I want to use a button connected to PA0 as an external interrupt to toggle LED on PE14 on button press. However calling the configure_PA0 function doesn't seem to work.
I did a simple blinking instruction in while loop to test and it turns out when I call configure_PA0 the LED stays ON all the time.
Without calling it, the LED will blink just fine so I think it must be something wrong with this function.
#include "stm32f30x.h"
void delay(volatile uint32_t count){
while(count > 0 )
count--;
}
void init_LED(){ //init led on PE14
RCC_AHBPeriphClockCmd(RCC_AHBPeriph_GPIOE, ENABLE);
GPIO_InitTypeDef GPIO_InitStructure;
GPIO_InitStructure.GPIO_Pin = GPIO_Pin_14;
GPIO_InitStructure.GPIO_OType = GPIO_OType_PP;
GPIO_InitStructure.GPIO_Mode = GPIO_Mode_OUT;
GPIO_InitStructure.GPIO_Speed = GPIO_Speed_50MHz;
GPIO_InitStructure.GPIO_PuPd = GPIO_PuPd_NOPULL;
GPIO_Init(GPIOE,&GPIO_InitStructure);
}
void configure_PA0(void) {
GPIO_InitTypeDef GPIO_InitStruct;
EXTI_InitTypeDef EXTI_InitStruct;
NVIC_InitTypeDef NVIC_InitStruct;
RCC_AHBPeriphClockCmd(RCC_AHBPeriph_GPIOA, ENABLE);
RCC_APB2PeriphClockCmd(RCC_APB2Periph_SYSCFG, ENABLE);
//PA0 as button init
GPIO_InitStruct.GPIO_Mode = GPIO_Mode_IN;
GPIO_InitStruct.GPIO_OType = GPIO_OType_PP;
GPIO_InitStruct.GPIO_Pin = GPIO_Pin_0;
GPIO_InitStruct.GPIO_PuPd = GPIO_PuPd_UP;
GPIO_InitStruct.GPIO_Speed = GPIO_Speed_50MHz;
GPIO_Init(GPIOA, &GPIO_InitStruct);
//EXTI init
SYSCFG_EXTILineConfig(EXTI_PortSourceGPIOA, EXTI_PinSource0);
EXTI_InitStruct.EXTI_Line = EXTI_Line0;
EXTI_InitStruct.EXTI_LineCmd = ENABLE;
EXTI_InitStruct.EXTI_Mode = EXTI_Mode_Interrupt;
EXTI_InitStruct.EXTI_Trigger = EXTI_Trigger_Rising;
EXTI_Init(&EXTI_InitStruct);
//NVIC init
NVIC_InitStruct.NVIC_IRQChannel = EXTI0_IRQn;
NVIC_InitStruct.NVIC_IRQChannelPreemptionPriority = 0x00;
NVIC_InitStruct.NVIC_IRQChannelSubPriority = 0x00;
NVIC_InitStruct.NVIC_IRQChannelCmd = ENABLE;
NVIC_Init(&NVIC_InitStruct);
}
void toggle_PE14(){
if(GPIO_ReadOutputDataBit(GPIOE,GPIO_Pin_14) == 0)
GPIO_SetBits(GPIOE,GPIO_Pin_14);
else
GPIO_ResetBits(GPIOE,GPIO_Pin_14);
}
//handle pa0 interrupt
void EXTI0_IRQHandler(void) {
if(EXTI_GetITStatus(EXTI_Line0) != RESET){
toggle_PE14();
EXTI_ClearITPendingBit(EXTI_Line0);
}
}
int main(void) {
init_LED();
configure_PA0();
while (1) {
delay(400);
}
return 0;
}
UPDATE
I fixed it by putting handler definition into extern "C" { .. } brackets. Apparently you have to do that if you code in C++.
UPDATE ...
First, thanks for letting other readers know!
Let me explain the causal relationship of these findings:
... I fixed it by putting handler definition into extern "C" { /* .. */ }
brackets.
Apparently you have to do that if you code in C++.
When programming in C++ (i.e., for those language features that are both valid in C and C++, when using a C++ compiler to build the program) there is a difference between C++ symbols and C symbols in the object code used by the linker.
In a nutshell, this is done because C++ identifiers must be extended by some type information in order to support polymorphism.
