From the sample code on Atlassian site
https://developer.atlassian.com/server/bamboo/executing-external-processes-using-processservice/
ExternalProcess process = ProcessService.createExternalProcess(taskContext, new ExternalProcessBuilder().*command*(Arrays.asList("**/bin/ls**")). workingDirectory(fileWorkingDir));
What Bamboo API should I use to fetch "/home/kshi/.local/bin/robot" and pass it to command(). Getting the values from TaskConfiguration configuration map, or TaskDefinition did not help.
I do have the below tag in my atlassian-plugin.xml
< executable key="**robot**" nameKey="RobotFrameworkTest.robotExecutable"/ >
RobotFrameworkTest.robotExecutable points to "robot"
I want to make use of the Executable defined in bamboo. (/home/kshi/.local/bin/root)
From the logs of the plan I can see that Bamboo is referring to the robot command as bamboo.capability.system.builder.command.robot, wondering if I have to use it in the same way in the code.
I have found a relevant link on Atlassian website hinting ways to use an
executable.
https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Answers-Developer-Questions/How-to-access-build-variables-from-a-bamboo-task/qaq-p/572570
#ComponentImport private final ProcessService processService;
#ComponentImport private final CapabilityContext capabilityContext;
public RobotTestTaskType(final ProcessService processService, final CapabilityContext capabilityContext)
{ this.processService = processService; this.capabilityContext = capabilityContext; }
String robotExecutable = capabilityContext.getCapabilityValue("system.builder.command.robot");
Related
I am developing a Plugin for IntelliJ for teaching purposes, where students write some code and the teacher can write tests and the students can run those tests and see if they are doing it all correctly. It would be great if I would get the file the user is writing in as a java class so that I can run the functions of that class from within another function and test it as if I would have written it.
What I have as of now:
In the Main Toolbar I have a button, where the students should be able to run the tests. I have a class that extends AnAction, now I have no Idea what I should write in it:
#Override
public void actionPerformed(AnActionEvent e) {
}
I have been going through the IntelliJ documentation for some time now and as by now I do not get any further. I sure hope that the experienced developers that can be found here can manybe give me a hint or two.
Thanks a lot in advance :)
If I understand correctly, the students would be programming within a project within IntelliJ?
Then you can get the path to the project that they are working on using the AnActionEvent event.
Project project = event.getProject();
String projectBasePath = project.getBasePath();
You could use this to send the entire src folder to your computer and do what it is that you need to do there?
But, it also sounds like you would want the students to run the test functions on their side via the plugin. In that case, one option that I know of is to again use the project.getBasePath(), or get them to select a file using a GUI, and then use ProcessBuilder to compile, run, test, etc their Java classes. You can run any Windows / shell command this way and pipe the output into the IDE, or your own tool window.
public void actionPerformed(AnActionEvent event) {
Project project = event.getProject();
String projectBasePath = project.getBasePath();
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder();
pb.directory(projectBasepath);
pb.command("cmd", "/k", "javac src\*.java")
pb.redirectErrorStream(true);
Process process = pb.start();
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(newInputStreamReader(process.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
int exitCode = process.waitFor();
System.out.println("\nExited with error code : " + exitCode);
... // anything else you need to do
}
Let me know if this makes sense - maybe I can help you out more if you give me more specific questions.
I have below java class which runs with cucumberOptions
#CucumberOptions(tags = {"#userManagement"})
public class IC_API_Tests_Runner {
runner code here
}
From jenkins I am passing below command ti run the tests
clean test "-Dkarate.env=$WhereToRun" "-Dbvt.tags=#userManagement"
I am able to fetch the value of 'bvt.tags' using below command
bvtTags = karate.properties['bvt.tags'];
Now I need to pass the 'bvtTags' value to the CucumberOptions.
I tried
#CucumberOptions(tags = {"bvtTags"})
public class IC_API_Tests_Runner {
runner code here
}
But 'bvtTags' value is not substituted in the CucumberOptions. But I am able to print the value of 'bvtTags' with print statement in karate code.
Any help will be great help
No you can't do dynamic changing of the #CucumberOptions like that.
Use the API for dynamically choosing tests, see this example: DemoTestSelected.java.
Then do something like this (please change for your environment):
String tags = System.getProperty("bvt.tags");
List<String> tags = Arrays.asList(tags);
EDIT: actually you don't need to do any of this. (I guess that you will never read the docs :)
Please refer: https://github.com/intuit/karate#command-line
-Dkarate.options="--tags #userManagement"
What I want to do?
