Rewrite a query with GROUP BY ALL - sql

Microsoft has deprecated GROUP BY ALL and while the query might work now, I'd like to future-proof this query for future SQL upgrades.
Currently, my query is:
SELECT qt.QueueName AS [Queue] ,
COUNT ( qt.QueueName ) AS [#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes] ,
COUNT ( CASE WHEN dq.AssignedToUserID = 0 THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END
) AS [#ofUnassignedEnvelopes] ,
MIN ( dq.DocumentDate ) AS [OldestEnvelope]
FROM dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_QueueTypes AS [qt]
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_Queue AS [dq] ON dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID
WHERE dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
GROUP BY ALL qt.QueueName
ORDER BY qt.QueueName ASC;
And the resulting data set:
<table><tbody><tr><td>Queue</td><td>#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes</td><td>#ofUnassignedEnvelopes</td><td>OldestEnvelope</td></tr><tr><td>Cancellations</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>NULL</td></tr><tr><td>Dealer</td><td>26</td><td>17</td><td>2018-04-06</td></tr><tr><td>Matched to Registration</td><td>93</td><td>82</td><td>2018-04-04</td></tr><tr><td>New Registration</td><td>166</td><td>140</td><td>2018-03-21</td></tr><tr><td>Remaining Documents</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2018-04-04</td></tr><tr><td>Renewals</td><td>217</td><td>0</td><td>2018-04-03</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers</td><td>296</td><td>245</td><td>2018-03-30</td></tr><tr><td>Writebacks</td><td>53</td><td>46</td><td>2018-04-09</td></tr></tbody></table>
I've tried various versions using CTE's and UNION's but I cannot get result set to generate correctly - the records that have no counts will not display or I will have duplicate records displayed.
Any suggestions on how to make this work without the GROUP BY ALL?
Below is one attempt where I tried a CTE with a UNION:
;WITH QueueTypes ( QueueTypeID, QueueName )
AS ( SELECT QueueTypeID ,
QueueName
FROM dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_QueueTypes )
SELECT qt.QueueName AS [Queue] ,
COUNT ( qt.QueueName ) AS [#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes] ,
COUNT ( CASE WHEN dq.AssignedToUserID = 0 THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END
) AS [#ofUnassignedEnvelopes] ,
CONVERT ( VARCHAR (8), MIN ( dq.DocumentDate ), 1 ) AS [OldestEnvelope]
FROM QueueTypes AS qt
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_Queue AS dq ON dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID
WHERE dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
GROUP BY qt.QueueName
UNION ALL
SELECT qt.QueueName AS [Queue] ,
COUNT ( qt.QueueName ) AS [#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes] ,
COUNT ( CASE WHEN dq.AssignedToUserID = 0 THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END
) AS [#ofUnassignedEnvelopes] ,
CONVERT ( VARCHAR (8), MIN ( dq.DocumentDate ), 1 ) AS [OldestEnvelope]
FROM QueueTypes AS qt
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_Queue AS dq ON dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID
GROUP BY qt.QueueName
But the results are not close to being correct:

Your current query doesn't work as it seems to work, because while you outer join table VehicleReg_Documents_Queue you dismiss all outer joined rows in the WHERE clause, so you are where you would have been with a mere inner join. You may want to consider either moving your criteria to the ON clause or make this an inner join right away.
It is also weird that you join queue type and queue not on the queue ID or the queue type ID, but on dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID. That's like joining employees and addresses on employee number matching the house number. At least that's what it looks like.
(Then why does your queue type table have a queue name? Shouldn't the queue table contain the queue name instead? But this is not about your query, but about your data model.)
GROUP BY ALL means: "Please give us all QueueNames, even when the WHERE clause dismisses them. I see two possibilities for your query:
You do want an outer join actually. Then there is no WHERE clause and you can simply make this GROUP BY qt.QueueName.
You don't want an outer join. Then we want a row per QueueName in the table, which we might not get with simply changing GROUP BY ALL qt.QueueName to GROUP BY qt.QueueName.
In that second case we want all QueueNames first and outer join your query:
select
qn.QueueName AS [Queue],
q.[#ofUnassignedEnvelopes],
q.[OldestEnvelope]
FROM (select distinct QueueName from VehicleReg_Documents_QueueTypes) qn
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT qt.QueueName,
COUNT ( qt.QueueName ) AS [#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes] ,
COUNT ( CASE WHEN dq.AssignedToUserID = 0 THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END
) AS [#ofUnassignedEnvelopes] ,
MIN ( dq.DocumentDate ) AS [OldestEnvelope]
FROM dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_QueueTypes AS [qt]
JOIN dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_Queue AS [dq] ON dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID
WHERE dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
) q ON q.QueueName = qn.QueueName
GROUP BY ALL qn.QueueName
ORDER BY qn.QueueName ASC;

I think the best corollary here for a 'GROUP BY ALL' into something more ANSI compliant would be a CASE statement. Without knowing your data, it's hard to say for sure if this is 1:1, but I'm betting it's in the ballpark.
SELECT qt.QueueName AS [Queue]
,COUNT(CASE
WHEN dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
THEN qt.QueueName
END) AS [#ofUnprocessedEnvelopes]
,COUNT(CASE
WHEN dq.AssignedToUserID = 0
AND dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS [#ofUnassignedEnvelopes]
,MIN(CASE
WHEN dq.IsProcessed = 0
AND dq.PageNumber = 1
THEN dq.DocumentDate
END) AS [OldestEnvelope]
FROM dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_QueueTypes AS [qt]
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.VehicleReg_Documents_Queue AS [dq] ON dq.QueueID = qt.QueueTypeID
GROUP BY qt.QueueName
ORDER BY qt.QueueName ASC;
That's a bit uglier because every aggregate has to have the WHERE conditions inside a case statement, but at least you are future proof.

Related

How do you properly query the result of a complex join statement in SQL?