Details are explained
here.
Any C++ function which is defined without extern C qualifiers will get an extended ("mangled") symbol.
This also applies to "ambiguous" functions fed into the C++ compiler like in the present case.
Any extern C function (and any function translated by a C compiler, if one mixes compilers) will turn into a linker symbol with an unmangled name (usually only extended by some underscores, depending on the toolchain used).
The point is: Assembler functions behave mostly like C functions - function symbols referenced/defined in assembler code will be passed to the linker just as they are.
Usually (and in the present example), this is also the case for the definition of the STM32 interrupt vector table
(both following code snippets are taken from startup_stm32l476xx.s):
g_pfnVectors:
.word _estack
.word Reset_Handler
.word NMI_Handler
.word HardFault_Handler
.word MemManage_Handler
.word BusFault_Handler
.word UsageFault_Handler
.word 0
/*...*/
.word PendSV_Handler
.word SysTick_Handler
/*...*/
.word EXTI0_IRQHandler
.word EXTI1_IRQHandler
/*...*/
and for the weak function definition linking to the DefaultHandler in default STM32CubeF3 / STM32CubeMX code
/*******************************************************************************
*
* Provide weak aliases for each Exception handler to the Default_Handler.
* As they are weak aliases, any function with the same name will override
* this definition.
*
*******************************************************************************/
.weak NMI_Handler
.thumb_set NMI_Handler,Default_Handler
/*...*/
.weak EXTI0_IRQHandler
.thumb_set EXTI0_IRQHandler,Default_Handler
.weak EXTI1_IRQHandler
.thumb_set EXTI1_IRQHandler,Default_Handler
/*...*/
This means that the linker found
a reference to C symbol EXTI0_IRQHandler in the vector table,
a (weak but unique) definition of C symbol EXTI0_IRQHandler
a (non-weak but mismatching) definition of a mangled C++ symbol based on EXTI0_IRQHandler.
It matched (1.) with (2.) and discarded (3.) for not being referenced, so the first interrupt produced at the external pin threw the MCU into the endless loop DefaultHandler and the LED stopped blinking.
Related
Since two days I am trying to make printf\sprintf working in my project...
MCU: STM32F722RETx
I tried to use newLib, heap3, heap4, etc, etc. nothing works. HardFault_Handler is run evry time.
Now I am trying to use simple implementation from this link and still the same problem. I suppose my device has some problem with double numbers, becouse program run HardFault_Handler from this line if (value != value) in _ftoa function.( what is strange because this stm32 support FPU)
Do you guys have any idea? (Now I am using heap_4.c)
My compiller options:
target_compile_options(${PROJ_NAME} PUBLIC
$<$<COMPILE_LANGUAGE:CXX>:
-std=c++14
>
-mcpu=cortex-m7
-mthumb
-mfpu=fpv5-d16
-mfloat-abi=hard
-Wall
-ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
-O1 -g
-DLV_CONF_INCLUDE_SIMPLE
)
Linker options:
target_link_options(${PROJ_NAME} PUBLIC
${LINKER_OPTION} ${LINKER_SCRIPT}
-mcpu=cortex-m7
-mthumb
-mfloat-abi=hard
-mfpu=fpv5-sp-d16
-specs=nosys.specs
-specs=nano.specs
# -Wl,--wrap,malloc
# -Wl,--wrap,_malloc_r
-u_printf_float
-u_sprintf_float
)
Linker script:
/* Highest address of the user mode stack */
_estack = 0x20040000; /* end of RAM */
/* Generate a link error if heap and stack don't fit into RAM */
_Min_Heap_Size = 0x200; /* required amount of heap */
_Min_Stack_Size = 0x400; /* required amount of stack */
/* Specify the memory areas */
MEMORY
{
RAM (xrw) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 256K
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x08000000, LENGTH = 512K
}
UPDATE:
I don't think so it is stack problem, I have set configCHECK_FOR_STACK_OVERFLOW to 2, but hook function is never called. I found strange think: This soulution works:
float d = 23.5f;
char buffer[20];
sprintf(buffer, "temp %f", 23.5f);
but this solution not:
float d = 23.5f;
char buffer[20];
sprintf(buffer, "temp %f",d);
No idea why passing variable by copy, generate a HardFault_Handler...
