I have a FlatList with a data prop pulling from Redux
render() {
return (
<View>
<FlatList
data={this.props.arrayOfPlacesFromRedux}
renderItem={({item}) => {.......
Whenever I dispatch changes to arrayOfPlacesFromRedux(i.e. adding or removing children), the FlatList rerenders....UNLESS I remove all children from array (i.e. make length zero).When arrayOfPlacesFromRedux changes from a positive length to a length of zero, the FlatList does not rerender.....however all other types of changes to array do indeed cause FlatList to rerender
UPDATE 02/27
Below is my reducer used to update Redux arrayOfPlacesFromRedux
const reducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case UPDATE_PLACES_ARRAY:
return {...state, arrayOfPlaces: action.payload};
default:
return state;
}
};
In the situation noted above when FlatList does not rerender.....action.payload is an empty array
The question is missing some important piece of code.
React as well as Redux need arrays reference to change, meaning for a component to reRender on state change, the array references needs to change.
Live demo at https://snack.expo.dev/RrFFxfeWY
Here is the most interesting parts:
If you have a basic component as below:
const MyList = () => {
const [data, setData] = React.useState([
'#FF0000',
'#FF8000',
'#FFFF00',
]);
return (
<>
<Text>List poping is not working</Text>
<FlatList
data={data}
renderItem={({ item }) => (
<Pressable
onPress={() => {
data.pop(); // Does not work because we are not changing it's ref
}}
style={{ backgroundColor: item, padding: 8 }}>
<Text>{item}</Text>
</Pressable>
)}
/>
</>
);
};
The data need to have a new array reference as below. data2.filter(..) will return a new array, we are not changing the data2 base values, just creating a new array with one item less.
const MyList = () => {
const [data2, setData2] = React.useState([
'#00FFFF',
'#0080FF',
'#0000FF',
]);
return (
<>
<Text>List WORKING!</Text>
<FlatList
data={data2}
renderItem={({ item }) => (
<Pressable
onPress={() => {
setData2(data2.filter(dataItem => dataItem !== item)) // works
//setData2([]); // Also works
}}
style={{ backgroundColor: item, padding: 8 }}>
<Text>{item}</Text>
</Pressable>
)}
/>
</>
);
};
A library like Immer.js simplify the manipulation of states to mutate the object, and immer will created a new reference for you.
Oh no rookie mistake that wasted everyones time!!
I was implementing shouldComponentUpdate method that was stopping Flatlist rendering :(
Thanks for all for the answers
You may need to use ListEmptyComponent, which is a prop that comes with FlatList, src.
Honestly, I'm not sure why it does not re-render when you update your state, or why they added a specific function/prop to render when the array is empty, but it's clear from the docs that this is what's needed.
You can do something like this:
<SafeAreaView style={styles.container}>
<FlatList
data={DATA}
renderItem={renderItem}
keyExtractor={(item) => item.id}
extraData={selectedId}
--> ListEmptyComponent={() => <MyComponent />}
/>
</SafeAreaView>
I'm working on a react-native app and I have to put a list of object in a Scrollview, so I use the FlatList component to do it. This is the piece of code that generates the error:
<ScrollView contentContainerStyle={style}>
Other components
<FlatList
style={style}
data={data}
scrollEnabled={false}
keyExtractor={(item, index) => index.toString()}
renderItem={({ item, index}) => (somethings)}
/>
Other components
</ScrollView>
The complete error is: VirtualizedLists should never be nested inside plain ScrollViews with the same orientation because it can break windowing and other functionality - use another VirtualizedList-backed container instead.
Avoid using FlatList with the same orientation. Instead, restructure your code like this --
<ScrollView contentContainerStyle={style}>
Other components
{
data.map((item)=> <Somthing item={item}/>)
}
Other components
</ScrollView>
Flatlist has its own ScrollView you can scroll through the list using that so there is no need to put a flatlist into a ScrollView that is why its giving a warning, the both scrollview will clash and one of them (mostly the parent one) works.
