I am busy with a project where I have to do a GET on an exposed rest service using specific certificates. I am using the apache camel framework with the https4 component. I created a keystore and tested it using soapUI and it connected successfully, but I am however unable to connect through my project.
I used the following page as reference: http://camel.apache.org/http4.html
I set up the SSL for the HTTP Client through the following configuration:
<spring:sslContextParameters id="sslContextParameters">
<spring:keyManagers keyPassword="xxxx">
<spring:keyStore resource="classpath:certificates/keystore.jks" password="xxxx"/>
</spring:keyManagers>
</spring:sslContextParameters>
<setHeader headerName="CamelHttpMethod">
<simple>GET</simple>
</setHeader>
My endpoint is configured as:
<to uri="https4://endpointUrl:9007/v1/{id}?sslContextParametersRef=sslContextParameters"/>
The stacktrace I am receiving:
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target
at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:192)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.fatal(SSLSocketImpl.java:1904)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.java:279)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.java:273)
at sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:1446)
at sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.processMessage(ClientHandshaker.java:209)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.processLoop(Handshaker.java:901)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.process_record(Handshaker.java:837)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:1023)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1332)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1359)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1343)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLConnectionSocketFactory.createLayeredSocket(SSLConnectionSocketFactory.java:394)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLConnectionSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLConnectionSocketFactory.java:353)
at org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultHttpClientConnectionOperator.connect(DefaultHttpClientConnectionOperator.java:141)
at org.apache.http.impl.conn.PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager.connect(PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager.java:353)
at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.MainClientExec.establishRoute(MainClientExec.java:380)
at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.MainClientExec.execute(MainClientExec.java:236)
at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.ProtocolExec.execute(ProtocolExec.java:184)
at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.RetryExec.execute(RetryExec.java:88)
at org.apache.http.impl.execchain.RedirectExec.execute(RedirectExec.java:110)
at org.apache.http.impl.client.InternalHttpClient.doExecute(InternalHttpClient.java:184)
at org.apache.http.impl.client.CloseableHttpClient.execute(CloseableHttpClient.java:82)
at org.apache.http.impl.client.CloseableHttpClient.execute(CloseableHttpClient.java:55)
at org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpProducer.executeMethod(HttpProducer.java:301)
at org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpProducer.process(HttpProducer.java:173)
at org.apache.camel.util.AsyncProcessorConverterHelper$ProcessorToAsyncProcessorBridge.process(AsyncProcessorConverterHelper.java:61)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor.process(SendProcessor.java:145)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor.process(TraceInterceptor.java:163)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler.process(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:468)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:197)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.process(Pipeline.java:121)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.process(Pipeline.java:83)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:197)
at org.apache.camel.component.direct.DirectProducer.process(DirectProducer.java:62)
at org.apache.camel.impl.InterceptSendToEndpoint$1.process(InterceptSendToEndpoint.java:164)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor.process(SendProcessor.java:145)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor.process(TraceInterceptor.java:163)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler.process(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:468)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:197)
at org.apache.camel.processor.ChoiceProcessor.process(ChoiceProcessor.java:117)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor.process(TraceInterceptor.java:163)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler.process(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:468)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:197)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.process(Pipeline.java:121)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.access$100(Pipeline.java:44)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline$1.done(Pipeline.java:139)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor$InternalCallback.done(CamelInternalProcessor.java:257)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler$1.done(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:480)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor$1.done(TraceInterceptor.java:180)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor$1.done(SendProcessor.java:155)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor$InternalCallback.done(CamelInternalProcessor.java:257)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline$1.done(Pipeline.java:148)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor$InternalCallback.done(CamelInternalProcessor.java:257)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler$1.done(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:480)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor$1.done(TraceInterceptor.java:180)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor$1.done(SendProcessor.java:155)
at org.apache.camel.component.cxf.CxfClientCallback.handleResponse(CxfClientCallback.java:61)
at org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.onMessage(ClientImpl.java:827)
at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.handleResponseInternal(HTTPConduit.java:1672)
at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream$1.run(HTTPConduit.java:1168)
at org.apache.cxf.workqueue.AutomaticWorkQueueImpl$3.run(AutomaticWorkQueueImpl.java:428)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at org.apache.cxf.workqueue.AutomaticWorkQueueImpl$AWQThreadFactory$1.run(AutomaticWorkQueueImpl.java:353)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Any help would be much appreciated !
Just same: I followed documented instructions and got too stuck on "PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target". There's a quick fix, but if you want to link the configuration to the client HTTP session at stake, it becomes a complex set-up.
Method 1:
Doc pages, forums, and this other article would tell you that setting JVM launch options "-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=myKeystore.jks -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=mystorepass" do solve the issue, provided the remote parties' certificates (self signed, or signed by a CA but then with all the full certificate chain) were all fetched as Trusted certificates in the supplied keystore. Fact is, HTTP4 is based on JSSE, and these java launch options do configure the stack JVM-wide.
As an alternative, you can also fetch peers' certificates (complete chains) in the default JVM keystore jre\lib\security\cacerts (initial password: "changeit") and thus not even need JVM options.
If you have a few outgoing client connections and few peer certificates, this is the simplest way.
