This question already has answers here:
Index n dimensional array with (n-1) d array
(3 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have a 3-d array. I find the indexes of the maxima along an axis using argmax. How do I now use these indexes to obtain the maximal values?
2nd part: How to do this for arrays of N-d?
Eg:
u = np.arange(12).reshape(3,4,1)
In [125]: e = u.argmax(axis=2)
Out[130]: e
array([[0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0]])
It would be nice if u[e] produced the expected results, but it doesn't work.
The return value of argmax along an axis can't be simply used as an index. It only works in a 1d case.
In [124]: u = np.arange(12).reshape(3,4,1)
In [125]: e = u.argmax(axis=2)
In [126]: u.shape
Out[126]: (3, 4, 1)
In [127]: e.shape
Out[127]: (3, 4)
e is (3,4), but its values only index the last dimension of u.
In [128]: u[e].shape
Out[128]: (3, 4, 4, 1)
Instead we have to construct indices for the other 2 dimensions, ones which broadcast with e. For example:
In [129]: I,J=np.ix_(range(3),range(4))
In [130]: I
Out[130]:
array([[0],
[1],
[2]])
In [131]: J
Out[131]: array([[0, 1, 2, 3]])
Those are (3,1) and (1,4). Those are compatible with (3,4) e and the desired output
In [132]: u[I,J,e]
Out[132]:
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11]])
This kind of question has been asked before, so probably should be marked as a duplicate. The fact that your last dimension is size 1, and hence e is all 0s, distracting readers from the underlying issue (using a multidimensional argmax as index).
numpy: how to get a max from an argmax result
Get indices of numpy.argmax elements over an axis
Assuming you've taken the argmax on the last dimension
In [156]: ij = np.indices(u.shape[:-1])
In [157]: u[(*ij,e)]
Out[157]:
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11]])
or:
ij = np.ix_(*[range(i) for i in u.shape[:-1]])
If the axis is in the middle, it'll take a bit more tuple fiddling to arrange the ij elements and e.
so for general N-d array
dims = np.ix_(*[range(x) for x in u.shape[:-1]])
u.__getitem__((*dims,e))
You can't write u[*dims,e], that's a syntax error, so I think you must use getitem directly.
Related
I have an array of arrays that I want to interpolate based on each array's min and max.
For a simple mxn array , with values ranging from 0 to 1, I can do this as follows:
x_inp=np.interp(x,(x.min(),x.max()),(0,0.7))
This suppresses every existing value to 0 to 0.7. However, if I have an array of dimension 100xmxn, the above method considers the global min/max and not the individual min/max of each of the mxn array.
Edit:
For example
x1=np.random.randint(0,5, size=(2, 4))
x2=np.random.randint(6,10, size=(2, 4))
my_list=[x1,x2]
my_array=np.asarray(my_list)
print(my_array)
>> array([[[1, 4, 3, 4],
[3, 2, 0, 0]],
[9, 6, 8, 6],
8, 7, 6, 7]]])
my_array is now of dimension 2x2x4 and my_array.min() and my_array.max() would give me 0 and 9. So If I interpolate, it won't work based on the min/max of the individual 2x4 arrays. What I want is, to have the interpolation work based on min/max of 0/4 for the 1st array and 6/9 for the second.
I have dataframe with 48870 rows and calculated embeddings with shape (48870, 768)
I wanna assign this embeddings to padnas column
When i try
test['original_text_embeddings'] = embeddings
I have an error: Wrong number of items passed 768, placement implies 1
I know if a make something like df.loc['original_text_embeddings'] = embeddings[0] will work but i need to automate this process
A dataframe/column needs a 1d list/array:
In [84]: x = np.arange(12).reshape(3,4)
In [85]: pd.Series(x)
...
ValueError: Data must be 1-dimensional
Splitting the array into a list (of arrays):
In [86]: pd.Series(list(x))
Out[86]:
0 [0, 1, 2, 3]
1 [4, 5, 6, 7]
2 [8, 9, 10, 11]
dtype: object
In [87]: _.to_numpy()
Out[87]:
array([array([0, 1, 2, 3]), array([4, 5, 6, 7]), array([ 8, 9, 10, 11])],
dtype=object)
Your embeddings have 768 columns, which would translate to equally 768 columns in a data frame. You are trying to assign all columns from the embeddings to just one column in the data frame, which is not possible.