New to advanced SQL!
I'm trying to write a query that returns the COUNT(*) and SUM of the resulting columns from this query:
DECLARE #Id INT = 1000;
SELECT
*,
CASE
WHEN Id1 >= 6 THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS Tier1,
CASE
WHEN Id1 >= 4 THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS Tier2,
CASE
WHEN Id1 >= 2 THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS Tier3
FROM (
SELECT
Org.OrgID,
App.AppID,
App.FirstName,
App.LastName,
MAX(AppSubmitU_Level.Id1) AS Id1
FROM Org
INNER JOIN AppEmployment
ON AppEmployment.OrgID = Org.OrgID
INNER JOIN App
ON App.AppID = AppEmployment.AppID
INNER JOIN AppSubmit
ON App.AppID = AppSubmit.AppID
INNER JOIN AppSubmitU_Level
ON AppSubmit.LevelID = AppSubmitU_Level.Id1
INNER JOIN AppEmpU_VerifyStatus
ON AppEmpU_VerifyStatus.VerifyStatusID = AppEmployment.VerifyStatusID
WHERE AppSubmitU_Level.SubmitTypeID = 1 -- Career
AND AppEmpU_VerifyStatus.StatusIsVerified = 1
AND AppSubmit.[ExpireDate] IS NOT NULL
AND AppSubmit.[ExpireDate] > GETDATE()
AND Org.OrgID = #Id
GROUP BY
Org.OrgID,
App.AppID,
App.FirstName,
App.LastName
) employees
I've tried to do so by moving the #Id outside the original query, and adding a SELECT(*), SUM, and SUM to the top, like so:
DECLARE #OrgID INT = 1000;
SELECT COUNT(*), SUM(employees.Tier1), SUM(employees.Tier2), SUM(employees.Tier3)
FROM
(SELECT *,
...
) AS employees
);
When I run the query, however, I'm getting the errors:
The multi-part identifier employees.Tier1 could not be bound
The same errors appear for the other identifiers in my SUM statements.
I'm assuming this has to do with the fact that the Tier1, Tier2, and Tier3 columns are being returned by the inner join query in my FROM(), and aren't values set by the existing tables that I'm querying. But I can't figure out how to rewrite it to initialize properly.
Thanks in advance for the help!
This is a scope problem: employees is defined in the subquery only, it is not available in the outer scope. You basically want to alias the outer query:
DECLARE #OrgID INT = 1000;
SELECT COUNT(*), SUM(employees.Tier1) TotalTier1, SUM(employees.Tier2) TotalTier2, SUM(employees.Tier3) TotalTier3
FROM (
SELECT *,
...
) AS employees
) AS employees;
--^ here
Note that I added column aliases to the outer query, which is a good practice in SQL.
It might be easier to understand what is going on if you use another alias for the outer query:
SELECT COUNT(*), SUM(e.Tier1), SUM(e.Tier2), SUM(e.Tier3)
FROM (
SELECT *,
...
) AS employees
) AS e;
Note that you don't actually need to qualify the column names in the outer query, since column names are unambigous anyway.
And finally: you don't actually need a subquery. You could write the query as:
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN Id1 >= 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS TotalTier1,
SUM(CASE WHEN Id1 >= 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS TotalTier2,
SUM(CASE WHEN Id1 >= 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS TotalTier3
FROM (
SELECT
Org.OrgID,
App.AppID,
App.FirstName,
App.LastName,
MAX(AppSubmitU_Level.Id1) AS Id1
FROM Org
INNER JOIN AppEmployment
ON AppEmployment.OrgID = Org.OrgID
INNER JOIN App
ON App.AppID = AppEmployment.AppID
INNER JOIN AppSubmit
ON App.AppID = AppSubmit.AppID
INNER JOIN AppSubmitU_Level
ON AppSubmit.LevelID = AppSubmitU_Level.Id1
INNER JOIN AppEmpU_VerifyStatus
ON AppEmpU_VerifyStatus.VerifyStatusID = AppEmployment.VerifyStatusID
WHERE AppSubmitU_Level.SubmitTypeID = 1 -- Career
AND AppEmpU_VerifyStatus.StatusIsVerified = 1
AND AppSubmit.[ExpireDate] IS NOT NULL
AND AppSubmit.[ExpireDate] > GETDATE()
AND Org.OrgID = #Id
GROUP BY
Org.OrgID,
App.AppID,
App.FirstName,
App.LastName
) employees

Select values where tow different conditions

I have a Questions group table like follows:
ID, NAME, DESCRIPTION, VERSION_ID
Versions table columns are:
ID, NUMBER, VERSION_STATE
VERSION_STATE is an enumerated that can be 0, 1 or 2.
I need to select all questions group that its version has thevVERSION_STATE 0 or 1, but if there is a questions group with a VERSION_STATE = 0 I don't have to return the questions group with the VERSION_STATE = 1.
The simplest approach is:
SELECT distinct QG.id FROM healthsafety.hs_questions_group QG
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM healthsafety.hs_version) VERSION
ON QG.VERSION_ID = VERSION.ID
WHERE
VERSION.VERSION_STATE=0
OR VERSION.VERSION_STATE=1
The problem is that this query returns all questions group with the VERSION_STATE 0 or 1. If I remove the or clause, and there are not questions groups with VERSION_STATE = 0, I need to return the questions groups with VERSION_STATE = 1.
I think that I need an if else or case statement but I am stucked. Any Idea?
Note that I have to implement this using criteria, so I need to use the simplest solution.
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT OG.ID,OG.NAME,OG.DESCRIPTION,VERSION.ID,VERSION.NUMBER,VERSION.VERSION_STATE,ROW_NUMBER()OVER(PARTITION BY OG.ID ORDER BY VERSION.VERSION_STATE ASC) as INDICATOR
FROM healthsafety.hs_questions_group QG
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(SELECT * FROM healthsafety.hs_version) VERSION
ON QG.VERSION_ID = VERSION.ID
WHERE
VERSION.VERSION_STATE=0
OR VERSION.VERSION_STATE=1
) AS ABC
WHERE (ABC.VERSION_STATE = 0 and ABC.INDICATOR = 1)
OR (ABC.VERSION_STATE = 1 and ABC.INDICATOR = 1)
Using a common table expression and a union all where the second query uses not exists() to only return rows where version_state=1 when rows with version_state=0 do not exist.
;with cte as (
select qg.id, v.version_state
from healthsafety.hs_questions_group qg
inner join healthsafety.hs_version version v
on qg.version_id = v.id
where v.version_state in (0,1)
)
select id
from cte
where version_state = 0
union all
select qg.id
from cte
where version_state = 1
and not exists (
select 1
from cte
where version_state = 0
)