Method 2:
In our context, with above 100 remote parties, each requiring certificate updates every 2 years in average, that method implies a JVM reboot on an updated keystore about every week. Our highly available gateway is no longer highly available. So I searched a dynamic/per-connexion/programmatic way.
Below is a simplified excerpt of code from a CAMEL Processor that we use to remotely connect as REST or plain-vanilla HTTP client, with or without SSL/TLS, and with or without client-side certificate (i.e. 2-way SSL/TLS versus 1-way SSL/TLS), as well as combine HTTP Basic Auth as required by peers.
For various reasons the now old CAMEL version 2.16.3 is still used in our context. I have not tested yet newer versions. I suspect no changes given the libraries at stake under the Apache CAMEL layer.
I have added in the code below many comments detailling variant API's to the same effect. So you have clues below to further simplify the code or try alternatives with newer HTTP4 versions. As is, the code works with 2.16, as a CAMEL Processor bean within a Spring application context that contains the entire CAMEL route definition in DSL.
In our context we use java code for configuring entirely dynamic SSL/TLS outbound connexions per session. You should have no difficulties freezing part of the configuration that we set below dynamically via java, into the CAMEL XML DSL as suitable to your context.
Maven dependencies at stake:
<properties>
<camel-version>2.16.3</camel-version>
</properties>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId>
<artifactId>camel-core</artifactId>
<version>${camel-version}</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId>
<artifactId>camel-http4</artifactId>
<version>${camel-version}</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
Code extracted from our org.apache.camel.Processor (I have removed many Exception handling and simplified the code below in order to focus on the solution):
// relevant imports (partial)
import java.security.KeyStore;
import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.security.Security;
import java.security.cert.CertificateException;
import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
import javax.net.ssl.HostnameVerifier;
import javax.net.ssl.KeyManagerFactory;
import javax.net.ssl.SSLContext;
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSession;
import javax.net.ssl.TrustManager;
import javax.net.ssl.TrustManagerFactory;
import javax.net.ssl.X509TrustManager;
import org.apache.camel.Exchange;
import org.apache.camel.Processor;
import org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpClientConfigurer;
import org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpComponent;
import org.apache.http.config.Registry;
import org.apache.http.config.RegistryBuilder;
import org.apache.http.conn.HttpClientConnectionManager;
import org.apache.http.conn.socket.ConnectionSocketFactory;
import org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLConnectionSocketFactory;
import org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicHttpClientConnectionManager;
...
#Override
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
// assume here that we have previously fetched all dynamic connexion parameters in set of java Properties. Of course you can use numerous means to inject connection parameters
Properties params= ... ;
// Trick! 'targetURL' is the URI of the http server to call. Its not the same as the Camel endpoint URI (see further "httpUrlToken" placeHolder), on which you configure endpoint options
// Fact is, we prefer to pass just the target URL as parameter and keep full control on building the CAMEL endpoint URI in java
String targetURL= params.getProperty("targetURL"); // URL to call, e.g. "http://remoteHost.com/some/servlet/path". Will override the placeholder URL set on the endpoint.
// default plain HTTP without SSL/TLS:
String endPointURI = "http4://httpUrlToken?throwExceptionOnFailure=false"; // with option to prevent exceptions from being thrown for failed response codes. It allows us to process all the response codes in a response Processor
// Oh yes! we have to manage a map of HttpComponent instances, because the CAMEL doc clearly tells that each instance can only support a single configuration
// and our true connector is multithreading where each request may go to a different (dynamic) destination with different SSL settings,
// so we actually use a Map of HttpComponent instances of size MAX_THREADS and indexed by the thread ID plus ageing and re-use strategies... but this brings us too far.
// So, for a single thread per client instance, you can just do:
HttpComponent httpComponent = exchange.getContext().getComponent("http4", HttpComponent.class);
// overload in case of SSL/TLS
if (targetURL.startsWith("https")) {
try {
endPointURI = "https4://httpUrlToken?throwExceptionOnFailure=false";
httpComponent = exchange.getContext().getComponent("https4", HttpComponent.class); // well: "https4" and "http4" are the same, so you may skip this line! (our true HttpComponent map is common to secured and unsecured client connexions)
// basic SSL context setup as documented elsewhere, should be enough in theory
SSLContext sslctxt = getSSLContext(exchange, params.getProperty("keystoreFilePath"), params.getProperty("keystorePassword"), params.getProperty("authenticationMode")); // cfr helper method below
HttpClientConfigurer httpClientConfig = getEndpointClientConfigurer(sslctxt); // cfr helper method below
httpComponent.setHttpClientConfigurer(httpClientConfig);
// from here, if you skip the rest of the configuration, you'll get the exception "sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:unable to find valid certification path to requested target"
// the SSL context covers certificate validation but not the host name verification process
// we de-activate here at the connection factory level (systematically... you may not want that), and link the later to the HTTP component
HostnameVerifier hnv = new AllowAll();
SSLConnectionSocketFactory sslSocketFactory = new SSLConnectionSocketFactory(sslctxt, hnv);
// You may choose to enforce the BasicHttpClientConnectionManager or PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager, cfr CAMEL docs
// In addition, the following linkage of the connection factory through a Registry that captures the 'https' scheme to your factory is required
Registry<ConnectionSocketFactory> lookup = RegistryBuilder.<ConnectionSocketFactory>create().register("https", sslSocketFactory).build();
HttpClientConnectionManager connManager = new BasicHttpClientConnectionManager(lookup);
// Does not work in 2.16, as documented at http://camel.apache.org/http4.html#HTTP4-UsingtheJSSEConfigurationUtility
// ... keystore and key manager setup ...
