I have used a left join on two of my tables. Now I want to use case to identify the records from my left table who don't have a match in the right table. Such records exist and have a null value in the 'id_zeus' column of my join, however when I execute the case, it is as these fields don't exist. Where am I going wrong ? I get "Present" in all my column Disturbance. I am using Oracle SQL developer.
SELECT
CASE DP.ID_PRB
WHEN NULL
THEN 'Absence'
ELSE 'Present' END as Disturbance,
FROM
FIRE.WSITE WI
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT DISTINCT
DPL.ID_PERT as ID_PRB
FROM FIRE.DEPPLAN DPL
GROUP BY DPL.ID_PERT
) DPL
ON WI.ID_PERT = DP.ID_PERT
What is const? You don't seem to need it. The SELECT DISTINCT and GROUP BY are redundant, so use only one of them. And your alias on the subquery is incorrect.
But your problem is the comparison to NULL. It doesn't even match when doing a comparison as you are doing in CASE. You need to use IS NULL:
SELECT (CASE WHEN DP.ID_PRB IS NULL THEN 'Absence' ELSE 'Present'
END) as Disturbance,
FROM FIRE.WSITE WI LEFT JOIN
(SELECT DISTINCT DPL.ID_PERT as ID_PRB
FROM FIRE.OSI_DEVIATION_PLANS DP
) DP
ON WI.ID_PERT = DP.ID_PERT;
This query would commonly be written as:
SELECT (CASE WHEN NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM FIRE.OSI_DEVIATION_PLANS DP
WHERE WI.ID_PERT = DP.ID_PERT
)
THEN 'Absence' ELSE 'Present'
END) as Disturbance,
FROM FIRE.WSITE WI ;
This offers more opportunities for optimization.
Related
I have a query like this:
SELECT
jobs.*,
(
CASE
WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state
ELSE 'NEW'
END
) AS lead_state
FROM
jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON
lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND
lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
WHERE
lead_state = 'NEW'
Which gives the following error:
PGError: ERROR: column "lead_state" does not exist
LINE 1: ...s.id AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3 WHERE (lead_state...
In MySql this is valid, but apparently not in Postgresql. From what I can gather, the reason is that the SELECT part of the query is evaluated later than the WHERE part. Is there a common workaround for this problem?
I struggled on the same issue and "mysql syntax is non-standard" is not a valid argument in my opinion. PostgreSQL adds handy non-standard extensions as well, for example "INSERT ... RETURNING ..." to get auto ids after inserts. Also, repeating large queries is not an elegant solution.
However, I found the WITH statement very helpful (CTE's). It sort of creates a temporary view within the query which you can use like a usual table then. I'm not sure if I have rewritten your JOIN correctly, but in general it should work like this:
WITH jobs_refined AS (
SELECT
jobs.*,
(SELECT CASE WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state ELSE 'NEW' END) AS lead_state
FROM jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations
ON lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
)
SELECT *
FROM jobs_refined
WHERE lead_state = 'NEW'
You would need to either duplicate the case statement in the where clause, or my preference is to do something like the following:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT
jobs.*,
(CASE WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state ELSE 'NEW' END) as lead_state
FROM
"jobs"
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
) q1
WHERE (lead_state = 'NEW')
MySQL's support is, as you experienced, non-standard. The correct way is to reprint the same expression used in the SELECT clause:
SELECT
jobs.*,
CASE
WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state
ELSE 'NEW'
END AS lead_state
FROM
jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON
lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND
lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
WHERE
lead_informations.state IS NULL
I believe the common solution is to use an inner SELECT for the calculation (or CASE statement in this case) so that the result of the inner SELECT is available to the entire outer query by the time the execution gets to that query. Otherwise, the WHERE clause is evaluated first and knows nothing about the SELECT clause.
Subquery:
SELECT "tab_1"."BirthDate", "tab_1"."col_1" FROM (
SELECT BirthDate, DATEADD(year, 18, BirthDate) AS "col_1" FROM Employees
) AS "tab_1"
WHERE "tab_1"."col_1" >= '2000-12-31';
I used alias in where like this. (Sub Query).
