I try to update 2 columns using a subquery with a specific order so the query is like that:
UPDATE myTable TAO
SET (TAO.BASE_AMT,TAO.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT) = (SELECT SUM(decode(TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,0,0,d.monetary_amount))
, MAX (D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT)
FROM source1 w
, source2 d
WHERE 1=1
-- Some conditions
GROUP BY d.business_unit, d.voucher_id
ORDER BY d.business_unit, d.voucher_id);
Why am I getting:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
EDIT 1
the query with all conditions :
UPDATE myTable TAO
SET (TAO.BASE_AMT,TAO.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT) = (
SELECT SUM(decode(TAX_CD_VAT_PCT
, 0
, 0
,d.monetary_amount))
, MAX (D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT)
FROM source1 w
, source2 d
WHERE w.business_unit = TAO.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND d.business_unit = w.business_unit
AND d.voucher_id = w.voucher_id
AND d.VOUCHER_LINE_NUM = w.VOUCHER_LINE_NUM
AND d.VOUCHER_ID = TAO.VOUCHER_ID
GROUP BY d.business_unit, d.voucher_id
ORDER BY d.business_unit, d.voucher_id )
You would appear to want a correlated subquery, because your subquery can return multiple rows.
You don't provide a table layout, but I would expect:
UPDATE myTable TAO
SET (BASE_AMT, TAX_CD_VAT_PCT) =
(SELECT SUM(d.monetary_amount), -- the DECODE does nothing
MAX(D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT)
FROM source1 w JOIN -- ALWAYS use proper, explicit, standard JOIN syntax
source2 d
ON . . .
WHERE . . . AND
d.business_unit = TAO.business_unit AND
d.voucher_id = TAO.voucher_id
);
Your code is filled with anachronisms and bad practices:
The DECODE() does nothing. If it did, you should use CASE expressions instead.
Commas in JOIN clauses have been obsolete for over fifteen years. Use proper, explicit, standard JOIN syntax.
The ORDER BY in the subquery does nothing.
Subquery have group by clause which can return multiple rows.
Update query cannot take list of values to update.
So, for every unique combination of d.business_unit, d.voucher_id, there will be one row even if you did not select those columns in the inner query.
Also, assuming it returns only one row, you are missing where clause for update query. Only where clause I can see is in subquery.
Related
I dont't get it. I changed some of the code. In the WPLEVENT Table are a lot of Events per person. In the Persab-Table are the Persons with their History. Now I need the from the Persab Table just that row wich matches the persab.gltab Date nearest to the WPLEVENT.vdat Date. So all rows from the WPLEVENT, but just the one matching row from the PERSAB-Table.
SELECT
persab.name,
persab.vorname,
vdat,
eventstart,
persab.rc1,
persab.rc2
FROM wplevent
INNER JOIN
persab ON WPLEVENT.PersID = persab.PRIMKEY
INNER JOIN
(SELECT TOP 1 persab.rc1
FROM PERSAB
WHERE persab.gltab <= getdate() --/ Should be wplevent.vdat instead of getdate()
) NewTable ON wplevent.persid = persab.primkey
WHERE
persid ='100458'
ORDER BY vdat DESC
Need to use the MAX() function with the proper syntax by supplying an expression like MAX(persab.rc1). Also need to use GROUP BY for the second column rc2 in the subquery (although it looks like you do not need it). Finally you are missing the ON clause for the final INNER JOIN. I can update the answer to fix the query if you provide that information.