// SSLContextParameters scp = new SSLContextParameters();
// scp.setKeyManagers(...);
// httpComponent.setSslContextParameters(scp);
// Not as good as using a connection manager on the HTTP component, although same effects in theory
// HttpClientBuilder clientBuilder = HttpClientBuilder.create();
// clientBuilder.set... various parameters...
// httpClientConfig.configureHttpClient(clientBuilder);
// Commented-out alternative method to set BasicAuth with user and password
// HttpConfiguration httpConfiguration = new HttpConfiguration();
// httpConfiguration.setAuthUsername(authUsername);
// ... more settings ...
// httpComponent.setHttpConfiguration(httpConfiguration);
// setClientConnectionManager() is compulsory to prevent "SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target"
// if instead we bind the connection manager to a clientBuilder, that doesn't work...
httpComponent.setClientConnectionManager(connManager);
} catch (Exception e) { ... ; }
}
// (back to code common to secured and unsecured client sessions)
// additional parameters on the endpoint as needed, cfr API docs
httpComponent.set...(...) ;
// you may want to append these 3 URI options in case of HTTP[S] with Basic Auth
if (... basic Auth needed ...)
endPointURI += "&authUsername="+params.getProperty("user")+"&authPassword="+params.getProperty("password")+"&authenticationPreemptive=true";
// *********** ACTUAL TRANSMISSION ********************
exchange.getIn().setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_URI, targetURL); // needed to overload the "httpUrlToken" placeholder in the endPointURI
// Next, there are many ways to get a CAMEL Producer or ProducerTemplate
// e.g. httpComponent.createEndpoint(endPointURI).createProducer()
// ... in our case we use a template injected from a Spring application context (i.e. <camel:template id="producerTemplate"/>) via constructor arguments on our Processor bean
try {
producerTemplate.send(httpComponent.createEndpoint(endPointURI),exchange);
} catch (Exception e) { ...; }
// you can then process the HTTP response here, or better dedicate the next
// Processor on the CAMEL route to such handlings...
...
}
Supporting helper methods, invoked by above code
private HttpClientConfigurer getEndpointClientConfigurer(final SSLContext sslContext) {
return new HttpClientConfigurer(){
#Override
public void configureHttpClient(HttpClientBuilder clientBuilder) {
// I put a logger trace here to see if/when the ssl context is actually applied, the outcome was ... weird, try it!
clientBuilder.setSSLContext(sslContext);
}
};
}
/**
* Build a SSL context with keystore and other parameters according to authentication mode.
* The keystore may just contain a trusted peer's certificate for 1way cases, and the associated certificate chain up to a trusted root as applicable.
* The keystore shall too contain one single client private key and certificate for 2way modes. We assume here a same password on keystore and private key.
* #param authenticationMode one of "1waySSL" "1wayTLS" "2waySSL" "2wayTLS" each possibly suffixed by "noCHECK" as in "1waySSLnoCHECK"
* #param keystoreFilePath can be null for "noCHECK" modes
* #param keystorePassword would be null if above is null
*/
private SSLContext getSSLContext(Exchange exchange, String keystoreFilePath, String keystorePassword, String authenticationMode) throws GeneralSecurityException, FileNotFoundException, IOException {
SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance(authenticationMode.substring(4,7).toUpperCase(),"SunJSSE");
//enforce Trust ALL ? pass a trust manager that does not validate certificate chains
if (authenticationMode.endsWith("noCHECK")) {
TrustManager[] trustAllCerts = new TrustManager[]{ new TrustALLManager()};
sslContext.init(null , trustAllCerts, null);
return sslContext;
}
// we use https, and validate remote cert's by default, henceforth keystore and password become compulsory
if (null == keystoreFilePath || null == keystorePassword)
throw new GeneralSecurityException("Config ERROR: using https://... and implicit default AUTHMODE=1waySSL altogether requires to supply keystore parameters");
KeyStore trustStore = KeyStore.getInstance(KeyStore.getDefaultType());
TrustManagerFactory tmf = TrustManagerFactory.getInstance("SunX509");
trustStore.load(new FileInputStream(keystoreFilePath), keystorePassword.toCharArray());
tmf.init(trustStore);
KeyStore keyStore = KeyStore.getInstance(KeyStore.getDefaultType());
KeyManagerFactory kmf = KeyManagerFactory.getInstance("SunX509");
if (authenticationMode.charAt(0)=='2') { // our authenticationMode starts with 1way.. or 2way...
