I am building my first react native application and I am using DeviceInfo (react-native-device-info) and geolocation API.
DeviceInfo.getMACAddress(mac => console.log(mac);
and
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(position => console.log(position)
both of them are returning promise. How to merge them with something like promise.all()
Well, I studied your code but what you're doing isn't called a promise, you're objectively giving a callback to the function instead of using .then to resolve the promise.
Check the API of GetMacAddress here also the getCurrentPosition doesn't use promises, it uses callbacks instead, it's api is here.
What you can do to use Promise.all is that, you can wrap getCurrentPosition to a promise and then use promise.all with the DeviceInfo.
wrap getposition to a promise:
const getPosition = (options) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(resolve, reject, options);
});
}
now use Promise.all like this:
const getData = async () => {
const [macAddress, currentPos] = await Promise.all([
DeviceInfo.getMACAddress(),
getPosition(),
]);
// use macAddress and currentPosition here.
}
Now the macAddress and currentPos are the outputs of the getMACAddress and getCurrentPosition function.
If you're not using an async function, then you can do the following:
Promise.all([
DeviceInfo.getMACAddress(),
getPosition(),
]).then((macAddress, pos) => {
// access macAddress and pos in this func
}).catch((error) => {
// access any error here
})
Related
state changes after getting data from api. i can see that with console.log()
but doesn`t render data after update. there is my code fetch code :
useEffect(() => {
axios
.get(
'https://mylink.ngrok.io/channels/getUser',
).then((data)=>{
let array = [];
const promises = data.data.channels.map((channel)=>{
axios.get(`https://mylink.ngrok.io/channels/getChannel/${channel}`).then((resp)=>{
array.push(resp.data);
})
})
Promise.all(promises).then(()=>{
setonLineChannels(array);
});
})
}, []);
btw its in context.
I think Promise.all casue of that
thx
Where you declare promises, it's not going to wait for those API requests to complete. They're running even before you've called Promise.all(promises).
You can just put the code you've defined as promises inside the Promise.all() directly, then make sure you return the get request inside. And don't push to array. Your map will return an array of promises, and you can use the results array in the .then after Promise.all to update your state directly.
Here's what I mean:
useEffect(() => {
axios.get("https://mylink.ngrok.io/channels/getUser").then((data) => {
Promise.all(
data.data.channels.map(
(channel) =>
axios
.get(`https://mylink.ngrok.io/channels/getChannel/${channel}`)
.catch((err) => console.error(err)) // this allows an individual request to fail
)
).then((results) => setonLineChannels(results));
});
}, []);
I am trying to build an app in react native that is suppose to take take two inputs by a user and then make a query to an api and get information about the two inputs. I have been having trouble with redux and redux-thunk and specifically with async actions.
This is the code in my app that i am specifically having trouble with
export const fetchData = url => {
console.log("start Fetching");
return async dispatch => { // this is where the problem is
dispatch(fetchingRequest());
try {
const response = await fetch("https://randomuser.me/api/?results=10");
const json = await response.text();
if (response.ok) {
dispatch(fetchingSuccess(json));
console.log("JSON", json);
} else {
console.log("fetch did not resolve");
}
} catch (error) {
dispatch(fetchingFailure(error));
}
};
console.log("Fetched data");
};
Upon debugging the function, I have ended with finding that when the fetchData function is called the function will execute but the async dispatch that is being returned has undefined behavior.
The output in the debugger when the function is called should be
start Fetching
JSON file information/Error
but the output in the debugger is actually
start Fetching
This is the function in which fetchData is called in
_onPress = () => {
let url = "https://randomuser.me/api/?results=10";
fetchData(url);
console.log("should have fetched");
};
this is the mapDispatchToProps function that I have added. The problem is i do not know what to add inside the function.
const mapStatetoDispatch = (url, dispatch) => {
return {dispatch(fetchData(url))}; // do not know what to place in body of function
};
i have connected it in the component with
export default connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
)(App);
these are the action creators that I import, if needed
import {
fetchingSuccess,
fetchingRequest,
fetchingFailure,
fetchData
} from "../data/redux/actions/appActions.js";
Assuming you have added redux-thunk as a middleware, it looks like the errors are here:
_onPress = () => {
const { fetchData } = this.props;
let url = "https://randomuser.me/api/?results=10";
fetchData(url);
console.log("should have fetched");
};
and
const mapStatetoDispatch = dispatch => ({
fetchData: url => dispatch(fetchData(url)),
}};
I'm getting the error:
Actions must be plain objects. Use custom middleware for async actions.
I've tried the solution in the following Stack Overflow question, but it didn't work:
React-Redux: Actions must be plain objects. Use custom middleware for async actions
action
export async function signupp(data){
console.log('In signupp:');
try{
const request = await axios({
method:'POST',
url:'http://192.168.1.10:3003/users/signup',
data:{
email:data.email,
password:data.password
},
}).then(response=>{
console.log(response.data);
return response.data
}).catch( e => {
console.log(e);
return false
});
return {
type:'signup',
payload:request
}
}
catch(e) {
console.log(e);
return false;
}
}
reducer
export default function(state={},action){
switch(action.type){
case 'signup':
return {
...state,
auth:{
email: action.payload.email,
password:action.payload.password
}
}
}
}
store
const createStoreWithMiddleware = applyMiddleware()(createStore);
const appRedux = () => (
<Provider store = {createStoreWithMiddleware(reducers)}>
<App/>
</Provider>
)
AppRegistry.registerComponent(appName, () => appRedux);
BTW, I am getting the right response in the log.
Inside of the component, in the place where you call signupp function, you have mapDispatchToProps function as callback in connect function from react-redux lib, which is doing behind the hoods something like dispatch(signupp())(or maybe you are doing dispatch directly without react-redux lib).