You can implement a hard fault handler that at least will provide you with the SP location to where the issue is occurring. This should provide more insight.
https://www.freertos.org/Debugging-Hard-Faults-On-Cortex-M-Microcontrollers.html
It should let you know if your issue is due to a floating point error within the MCU or if it is due to a branching error possibly caused by some linking problem
I also had error with printf when using FreeRTOS for my SiFive HiFive Rev B.
To solve it, I rewrite _fstat and _write functions to change output function of printf
/*
* Retarget functions for printf()
*/
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
int _fstat (int file, struct stat * st) {
errno = -ENOSYS;
return -1;
}
int _write (int file, char * ptr, int len) {
extern int uart_putc(int c);
int i;
/* Turn character to capital letter and output to UART port */
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) uart_putc((int)*ptr++);
return 0;
}
And create another uart_putc function for UART0 of SiFive HiFive Rev B hardware:
void uart_putc(int c)
{
#define uart0_txdata (*(volatile uint32_t*)(0x10013000)) // uart0 txdata register
#define UART_TXFULL (1 << 31) // uart0 txdata flag
while ((uart0_txdata & UART_TXFULL) != 0) { }
uart0_txdata = c;
}
The newlib C-runtime library (used in many embedded tool chains) internally uses it's own malloc-family routines. newlib maintains some internal buffers and requires some support for thread-safety:
http://www.nadler.com/embedded/newlibAndFreeRTOS.html
hard fault can caused by unaligned Memory Access:
https://www.keil.com/support/docs/3777.htm
I have a CGAL::Point_set_3 point set with point normal and color. I would like to save all properties to a PLY file, using write_ply_with_properties() function.
My goal is to make the full version work (see code below), but even the simple version doesn't compile, with the same error as the full version.
I work on Linux with CGAL release 4.14 and gcc 7.4.0.
Here is the code:
#include <CGAL/Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel.h>
#include <CGAL/Point_set_3.h>
#include <CGAL/Point_set_3/IO.h>
#include <tuple> // for std::tie
#include <fstream>
typedef CGAL::Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel Kernel;
typedef Kernel::Point_3 Point;
typedef Kernel::Vector_3 Vector;
typedef CGAL::Point_set_3<Point> Point_set;
int main(int argc, char*argv[])
{
Point_set points;
points.insert(Point(1., 2., 3.));
points.insert(Point(4., 5., 6.));
// add normal map
points.add_normal_map();
auto normal_map = points.normal_map();
// add color map
typedef Point_set::Property_map< Vector > ColorMap;
bool success = false;
ColorMap color_map;
std::tie(color_map, success) =
points.add_property_map< Vector >("color");
assert(success);
// populate normal and color map
for(auto it = points.begin(); it != points.end(); ++it)
{
normal_map[*it] = Vector(10., 11., 12.);
color_map[*it] = Vector(20., 21., 22.);
}
std::ofstream out("out.ply");
#if 1
// simple version
if(!out || !CGAL::write_ply_points_with_properties(
out,
points.points(), // const PointRange
CGAL::make_ply_point_writer(points.point_map())))
#else
// full version
if(!out || !CGAL::write_ply_points_with_properties(
out,
points.points(), // const PointRange
CGAL::make_ply_point_writer(points.point_map()),
CGAL::make_ply_normal_writer(points.normal_map()),
std::make_tuple(color_map,
CGAL::PLY_property< double >("red"),
CGAL::PLY_property< double >("green"),
CGAL::PLY_property< double >("blue"))))
#endif
{
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
The compilation error is:
...
/usr/include/boost/property_map/property_map.hpp:303:54: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ (operand types are ‘const CGAL::Point_set_3<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >::Property_map<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >’ and ‘const CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick>’)
Reference v = static_cast<const PropertyMap&>(pa)[k];
CGAL-4.14/include/CGAL/Surface_mesh/Properties.h:567:15: note: candidate: CGAL::Properties::Property_map_base<I, T, CRTP_derived_class>::reference CGAL::Properties::Property_map_base<I, T, CRTP_derived_class>::operator[](const I&) [with I = CGAL::Point_set_3<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >::Index; T = CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick>; CRTP_derived_class = CGAL::Point_set_3<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >::Property_map<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >; CGAL::Properties::Property_map_base<I, T, CRTP_derived_class>::reference = CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick>&]
reference operator[](const I& i)
^~~~~~~~
CGAL-4.14/include/CGAL/Surface_mesh/Properties.h:567:15: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick>’ to ‘const CGAL::Point_set_3<CGAL::Point_3<CGAL::Epick> >::Index&’
How can I fix it?