// 2way... case: set the keystore parameters accordingly
keyStore.load(new FileInputStream(keystoreFilePath), keystorePassword.toCharArray());
kmf.init(keyStore, keystorePassword.toCharArray());
sslContext.init(kmf.getKeyManagers() , tmf.getTrustManagers(), new SecureRandom());
} else { // 1way... case
sslContext.init(null , tmf.getTrustManagers(), new SecureRandom());
}
return sslContext;
}
// Create a trust manager that does not validate certificate chains
private class TrustALLManager implements X509TrustManager {
#Override
public void checkClientTrusted(X509Certificate[] chain, String authType) throws CertificateException { }
#Override
public void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] chain, String authType) throws CertificateException { }
#Override
public X509Certificate[] getAcceptedIssuers() {
return new X509Certificate[0];
}
}
private static class AllowAll implements HostnameVerifier
{
#Override
public boolean verify(String arg0, SSLSession arg1) {
return true;
}
}
}
Hope this helps. I spent many hours trying to get it working (although I know well about SSL/TLS principles, security, X509, etc) ... This code is far from my taste for clean and lean java code. In addition I assumed that you do know how to build a keystore, supply all needed certificate chains, define a CAMEL route, etc. As such, it works with Camel 2.16 within a Spring Application Context, and has no other pretention than providing clues that would save you hours.
Related
We have a java client that allows both secure and non-secure connections to LDAP hosts.
It comes as part of a software suite which
has its own server component.
We are good with non-secure connections but need to switch to secure only.
The trusted public certificates are maintained (root+intermediate+host are copy pasted into one PEM file) in a
central location with the server component external to the clients.
The custom trust manager downloads the externally held trusted certificates on demand
and builds the trusted certificate chain. This way, I guess, it avoids pre-saving the trusted certicate chain in each client.
Our LDAP hosts are load balanced and that setup has not gone well with the trust manager. When we investigated, we found two questionable lines
in the code.
An environment variable to by-pass the host name verification.
if ("T".equals(System.getenv("IGNORE_HOSTNAME_CHECK"))) return true;
It seems like doing something similar to below which I have seen elsewhere.
HostnameVerifier allHostsValid = new HostnameVerifier() {
public boolean verify(String hostname, SSLSession session) {
return true;
}
};
HttpsURLConnection.setDefaultHostnameVerifier(allHostsValid);
Host name check relies on CN value of subject alone.
if (this.tgtHostname.equalsIgnoreCase(leafCn)) return true;
I have skimmed through some RFCs related to TLS and have come across SNI, SAN:DNSName and MITM warnings
but my rudimentary knowledge is not enough to make a case one way or the other.
Any advice on improvements (or against the use of it altogether) around commented out lines labelled H1 and H2 will be greatly valued.
I intend to pass them on to the right entity later.
The cut-down version of checkServerTrusted() of the custom trust manager is pasted below.
public void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] certsRcvdFromTgt, String authType) throws CertificateException
{
// Some stuff
// Verify that the last certificate in the chain corresponds to the tgt server we want to access.
checkLastCertificate(certsRcvdFromTgt[certsRcvdFromTgt.length - 1]);
// Some more stuff
}
private boolean checkLastCertificate(X509Certificate leafCert) throws CertificateException
{
// need some advice here ... (H1)
if ("T".equals(System.getenv("IGNORE_HOSTNAME_CHECK"))) return true;
try
{
String leafCn = null;
X500Principal subject = leafCert.getSubjectX500Principal();
String dn = subject.getName();
LdapName ldapDN = new LdapName(dn);
for (Rdn rdn : ldapDN.getRdns())
{
if (rdn.getType().equalsIgnoreCase("cn"))
{
leafCn = rdn.getValue().toString();
break;
}
}
// need some advice here ... (H2)
if (this.tgtHostname.equalsIgnoreCase(leafCn)) return true;
}
catch (InvalidNameException e){/*error handling*/}
throw new CertificateException("Failed to verify that the last certificate in the chain is for target " + this.tgtHostname);
}
I am using spring cloud gateway to front a legacy application so that we can start migrating things behind the scenes. Some of the urls that are hosted by the application are public facing and some are device restricted. We control the devices and they use a browser client to access the restricted urls. We have mutual authentication setup for the device restricted urls on the server using tomcat and security constraints like this in web.xml:
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Certificate Content</web-resource-name>
<!-- URL for authentication endpoint - this is locked down with the role assigned by tomcat -->
<url-pattern>/rest/secure/url1</url-pattern>
<url-pattern>/rest/secure/url2</url-pattern>
<url-pattern>/rest/secure/url3</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>certificate</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
<user-data-constraint>
<transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
</user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<!-- All other endpoints- force the switch from http to https with transport-guarantee -->
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Protected Context</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<user-data-constraint>
<transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
</user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>CLIENT-CERT</auth-method>
</login-config>
<security-role>
<role-name>certificate</role-name>
</security-role>
That is coupled with a truststore setup in tomcat's server.xml (I can add it, but I don't think that is relevant to this conversation).
My goal is to implement a similar setup in spring cloud gateway which is using reactive netty under-the-hood and remove the web.xml restrictions from the legacy application. I think I could switch it to using tomcat and probably get the web.xml from above to work, but I'd rather stick to the performance benefits of using reactive netty.
Key Goals:
Only deploy one api gateway for the app. The number of urls that
require mutual auth is very small so I'd rather not include a whole
other container to manage just to support them.
