
If I only have the type : *VALUE -> I need to show this line only.
If I have the type : *VALUE & 2 -> Still showing row accordingly to *VALUE type only.
If I only have the type : 2 -> Showing this one.
I already did somethink like this :
VALUE* is a value that should come from an another table with a Join.
SELECT Id_item ,Name_item , Type_item , Id_type_item FROM ITEM
WHERE Name_item = 'Gillette' AND (Id_Type_item = VALUE* OR Id_Type_item ='10')
ORDER BY CASE
WHEN row_number() OVER(ORDER BY Id_item DESC , Id_Type_Item DESC) <= 1 THEN 0
ELSE 1
END;
But it does that in the case where we've got both row for the types(*VALUE & 10):
Id_item / Name_item / Type_item / Id_Type_Item
1 Gillette 45 30 (*VALUE)
1 Gillette 2 10
So I think that the order by on the Over() could be useful to always sort by *VALUE (which are in reality another column from another table)
I always want to select 1 row of data only ! :)

I'm guessing, that what you want is the "first" row returned from each SELECT? There's no need to use a separate SELECT statement for each variable on the same table, you can use a window function to do so. I believe this is what you might be after.
WITH CTE AS(
--The following assumes table A and B have the same DDL (which begs the question, why are they different tables?)
SELECT *,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY var
ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) AS RN --Replace SELECT(NULL) with your actual ordering criteria
FROM A
WHERE var IN (1,2)
UNION --ALL(?)
SELECT *
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY var
ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) AS RN --Replace SELECT(NULL) with your actual ordering criteria
FROM B
WHERE var IN (3))
SELECT *
FROM CTE
WHERE RN = 1;

Here is a possible solution. In this case ROW_NUMBER, RANK and DENSE_RANK would all work. However, ROW_COUNT is not a valid window function in sql server.
DECLARE #A TABLE(ID INT, Value INT)
DECLARE #B TABLE(ID INT,Value INT)
INSERT INTO #A VALUES (1,1),(2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,2),(6,1),(7,3)
INSERT INTO #B VALUES (1,1),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(6,2),(7,1),(8,3)
;WITH D AS
(
SELECT ID,Value FROM #A WHERE Value IN(1,2)
UNION ALL
SELECT ID,Value FROM #B WHERE Value IN (3)
)
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT
ID, Value,
ValueRankInSet = DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY VALUE ORDER BY ID) -- <-- If you do not have an ID field you can subst ID with NEWID() as order is not important
FROM D
)AS X
WHERE ValueRankInSet = 1

Assign the priority within your Select(s) and then order by it in the row_number:
with cte as
(
SELECT *,
row_number()
over (-- partition by ???
order by prio) as Position
FROM
(
SELECT 1 as prio, * FROM A WHERE var = 1
UNION -- probably a more efficient UNION ALL
SELECT 2 as prio, * FROM A WHERE var = 2
UNION -- probably a more efficient UNION ALL
SELECT 3 as prio, * FROM B WHERE var = 3
)
)
select *
from cte
WHERE Position = 1

Related

2 rows differences

I would like to get 2 consecutive rows from an SQL table.
One of the columns storing UNIX datestamp and between 2 rows the difference only this value.
For example:
id_int dt_int
1. row 8211721 509794233
2. row 8211722 509794233
I need only those rows where dt_int the same (edited)
Do you want both lines to be shown?
A solution could be this:
with foo as
(
select
*
from (values (8211721),(8211722),(8211728),(8211740),(8211741)) a(id_int)
)
select
id_int
from
(
select
id_int
,id_int-isnull(lag(id_int,1) over (order by id_int) ,id_int-6) prev
,isnull(lead(id_int,1) over (order by id_int) ,id_int+6)-id_int nxt
from foo
) a
where prev<=5 or nxt<=5
We use lead and lag, to find the differences between rows, and keep the rows where there is less than or equal to 5 for the row before or after.
If you use 2008r2, then lag and lead are not available. You could use rownumber in stead:
with foo as
(
select
*
from (values (8211721),(8211722),(8211728),(8211740),(8211741)) a(id_int)
)
, rownums as
(
select
id_int
,row_number() over (order by id_int) rn
from foo
)
select
id_int
from
(
select
cur.id_int
,cur.id_int-prev.id_int prev
,nxt.id_int-cur.id_int nxt
from rownums cur
left join rownums prev
on cur.rn-1=prev.rn
left join rownums nxt
on cur.rn+1=nxt.rn
) a
where isnull(prev,6)<=5 or isnull(nxt,6)<=5
Assuming:
lead() analytical function available.
ID_INT is what we need to sort by to determine table order...
you may need to partition by some value lead(ID_int) over(partition by SomeKeysuchasOrderNumber order by ID_int asc) so that orders and dates don't get mixed together.
.
WITH CTE AS (
SELECT A.*
, lead(ID_int) over ([missing partition info] ORDER BY id_Int asc) - id_int as ID_INT_DIFF
FROM Table A)
SELECT *
FROM CTE
WHERE ID_INT_DIFF < 5;
You can try it. This version works on SQL Server 2000 and above. Today I don not a more recent SQL Server to write on.
declare #t table (id_int int, dt_int int)
INSERT #T SELECT 8211721 , 509794233
INSERT #T SELECT 8211722 , 509794233
INSERT #T SELECT 8211723 , 509794235
INSERT #T SELECT 8211724 , 509794236
INSERT #T SELECT 8211729 , 509794237
INSERT #T SELECT 8211731 , 509794238
;with cte_t as
(SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id_int) id
,id_int
,dt_int
FROM #t),
cte_diff as
( SELECT
id_int
,dt_int
,(SELECT TOP 1 dt_int FROM cte_t b WHERE a.id < b.id) dt_int1
,dt_int - (SELECT TOP 1 dt_int FROM cte_t b WHERE a.id < b.id) Difference
FROM cte_t a
)
SELECT DISTINCT id_int , dt_int FROM #t a
WHERE
EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM cte_diff b where b.Difference =0 and a.dt_int = b.dt_int)