SELECT
Z1PERS.NAME
, Z1PERS.VORNAME
, WPLEVENT.VDat
, WPLEVENT.EventStart
, WPLEVENT.EventStop
, WPLEVENT.PEPGROUP
, Z1SGRP.TXXT
, PERSAB.GLTAB
, Z1PERS.PRIMKEY AS Expr1
, PERSAB.PRIMKEY
FROM
Z1PERS
INNER JOIN
WPLEVENT ON Z1PERS.PRIMKEY = WPLEVENT.PersID
INNER JOIN
Z1SGRP ON WPLEVENT.PEPGROUP = Z1SGRP.GRUPPE
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT MAX(Persab.rc1) --Fixed MAX expression
, persab.rc2
FROM
persab
GROUP BY
persab.rc2 --Need to group on rc2 if you want that column in the query otherwise remove this AND the rc2 column from select list
WHERE
WPLEVENT.PersID = PERSAB.PRIMKEY
AND WPLEVENT.VDat <= PERSAB.GLTAB
) --Missing ON clause for the INNER JOIN here
WHERE z1pers.vorname = 'henning'
I am trying to use a case statement with sub query in a Update statement but I am facing an Issue like
single-row sub query returns more than
Please find my Query which I tried
update r_gl.ac
set meeting_cost = case currency_code when 'IND'
then amount
else round(tgt.amount)
from r_gl.ac tgt
join
(
select distinct
a.frm_cur,
a.to_cur,
a.exch_rate
from b_gl.currncy_conv_dim a
join r_gl.ac b
on (a.frm_cur = 123 and a.to_cur = b.cur_cd and f_rate = 'ABC')
join b_gl.int_fg
on b.in_s=c.in_s and a.cal_sk = trunc(c.intact_dt_key,-2)
) src
on tgt.cur_cd=src.to_cur
)
end
Please help me to solve this issue
Your current CASE expression is missing its END. That aside, I see even bigger problems with your UPDATE statement. Redshift is based on an old version of Postgres, and hence I expect that it would adhere to the same syntax Postgres would use for an update join:
UPDATE table1 AS t1
SET some_column = t2.some_other_column
FROM table2 AS t2
WHERE t1.id = t2.id
Applying this syntax to your current query along with the fix for the CASE expression leaves us with the following:
update r_gl.ac tgt
set meeting_cost = case when currency_code = 'IND'
then tgt.amount
else round(tgt.amount) end
from
(
select distinct
a.frm_cur,
a.to_cur,
a.exch_rate
from b_gl.currncy_conv_dim a
inner join r_gl.ac b
on (a.frm_cur = 123 and a.to_cur = b.cur_cd and f_rate = 'ABC')
inner join b_gl.int_fg
on b.in_s=c.in_s and a.cal_sk = trunc(c.intact_dt_key,-2)
) src
where tgt.cur_cd = src.to_cur
The table to which you are joining r_gl.ac has no effect on the data being used to update, but rather would only affect the update by targeting certain rows. If this be not your intended logic, then you might have to rethink the entire query.
I have written a SQL query with a subquery to include counts. When the count is 0, and I try to filter out the 0, it turns the 0's to NULLs and keeps the rows, and vice versa. The result is that I can't filter out the 0's, which was the purpose of including the counts.
SELECT distinct
a
,b
,
(SELECT
count(id)
FROM seq_stud
WHERE scs.SequenceID = seq_stud.SequenceID
and seq_stud.EndDate is null
HAVING count(id) <> 0
) As t1
FROM sp
INNER JOIN p on sp.ProgramID = p.ProgramID
...etc.
Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can filter out the 0 counts?
You don't filter in the SELECT clause. If you don't want rows that have no match in seq_stud, then use WHERE:
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM seq_stud ss
WHERE scs.SequenceID = ss.SequenceID and ss.EndDate is null
)
I would remove the HAVING statement altogether. You need to put that in the WHERE clause. Otherwise, it will return null, as you found.
SELECT distinct a, b,
(SELECT count(id)
FROM seq_stud
WHERE scs.SequenceID = seq_stud.SequenceID
and seq_stud.EndDate is null
) As t1
FROM sp
INNER JOIN p on sp.ProgramID = p.ProgramID
WHERE t1 > 0
I just figured this out. The Select subquery should be included as a WHERE statement
Using having count() in exists clause
I got an error
Column 'Employee.EmpID' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
SQL code:
with cte(stu_id,term_cd, spcl_cd ) as
(
Select
zt.[STU_ID], zt.TERM_CD, zt.SPCL_CD
From
SR0TZT(nolock) zt
Inner Join
(Select
STU_ID, MIN(TERM_SEQ_NUM) MinPoint, SPCL_CD
From SR0TZT
Group By STU_ID) tbl1 On zt.STU_ID = tbl1.STU_ID
Where
tbl1.MinPoint = zt.TERM_SEQ_NUM
and zt.STU_ID = '202716354'
and tbl1.SPCL_CD = zt.SPCL_CD
)
SELECT
zt.[STU_ID], zt.[TERM_CD], zt.[SPCL_CD],
zt.[SPCL_STRT_TERM], zt.TERM_SEQ_NUM, t.term_id
FROM
SR0TZT zt
JOIN
cte ON zt.STU_ID = cte.stu_id
WHERE
zt.STU_ID = '202716354'
Condition is:
For each unique combination of TZT.STU_ID and TZT.SPCL_CD where TZT.COLL_CD = '', display the TZT.TERM_CD with the minimum TZT.TERM_SEQ_NUM.
For UID 202716354, based on the above rule, the value of this column is incorrect for both specialization codes.
Not sure I understand why you are getting an error for 'Employee.EmpID' as it doesn't appear in your query.