How to improve sql script performance

The following script is very slow when its run.
I have no idea how to improve the performance of the script.
Even with a view takes more than quite a lot minutes.
Any idea please share to me.
SELECT DISTINCT
( id )
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
ct.id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
LEFT JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Customer_ids] hnci ON ct.id = hnci.contact_id
WHERE hnci.customer_id IN (
SELECT DISTINCT
( [Customer_ID] )
FROM [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header]
WHERE actual_transaction_date > '20120218' )
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
contact_id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Restaurant_Attendance]
WHERE ( created > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
OR modified > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
)
AND ( [Fifth_Floor_London] = 1
OR [Fourth_Floor_Leeds] = 1
OR [Second_Floor_Bristol] = 1
)
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
( ct.id )
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
INNER JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Wifinity_Devices] wfd ON ct.wifinity_uniqueID = wfd.[CustomerUniqueID]
AND startconnection > '2012-02-17'
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
comdt.id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Complete_dataset] comdt
LEFT JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Aggregate_Spend_Counts] agsc ON comdt.id = agsc.contact_id
WHERE agsc.contact_id IS NULL
AND ( opt_out_Mail <> 1
OR opt_out_email <> 1
OR opt_out_SMS <> 1
OR opt_out_Mail IS NULL
OR opt_out_email IS NULL
OR opt_out_SMS IS NULL
)
AND ( address_1 IS NOT NULL
OR email IS NOT NULL
OR mobile IS NOT NULL
)
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
( contact_id ) AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[VIP_Card_Holders]
WHERE VIP_Card_number IS NOT NULL
) AS tbl
Wow, where to start...
--this distinct does nothing. Union is already distinct
--SELECT DISTINCT
-- ( id )
--FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT [Customer_ID] as ID
FROM [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header]
where actual_transaction_date > '20120218' )
UNION
SELECT
contact_id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Restaurant_Attendance]
-- not sure that you are getting the date range you want. Should these be >=
-- if you want everything that occurred on the 18th or after you want >= '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
-- if you want everything that occurred on the 19th or after you want >= '2012-02-19 00:00:00.000'
-- the way you have it now, you will get everything on the 18th unless it happened exactly at midnight
WHERE ( created > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
OR modified > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
)
AND ( [Fifth_Floor_London] = 1
OR [Fourth_Floor_Leeds] = 1
OR [Second_Floor_Bristol] = 1
)
-- all of this does nothing because we already have every id in the contact table from the first query
-- UNION
-- SELECT
-- ( ct.id )
-- FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
-- INNER JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Wifinity_Devices] wfd ON ct.wifinity_uniqueID = wfd.[CustomerUniqueID]
-- AND startconnection > '2012-02-17'
UNION
-- cleaned this up with isnull function and coalesce
SELECT
comdt.id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Complete_dataset] comdt
LEFT JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Aggregate_Spend_Counts] agsc ON comdt.id = agsc.contact_id
WHERE agsc.contact_id IS NULL
AND ( isnull(opt_out_Mail,0) <> 1
OR isnull(opt_out_email,0) <> 1
OR isnull(opt_out_SMS,0) <> 1
)
AND coalesce(address_1 , email, mobile) IS NOT NULL
UNION
SELECT
( contact_id ) AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[VIP_Card_Holders]
WHERE VIP_Card_number IS NOT NULL
-- ) AS tbl
Where exists is generally faster than in as well.
Or conditions are generally slower as well, use more union statements instead.
And learn to use left joins correctly. If you have a where condition (other than where id is null) on the table on teh right side of a left join, it will convert to an inner join. If this is not what you want, then your code is currently giving you an incorrect result set.
See http://wiki.lessthandot.com/index.php/WHERE_conditions_on_a_LEFT_JOIN for an explanation of how to fix.