Do not ask for a client cert on the public urls.
Require valid client certs for the restricted urls.
I've setup mutual authentication and can get it to work with need/want/none as expected (truststores setup, etc), but it applies to ALL urls. I've also setup X509 security restrictions and that all seems to work.
I think what I want to setup is tsl renegotiation using the SslHandler after the http request is decrypted (so that I can access the url) based on the path. But I'm having trouble with the details and I've failed at finding any examples that incorporate spring-boot applications using reactive netty to do a tsl renegotiation. Any tips on how to perform a renegotiation of the ssl connection with needClientAuth set to true would be appreciated. I think I need to invalidate the session or something because when I try to do it manually it appears that it is skipping negotiation because the connection is already marked as negotiated in the ssl engine.
This is one of the iterations I've tried (this doesn't restrict on urls, but I plan to add that after I get this working):
#Component
public class NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer implements WebServerFactoryCustomizer<NettyReactiveWebServerFactory> {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer.class);
#Override
public void customize(NettyReactiveWebServerFactory serverFactory) {
serverFactory.addServerCustomizers(httpServer -> {
httpServer = httpServer.wiretap(true);
return httpServer.tcpConfiguration(tcpServer -> {
tcpServer = tcpServer.doOnConnection(connection ->
connection.addHandler("request client cert",
new SimpleChannelInboundHandler<HttpRequest>() {
#Override
protected void channelRead0(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, HttpRequest httpRequest) {
LOG.error("HttpRequest: {}", httpRequest);
final ChannelPipeline pipeline = ctx.pipeline();
final SslHandler sslHandler = pipeline.get(SslHandler.class);
final SSLEngine sslEngine = sslHandler.engine();
sslEngine.setNeedClientAuth(true);
sslHandler.renegotiate()
.addListener(future -> ctx.fireChannelRead(httpRequest));
}
}
)
);
return tcpServer;
});
});
}
}
I see it performing the renegotiation in the debugger, but it still seems to be set to client auth none (as set in the application.properties) instead of need as set in the code before renegotiation. I've tried sslEngine.getSession().invalidate(); but that didn't help. I've also tried generating a new ssl handler from the ssl provider but that seemed to really screw things up.
Thank you for any help provided.
Edit: Doing more research it appears that this approach is not appropriate going forward since ssl renegotiation is being dropped entirely in tsl 1.3 (see https://security.stackexchange.com/a/230327). Is there a way to perform the equivalent of SSL verify client post handshake as described here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man3/SSL_verify_client_post_handshake.html ?
Edit2: Looks like this was an issue where TLS1.3 post handshake was not supported by the browser I was testing with. Setting the server to just accept TLS 1.2 seemed to work. Not sure if there is a better way to solve this but this is what I added to my application.properties:
server.ssl.enabled-protocols=TLSv1.2
Here is what I used to get it to work. I'm going to leave out the spring security side of it since that is separate from requesting the certificate from the client.
There are so many ways to configure the child pipeline that is used to process the request. Please let me know if there is a more accepted way to configure it.
Configure the HttpServer by adding to the bootstrap pipeline that is applied when a connection is established with the client:
#Component
public class NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer implements WebServerFactoryCustomizer<NettyReactiveWebServerFactory> {
private static final HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler HTTP_RENEGOTIATE_CLIENT_CERT_HANDLER =
new HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler(SecurityConfig.X509_PROTECTED_ENDPOINTS);
#Override
public void customize(NettyReactiveWebServerFactory serverFactory) {
serverFactory.addServerCustomizers(NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer::addRenegotiateHandlerToHttpServer);
}
private static HttpServer addRenegotiateHandlerToHttpServer(HttpServer httpServer) {
return httpServer.tcpConfiguration(NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer::addRenegotiateHandlerToTcpServer);
}
private static TcpServer addRenegotiateHandlerToTcpServer(TcpServer server) {
return server.doOnBind(NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer::addRenegotiateHandlerToServerBootstrap);
}
private static void addRenegotiateHandlerToServerBootstrap(ServerBootstrap serverBootstrap) {
BootstrapHandlers.updateConfiguration(
serverBootstrap,
HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler.NAME,
NettyWebServerFactoryGatewayCustomizer::addRenegotiateHandlerToChannel
);
}
private static void addRenegotiateHandlerToChannel(ConnectionObserver connectionObserver, Channel channel) {
final ChannelPipeline pipeline = channel.pipeline();
pipeline.addLast(HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler.NAME, HTTP_RENEGOTIATE_CLIENT_CERT_HANDLER);
}
}
Child Handler that performs the renegotiation:
#ChannelHandler.Sharable
public class HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<HttpRequest> {
public static final String NAME = NettyPipeline.LEFT + "clientRenegotiate";
private static final PathPatternParser DEFAULT_PATTERN_PARSER = new PathPatternParser();
private final Collection<PathPattern> pathPatterns;
public HttpRenegotiateClientCertHandler(String ... antPatterns) {
Assert.notNull(antPatterns, "patterns cannot be null");
Assert.notEmpty(antPatterns, "patterns cannot be empty");
Assert.noNullElements(antPatterns, "patterns cannot have null items");
pathPatterns = Arrays.stream(antPatterns)
.map(DEFAULT_PATTERN_PARSER::parse)
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
}
#Override
protected void channelRead0(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, HttpRequest request) {
if (shouldNotRenegotiate(request)) {
ctx.fireChannelRead(request);
return;
}
final ChannelPipeline pipeline = ctx.pipeline();
final SslHandler sslHandler = pipeline.get(SslHandler.class);
final SSLEngine sslEngine = sslHandler.engine();
sslEngine.setNeedClientAuth(true);
sslHandler.renegotiate()
.addListener(renegotiateFuture -> ctx.fireChannelRead(request));
}
/**
* Determine if the request uri matches the configured uris for this handler.