The error is self explanatory and it should be in a developers best interest to avoid these kind of things even when it's just a false alarm.
Your particular situation could use the following solution:
<FlatList
data={data}
keyExtractor={(item, index) => `key-${index}`}
ListHeaderComponent={() => (
<SomeComponents>
...Some components those need to be on top of the list
</SomeComponents>
)}
ListFooterComponent={() => (
<SomeComponents>
...Some components those need to be below the list
</SomeComponents>
)}
renderItem={({ item, index}) => (somethings)}
/>
Another note, if you need more complex list that needs header and footer for the list itself, you can try SectionList.
Your component FlatList and ScrollView have the same orientation(vertical), so you need put your component inside a ScrollView with horizontal orientation like this:
<View>
<ScrollView nestedScrollEnabled={true} style={{ width: "100%" }} >
<View>
<ScrollView horizontal={true} style={{ width: "100%" }}>
<FlatList />
</ScrollView>
</View>
</ScrollView>
</View>
Solution 1: Use FlatList props ListHeaderComponent and create all of your page top section in that. Something like this:
This will not show any warning or error.
Solution 2:
Because only parent view will scroll (ScrollView) and not the child FlatList, so to get rid of the warning you can pass a prop scrollEnabled={false} to the FlatList.
If it doesn't go then import LogBox from react-native and write this in your component
useEffect(() => {
LogBox.ignoreLogs(["VirtualizedLists should never be nested"])
}, [])
hopefully, the warning will be removed.
Anyone want to solve this issue can use a custom VirtualizedScrollView like this:
import React from 'react';
import { FlatList } from 'react-native';
const VirtualizedScrollView = props => {
return (
<FlatList
{...props}
data={[]}
keyExtractor={(e, i) => 'dom' + i.toString()}
ListEmptyComponent={null}
renderItem={null}
ListHeaderComponent={() => (
<>{props.children}</>
)}
/>
);
};
export default VirtualizedScrollView;
Then if you use FlatList inside VirtualizedScrollView, it won't get the warning/error.
<VirtualizedScrollView>
<FlatList
/*--- your props ---*/
/>
</VirtualizedScrollView>
There is a npm package where I get this code, you can also use this package
Solution:
I have also encountered same problem with FlatList. Then the package below solved my problem.
'react-native-virtualized-view'
import { ScrollView } from 'react-native-virtualized-view'
if ScrollView is Vertical change Flatlist Horizontal
<ScrollView >
<FlatList
horizontal
data={lenders}
keyExtractor={(_, index) => index}
renderItem={(item) => {
return <Text>item</Text>
}}
/>
You can solve the 2 vertical ones(I'm assuming their side by side, separated with a segemented control?) by using the same flat list and switching out the data when it's switched. If they're just two vertical flat list's one after another use the SectionList.
For the horizontal one you can try putting the Horizontal FlatList in the ListHeaderComponent of the vertical FlatList and see what happens. It can be janky if you use a vertical FlatList in a vertical scroll view but maybe with two different axis it might be ok. The other option is two only show a few items in the horizontal scrollview and have a "Show More".
The last option is too re design/rethink the page so it's not doing so much. On mobile less is more and developers/designers like to get in the mindset of porting desktop thinking onto mobile. Might be worth a shot.
I used the SectionList approach to solve this & wanted to post a code example because I found the Section data required by React Native to be clear but also quite prescriptive.
renderList = ({empty, posts}: {empty: boolean, posts: Array<Object>}) => (
<SectionList
sections={[
{type: 'MAP', data: [{}]}, // Static sections.
{type: 'PROFILE', data: [{}]},
{type: 'POSTS', data: posts} // Dynamic section data replaces the FlatList.
]}
keyExtractor={(item, index) => index}
renderItem={({item, section}) => {
switch (section.type) {
// Different components for each section type.
case 'MAP':
return <MapView />;
case 'PROFILE':
return <Profile />;
case 'POSTS':
return <Post item={item} />;
default:
return null;
}
}}
ItemSeparatorComponent={() => <Separator />}
ListFooterComponent={() => <>{empty && <EmptyList />}</>}
/>
);
What's nice is that the content feels logically quite separate, so you can add sections easily or have different dynamic data sources.