get intervals of nonchanging value from a sequence of numbers

I need to sumarize a sequence of values into intervals of nonchanging values - begin, end and value for each such interval. I can easily do it in plsql but would like a pure sql solution for both performance and educational reasons. I have been trying for some time to solve it with analytical functions, but can't figure how to properly define windowing clause. The problem I am having is with a repeated value.
Simplified example -
given input:
id value
1 1
2 1
3 2
4 2
5 1
I'd like to get output
from to val
1 2 1
3 4 2
5 5 1
You want to identify groups of adjacent values. One method is to use lag() to find the beginning of the sequence, then a cumulative sum to identify the groups.
Another method is the difference of row number:
select value, min(id) as from_id, max(id) as to_id
from (select t.*,
(row_number() over (order by id) -
row_number() over (partition by val order by id
) as grp
from table t
) t
group by grp, value;
Using a CTE to collect all the rows and identifying them into changing values, then finally grouping together for the changing values.
CREATE TABLE #temp (
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1),
[Value] INT NOT NULL
)
GO
INSERT INTO #temp ([Value])
SELECT 1 UNION ALL
SELECT 1 UNION ALL
SELECT 2 UNION ALL
SELECT 2 UNION ALL
SELECT 1;
WITH Marked AS (
SELECT
*,
grp = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ID)
- ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY Value ORDER BY ID)
FROM #temp
)
SELECT MIN(ID) AS [From], MAX(ID) AS [To], [VALUE]
FROM Marked
GROUP BY grp, Value
ORDER BY MIN(ID)
DROP TABLE #temp;

How to create "subsets" as a result from a column in SQL

Let's suppose that I've got as a result from one query the next set of values of one column:
Value
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
5 E
6 F
7 G
8 H
9 I
10 J
Now, I would like to see this information with another order, establishing a limit to the number of values of every single subset. Now suppose that I choose 3 as a limit,the information will be given like this (one column for all the subsets):
Values
1 A, B, C
2 D, E, F
3 G, H, I
4 J,
Obviously, the last row will contain the remaining values when their number is smaller than the limit established.
Is it possible to perform a query like this in SQL?
What about if the limit is dynamic?. It can be chosen randomly.
create table dee_t (id int identity(1,1),name varchar(10))
insert into dee_t values ('A'),('B'),('c'),('D'),('E'),('F'),('g'),('H'),('I'),('J')
;with cte as
(
select (id-1)/3 +1 rno ,* from dee_t
) select rno ,
(select name+',' from cte where rno = c.rno for xml path('') )
from cte c group by rno
You can do this by using few calculations with row_number, like this:
select
GRP,
max(case when RN = 1 then Value end),
max(case when RN = 2 then Value end),
max(case when RN = 0 then Value end)
from (
select
row_number() over (order by Value) % 3 as RN,
(row_number() over (order by Value)+2) / 3 as GRP,
Value
from Table1
) X
group by GRP
The first row_number creates numbers for the columns (1,2,0,1,2,0...) and the second one creates numbers for the rows (1,1,1,2...). Those are then used to group the values into correct place using case, but you can also use pivot instead of it if you like it more.
If you want them into same column, of course just concatenate the cases instead of selecting them on different columns, but beware of nulls.
Example in SQL Fiddle
Thanks a lot for all your reply. Finally I've got a Solution with the help of Rajen Singh
This is the code than can be used:
WITH CTE_0 AS
(
SELECT DISTINCT column_A_VALUE AS id
FROM Table
WHERE column_A_VALUE IS NOT NULL
), CTE_1 AS
(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id) RN, id
FROM CTE_0
), CTE_2 AS
(
SELECT RN%30 GROUP, ID
FROM CTE_1
)SELECT STUFF(( SELECT ','''+CAST(ID AS NVARCHAR(20))+''''
FROM CTE_2
WHERE GROUP = A.GROUP
FOR XML PATH('')),1,1,'') IDS
FROM CTE_2 A
GROUP BY GROUP