As stated in a comment optimize one at a time. See which one takes the longest and focus on that one.
union will remove duplicates so you don't need the distinct on the individual queries
On you first I would try this:
The left join is killed by the WHERE hnci.customer_id IN so you might as well have a join.
The sub-query is not efficient as cannot use an index on the IN.
The query optimizer does not know what in ( select .. ) will return so it cannot optimize use of indexes.
SELECT ct.id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Customer_ids] hnci
ON ct.id = hnci.contact_id
JOIN [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header] th
on hnci.customer_id = th.[Customer_ID]
and th.actual_transaction_date > '20120218'
On that second join the query optimizer has the opportunity of which condition to apply first. Let say [Customer].[dbo].[Customer_ids].[customer_id] and [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header] each have indexes. The query optimizer has the option to apply that before [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header].[actual_transaction_date].
If [actual_transaction_date] is not indexed then for sure it would do the other ID join first.
With your in ( select ... ) the query optimizer has no option but to apply the actual_transaction_date > '20120218' first. OK some times query optimizer is smart enough to use an index inside the in outside the in but why make it hard for the query optimizer. I have found the query optimizer make better decisions if you make the decisions easier.
A join on a sub-query has the same problem. You take options away from the query optimizer. Give the query optimizer room to breathe.
try this, temptable should help you:
IF OBJECT_ID('Tempdb..#Temp1') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #Temp1
--Low perfomance because of using "WHERE hnci.customer_id IN ( .... ) " - loop join must be
--and this "where" condition will apply to two tables after left join,
--so result will be same as with two inner joints but with bad perfomance
--SELECT DISTINCT
-- ct.id AS id
--INTO #temp1
--FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
-- LEFT JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Customer_ids] hnci ON ct.id = hnci.contact_id
--WHERE hnci.customer_id IN (
-- SELECT DISTINCT
-- ( [Customer_ID] )
-- FROM [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header]
-- WHERE actual_transaction_date > '20120218' )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--this will give the same result but with better perfomance then previouse one
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT DISTINCT
ct.id AS id
INTO #temp1
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Customer_ids] hnci ON ct.id = hnci.contact_id
JOIN ( SELECT DISTINCT
( [Customer_ID] )
FROM [Transactions].[dbo].[Transaction_Header]
WHERE actual_transaction_date > '20120218'
) T ON hnci.customer_id = T.[Customer_ID]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSERT INTO #temp1
( id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
contact_id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Restaurant_Attendance]
WHERE ( created > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
OR modified > '2012-02-18 00:00:00.000'
)
AND ( [Fifth_Floor_London] = 1
OR [Fourth_Floor_Leeds] = 1
OR [Second_Floor_Bristol] = 1
)
INSERT INTO #temp1
( id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
( ct.id )
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Contact] ct
INNER JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Wifinity_Devices] wfd ON ct.wifinity_uniqueID = wfd.[CustomerUniqueID]
AND startconnection > '2012-02-17'
INSERT INTO #temp1
( id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
comdt.id AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[Complete_dataset] comdt
LEFT JOIN [Customer].[dbo].[Aggregate_Spend_Counts] agsc ON comdt.id = agsc.contact_id
WHERE agsc.contact_id IS NULL
AND ( opt_out_Mail <> 1
OR opt_out_email <> 1
OR opt_out_SMS <> 1
OR opt_out_Mail IS NULL
OR opt_out_email IS NULL
OR opt_out_SMS IS NULL
)
AND ( address_1 IS NOT NULL
OR email IS NOT NULL
OR mobile IS NOT NULL
)
INSERT INTO #temp1
( id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
( contact_id ) AS id
FROM [Customer].[dbo].[VIP_Card_Holders]
WHERE VIP_Card_number IS NOT NULL
SELECT DISTINCT
id
FROM #temp1 AS T