(If you're building a form & want better keyboard handling, you could also try a KeyboardAwareSectionList from react-native-keyboard-aware-scroll-view.)
Flatlist has an integrated scrollview itself, so you can resolve this error by removing ScrollView Component, And let just the Fatlist component
Error ? you are trying to render a FlatList component inside a scrollview component, this is what is throwing the warning.
solution Render the components using Flatlist's ListHeaderComponent={} prop, i.e in your flatlist add the prop as follows
const FlatList_Header = () => {
return (
<View style={{
height: 45,
width: "100%",
backgroundColor: "#00B8D4",
justifyContent: 'center',
alignItems: 'center'
}}
>
<Text style={{ fontSize: 24, color: 'white' }}> Sample FlatList Header </Text>
</View>
);
}
<FlatList
data={BirdsName}
renderItem={({ item }) => <ItemRender name={item.name} />}
keyExtractor={item => item.id}
ItemSeparatorComponent={ItemDivider}
**ListHeaderComponent={FlatList_Header}**
ListHeaderComponentStyle={{ borderBottomColor: 'red', borderBottomWidth: 2 }}
/>
Note the use of the ListHeaderComponent in the code above, that should supress the warning.
Use flatList like this ListHeaderComponent and ListFooterComponent:
<FlatList ListHeaderComponent={
<ScrollView
style={styles.yourstyle}
showsVerticalScrollIndicator={false}
>
<View style={styles.yourstyle}>
</View>
</ScrollView>
}
data={this.state.images}
renderItem={({ item, index }) => {
return (
<View
style={styles.yourstyle}
>
<Image
source={{
uri: item,
}}
style={styles.yourstyle}
resizeMode={"contain"}
/>
<Text
numberOfLines={2}
ellipsizeMode="tail"
style={styles.yourstyle}
>
{item.name}
</Text>
</View>
);
}}
keyExtractor={({ name }, index) => index.toString()}
ListFooterComponent={
<View style={styles.yourstyle}></View>
}
/>
In my case it was happening due to nesting of ScrollView.
Try replacing some of the ScrollView from children components with React.Fragment.
The solution is very simple, please do not put the Flatlist component in the ScrollView.
They both have the same functionality but Flatlist has advantages and is more stable to use.
im using react native to create an app for a legal document. i need the document to be scrollable. i rendered it using VirtualizedList.
thing is when i try to use scrollToIndex(index: 'something') performance is too slow.
my list contains about 4000 rendered items (each being about a paragraph long).
is there any way to make this run smoother?
export default function App() {
const scroller = useRef();
return (
<SafeAreaView>
<View style={styles.upperContainer}>
<CustomButton
onPress={() => {
scroller.current.scrollToIndex({ index: 1547 });
}}
/>
</View>
<View style={styles.flatContainer}>
<VirtualizedList
ref={scroller}
data={data}
renderItem={({ item }) => (
<CustomText data={item.content} type={item.type} />
)}
getItem={(data, index) => data[index]}
getItemCount={(data) => data.length}
keyExtractor={(item) => item.number.toString()}
initialNumToRender={4000}
onScrollToIndexFailed={() => {
alert('error');
}}
/>
</View>
</SafeAreaView>
);
}
This question is similar to these ones and maybe you can reference some of the answers and see what works for your case. Basically, you need a pure component to make this work.
Link - Flatlist performance slow
Link - VirtualizedList: You have a large list that is slow to update
I followed this answer to dynamically style my component.