What you could do is generating a new data frame from the embeddings and concatenate the test df with the embedding df
embedding_df = pd.DataFrame(embeddings)
test = pd.concat([test, embedding_df], axis=1)
Have a look at the documentation for handling indexes and concatenating on different axis:
https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.concat.html
Using numpy, given a sorted 1D array, how to efficiently obtain a 1D array with equal size where the value at each position is the number of preceding equal elements? I have very large arrays and processing each element in Python code one way or another is not acceptable.
Example:
input = [0, 0, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6]
output = [0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2, 3, 0]
import numpy as np
A=np.array([0, 0, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6])
uni,counts=np.unique(A, return_counts=True)
out=np.concatenate([np.arange(n) for n in counts])
print(out)
Not certain about the efficiency (probably better way to form the out array rather than concatenating), but a very straightforward way to get the result you are looking for. Counts the unique elements, then does np.arange on each count to get the ascending sequence, then concatenates these arrays together.
I'm using this code to one-hot encode values:
idxs = np.array([1, 3, 2])
vals = np.zeros((idxs.size, idxs.max()+1))
vals[np.arange(idxs.size), idxs] = 1
But I would like to generalize it to k-hot encoding (where shape of vals would be same, but each row can contain k ones).
Unfortunatelly, I can't figure out how to index multiple cols from each row. I tried vals[0:2, [[0, 1], [3]] to select first and second column from first row and third column from second row, but it does not work.
It's called advanced-indexing.
to select first and second column from first row and third column from second row
You just need to pass the respective rows and columns in separate iterables (tuple, list):
In [9]: a
Out[9]:
array([[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]])
In [10]: a[[0, 0, 1],[0, 1, 3]]
Out[10]: array([0, 1, 8])
I am having a lot of trouble understanding numpy indexing for multidimensional arrays. In this example that I am working with, let's say that I have a 2D array, A, which is 100x10. Then I have another array, B, which is a 100x1 1D array of values between 0-9 (indices for A). In MATLAB, I would use A(sub2ind(size(A), 1:size(A,1)', B) to return for each row of A, the value at the index stored in the corresponding row of B.
So, as a test case, let's say I have this:
A = np.random.rand(100,10)
B = np.int32(np.floor(np.random.rand(100)*10))
If I print their shapes, I get:
print A.shape returns (100L, 10L)
print B.shape returns (100L,)
When I try to index into A using B naively (incorrectly)
Test1 = A[:,B]
print Test1.shape returns (100L, 100L)
but if I do
Test2 = A[range(A.shape[0]),B]
print Test2.shape returns (100L,)
which is what I want. I'm having trouble understanding the distinction being made here. In my mind, A[:,5] and A[range(A.shape[0]),5] should return the same thing, but it isn't here. How is : different from using range(sizeArray) which just creates an array from [0:sizeArray] inclusive, to use an indices?
Let's look at a simple array:
In [654]: X=np.arange(12).reshape(3,4)
In [655]: X
Out[655]:
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11]])
With the slice we can pick 3 columns of X, in any order (and even repeated). In other words, take all the rows, but selected columns.
In [656]: X[:,[3,2,1]]
Out[656]:
array([[ 3, 2, 1],
[ 7, 6, 5],
[11, 10, 9]])
If instead I use a list (or array) of 3 values, it pairs them up with the column values, effectively picking 3 values, X[0,3],X[1,2],X[2,1]:
In [657]: X[[0,1,2],[3,2,1]]
Out[657]: array([3, 6, 9])
If instead I gave it a column vector to index rows, I get the same thing as with the slice:
In [659]: X[[[0],[1],[2]],[3,2,1]]
Out[659]:
array([[ 3, 2, 1],
[ 7, 6, 5],
[11, 10, 9]])
This amounts to picking 9 individual values, as generated by broadcasting:
In [663]: np.broadcast_arrays(np.arange(3)[:,None],np.array([3,2,1]))
Out[663]:
[array([[0, 0, 0],
[1, 1, 1],
[2, 2, 2]]),
array([[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 1]])]
numpy indexing can be confusing. But a good starting point is this page: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.indexing.html