SQL group by if values are close

Class| Value
-------------
A | 1
A | 2
A | 3
A | 10
B | 1
I am not sure whether it is practical to achieve this using SQL.
If the difference of values are less than 5 (or x), then group the rows (of course with the same Class)
Expected result
Class| ValueMin | ValueMax
---------------------------
A | 1 | 3
A | 10 | 10
B | 1 | 1
For fixed intervals, we can easily use "GROUP BY". But now the grouping is based on nearby row's value. So if the values are consecutive or very close, they will be "chained together".
Thank you very much
Assuming MSSQL
You are trying to group things by gaps between values. The easiest way to do this is to use the lag() function to find the gaps:
select class, min(value) as minvalue, max(value) as maxvalue
from (select class, value,
sum(IsNewGroup) over (partition by class order by value) as GroupId
from (select class, value,
(case when lag(value) over (partition by class order by value) > value - 5
then 0 else 1
end) as IsNewGroup
from t
) t
) t
group by class, groupid;
Note that this assumes SQL Server 2012 for the use of lag() and cumulative sum.
Update:
*This answer is incorrect*
Assuming the table you gave is called sd_test, the following query will give you the output you are expecting
In short, we need a way to find what was the value on the previous row. This is determined using a join on row ids. Then create a group to see if the difference is less than 5. and then it is just regular 'Group By'.
If your version of SQL Server supports windowing functions with partitioning the code would be much more readable.
SELECT
A.CLASS
,MIN(A.VALUE) AS MIN_VALUE
,MAX(A.VALUE) AS MAX_VALUE
FROM
(SELECT
ROW_NUMBER()OVER(PARTITION BY CLASS ORDER BY VALUE) AS ROW_ID
,CLASS
,VALUE
FROM SD_TEST) AS A
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT
ROW_NUMBER()OVER(PARTITION BY CLASS ORDER BY VALUE) AS ROW_ID
,CLASS
,VALUE
FROM SD_TEST) AS B
ON A.CLASS = B.CLASS AND A.ROW_ID=B.ROW_ID+1
GROUP BY A.CLASS,CASE WHEN ABS(COALESCE(B.VALUE,0)-A.VALUE)<5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
ORDER BY A.CLASS,cASE WHEN ABS(COALESCE(B.VALUE,0)-A.VALUE)<5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END DESC
ps: I think the above is ANSI compliant. So should run in most SQL variants. Someone can correct me if it is not.
These give the correct result, using the fact that you must have the same number of group starts as ends and that they will both be in ascending order.
if object_id('tempdb..#temp') is not null drop table #temp
create table #temp (class char(1),Value int);
insert into #temp values ('A',1);
insert into #temp values ('A',2);
insert into #temp values ('A',3);
insert into #temp values ('A',10);
insert into #temp values ('A',13);
insert into #temp values ('A',14);
insert into #temp values ('b',7);
insert into #temp values ('b',8);
insert into #temp values ('b',9);
insert into #temp values ('b',12);
insert into #temp values ('b',22);
insert into #temp values ('b',26);
insert into #temp values ('b',67);
Method 1 Using CTE and row offsets
with cte as
(select distinct class,value,ROW_NUMBER() over ( partition by class order by value ) as R from #temp),
cte2 as
(
select
c1.class
,c1.value
,c2.R as PreviousRec
,c3.r as NextRec
from
cte c1
left join cte c2 on (c1.class = c2.class and c1.R= c2.R+1 and c1.Value < c2.value + 5)
left join cte c3 on (c1.class = c3.class and c1.R= c3.R-1 and c1.Value > c3.value - 5)
)
select
Starts.Class
,Starts.Value as StartValue
,Ends.Value as EndValue
from
(
select
class
,value
,row_number() over ( partition by class order by value ) as GroupNumber
from cte2
where PreviousRec is null) as Starts join
(
select
class
,value
,row_number() over ( partition by class order by value ) as GroupNumber
from cte2
where NextRec is null) as Ends on starts.class=ends.class and starts.GroupNumber = ends.GroupNumber
** Method 2 Inline views using not exists **
select
Starts.Class
,Starts.Value as StartValue
,Ends.Value as EndValue
from
(
select class,Value ,row_number() over ( partition by class order by value ) as GroupNumber
from
(select distinct class,value from #temp) as T
where not exists (select 1 from #temp where class=t.class and Value < t.Value and Value > t.Value -5 )
) Starts join
(
select class,Value ,row_number() over ( partition by class order by value ) as GroupNumber
from
(select distinct class,value from #temp) as T
where not exists (select 1 from #temp where class=t.class and Value > t.Value and Value < t.Value +5 )
) ends on starts.class=ends.class and starts.GroupNumber = ends.GroupNumber
In both methods I use a select distinct to begin because if you have a dulpicate entry at a group start or end things go awry without it.
Here is one way of getting the information you are after:
SELECT Under5.Class,
(
SELECT MIN(m2.Value)
FROM MyTable AS m2
WHERE m2.Value < 5
AND m2.Class = Under5.Class
) AS ValueMin,
(
SELECT MAX(m3.Value)
FROM MyTable AS m3
WHERE m3.Value < 5
AND m3.Class = Under5.Class
) AS ValueMax
FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT m1.Class
FROM MyTable AS m1
WHERE m1.Value < 5
) AS Under5
UNION
SELECT Over4.Class,
(
SELECT MIN(m4.Value)
FROM MyTable AS m4
WHERE m4.Value >= 5
AND m4.Class = Over4.Class
) AS ValueMin,
(
SELECT Max(m5.Value)
FROM MyTable AS m5
WHERE m5.Value >= 5
AND m5.Class = Over4.Class
) AS ValueMax
FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT m6.Class
FROM MyTable AS m6
WHERE m6.Value >= 5
) AS Over4