According to redux API, this dispatch function expects to receive a plain object, but your signupp() function returns a promise(as you have async inside).
To solve this problem you can simply use redux-thunk middleware. Also you can see some examples in the redux docs section about async actions.
An alternative solution could be to move fetch logic to component and then dispatch just plain object with data that you received from the request.
EDIT
Current example,
it('CALLED THE canOpenURL FUNCTION', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<ResourceCardComponent {...mockProps} />);
const canOpenURLSpy = jest.spyOn(Linking, 'canOpenURL');
wrapper.find('TouchableOpacity').simulate('click');
expect(canOpenURLSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
canOpenURLSpy.mockReset();
canOpenURLSpy.mockRestore();
});
Error
expect(jest.fn()).toHaveBeenCalled() Expected mock function to have
been called.
Problem
I am using Jest & Enzyme to test a class made with React Native. This class has a function inside of it that when fired off uses the Linking library to call canOpenUrl and openUrl. I can simulate the click event on the mounted component but I am having trouble knowing how much of this I can actually test.
My goal is to check if Linking.canOpenUrl ever fires off.
Exmaple
The function inside the component looks like this,
onPressLink() {
console.log('HEY THIS FUNCTION FIRED WOOT WOOT');
Linking.canOpenURL(this.props.url).then((supported) => {
if (supported) {
Linking.openURL(this.props.url);
}
});
}
I can simulate this firing off like this,
describe('onPressLink has been called!', () => {
it('It clicks the mock function onPressLink!', (done) => {
const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent {...mockProps} />);
const onPressLink = jest.fn();
const a = new onPressLink();
wrapper.find('TouchableOpacity').first().simulate('click');
expect(onPressLink).toHaveBeenCalled();
done();
});
});
Now that does work, but my goal is to use something like this,
expect(Linking.canOpenUrl).toHaveBeenCalled();
But I keep getting this error,
TypeError: Cannot read property '_isMockFunction' of undefined
Current code that is trying to check if this function is ever fired off. Which is inside the parent function that is clicked with the simulate method,
it('calls canOpenURL', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent {...mockProps} />);
const canOpenURL = jest.spyOn(wrapper.instance, 'onPressLink');
wrapper.find('TouchableOpacity').simulate('click');
expect('Linking.canOpenUrl').toHaveBeenCalled();
});
Question
What is the proper way to check to see if Linking.canOpenURL is fired when its parent function is executed?
(Since Jest 19.0.0+)
You can spy on the Linking module methods using jest.spyOn().
(1) Tell jest to spy on the module method:
const spy = jest.spyOn(Linking, 'canOpenURL');
(2) After doing everything you need to test it, check the spy:
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled();
(3) Clean up and stop spying on the module method
spy.mockReset();
spy.mockRestore();
If you don't want the tests to use the actual implementation of the methods, you can fake them like this:
jest.spyOn(Linking, 'canOpenURL').mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve());
Where the function passed to mockImplementation will be whatever you want the method to do when called.
Ref https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/jest-object.html#jestspyonobject-methodname
When using the actual implementation of your module method, which is asynchronous, the promise might not have been resolved by the time you tested it. You need to make sure any promise is resolved in your method implementation before making any assertions on it.
One way to deal with this is using async/await, like so:
it('...', async () => {
// Wait for promise to resolve before moving on
await wrapper.instance().onPressLink();
// make your assertions
expect(...);
});
Another option is using expect().resolves, available since Jest 20.0.0, where you wait for some promise in the argument to expect() to resolve with a value before making an assertion on that value.
expect(somePromiseThatEventuallyResolvesWithValue).resolves.toBe(Value);
I've done in simplest way:
Steps to spy:
Make spy object for original function using jest
Call original function with / without argument(s)
Assert the function which should be called with valid argument(s)
Reset mock
Restore mock
Here is the sample example
DefaultBrowser.ts which is actual class.
import { Linking } from 'react-native';
export const openDefaultBrowser = async url => {
if (await Linking.canOpenURL(url)) {
Linking.openURL(url);
}
};
DefaultBrowser.test.ts which is test case class.
import { openDefaultBrowser } from '../DefaultBrowser';
import { Linking } from 'react-native';
describe('openDefaultBrowser with validate and open url', () => {
it('validate url', async () => {
const spy = jest.spyOn(Linking, 'canOpenURL');
openDefaultBrowser('https://www.google.com');
expect(spy).toBeCalledWith('https://www.google.com');
spy.mockReset();
spy.mockRestore();
});
it('open url', async () => {
const spy = jest.spyOn(Linking, 'openURL');
openDefaultBrowser('https://www.google.com');
expect(spy).toBeCalledWith('https://www.google.com');
spy.mockReset();
spy.mockRestore();
});
});
Hope this helps you.
it('open url', async () => {
jest.spyOn(Linking, 'canOpenURL')
const spy = jest.spyOn(Linking, 'openURL')
openURL(sitePath)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(sitePath)
})
spy.mockReset()
spy.mockRestore()
})
I am basically trying to wrap the React Native GPS feature into a Promise.
When I reach the failure callback of navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition I want to manually reject a Promise.
Here the relevant code:
var p = new Promise();
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(
(position) => { ... all good here ... },
(error) => {
// trying to reject manually a Promise
p.reject(error);
}
);
Problems:
If I don't pass any function in the Promise arguments I get not a function error on the first line
If I pass a function I get undefined is not a function evaluating p.reject
I was confusing Promise with an Angular-like deferred promise.
A working way is to wrap the GPS function into a Promise like so:
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(
(position) => {
resolve('All good');
},
(error) => {
reject(error);
}
);
});