The problem in your code is that you are using the method points() of CGAL::Point_set_3 which returns a range of points of type CGAL::Point_set_3::Point_range, whereas the property maps that you use (points.point_map(), etc.) are directly applied to a type CGAL::Point_set_3.
So you should simply call the write_ply_points_with_properties() on points, not on points.points().
Note also that if you store your colors on simple types (for example, using three Point_set_3 properties typed unsigned char), you can take advantage of the function CGAL::write_ply_point_set() that will automatically write all the simply-typed properties it finds, which makes it quite straightforward to use (just do CGAL::write_ply_point_set(out, points) and you're done).
One last thing that is really a detail not related to your problem, but you should avoid using the CGAL::Vector_3 for storing anything else than an actual geometric 3D vector (like colors in your case). That makes your code harder to read and is also quite an ineffective way to store colors if they are encoded as integer values between 0 and 255 (which is what unsigned char is for).
I am creating a currency converter Win32 program in Embarcadero C++Builder. I wrote a function for transforming date from format specified on user PC to YYYY-MM-DD format. I need that part because of API settings.
When I have this function inside my project it works fine, but I need to have that function inside a DLL.
This is how my code looks like:
#pragma hdrstop
#pragma argsused
#include <SysUtils.hpp>
extern DELPHI_PACKAGE void __fastcall DecodeDate(const System::TDateTime DateTime, System::Word &Year, System::Word &Month, System::Word &Day);
extern "C" UnicodeString __declspec (dllexport) __stdcall datum(TDateTime dat) {
Word dan, mjesec, godina;
UnicodeString datum, datum_dan, datum_mjesec, datum_godina;
DecodeDate(dat, godina, mjesec, dan);
if (dan<=9 && mjesec<=9) {
datum_dan="0"+IntToStr(dan);
datum_mjesec="0"+IntToStr(mjesec);
}
if (dan<=9 && mjesec>9) {
datum_dan="0"+IntToStr(dan);
datum_mjesec=IntToStr(mjesec);
}
if (dan>9 && mjesec<=9) {
datum_dan=IntToStr(dan);
datum_mjesec="0"+IntToStr(mjesec);
}
if (dan>9 && mjesec>9) {
datum_dan=IntToStr(dan);
datum_mjesec=IntToStr(mjesec);
}
datum_godina=IntToStr(godina);
return datum_godina+"-"+datum_mjesec+"-"+datum_dan;
}
extern "C" int _libmain(unsigned long reason)
{
return 1;
}
`
I've included SysUtils.hpp and declared DecodeDate() function, without those lines I have a million errors. But with code looking like this, I am getting this error, which I can't get rid of:
[bcc32 Error] File1.cpp(30): E2015 Ambiguity between '_fastcall System::Sysutils::DecodeDate(const System::TDateTime,unsigned short &,unsigned short &,unsigned short &) at c:\program files (x86)\embarcadero\studio\19.0\include\windows\rtl\System.SysUtils.hpp:3466' and '_fastcall DecodeDate(const System::TDateTime,unsigned short &,unsigned short &,unsigned short &) at File1.cpp:25'
Full parser context
File1.cpp(27): parsing: System::UnicodeString __stdcall datum(System::TDateTime)
Can you help me to get rid of that error?
The error message is self-explanatory. You have two functions with the same name in scope, and the compiler doesn't know which one you want to use on line 30 because the parameters you are passing in satisfy both function declarations.
To fix the error, you can change this line:
DecodeDate(dat, godina, mjesec, dan);
To either this:
System::Sysutils::DecodeDate(dat, godina, mjesec, dan);
Or this:
dat.DecodeDate(&godina, &mjesec, &dan);
However, either way, you should get rid of your extern declaration for DecodeDate(), as it doesn't belong in this code at all. You are not implementing DecodeDate() yourself, you are just using the one provided by the RTL. There is already a declaration for DecodeDate() in SysUtils.hpp, which you are #include'ing in your code. That is all the compiler needs.