Select top and bottom rows

I'm using SQL Server 2005 and I'm trying to achieve something like this:
I want to get the first x rows and the last x rows in the same select statement.
SELECT TOP(5) BOTTOM(5)
Of course BOTTOM does not exist, so I need another solution. I believe there is an easy and elegant solution that I'm not getting. Doing the select again with GROUP BY DESC is not an option.
Using a union is the only thing I can think of to accomplish this
select * from (select top(5) * from logins order by USERNAME ASC) a
union
select * from (select top(5) * from logins order by USERNAME DESC) b
Check the link
SQL SERVER – How to Retrieve TOP and BOTTOM Rows Together using T-SQL
Did you try to using rownumber?
SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order BY columnName) as TopFive
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order BY columnName Desc) as BottomFive
FROM Table
)
WHERE TopFive <=5 or BottomFive <=5
http://www.sqlservercurry.com/2009/02/select-top-n-and-bottom-n-rows-using.html
I think you've two main options:
SELECT TOP 5 ...
FROM ...
ORDER BY ... ASC
UNION
SELECT TOP 5 ...
FROM ...
ORDER BY ... DESC
Or, if you know how many items there are in the table:
SELECT ...
FROM (
SELECT ..., ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ... ASC) AS intRow
FROM ...
) AS T
WHERE intRow BETWEEN 1 AND 5 OR intRow BETWEEN #Number - 5 AND #Number
Is it an option for you to use a union?
E.g.
select top 5 ... order by {specify columns asc}
union
select top 5 ... order by {specify columns desc}
i guess you have to do it using subquery only
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT id ORDER BY columnName LIMIT 5) OR
(SELECT id ORDER BY columnName DESC LIMIT 5)
)
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT TOP(5) id ORDER BY columnName) OR
(SELECT TOP(5) id ORDER BY columnName DESC)
)
EDITED
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT TOP 5 id ORDER BY columnName) OR
(SELECT TOP 5 id ORDER BY columnName DESC)
)
No real difference between this and the union that I'm aware of, but technically it is a single query.
select t.*
from table t
where t.id in (select top 5 t2.id from table t2 order by MyColumn)
or
t.id in (select top 5 t2.id from table t2 order by MyColumn desc);
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT x, rank() over (order by x asc) as rown
FROM table
) temp
where temp.rown = 1
or temp.rown = (select count(x) from table)
Then you are out - doing the select again IS the only option, unless you want to pull in the complete result set and then throwing away everything in between.
ANY sql I cna think of is the same way - for the bottom you need to know first either how many items you have (materialize everything or use count(*)) or a reverse sort order.
Sorry if that does not suit you, but at the end.... reality does not care, and I do not see any other way to do that.
I had to do this recently for a very large stored procedure; if your query is quite large, and you want to minimize the amount of queries you could declare a #tempTable, insert into that #tempTable then query from that #tempTable,
DECLARE #tempTable TABLE ( columns.. )
INSERT INTO #tempTable
VALUES ( SELECT.. your query here ..)
SELECT TOP(5) columns FROM #tempTable ORDER BY column ASC -- returns first to last
SELECT TOP(5) columns FROM #tempTable ORDER BY column DESC -- returns last to first