At first look I can see that the following part of your SQL code (the derived table 'tbl1')...
Select STU_ID,MIN(TERM_SEQ_NUM) MinPoint,SPCL_CD From SR0TZT Group By STU_ID
..is incorrect and would cause a similar error because SPCL_CD isn't used in an aggregate function (such as MIN) or in the GROUP BY. You should change it to:-
Select STU_ID,MIN(TERM_SEQ_NUM) MinPoint,SPCL_CD From SR0TZT Group By STU_ID, SPCL_CD
And that should solve your problem.
Your problem is in this below script:
Select STU_ID,MIN(TERM_SEQ_NUM) MinPoint,SPCL_CD From SR0TZT Group By STU_ID
It should be:
Select STU_ID,MIN(TERM_SEQ_NUM) MinPoint,SPCL_CD From SR0TZT Group By STU_ID, SPCL_CD
Every column that you put in select, you should put them too in group by.
I have a table where I wish to update some of the rows. All the fields are not null. I'm doing a sub-query, and I wish to update the table with the non-Null results.
See Below for my final answer:
In MySQL, I solve this problem by doing an UPDATE IGNORE. How do I make this work in SQL Server 2005? The sub-query uses a four-table Join to find the data to insert if it exists. The Update is being run against a table that could have 90,000+ records, so I need a solution that uses SQL, rather than having the Java program that's querying the database retrieve the results and then update those fields where we've got non-Null values.
Update: My query:
UPDATE #SearchResults SET geneSymbol = (
SELECT TOP 1 symbol.name FROM
GeneSymbol AS symbol JOIN GeneConnector AS geneJoin
ON symbol.id = geneJoin.geneSymbolID
JOIN Result AS sSeq ON geneJoin.sSeqID = sSeq.id
JOIN IndelConnector AS joiner ON joiner.sSeqID = sSeq.id
WHERE joiner.indelID = #SearchResults.id ORDER BY symbol.id ASC)
WHERE isSNV = 0
If I add "AND symbol.name IS NOT NULL" to either WHERE I get a SQL error. If I run it as is I get "adding null to a non-null column" errors. :-(
Thank you all, I ended up finding this:
UPDATE #SearchResults SET geneSymbol =
ISNULL ((SELECT TOP 1 symbol.name FROM
GeneSymbol AS symbol JOIN GeneConnector AS geneJoin
ON symbol.id = geneJoin.geneSymbolID
JOIN Result AS sSeq ON geneJoin.sSeqID = sSeq.id
JOIN IndelConnector AS joiner ON joiner.sSeqID = sSeq.id
WHERE joiner.indelID = #SearchResults.id ORDER BY symbol.id ASC), ' ')
WHERE isSNV = 0
While it would be better not to do anything in the null case (so I'm going to try to understand the other answers, and see if they're faster) setting the null cases to a blank answer also works, and that's what this does.
Note: Wrapping the ISNULL (...) with () leads to really obscure (and wrong) errors.
with UpdatedGenesDS (
select joiner.indelID, name, row_number() over (order by symbol.id asc) seq
from
GeneSymbol AS symbol JOIN GeneConnector AS geneJoin
ON symbol.id = geneJoin.geneSymbolID
JOIN Result AS sSeq ON geneJoin.sSeqID = sSeq.id
JOIN IndelConnector AS joiner ON joiner.sSeqID = sSeq.id
WHERE name is not null ORDER BY symbol.id ASC
)
update Genes
set geneSymbol = upd.name
from #SearchResults a
inner join UpdateGenesDs upd on a.id = b.intelID
where upd.seq =1 and isSNV = 0
this handles the null completely as all are filtered out by the where predicate (can also be filtered by join predicate if You wish. Is it what You are looking for?
Here's another option, where only those rows in #SearchResults that are succesfully joined will be udpated. If there are no null values in the underlying data, then the inner joins will pull in no null values, and you won't have to worry about filtering them out.
UPDATE #SearchResults
set geneSymbol = symbol.name
from #SearchResults sr
inner join IndelConnector AS joiner
on joiner.indelID = sr.id
inner join Result AS sSeq
on sSeq.id = joiner.sSeqID
inner join GeneConnector AS geneJoin
on geneJoin.sSeqID = sSeq.id
-- Get "lowest" (i.e. first if listed alphabetically) value of name for each id
inner join (select id, min(name) name
from GeneSymbol
group by id) symbol
on symbol.id = geneJoin.geneSymbolID
where isSNV = 0 -- Which table is this value from?
(There might be some syntax problems, without tables I can't debug it)