Select "Vendors"."VendorId", "Vendors"."Name","Result"."Total"
From (Select "Trans"."VendorId", ("Trans"."A"+"Trans"."B"+"Trans"."C") AS "Total"
FROM "Trans"
WHERE "Trans"."Year"=2014
) As "Result"
JOIN "Vendors" ON "Result"."VendorId"="Vendors"."VendorId"
WHERE "Vendors"."Class"='I' AND "Result"."Total" > 200
I've built a query for a summary table of information, and it's almost there, with one small bug. The confirmed_class_count variable comes back too high if there's multiple users on a class, leading me to believe that the number isn't distinct
Here's my current code:
SELECT "staffs".*,
count(distinct subclasses) as class_count,
sum(case when users.confirmed_at is not null then 1 else 0 end) confirmed_class_count
FROM
staffs
INNER JOIN classes as subclasses on staffs.staff_id = ANY(subclasses.staff)
INNER JOIN "classes_users" ON "classes_users"."class_id" = "subclasses"."id"
INNER JOIN "users" ON "users"."id" = "classes_users"."user_id"
INNER JOIN class_types ON class_types.code = subclasses.class_type_code
WHERE
(subclasses.closed_date is NULL OR subclasses.closed_date > '2019-09-06')
GROUP BY
staffs.id ORDER BY "staffs"."full_name" ASC
I want to replace the sum with something like (select distinct count(*) from subcases where users.confirmed_at is not null) as confirmed_case_count but I get relation "subclasses" does not exist.
How do I get what I'm intending here?
You can use count distinct with conditional aggregation. Replace
sum(class when users.confirmed_at is not null then 1 else 0 end) confirmed_class_count
^ looks like a typo, this should be case not class
with
count(distinct case when users.confirmed_at is not null then classes_users.class_id end) confirmed_class_count
Having a slow day....could use some assistance writing a simple ANSI SQL query.
I have a list of individuals within families (first and last names), and a second table which lists a subset of those individuals. I would like to create a third table which flags every individual within a family if ANY of the individuals are not listed in the second table. The goal is essentially to flag "incomplete" families.
Below is an example of the two input tables, and the desired third table.
As I said...very simple...having a slow day. Thanks!
I think you want a left join and case expression:
select t1.*,
(case when t2.first_name is null then 'INCOMPLETE' else 'OK' end) as flag
from table1 t1 left join
table2 t2
on t1.first_name = t2.first_name and t1.last_name = t2.last_name;
Of course, this marks "Diane Thomson" as "OK", but I think that is an error in the question.
EDIT:
Oh, I see. The last name defines the family (that seems like a pretty big assumption). But you can do this with window functions:
select t1.*,
(case when count(t2.first_name) over (partition by t1.last_name) =
count(*) over (partition by t1.last_name)
then 'OK'
else 'INCOMPLETE'
end) as flag
from table1 t1 left join
table2 t2
on t1.first_name = t2.first_name and t1.last_name = t2.last_name;
That's not simple, at least not in SAS :-)
Standard SQL, when Windowed Aggregates are supported:
select ft.*,
-- counts differ when st.first_name is null due to the outer join
case when count(*) over (partition by ft.last_name)
= count(st.first_name) over (partition by ft.last_name)
then 'OK'
else 'INCOMPLETE'
end
from first_table as ft
left join second_table as st
on ft.first_name = st.first_name
and ft.last_name = ft.last_name
Otherwise you need to a standard aggregate and join back:
select ft.*, st.flag
from first_table as ft
join
(
select ft.last_name,
case when count(*)
= count(st.first_name)
then 'OK'
else 'INCOMPLETE'
end as flag
from first_table as ft
left join second_table as st
on ft.first_name = st.first_name
and ft.last_name = st.last_name
group by ft.last_name
) as st
on ft.last_name = st.last_name
It is pretty easy to do in SAS if you want to take advantage of its non-ANSI SQL feature of automatically re-merging aggregate function results back onto detail records.
select
a.first
, a.last
, case when 1=max(missing(b.last)) then 'INCOMPLETE'
else 'OK'
end as flag
from table1 a left join table2 b
on a.last=b.last and a.first=b.first
group by 2
order by 2,1
;
Here is my query:
SELECT DISTINCT v.codi, m.nom, v.matricula, v.data_compra, v.color,
v.combustible, v.asseguranca,
(CASE WHEN lloguer.dataf IS NOT NULL THEN 'Si' ELSE 'Llogat' END) AS Disponible
FROM vehicle v
INNER JOIN model m on model_codi=m.codi
INNER JOIN lloguer on codi_vehicle=v.codi
WHERE Disponible='Si';
What I'm trying to do it's to show only those rows that have the "lloguer.dataf" is not NULL, but it doesn't alow me to use the "Disponible" alias to do the last line comparison.