I want to create and consume java objects in PowerBuilder and call methods on it. This should happen with less overhead possible.
I do not want to consume java webservices!
So I've a working sample in which I can create a java object, call a method on this object and output the result from the called method.
Everything is working as expected. I'm using Java 1.8.0_31.
But now I want to attach my java IDE (IntelliJ) to the running JVM (started by PowerBuilder) to debug the java code which gets called by PowerBuilder.
And now my question.
How do I tell PowerBuilder to add special options when starting the JVM?
In special I want to add the following option(s) in some way:
-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005
The JVM is created like following:
LONG ll_result
inv_java = CREATE JavaVM
ll_result = inv_java.CreateJavaVM("C:\Development\tms java\pbJavaTest", FALSE)
CHOOSE CASE ll_result
CASE 1
CASE 0
CASE -1
MessageBox ( "", "jvm.dll was not found in the classpath.")
CASE -2
MessageBox ( "", "pbejbclient90.jar file was not found." )
CASE ELSE
MessageBox ( "", "Unknown result (" + String (ll_result ) +")" )
END CHOOSE
In the PowerBuilder help I found something about overriding the static registry classpath. There is something written about custom properties which sounds like what I'm looking for.
But there's no example on how to add JVM options to override default behavior.
Does anyone have a clue on how to tell PowerBuilder to use my options?
Or does anyone have any advice which could guide me in the right direction?
Update 1
I found an old post which solved my initial issue.
If someone else want to know how it works take a look at this post:
http://nntp-archive.sybase.com/nntp-archive/action/article/%3C46262213.6742.1681692777#sybase.com%3E
Hi, you need to set some windows registry entries.
Under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\Powerbuilder\9.0\Java, there
are two folders: PBIDEConfig and PBRTConfig. The first one is used when
you run your application from within the IDE, and the latter is used
when you run your compiled application. Those two folders can have
PBJVMconfig and PBJVMprops folders within them.
PBJVMconfig is for JVM configuration options such as -Xms. You have to
specify incremental key values starting from "0" by one, and one special
key "Count" to tell Powerbuilder how many options exists to enumerate.
PBJVMprops is for all -D options. You do not need to specify -D for
PBJVMProps, just the name of the property and its value, and as many
properties as you wish.
Let me give some examples:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBIDEConfig\PBJVMprops]
"java.security.auth.login.config"="auth.conf"
"user.language"="en"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBRTConfig\PBJVMconfig]
"0"="-client"
"1"="-Xms128m"
"2"="-Xmx512m"
"Count"="3"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBRTConfig\PBJVMprops]
"java.security.auth.login.config"="auth.conf"
"user.language"="en"
Regards,
Gokhan Demir
But now there's another issue...
PB isn't able to create EJB Proxies for my sample class which is really simple with java 1.8.0_31. They were created with the default version, which is 1.6.0_24.
public class Simple
{
public Simple()
{
}
public static String getValue()
{
return "blubber";
}
public int getInt32Value()
{
return 123456;
}
public double getDoubleVaue()
{
return 123.123;
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(Simple.getValue());
}
}
The error is the following. :D
---------- Deploy: Deploy of project p_genapp_ejbclientproxy (15:35:18)
Retrieving PowerBuilder Proxies from EJB...
Generation Errors: Error: class not found: (
Deployment Error: No files returned for package/component 'Simple'. Error code: Unknown. Proxy was not created.
Done.
---------- Finished Deploy of project p_genapp_ejbclientproxy (15:35:19)
So the whole way isn't a option because we do not want to change the JAVA settings in PB back and forth just to generate new EJB Proxies for changed JAVA objects in the future...
So one option to test will be creating COM wrappers for JAVA classes to use them in PB...
Is there any way to generate code coverage report when using SimpleTest similar to PHPUnit.
I have read the documentation of SimpleTest on their website but can not find a clear way on how to do it!
I came across this website that says
we can add require_once (dirname(__FILE__).'/coverage.php')
to the intended file and it should generate the report, but it did not work!
If there is a helpful website on how to generate code coverage, please share it here.
Thanks alot.
I could not get it to work in the officially supported way either, but here is something I got working that I was able to hack together by examining their code. This works for v1.1.7 of SimpleTest, not their master code. At the time of this writing v1.1.7 is the latest release, and works with new versions of PHP 7, even though it is an old release.
