I have a _Layout.cshtml as the top level layout for the page (which includes a header and footer, ect.). Then, I have a _MainLayout.cshtml which I want to contain two partial pages. See code below.
To keep it simple for starters, all I want to do at this time is display the two partial pages (each containing simple text "Hello World"). Sounds simple, huh? NOT!
_MainLayout.cshtml
#{
Layout = "~/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml";
}
<div>
<div class="large-2 columns" style="min-height: 800px; border-style: solid; border-width: thin; border-color: lightgray; ">
#Html.Partial("~/Views/Shared/MenuPartial.cshtml");
</div>
<div class="large-10 columns" style="min-height: 800px; border-style: solid; border-width: thin; border-color: lightgray; ">
#Html.Partial("~/Views/Shared/ContentPartial.cshtml");
</div>
</div>
Do the partials in this layout need to be layouts themselves? I've tried so many different things that I am completely confused and frustrated.
Eventually these will need to have controllers and a lot of JavaScript behind them. But for now, all I want is to display two very simple partial views.
If you wanted to show just two partial pages on start , then Get all this code into a controller action view. and not in a Layout.
Related
I'm starting to learn a few basics with nuxt & vue.
I'm basically building a little list of elements that you can click and will expand with an image or some other content.
What I made so far
is an homepage with the list (like the first image)
and 3 other pages : /about, /projects, /contact
Here is the demo with images :
As soon as I click the first link, an image appears, and everything is moved down to the bottom. The URL is updated with the corresponding url (here, /about)
What I would like to achieve:
So far it's working fine and I can naviguate on my website.
But as the images suggests, I would like the differents elements of the menu to move with an animation to the bottom on the page transition to the different pages, it would take them (let's say) 2 seconds to go their next position in the next page.
It would look something like that : https://codepen.io/pbouigue/pen/KKVxbYa
when you click a dropdown menu like first videothe menu expends and everything is moved down.
The issue with that is that the url is not updated and considered to move to another page (in the case it should be exemple.com/first-video
<template>
<div class="container">
<transition-group name="list">
<nuxt-link to="about" key="about">First item - about</nuxt-link>
<img src="../assets/ours.png" alt="">
//these two remaining items should have an animation when they move to the bottom of the image
<nuxt-link to="projects" key="projects">Second item - projects</nuxt-link>
<nuxt-link to="contact" key="contact">Last item - contact</nuxt-link>
<transition-group>
</div>
</template>
<style >
img{
display: block;
width: 40%;
}
a{
display: block;
color: orangered;
font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;
}
</style>
and my /about :
<template>
<div class="container">
<transition-group name="list">
<nuxt-link to="about" key="about">First item - about</nuxt-link>
<nuxt-link to="projects" key="projects">Second item - projects</nuxt-link>
<nuxt-link to="contact" key="contact">Last item - contact</nuxt-link>
<transition-group>
</div>
</template>
<style >
img{
display: block;
width: 40%;
}
a{
display: block;
color: orangered;
font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;
}
</style>
Do you have any help on how to achieve that? Maybe there is an easier way to do it, but since I'm all new and learning by myself, I would have loved some clues or a little help.
I read about transition-group and this css, but somehow, I can't manage to make it work...
.list-enter-active,
.list-leave-active {
transition: all 0.5s ease;
}
.list-enter-from,
.list-leave-to {
opacity: 0;
transform: translateX(30px);
}
because actually this :https://vuejs.org/guide/built-ins/transition-group.html#move-transitions
does exactly what i would like to do : move elements down in an animation, but I would like this to happen on a page transition in order to have to url updated.
Maybe I should look for https://router.vuejs.org/guide/essentials/nested-routes.html ?
Is there a way to automatically keep in sync rows height of table-alike structure between headers and body? I mean to force CSS Grid to keep each header and data row to have equal height, despite them having separate parents? I don't want headers and body to share the same column in HTML. I want two main columns: headers and body.