Replace no result

I have a query like this:
SELECT TV.Descrizione as TipoVers,
sum(ImportoVersamento) as ImpTot,
count(*) as N,
month(DataAllibramento) as Mese
FROM PROC_Versamento V
left outer join dbo.PROC_TipoVersamento TV
on V.IDTipoVersamento = TV.IDTipoVersamento
inner join dbo.PROC_PraticaRiscossione PR
on V.IDPraticaRiscossioneAssociata = PR.IDPratica
inner join dbo.DA_Avviso A
on PR.IDDatiAvviso = A.IDAvviso
where DataAllibramento between '2012-09-08' and '2012-09-17' and A.IDFornitura = 4
group by V.IDTipoVersamento,month(DataAllibramento),TV.Descrizione
order by V.IDTipoVersamento,month(DataAllibramento)
This query must always return something. If no result is produced a
0 0 0 0
row must be returned. How can I do this. Use a isnull for every selected field isn't usefull.
Use a derived table with one row and do a outer apply to your other table / query.
Here is a sample with a table variable #T in place of your real table.
declare #T table
(
ID int,
Grp int
)
select isnull(Q.MaxID, 0) as MaxID,
isnull(Q.C, 0) as C
from (select 1) as T(X)
outer apply (
-- Your query goes here
select max(ID) as MaxID,
count(*) as C
from #T
group by Grp
) as Q
order by Q.C -- order by goes to the outer query
That will make sure you have always at least one row in the output.
Something like this using your query.
select isnull(Q.TipoVers, '0') as TipoVers,
isnull(Q.ImpTot, 0) as ImpTot,
isnull(Q.N, 0) as N,
isnull(Q.Mese, 0) as Mese
from (select 1) as T(X)
outer apply (
SELECT TV.Descrizione as TipoVers,
sum(ImportoVersamento) as ImpTot,
count(*) as N,
month(DataAllibramento) as Mese,
V.IDTipoVersamento
FROM PROC_Versamento V
left outer join dbo.PROC_TipoVersamento TV
on V.IDTipoVersamento = TV.IDTipoVersamento
inner join dbo.PROC_PraticaRiscossione PR
on V.IDPraticaRiscossioneAssociata = PR.IDPratica
inner join dbo.DA_Avviso A
on PR.IDDatiAvviso = A.IDAvviso
where DataAllibramento between '2012-09-08' and '2012-09-17' and A.IDFornitura = 4
group by V.IDTipoVersamento,month(DataAllibramento),TV.Descrizione
) as Q
order by Q.IDTipoVersamento, Q.Mese
Use COALESCE. It returns the first non-null value. E.g.
SELECT COALESCE(TV.Desc, 0)...
Will return 0 if TV.DESC is NULL.
You can try:
with dat as (select TV.[Desc] as TipyDesc, sum(Import) as ToImp, count(*) as N, month(Date) as Mounth
from /*DATA SOURCE HERE*/ as TV
group by [Desc], month(Date))
select [TipyDesc], ToImp, N, Mounth from dat
union all
select '0', 0, 0, 0 where (select count (*) from dat)=0
That should do what you want...
If it's ok to include the "0 0 0 0" row in a result set that has data, you can use a union:
SELECT TV.Desc as TipyDesc,
sum(Import) as TotImp,
count(*) as N,
month(Date) as Mounth
...
UNION
SELECT
0,0,0,0
Depending on the database, you may need a FROM for the second SELECT. In Oracle, this would be "FROM DUAL". For MySQL, no FROM is necessary