* #param request to match the path from.
* #return true if any of the path patterns are matched.
*/
private boolean shouldNotRenegotiate(HttpRequest request) {
final String requestUri = request.uri();
final PathContainer path = PathContainer.parsePath(requestUri);
return pathPatterns.stream()
.noneMatch(matcher -> matcher.matches(path));
}
}
And these configurations in application.properties:
# Setup Client Auth Truststore:
server.ssl.trust-store=<path to truststore>
server.ssl.trust-store-password=<truststore password>
server.ssl.trust-store-type=<truststore type>
# Set to none by default so we do not ask for client auth until needed.
server.ssl.client-auth=none
# This is specifically not including TLSv1.3 because there are issues
# with older browsers' implementation of TLSv1.3 that prevent verify
# client post handshake client from working.
server.ssl.enabled-protocols=TLSv1.2
Edit: Updated because handler gateway route code wasn't being invoked properly.
I have a Java Key Store where I store certificates for each of my customer's sub-domain. I am planning to use the server alias to differentiate between multiple customers in the key store as suggested here. Play framework 1.2.7 uses Netty's SslHandler to support SSL on the server-side. I tried implementing a custom SslHttpServerContextFactory that uses this solution.
import play.Play;
import javax.net.ssl.*;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.net.InetAddress;
import java.net.Socket;
import java.security.KeyStore;
import java.security.Principal;
import java.security.PrivateKey;
import java.security.Security;
import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
import java.util.Properties;
public class CustomSslHttpServerContextFactory {
private static final String PROTOCOL = "SSL";
private static final SSLContext SERVER_CONTEXT;
static {
String algorithm = Security.getProperty("ssl.KeyManagerFactory.algorithm");
if (algorithm == null) {
algorithm = "SunX509";
}
SSLContext serverContext = null;
KeyStore ks = null;
try {
final Properties p = Play.configuration;
// Try to load it from the keystore
ks = KeyStore.getInstance(p.getProperty("keystore.algorithm", "JKS"));
// Load the file from the conf
char[] certificatePassword = p.getProperty("keystore.password", "secret").toCharArray();
ks.load(new FileInputStream(Play.getFile(p.getProperty("keystore.file", "conf/certificate.jks"))),
certificatePassword);
// Set up key manager factory to use our key store
KeyManagerFactory kmf = KeyManagerFactory.getInstance(algorithm);
kmf.init(ks, certificatePassword);
TrustManagerFactory tmf = TrustManagerFactory.getInstance(algorithm);
tmf.init(ks);
final X509KeyManager origKm = (X509KeyManager) kmf.getKeyManagers()[0];
X509KeyManager km = new X509KeyManagerWrapper(origKm);
// Initialize the SSLContext to work with our key managers.
serverContext = SSLContext.getInstance(PROTOCOL);
serverContext.init(new KeyManager[]{km}, tmf.getTrustManagers(), null);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new Error("Failed to initialize the server-side SSLContext", e);
}
SERVER_CONTEXT = serverContext;
}
public static SSLContext getServerContext() {
return SERVER_CONTEXT;
}
public static class X509KeyManagerWrapper implements X509KeyManager {
final X509KeyManager origKm;
public X509KeyManagerWrapper(X509KeyManager origKm) {
this.origKm = origKm;
}
public String chooseServerAlias(String keyType,
Principal[] issuers, Socket socket) {
InetAddress remoteAddress = socket.getInetAddress();
//TODO: Implement alias selection based on remoteAddress
return origKm.chooseServerAlias(keyType, issuers, socket);
}
#Override
public String chooseClientAlias(String[] keyType,
Principal[] issuers, Socket socket) {
return origKm.chooseClientAlias(keyType, issuers, socket);
}
#Override
public String[] getClientAliases(String s, Principal[] principals) {
return origKm.getClientAliases(s, principals);
}
#Override
public String[] getServerAliases(String s, Principal[] principals) {
return origKm.getServerAliases(s, principals);
}
#Override
public X509Certificate[] getCertificateChain(String s) {
return origKm.getCertificateChain(s);
}
#Override
public PrivateKey getPrivateKey(String s) {
return origKm.getPrivateKey(s);
}
}
}
But, this approach did not work for some reason. I get this message in my SSL debug log.
X509KeyManager passed to SSLContext.init(): need an X509ExtendedKeyManager for SSLEngine use
This is the SSL trace, which fails with "no cipher suites in common". Now, I switched the wrapper to:
public static class X509KeyManagerWrapper extends X509ExtendedKeyManager
With this change, I got rid of the warning, but I still see the same error as before "no cipher suites in common" and here is the SSL trace. I am not sure why the delegation of key manager won't work.