First off you have to make sure you have Xdebug installed, configured, and working. On my system there is both a CLI and Apache version of the php.ini file that have to be configured properly depending on if I am trying to use PHP through Apache or just directly from the terminal. There are alternatives to Xdebug, but most people us Xdebug.
Then, you have to make the PHP_CodeCoverage library accessible from your code. I recommend adding it to your project as a composer package.
Now you just have to manually use that library to capture code coverage and generate a report. How exactly you do that will depend on how you run your tests. Personally, I run my tests on the terminal, and I have a bootstrap file that php runs before it starts the script. At the end of the bootstrap file, I include the SimpleTest autorun file so it will automatically run the tests in any test classes that get included like so:
require_once __DIR__.'/vendor/simpletest/simpletest/autorun.php';
Somewhere inside your bootstrap file you will need to create a filter, whitelist the directories and files you want to get reported, create a coverage object and pass in the filter to the constructor, start coverage, and create and register a shutdown function that will change the way SimpleTest executes the tests to make sure it also stops the coverage and generates the coverage report. Your bootstrap file might look something like this:
<?php
require __DIR__.'/vendor/autoload.php';
$filter = new \SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\Filter();
$filter->addDirectoryToWhitelist(__DIR__."/src/");
$coverage = new \SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\CodeCoverage(null, $filter);
$coverage->start('<name of test>');
function shutdownWithCoverage($coverage)
{
$autorun = function_exists('\run_local_tests'); // provided by simpletest
if ($autorun) {
$result = \run_local_tests(); // this actually runs the tests
}
$coverage->stop();
$writer = new \SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\Report\Html\Facade;
$writer->process($coverage, __DIR__.'/tmp/code-coverage-report');
if ($autorun) {
// prevent tests from running twice:
exit($result ? 0 : 1);
}
}
register_shutdown_function('\shutdownWithCoverage', $coverage);
require_once __DIR__.'/vendor/simpletest/simpletest/autorun.php';
It took me some time to figure out, as - to put it mildly - the documentation for this feature is not really complete.
Once you have your test suite up and running, just include these lines before the lines that are actually running it:
require_once ('simpletest/extensions/coverage/coverage.php');
require_once ('simpletest/extensions/coverage/coverage_reporter.php');
$coverage = new CodeCoverage();
$coverage->log = 'coverage/log.sqlite'; // This folder should exist
$coverage->includes = ['.*\.php$']; // Modify these as you wish
$coverage->excludes = ['simpletest.*']; // Or it is even better to use a setting file
$coverage->maxDirectoryDepth = '1';
$coverage->resetLog();
$coverage->startCoverage();
Then run your tests, for instance:
$test = new ProjectTests(); //It is an extension of the class TestSuite
$test->run(new HtmlReporter());
Finally generate your reports
$coverage->stopCoverage();
$coverage->writeUntouched();
$handler = new CoverageDataHandler($coverage->log);
$report = new CoverageReporter();
$report->reportDir = 'coverage/report'; // This folder should exist
$report->title = 'Code Coverage Report';
$report->coverage = $handler->read();
$report->untouched = $handler->readUntouchedFiles();
$report->summaryFile = $report->reportDir . '/index.html';
And that's it. Based on your setup, you might need to make some small adjustment to make it work. For instance, if you are using the autorun.php from simpletest, that might be a bit more tricky.
I designed a framework in RFT where the test cases are written in spreadsheet specifying the data source, object and keyword and a driver script which processes through all this data and routes it to the appropriate method for each test step all in a spreadsheet. Now I want to integrate this with RQM so that each of my test cases in the spreadsheet is shown as passed/failed in RQM. Any ideas?
You could implement now an algorithm to read those testcases in the spreadsheet and pass them to RQM as attachments with logTestResult.
For example:
logTestResult( <your attachment> , true );
And if you are already connected to RQM the adapter will attach files that you indicate automatically to RQM. So, at the end you will see step by step the results and if the script ends correctly RQM will show you the script as "passed".
Thanks for the answer Juan. I solved this by passing the testcase name from Script Argument part of RQM and fetching the arguments in my starter script as shown below:-
public void testMain(Object[] args) throws Exception
{
String n=args[0].toString();
logInfo("Parameter from RQM"+n);
ModuleDriver d=new ModuleDriver();
d.execute_main(n);
}
Since I have verification points setup for each of the steps in my test cases the results get reported based on each of those verification points in RQM which is what i needed.