Here is my render method :
render() {
return (
<View style={styles.container}>
<FlatList
data={this.state.images}
numColumns={2}
keyboardShouldPersistTaps={'always'}
keyboardDismissMode={'on-drag'}
keyExtractor={item => item.localIdentifier}
renderItem={({ item, index }) =>
<TouchableHighlight
underlayColor='transparent'
onPress={() => this.openImage(index)}
onLongPress={() => this.startSelection(item)}
>
<View style={[styles.albumContainer, (this.state.selectedItems.indexOf(item)>-1)?styles.selectedItem:styles.unselectedItem]}>
<Image
style={styles.albumThumbnail}
source={item.image}
/>
</View>
</TouchableHighlight>
}
/>
</View>
);
}
As you can see I am displaying image thumbnail with TouchableHighlight and FlatList. When user will press and hold on any image thumbnail I called startSelection() with particular flatlist item which then add that item to state. I used that state to set style dynamically of my image as :
<View style={[styles.albumContainer, (this.state.selectedItems.indexOf(item)>-1)?styles.selectedItem:styles.unselectedItem]}>
<Image
style={styles.albumThumbnail}
source={item.image}
/>
</View>
Here is startSelection() method :
startSelection(item) {
let temp = this.state.selectedItems;
temp.push(item);
this.setState({
selectedItems : temp
});
}
Here is my stylesheet :
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
selectedItem: {
borderWidth: 3,
borderColor: '#22aaff',
},
unselectedItem: {
borderColor: '#000000',
}
});
But when user press and hold that view, item will added to state but style is not changing.
Please help me what's going wrong here !!!
This can be found on FlatList docs:
This is a PureComponent which means that it will not re-render if props remain shallow-equal. Make sure that everything your renderItem function depends on is passed as a prop (e.g. extraData) that is not === after updates, otherwise your UI may not update on changes. This includes the data prop and parent component state.
So you can add extraData to your FlatList component like this:
FlatList Component:
<FlatList
data={this.state.images}
extraData={this.state} //add this!
numColumns={2}
keyboardShouldPersistTaps={'always'}
keyboardDismissMode={'on-drag'}
keyExtractor={item => item.localIdentifier}
renderItem={({ item, index }) =>
<TouchableHighlight
underlayColor='transparent'
onPress={() => this.openImage(index)}
onLongPress={() => this.startSelection(item)}
>
<View style={[styles.albumContainer, (this.state.selectedItems.indexOf(item)>-1)?styles.selectedItem:styles.unselectedItem]}>
<Image
style={styles.albumThumbnail}
source={item.image}
/>
</View>
</TouchableHighlight>
}
/>
P.S: If your component state has variables which should not re-render FlatList, you would be better of using extraData = {this.state.selectedItems}, but then you need to make sure you pass a different reference to selectedItems when you call setState on startSelection. Like this:
startSelection(item) {
let temp = [...this.state.selectedItems];
temp.push(item);
this.setState({
selectedItems : temp
});
}
Wrap them with extra []
style={[styles.albumContainer, [(this.state.selectedItems.indexOf(item)>-1)?styles.selectedItem:styles.unselectedItem]]}
I you put an Algolia connected component in a header of a FlatList it's as if it enters an infinite loop of queries. The connectInfiniteHits runs constantly.
This is really annoying if you like to put some simple filters in the headers of a list of hits.
My setup is like this:
I have a FlatList that is wrapped by the connectInfiniteHits HOC.
The ListHeaderComponent contains a component this is wrapped by the connectRefinementList HOC. The same problem occurs with a connectSearchBox HOC.
Has anyone seen this and found a solution?
I manage to make it work with those lines:
const RefinementList = connectRefinementList(({ items, refine }) => (
<View>
{items.map(item => (
<TouchableOpacity key={item.label} onPress={() => refine(item.value)}>
<Text style={{ fontWeight: item.isRefined ? '600' : 'normal' }}>
{item.label}
</Text>
</TouchableOpacity>
))}
</View>
));
const InfiniteHits = connectInfiniteHits(({ hits, hasMore, refine }) => (
<FlatList
data={hits}
keyExtractor={item => item.objectID}
onEndReached={() => hasMore && refine()}
ListHeaderComponent={<RefinementList attribute="brand" />}
renderItem={({ item }) => (
<View>
<Text>{JSON.stringify(item).slice(0, 100)}</Text>
</View>
)}
/>
));
Note that I'm not using the function version which indeed breaks.