Additionally, number of rows as well as body columns is dynamic. The goal is to create comparison table, where headers represent product features names and body columns represent product features values. Also, table body will additionally be wrapped in <div> to introduce a slider feature.
AFAIK CSS Subgrid theoretically would do that, but it's experimental in Firefox only
Below is simplified input code available also on CodePen. I want "Header 1", "Data 1.1", "Data 2.1" cells to have same height. Same for higher rows, like "Header 2 | higher header 2 | yet higher header 2", "Data 1.2", "Data 2.2" - all cells should have same height.
.table {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 2fr;
}
.table__headers,
.table__body {
border: 1px solid black;
}
.table__body {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
border: 1px solid blue;
margin: 5px;
padding: 5px;
}
.cell {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="table">
<div class="table__headers">
<div class="cell">Header 1</div>
<div class="cell">
Header 2
<br>
higher header 2
<br>
yet higher header 2
</div>
<div class="cell">
Header 3
<br>
higher header 3
</div>
<div class="cell">Header 4</div>
</div>
<div class="table__body">
<div class="table__body-inside">
<div class="cell">Data 1.1</div>
<div class="cell">Data 1.2</div>
<div class="cell">Data 1.3</div>
<div class="cell">Data 1.4</div>
</div>
<div class="table__body-inside">
<div class="cell">Data 2.1</div>
<div class="cell">Data 2.2</div>
<div class="cell">Data 2.3</div>
<div class="cell">Data 2.4</div>
</div>
</divc>
</div>
In a concise way: the highest cell in the visual row (because headers and body are technically in separate columns not being same row in the HTML) should dictate the height for the whole row.
Below i attach ugly Paint made picture presenting what i want to achieve:
I made a workaround by manually setting each row's header height (via inline style) to be equal to neighbor row's data height with the help of ResizeObserver (so these heights are dynamically set up when viewport width is changed). To make it work i had to switch from Grid to Flexbox for the headers and data columns, because changing height for Grid children don't make them "take" (or move into) remaining vertical space (they behave like being glued to tracks they are bound to), which happens in Flexbox.
I am aware this is not the best solution, but i haven't came up with anything that worked better.
<div id="abc">
<div id="bac" ngIf="show">
<!-- Content -->
</div>
<div id="cde">cds</div>
</div>
I have a div want to add or remove from DOM slowly(show and hide) using *ngIf and likewise adding or removing of div.id ="bac" should cause div.id='cde' to move left or right slowly like it is animating.
*ngIf probably is not he best thing you are looking for, instead of this, use ngClass and define the css transitions and positions for these animations.
*ngIf fully hides/shows a node from/in DOM, it's like display: none/block which is not able to be animated through css-transitions
here is an example
<div class="animated" [ngClass]=" { 'show': show, 'hide': !show }">
content
</div>
then in the css
.animated {
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 80px;
background: gray;
transition: 1.5s linear margin-left;
}
.animated.show {
margin-left: 0;
}
.animated.hide {
margin-left: -120vw;
}
Height also can be changed, depends on which effect you expect.
Here is stackblitz with working code
I'm updating an older html page with CSS, which I've just started getting into. The new version looks good, but there are huge empty spaces now at the bottom and right of the page when the user scrolls.
The nature of the page is several different content boxes, all of which have graphical backgrounds.
The old method I was using was to use a large table to organize the layout and give the table one large, solid background image. A colleague pointed out this was too old-school and suggested I try learning divs and css.
The newer version I produced broke each box up into separate divs and images and positioned them absolutely, but there was no way to keep the content centered if the browser window was resized.
I redid the whole page again, this time using relative positioning and one main container div that I could center. Everything looks good and stays centered, but now I'm getting big blank spaces on the bottom and right sides because of the positioning.
I've seen some people say they've fixed this by using a negative margin, but it doesn't seem to be having any effect on my page (unless I'm putting it in the wrong spot).
