Is ODL-SDNiApp still supported? - sdn

I am trying to test ODL-SDNiApp and found it not updated since Helium on this page https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNiApp:User_Guide. So, is it still supported by Opendaylight? if not, please list me some useful tools or methods for inter SDN controller communication.
Thanks.

According to the project page https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNi_App:Main, it last participated in the Boron release but it doesn't look like it's been active since. You can try the project mailing list or contact the listed committers. If it is inactive as it appears, perhaps you might want to try to reboot it.

Related

how can i update UI to show "WebRTC data channel" at match section in use by httptoolkit-server?

enter image description hereI've installed all httptoolkit-server and also the httptoolkit-ui to capture data and mock it up, i've installed mockrt,mockttp,docker,... plugin's too but i cant see "WebRTC data channel" in the match section like the image below
(picture is from httptoolkit blog : https://httptoolkit.tech/blog/developer-tools-decentralized-web/
how can i capture and mock RTC connection's in httptoolkit as it shown ?
I'm the developer of HTTP Toolkit. The feature you're looking for does not exist yet.
That blog post is just a proposal and an announcement of funding, and the screenshot is only an example mockup of the future UI.
This will be available within the new few months (keep an eye on that blog and the mailing list for updates) but it's not available today.
(I think you also emailed me earlier asking about this, and I replied there - feel free to respond by email if you want to discuss this further).

Bitbucket - Add default task when creating a pull requst

I am looking into improving the workflow my colleague and myself are using for BitBucket. Something that is often forgotten is the documentation for the feature we are working on therefore I thought I good way to 'don't forget' would be to add a Task as soon as a Pull request is created for a particular branch.
The first think a developer should do after creating the Pull Request would be:
- Add a comment, something like WIP (Work in Progress)
- Create a task underneath, something like 'Add documentation'
In this way, we won't be able to 'Merge' the branch into 'Develop' if All tasks are not completed (this is how it is currenly configured).
Rather than having the developer to do so, it would be good if we can have the system to do so as soon as we create the Pull Request.
Is that possible?
I had searchd on Internet, to be honest I didn't understand if taht functionality comes with like the Premium package or if it is an Add-On...who knows.
Thanks :)
Atlassian recently added a 'Default Pull Request Tasks' feature to Bitbucket Cloud.
The same functionality was previously available as a Bitbucket app, but it was removed in May 2020. It's now a native feature.
Product announcement: https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-product-updates-august-2022
Feature details: https://bitbucket.org/blog/default-pull-request-tasks
You can try this. It is free for 30 days.
https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1225598/default-tasks-for-pull-requests?tab=pricing&hosting=datacenter
I did not find any free solutions.

Opera Next extension autoupdate via update_url

I got problem with my company internal extension. They don't want to publish it, as it does gather data on external server. So I need to host it myself... but would like not to lose ability of autoupdate.
As far as I read I need to use update_url in manifest, but nothing more is said in Opera documentation...
"update_url": "http://path/to/updateInfo.xml", - as it is said in documentation page
Ok... and what should I put in that xml? Will it autoupdate or just notify users about new updates? Where do I put rest of updated files?
I tried to concat Opera itself about this question, but they don't give any contact information except something like if you have problem, ask on stackoverflow... so here I am.
If it does not work, I was thinking about really BAD method, using unsafe-eval and keeping newest version in local storage... but would rather like to avoid that.
In general the behavior is the same as for Chrome. You can base on this document: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/autoupdate

Web Dynpro for ABAP Explanation Text (Green Underline) not working for certain users

I have recently added Explanation text to certain fields on the SRM Contract screen (both standard and cusom fields). The user that I unit tested with worked fine, however most other users do not work. After investigation I've found that it is not just the Explanation Text that I've added, but all Explanation Text that is missing.
According to the sap help entry the behaviour is similar to what I would expect for Help mode = off.
Is it possible to turn Help mode on or off on a per user (or role) basis, and where should I look to find this?
you already found it: SAP Help says:
"You can activate the help mode either in the personal settings in the portal or in the associated URL Parameter" ... means in personal Settings, but I feel that you want it globally not on personal base or in the associated URL Parameter. The latter means you'll have to find the application in the Portal Content, there you can find URL Parameter and i would try adding HELPMODE=ON... does this help you?
start by rightclicking you application "Technical Help" or "..Help" and see what application you are looking for. Then Google the application and add +"Portal Content", I think then you'll find it.
regards, zy

UserExtendedProperties.GetValue("ANID") equivalent on Windows 8

On Windows Phone 7 you can do like this to get an anonymous unique id for the current user.
UserExtendedProperties.GetValue("ANID")
I have search for a while to find an equivalent for my current Windows 8 (WinRT), but I can't seem to find it. All the results I find, talks about how to get a Hardware/device specific ID, which IS supported, it's just not what I need.
Thanks in advance,
Mads
Found out, thanks to xamlgeek an others, that it's not possible to get a Unique User Id in Windows 8 - at least for now.
So I have to fallback on Device Id, which is far from what I needed, but found this code snippet with works perfect (C#):
http://bartwullems.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/windows-8-uniquely-identifying-device.html
The answer is not good at all, because the user can upgrade his PC config (by pluging a bluetooth adapter or anything else). The good answer is to use the object :
Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.Current.RoamingSettings.Values["HighPriority"]
It's synchronized through the different installation of the apps on the cloud, more infos here :
The HighPriority key is special because it's get automatically during the new installation of the app.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsappdev/archive/2012/07/17/roaming-your-app-data.aspx
It's unwise to use GetPackageSpecificToken. This ID will change even if user just plug USB device into his PC/tab, or turn Wifi on/off. Actually it's a quite unstable thing, no idea why MSFT has ever made it.
I use LiveConnect instead (only Liveconnect user ID is needed and it's the same on all user devices). It much more reliable. See my post here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22389679/1656824