What can I do?
This is how the info is shown (with some more atribute) without the last line comparison.
The problem is the alias doesnt exists yet. So you have to repeat the full code or create a subquery.
SELECT *
FROM ( .... ) YourQuery
WHERE Disponible='Si';
You can read more details here https://community.oracle.com/thread/1109532?tstart=0
Remove your CASE WHEN from the SELECT block and replace your WHERE clause with:
WHERE lloguer.dataf IS NOT NULL
I'm a TSQL guy by nature, but can you do this?
Select distinct codi, nom,matricula, data_compra, colour, combustible, asseguranca from
(SELECT DISTINCT v.codi, m.nom, v.matricula, v.data_compra, v.color,
v.combustible, v.asseguranca,
(CASE WHEN lloguer.dataf IS NOT NULL THEN 'Si' ELSE 'Llogat' END) AS Disponible
FROM vehicle v
INNER JOIN model m on model_codi=m.codi
INNER JOIN lloguer on codi_vehicle=v.codi)
WHERE Disponible='Si';
As #JuanCarlosOropeza has stated, the alias doesn't exist until the data is initially fetched. This is why you would be able to use the alias in an order by clause without using a subquery, but not in the where clause as the data hasn't been fetched yet.
I have a query like this:
SELECT
jobs.*,
(
CASE
WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state
ELSE 'NEW'
END
) AS lead_state
FROM
jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON
lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND
lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
WHERE
lead_state = 'NEW'
Which gives the following error:
PGError: ERROR: column "lead_state" does not exist
LINE 1: ...s.id AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3 WHERE (lead_state...
In MySql this is valid, but apparently not in Postgresql. From what I can gather, the reason is that the SELECT part of the query is evaluated later than the WHERE part. Is there a common workaround for this problem?
I struggled on the same issue and "mysql syntax is non-standard" is not a valid argument in my opinion. PostgreSQL adds handy non-standard extensions as well, for example "INSERT ... RETURNING ..." to get auto ids after inserts. Also, repeating large queries is not an elegant solution.
However, I found the WITH statement very helpful (CTE's). It sort of creates a temporary view within the query which you can use like a usual table then. I'm not sure if I have rewritten your JOIN correctly, but in general it should work like this:
WITH jobs_refined AS (
SELECT
jobs.*,
(SELECT CASE WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state ELSE 'NEW' END) AS lead_state
FROM jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations
ON lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
)
SELECT *
FROM jobs_refined
WHERE lead_state = 'NEW'
You would need to either duplicate the case statement in the where clause, or my preference is to do something like the following:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT
jobs.*,
(CASE WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state ELSE 'NEW' END) as lead_state
FROM
"jobs"
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
) q1
WHERE (lead_state = 'NEW')
MySQL's support is, as you experienced, non-standard. The correct way is to reprint the same expression used in the SELECT clause:
SELECT
jobs.*,
CASE
WHEN lead_informations.state IS NOT NULL THEN lead_informations.state
ELSE 'NEW'
END AS lead_state
FROM
jobs
LEFT JOIN lead_informations ON
lead_informations.job_id = jobs.id
AND
lead_informations.mechanic_id = 3
WHERE
lead_informations.state IS NULL
I believe the common solution is to use an inner SELECT for the calculation (or CASE statement in this case) so that the result of the inner SELECT is available to the entire outer query by the time the execution gets to that query. Otherwise, the WHERE clause is evaluated first and knows nothing about the SELECT clause.
Subquery:
SELECT "tab_1"."BirthDate", "tab_1"."col_1" FROM (
SELECT BirthDate, DATEADD(year, 18, BirthDate) AS "col_1" FROM Employees
) AS "tab_1"
WHERE "tab_1"."col_1" >= '2000-12-31';
I used alias in where like this. (Sub Query).
Select "Vendors"."VendorId", "Vendors"."Name","Result"."Total"
From (Select "Trans"."VendorId", ("Trans"."A"+"Trans"."B"+"Trans"."C") AS "Total"
FROM "Trans"
WHERE "Trans"."Year"=2014
) As "Result"
JOIN "Vendors" ON "Result"."VendorId"="Vendors"."VendorId"
WHERE "Vendors"."Class"='I' AND "Result"."Total" > 200