Just make sure you are linking to the RTL/VCL libraries to resolve the function during the linker stage after compiling. You should have enabled VCL support when you created the DLL project. If you didn't, recreate your project and enable it.
BTW, there is a MUCH easier way to implement your function logic - instead of manually pulling apart the TDateTime and reconstituting its components, just use the SysUtils::FormatDateTime() function or the TDateTime::FormatString() method instead, eg:
UnicodeString __stdcall datum(TDateTime dat)
{
return FormatDateTime(_D("yyyy'-'mm'-'dd"), dat);
}
UnicodeString __stdcall datum(TDateTime dat)
{
return dat.FormatString(_D("yyyy'-'mm'-'dd"));
}
That being said, this code is still wrong, because it is not safe to pass non-POD types, like UnicodeString, over the DLL boundary like you are doing. You need to re-think your DLL function design to use only interop-safe POD types. In this case, change your function to either:
take a wchar_t* as input from the caller, and just fill in the memory block with the desired characters. Let the caller allocate the actual buffer and pass it in to your DLL for populating:
#pragma hdrstop
#pragma argsused
#include <SysUtils.hpp>
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) int __stdcall datum(double dat, wchar_t *buffer, int buflen)
{
UnicodeString s = FormatDateTime(_D("yyyy'-'mm'-'dd"), dat);
if (!buffer) return s.Length() + 1;
StrLCopy(buffer, s.c_str(), buflen-1);
return StrLen(buffer);
}
extern "C" int _libmain(unsigned long reason)
{
return 1;
}
wchar_t buffer[12] = {};
datum(SomeDateValueHere, buffer, 12);
// use buffer as needed...
int len = datum(SomeDateValueHere, NULL, 0);
wchar_t *buffer = new wchar_t[len];
int len = datum(SomeDateValueHere, buffer, len);
// use buffer as needed...
delete[] buffer;
allocate a wchar_t[] buffer to hold the desired characters, and then return a wchar_t* pointer to that buffer to the caller. Then export a second function that the caller can pass the returned wchar_t* back to you so you can free it correctly.
#pragma hdrstop
#pragma argsused
#include <SysUtils.hpp>
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) wchar_t* __stdcall datum(double dat)
{
UnicodeString s = FormatDateTime("yyyy'-'mm'-'dd", dat);
wchar_t* buffer = new wchar_t[s.Length()+1];
StrLCopy(buffer, s.c_str(), s.Length());
return buffer;
}
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void __stdcall free_datum(wchar_t *dat)
{
delete[] dat;
}
extern "C" int _libmain(unsigned long reason)
{
return 1;
}
wchar_t *buffer = datum(SomeDateValueHere);
// use buffer as needed...
free_datum(buffer);
I am developing a simple NAND module in SystemC. By specification, it should have a 4 ns delay so I tried to describe it with a process with a "wait" statement and SC_THREAD, as follows:
//file: nand.h
#include "systemc.h"
SC_MODULE(nand2){
sc_in<bool> A, B;
sc_out<bool> F;
void do_nand2(){
bool a, b, f;
a = A.read();
b = B.read();
f = !(a && b);
wait(4, SC_NS);
F.write(f);
}
SC_CTOR(nand2){
SC_THREAD(do_nand2);
sensitive << A << B;
}
};
To simulate I've created another module the outputs the stimulus for the NAND, as follows:
//file: stim.h
#include "systemc.h"
SC_MODULE(stim){
sc_out<bool> A, B;
sc_in<bool> Clk;
void stimGen(){
wait();
A.write(false);
B.write(false);
wait();
A.write(false);
B.write(true);
wait();
A.write(true);
B.write(true);
wait();
A.write(true);
B.write(false);
}
SC_CTOR(stim){
SC_THREAD(stimGen);
sensitive << Clk.pos();
}
};
Having these two modules described, the top module (where sc_main is) looks like this:
//file: top.cpp
#include "systemc.h"
#include "nand.h"
#include "stim.h"
int sc_main(int argc, char* argv[]){
sc_signal<bool> ASig, BSig, FSig;
sc_clock Clk("Clock", 100, SC_NS, 0.5);
stim Stim("Stimulus");
Stim.A(ASig); Stim.B(BSig); Stim.Clk(Clk);
nand2 nand2("nand2");
nand2.A(ASig); nand2.B(BSig); nand2.F(FSig);
sc_trace_file *wf = sc_create_vcd_trace_file("sim");
sc_trace(wf, Stim.Clk, "Clock");
sc_trace(wf, nand2.A, "A");
sc_trace(wf, nand2.B, "B");
sc_trace(wf, nand2.F, "F");
sc_start(400, SC_NS);
sc_close_vcd_trace_file(wf);
return 0;
}
The code was compiled and simulated with no errors, however when visualizing the .vcd file in gtkwave the output (F) gets stuck in 1, only showing the delay in the beginning of the simulation.