Find records with exact matches on a many to many relationship

I have three tables that look like these:
PROD
Prod_ID|Desc
------------
P1|Foo1
P2|Foo2
P3|Foo3
P4|Foo4
...
RAM
Ram_ID|Desc
------------
R1|Bar1
R2|Bar2
R3|Bar3
R4|Bar4
...
PROD_RAM
Prod_ID|Ram_ID
------------
P1|R1
P2|R2
P3|R1
P3|R2
P3|R3
P4|R3
P5|R1
P5|R2
...
Between PROD and RAM there's a Many-To-Many relationship described by the PROD_RAM table.
Given a Ram_ID set like (R1,R3) I would like to find all the PROD that has exactly ONE or ALL of the RAM of the given set.
Given (R1,R3) should return for example P1,P4 and P5; P3 should not be returned because has R1 and R3 but also R2.
What's the fastest query to get all the PROD that has exactly ONE or ALL of the Ram_ID of a given RAM set?
EDIT:
The PROD_RAM table could contain relationship bigger than 1->3 so, "hardcoded" checks for count = 1 OR = 2 are not a viable solution.
Another solution you could try for speed would be like this
;WITH CANDIDATES AS (
SELECT pr1.Prod_ID
, pr2.Ram_ID
FROM PROD_RAM pr1
INNER JOIN PROD_RAM pr2 ON pr2.Prod_ID = pr1.Prod_ID
WHERE pr1.Ram_ID IN ('R1', 'R3')
)
SELECT *
FROM CANDIDATES
WHERE CANDIDATES.Prod_ID NOT IN (
SELECT Prod_ID
FROM CANDIDATES
WHERE Ram_ID NOT IN ('R1', 'R3')
)
or if you don't like repeating the set conditions
;WITH SUBSET (Ram_ID) AS (
SELECT 'R1'
UNION ALL SELECT 'R3'
)
, CANDIDATES AS (
SELECT pr1.Prod_ID
, pr2.Ram_ID
FROM PROD_RAM pr1
INNER JOIN PROD_RAM pr2 ON pr2.Prod_ID = pr1.Prod_ID
INNER JOIN SUBSET s ON s.Ram_ID = pr1.Ram_ID
)
, EXCLUDES AS (
SELECT Prod_ID
FROM CANDIDATES
LEFT OUTER JOIN SUBSET s ON s.Ram_ID = CANDIDATES.Ram_ID
WHERE s.Ram_ID IS NULL
)
SELECT *
FROM CANDIDATES
LEFT OUTER JOIN EXCLUDES ON EXCLUDES.Prod_ID = CANDIDATES.Prod_ID
WHERE EXCLUDES.Prod_ID IS NULL
One way to do this would be something like the following:
SELECT PROD.Prod_ID FROM PROD WHERE
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM PROD_RAM WHERE PROD_RAM.Prod_ID = PROD.Prod_ID) > 0 AND
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM PROD_RAM WHERE PROD_RAM.Prod_ID = PROD.Prod_ID AND PROD.Ram_ID <>
IFNULL((SELECT TOP 1 Ram_ID FROM PROD_RAM WHERE PROD_RAM.Prod_ID = PROD.Prod_ID),0)) = 0
SELECT Prod_ID
FROM
( SELECT Prod_ID
, COUNT(*) AS cntAll
, COUNT( CASE WHEN Ram_ID IN (1,3)
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END
) AS cntGood
FROM PROD_RAM
GROUP BY Prod_ID
) AS grp
WHERE cntAll = cntGood
AND ( cntGood = 1
OR cntGood = 2 --- number of items in list (1,3)
)
Not at all sure if it's the fastest way. You'll have to try different ways to write this query (using JOINs and NOT EXISTS ) and test for speed.