Some more information that may be useful in this context.
Netty uses javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine to support SSL in NIO server.
As per the recommendation in this bug report, it is intentional that X509ExtendedKeyManager must be used with an SSLEngine. So, the wrapper must extend X509ExtendedKeyManager.
This is hindering me to move further with the custom alias selection logic in X509KeyManagerWrapper. Any clues on what might be happening here? Is there any other way to implement this in Netty/Play? Appreciate any suggestions.
SSLEngine uses the chooseEngineServerAlias method to pick the certificate to use (in server mode) - not the chooseServerAlias method.
The default chooseEngineServerAlias implementation actually returns null, which is what causes the "no cipher suites in common" message - you need a certificate to know which cipher suites can be used (e.g. ECDSA can only be used for authentication if the certificate has an ECC public key, etc.) There are actually some cipher suites which can be used without a certificate, however, these are typically disabled as they are vulnerable to MITM attacks.
Therefore, you should also override chooseEngineServerAlias, and implement your logic to select the certificate based on the IP address there. As Netty only uses SSLEngine, what chooseServerAlias does doesn't matter - it'll never be called.
Java 8 also has support for server-side SNI, which allows you to use several certificates across many hostnames with a single IP address. Most web browsers support SNI - the notable exceptions are IE running on Windows XP and some old versions of Android, however, usage of these is declining. I have created a small example application demonstrating how to use SNI in Netty on GitHub. The core part of how it works is by overriding chooseEngineServerAlias - which should give you enough hints, even if you want to use the one certificate per IP address technique instead of SNI.
(I posted a similar answer to this on the Netty mailing list, where you also asked this question - however, my post seems to have not yet been approved, so I thought I'd answer here too so you can get an answer sooner.)
I have a web application running on Tomcat 7.0.14 and I'm using LDAP for user authentication. The problem is that when a user logs in after an inactive period the following warning comes out. The inactive period doesn't have to be long, as only few minutes is enough. However, the user is able to log in despite of the warning. From the users' point of view the application behaves normally, but Tomcat log reveals the warning below.
Jun 6, 2012 9:41:19 AM org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm authenticate
WARNING: Exception performing authentication
javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is java.io.IOException: connection closed]; remaining name ''
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapClient.authenticate(LdapClient.java:157)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.connect(LdapCtx.java:2685)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.ensureOpen(LdapCtx.java:2593)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.ensureOpen(LdapCtx.java:2567)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.doSearch(LdapCtx.java:1932)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.doSearchOnce(LdapCtx.java:1924)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.c_getAttributes(LdapCtx.java:1317)
at com.sun.jndi.toolkit.ctx.ComponentDirContext.p_getAttributes(ComponentDirContext.java:231)
at com.sun.jndi.toolkit.ctx.PartialCompositeDirContext.getAttributes(PartialCompositeDirContext.java:139)
at com.sun.jndi.toolkit.ctx.PartialCompositeDirContext.getAttributes(PartialCompositeDirContext.java:127)
at javax.naming.directory.InitialDirContext.getAttributes(InitialDirContext.java:140)
at org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm.bindAsUser(JNDIRealm.java:1621)
at org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm.checkCredentials(JNDIRealm.java:1480)
at org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm.authenticate(JNDIRealm.java:1131)
at org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm.authenticate(JNDIRealm.java:1016)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.FormAuthenticator.authenticate(FormAuthenticator.java:282)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:440)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:164)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:100)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:563)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:399)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:317)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: connection closed
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapClient.ensureOpen(LdapClient.java:1576)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapClient.authenticate(LdapClient.java:155)
... 27 more
The LDAP configuration is in the application's context.xml file:
<Realm className="org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm"
connectionURL="ldaps://ldap-company.com"
userPattern="uid={0},dc=company,dc=com"
roleBase="ou=groups,o=company"
roleName="uid"
roleSearch="uniqueMember={0}"
roleSubtree="true" />
I've found posts about this problem from several forums, but no one seems to have figured out the solution.
I was able to figure out the reason for the warning and also a way to get rid of it.
The reason for the warning was that the LDAP server is closing all the connections that have been idle for more than 5 minutes. The LDAP server admin told me that it's recommended to close the connection immediately after each login request, because the number of available handles is limited. Tomcat's JNDIRealm, however, doesn't offer a way to configure this, so I resolved the problem by extending the JNDIRealm class and overriding the authenticate(..) method. All that needs to be done is to close the connection to the LDAP server after each authentication request and the warnings are gone.
Note that the package needs to be the same as JNDIRealm class, because otherwise it's not possible to access the context variable.
package org.apache.catalina.realm;
import java.security.Principal;
public class CustomJNDIRealm extends JNDIRealm {
#Override
public Principal authenticate(String username, String credentials) {
Principal principal = super.authenticate(username, credentials);
if (context != null) {
close(context);
}
return principal;
}
}
Generated jar needs to be put under Tomcat's lib folder and change the className in the application's context.xml to org.apache.catalina.realm.CustomJNDIRealm. Then just restart Tomcat and that's it.