To test if there were any errors in the code I removed the "wait" statements and changed SC_THREAD to SC_METHOD in the nand.h file and simulated again, now getting the correct results, but without the delays of course.
What am I doing wrong?
It's best if you use an SC_METHOD for process do_nand2, which is sensitive to the inputs. A thread usually has an infinite loop inside of it and it runs for the entire length of the simulation. A method runs only once from beginning to end when triggered. You use threads mostly for stimulus or concurrent processes and threads may, or may not be sensitive to any events.
Just solved the problem:
instead of using
wait(4, SC_NS);
with SC_THREAD I used
next_trigger(4, SC_NS);
with SC_METHOD and it worked just fine.
Im making a xor gate in SystemC, from the binding of four NAND gates. I want the module to receive a vector of N bits, where N is passed as parameter. I should be able to perform & and not bitwise operations (for the NAND gate).
The best solution may be using sc_bv_base type, but I don't know how to initialize it in the constructor.
How can I create a bit vector using a custom length?
A way to parameterise the module is to create a new C++ template for the module.
In this example, the width of the input vector can be set at the level of the instantiation of this module
#ifndef MY_XOR_H_
#define MY_XOR_H_
#include <systemc.h>
template<int depth>
struct my_xor: sc_module {
sc_in<bool > clk;
sc_in<sc_uint<depth> > din;
sc_out<bool > dout;
void p1() {
dout.write(xor_reduce(din.read()));
}
SC_CTOR(my_xor) {
SC_METHOD(p1);
sensitive << clk.pos();
}
};
#endif /* MY_XOR_H_ */
Note that the struct my_xor: sc_module is used i.s.o. the SC_MODULE macro. (See page 40 , 5.2.5 SC_MODULE of the IEEE Std 1666-2011).
You can test this with the following testbench:
//------------------------------------------------------------------
// Simple Testbench for xor file
//------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <systemc.h>
#include "my_xor.h"
int sc_main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
const int WIDTH = 8;
sc_signal<sc_uint<WIDTH> > din;
sc_signal<bool> dout;
sc_clock clk("clk", 10, SC_NS, 0.5); // Create a clock signal
my_xor<WIDTH> DUT("my_xor"); // Instantiate Device Under Test
DUT.din(din); // Connect ports
DUT.dout(dout);
DUT.clk(clk);
sc_trace_file *fp; // Create VCD file
fp = sc_create_vcd_trace_file("wave"); // open(fp), create wave.vcd file
fp->set_time_unit(100, SC_PS); // set tracing resolution to ns
sc_trace(fp, clk, "clk"); // Add signals to trace file
sc_trace(fp, din, "din");
sc_trace(fp, dout, "dout");
sc_start(31, SC_NS); // Run simulation
din = 0x00;
sc_start(31, SC_NS); // Run simulation
din = 0x01;
sc_start(31, SC_NS); // Run simulation
din = 0xFF;
sc_start(31, SC_NS); // Run simulation
sc_close_vcd_trace_file(fp); // close(fp)
return 0;
}
Note that I'm using a struct and not a class. A class is also possible.
class my_xor: public sc_module{
public:
The XOR in this code is just the xor_reduce. You can find more about in the IEEE Std 1666-2011 at page 197 (7.2.8 Reduction operators). But I assume this is not the solution you wanted to have.