I need to know if there's a specific way to fix this that I don't know about or if I'm just going about the whole page completely the wrong way. How can I get my elements lined up correctly, centered, and with no extra scroll space? Should I just go back to using a table?
Here's a simplified version of the page with the content taken out (just the layout):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<style type="text/css">
body
{
background-color: black;
margin-bottom: -2000px;
}
div.main
{
width: 1100px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: -2000px;
}
div.logo
{
position: relative;
left: 40px;
top: 60px;
z-index: 1;
}
div.window1
{
position: relative;
left: 320px;
top: -555px;
z-index: 1;
}
div.window2
{
position: relative;
left: 320px;
top: -580px;
z-index: 1;
}
div.window3
{
position: relative;
left: 680px;
top: -1250px;
z-index: 2;
}
div.window4
{
position: relative;
left: 25px;
top: -1570px;
z-index: 1;
}
</style>
<div class="main">
<div class="logo">
<img src="images/logo8.png">
</div>
<div class="window1">
<img src="images/window1_fullsize.png">
</div>
<div class="window2">
<img src="images/window2_fullsize.png">
</div>
<div class="window3">
<img src="images/window3_fullsize.png">
</div>
<div class="window4">
<img src="images/window4_fullsize.png">
</div>
</div>
</html>
You could use "em" or "%" values for top and left.
But the best be to handle this using JS.
Hope this helps.
I fixed this some time ago. I eventually did go back to using a table for the layout (which I understand is frowned upon) combined with a little bit of relative positioning, but I made sure everything was done with css and was w3 compliant:
http://www.burningfreak.com
The inherent problem, I think, is the way I designed my older pages, visually. They were highly graphical and usually made up of one contiguous background image, with a lot of art making up the section borders, etc. The general layouts tended to be unusual shapes, and I would then over-lay text and content on top on that. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to get looking right if the sections are separated.
I've since designed newer pages using only divs and css and it seems to work well, although it's a bit trickier to get working. The key, I think, is to come up with a look and style that I know is going to work using that technique from the start.
I've encountered an odd behavior in a Windows8 app that I'm building with WinJS, javascript, and HTML. In a particular Page that I'm implementing, there are several divs that have CSS rules like this:
.col {
border: 1px solid none;
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
height: 100%;
margin: 0px;
width: 100%;
}
The problem is when I invoke the main app bar by right clicking, the scrolled content in the div snaps to the top of the div. In other words, the scroll position of the div is lost. I've tried a host of ways to fix, but nothing has come up. How can I prevent the scrolled content from jumping around upon invoking the App Bar.
Thanks!
suggest to use -ms-grid for the page. The app bar will overlap the div in that case, which is ok and likely right behavior that you can see in other apps also.
html:
<div class="test5 fragment">
<header aria-label="Header content" role="banner">
<button class="win-backbutton" aria-label="Back" disabled type="button"></button>
<h1 class="titlearea win-type-ellipsis">
<span class="pagetitle">test page</span>
</h1>
</header>
<section class="content" aria-label="Main content" role="main">
<div class="test-content">
Text here.
</div>
</section>
</div>
<div id="appbar" data-win-control="WinJS.UI.AppBar">
<button data-win-control="WinJS.UI.AppBarCommand" data-win-options="{id:'cmd', label:'Command', icon:'placeholder'}" type="button"></button>
</div>
css:
.test5.fragment section[role=main] {
display: -ms-grid;
-ms-grid-rows: 1fr;
-ms-grid-columns: 1fr;
}
#Sushil is correct. AppBar is an overlay control, so you should place it next to the fragment div, not inside it. #Sushil's code shows how to do it.
Placing an appbar inside the fragment has performance penalties as it will need to be rendered every time a user navigates to that page. Another undesirable side effect is that all input to the appbar will propagate to the fragment. This is the problem you are facing.
In theory, you can listen to the various input events for mouse, keyboard, touch and call preventDefault on them. But it is not recommended.