<Realm className="org.apache.catalina.realm.CustomJNDIRealm"
connectionURL="ldaps://ldap-company.com"
userPattern="uid={0},dc=company,dc=com"
roleBase="ou=groups,o=company"
roleName="uid"
roleSearch="uniqueMember={0}"
roleSubtree="true" />
I am answering, because this is a current research topic for me, as we currently extend the JNDIRealm for our needs.
The realm will retry after the warning, so the suggested patch is just beautifying the logfile. Later versions of tomcat (7.0.45 iirc) will beautify the logmessage to make clear, that there is a retry attempt done.
If you want to have the realm doing authentication with a fresh connection every time, it should be sufficient to use this class (I have not tested this implementation but will if our realm is done):
package org.apache.catalina.realm;
import java.security.Principal;
public class CustomJNDIRealm extends JNDIRealm {
#Override
public Principal authenticate(String username, String credentials) {
Principal principal = null;
DirContext context = null;
try {
context = open();
principal = super.authenticate(context, username, credentials);
}
catch(Throwable t) {
// handle errors
principal = null;
}
finally {
close(context); // JNDIRealm close() takes care of null context
}
return principal;
}
#Override
protected DirContext open() throws NamingException {
// do no longer use the instance variable for context caching
DirContext context = null;
try {
// Ensure that we have a directory context available
context = new InitialDirContext(getDirectoryContextEnvironment());
} catch (Exception e) {
connectionAttempt = 1;
// log the first exception.
containerLog.warn(sm.getString("jndiRealm.exception"), e);
// Try connecting to the alternate url.
context = new InitialDirContext(getDirectoryContextEnvironment());
} finally {
// reset it in case the connection times out.
// the primary may come back.
connectionAttempt = 0;
}
return (context);
}
}
The LDAP server is disconnecting idle connections that have been idle, that is, no requests transmitted, after a certain period of time.
basically adding a keepaliveTimeout to override connection timeout which was around 5 minutes resolved the issue in my scenario i.e. keepaliveTimeout ="-1" attribute to connector element in server.xml file
keepAliveTimeout="-1"
My application is using Apache's HttpClient 3.1 deployed on Weblogic 10.3 to perform a POST using SSL mutual authentication. I can get this to work using the following system properties to configure the keystore & truststore:-
-Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=C:\Keystore\KEYSTORE.jks
-Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=changeit
-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=C:\Truststore\TRUSTSTORE.jks
-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=changeit
Is there any way to get HttpClient to recognize and use the Weblogic custom keystore & truststore settings (as configured in the console / config.xml). Amongst other things this would provide the ability to keep the passwords "hidden" and not visible as plain text in config files / console etc.
Can anyone enlighten me?
I have been able to get HttpClient to use the custom weblogic trust store certificates for SSL connection by implementing custom TrustStrategy:
import sun.security.provider.certpath.X509CertPath;
import weblogic.security.pk.CertPathValidatorParameters;
import java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException;
import java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException;
import java.security.cert.CertPath;
import java.security.cert.CertPathParameters;
import java.security.cert.CertPathValidator;
import java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorException;
import java.security.cert.CertificateException;
import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class WeblogicSSLTrustStrategy implements TrustStrategy {
#Override
public boolean isTrusted(X509Certificate[] chain, String authType) throws CertificateException {
validator = CertPathValidator.getInstance("WLSCertPathValidator");
CertPath certPath = new X509CertPath(Arrays.asList(chain));
// supply here the weblogic realm name, configured in weblogic console
// "myrealm" is the default one
CertPathParameters params = new CertPathValidatorParameters("myrealm", null, null);
try {
validator.validate(certPath, params);
} catch (CertPathValidatorException e) {
throw new CertificateException(e);
} catch (InvalidAlgorithmParameterException e) {
throw new CertificateException(e);
}
return true;
}
}
This code is based on Weblogic documentation. The strategy can be passed to HttpClient via SSLSocketFactory:
SchemeRegistry schemeRegistry = new SchemeRegistry();
schemeRegistry.register(new Scheme("http", 80, PlainSocketFactory.getSocketFactory()));
SSLSocketFactory sslSocketFactory = new SSLSocketFactory(new WeblogicSSLTrustStrategy());
schemeRegistry.register(new Scheme("https", 443, sslSocketFactory));
PoolingClientConnectionManager connectionManager = new PoolingClientConnectionManager(schemeRegistry);
DefaultHttpClient httpClient = new DefaultHttpClient(connectionManager);
The only unknown parameter is the Weblogic Realm name, which can be taken from Weblogic JMX API, or simply preconfigured. This way it does not require to instantiate the trust store or to reconfigure Weblogic startup parameters.
You might be able to obtain these values via JMX using the KeyStoreMBean. Be forewarned though, this might not be a trivial exercise due to the following:
This would require storing the keystore passwords in cleartext in your JMX client (now that you would be writing one in your application). This is insecure, and a security audit might fail due to this, depending on what the audit is meant to look for.
The MBeans might not be accessible at runtime, due to the JMX service configuration, or would have to be accessed differently in different scenarios. Assuming WebLogic 11g, the values might be made read-only, by setting the value of the EditMBeanServerEnabled attribute of the JMXMBean to false.