Given a digitally signed PDF with a certificate I do not have the private key to, is it possible to alter the document, sign it with my certificate and keep the previous signature as 'history', that is, the old signature should not verify the integrity of the document, rather the user should just be able to see that it was once signed with this other certificate?
If it's your intention to remove the old signature (created with someone else's private key), alter the document, and add a new signature (using your own private key), then yes, that's possible.
If it's your intention to keep the old signature, and add a second (a so-called approval) signature (using your own private key), then it depends on the nature of the first signature (if that signature "locks" the document, it's not possible) whether or not you can alter the document in-between.
Moreover, altering the document will almost always invalidate the original signature. See Which operations are allowed on a digitally signed PDF? to find out which changes are possible (e.g. filling out a form field) and which changes are impossible (e.g. adding an extra page).
A not so elegant workaround that is used to tackle this by at least one of our customers, is to wrap the signed PDF in a PDF portfolio, and to add a cover page with additional info. A PDF portfolio is like a ZIP file that can be opened in Adobe Reader (and some other PDF viewers). That ZIP file can contain all kinds of other documents, including unaltered signed PDF's in which the signatures are kept intact.
Related
I am trying to use Apache PdfBox to sign pdf and verify signature. I use examples: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/trunk/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/examples/signature/
If I add, for example, new page to document, then Acrobat Reader says, that signature is incorrect (ofcourse, because document was changed). But, when I verify signature via pdfbox methods - signature is correct (because ByteRange of signed data does not cover incremental updates).
How I can check disallowed incremental updates (changed data, pages, locked forms, etc)? And skip check allowed updates, such as new signatures or unlocked fields.
I'm thinking about the case and pdf is dynamically generated according to a template and some data.
Until I keep the template the same and the data the same, may I reapply the same signature to the document or it will be invalidated?
You can read also as: is the public signature related only to content or depends on create time of the document,etc..?
Until I keep the template the same and the data the same, may I reapply the same signature to the document or it will be invalidated?
If you re-generate the PDF byte-wise identically and in particular also identically prepare it for signing, the signed bytes are identical, so the identical signature can be used.
You can read also as: is the public signature related only to content or depends on create time of the document,etc..?
You said you want to keep the data the same. If the claimed creation time of the document is stored in the document (e.g. in the metadata), then that claimed creation time obviously must be part of the data you keep and re-use.
You can get a different best signing time, though, by using a digital time stamp for the signing time and nothing else because such a time stamp is applied as unsigned attribute.
Unfortunately you don't mention your PDF generation tool chain, so we can not check whether your tools allow such a faithful regeneration of PDFs.
This question already has answers here:
how to add blank page in digitally signed pdf using java?
(2 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
Is there a way to append a page to an e-signed PDF without losing the digital signature using iTextSharp? In real estate you often have a contract and addendum, both esigned in a seperate process, but users would like to have them attached in one single pdf file. The problem is that once you add a page to an e-signed doc, the e-signature disappears.
It makes sense since the signature means a user has made an agreement based on what was presented to them, but if you're just appending another esigned addendum, or even another unsigned page for them to sign in addition to the previously signed page, I would hope they is something that takes this into account and keeps track of envelope changes for any legal reasons
Digitally signing a document means that the software validates its content and appends a "seal" using a certificate. That means that when the file is signed, its content is locked and any modification to the content of the file would result in an invalidation of the digital signature (not the same as eSignature, which is more procedural in nature). DocuSign enforces this and as a result would invalidate both signatures (digital and electronic) when the file is modified. You can send a new envelope with the new file to be digitally signed if you want, but you cannot modify a signed digitally document after the fact.
Maybe this one would fit better on so security? I'm not sure...
These are the facts:
We have a web app where users download a PDF document with a form, they fullfill this form, sign it with their electronic certificate and upload it back to our environment.
We've shown cases where the uploaded document is signed, but it show some fields that have been altered after the signature. If we check the integrity of PDF signatures, it shows that have been data alteration after the signature, but the signature it's fine and valid.
If we right-click on the signature and select "See signed version" we see the real data loaded on the moment of the signature.
Now, this goes against my general perception of electronic signature functionality. If any change is made to the document (or the data loaded into it) after I make a signature, this signature should become invalid, as the document has been altered.
The behaviour of the PDF seems to be different, as not only the signature still is valid, also the "default version" that you see when you open the document is the last one, not the signed one.
Now I'm wondering
Is this some kind of bug or is a expected behaviour?
There is any place where info on the matter can be found? (google keeps redirecting me once and again to "how to sign a PDF" articles).
If this is a defined behaviour, how do you deal with it?
Now, this goes against my general perception of electronic signature functionality. If any change is made to the document (or the data loaded into it) after I make a signature, this signature should become invalid, as the document has been altered.
The behaviour of the PDF seems to be different, as not only the signature still is valid, also the "default version" that you see when you open the document is the last one, not the signed one.
Is this some kind of bug or is a expected behaviour?
It is expected behavior.
You have to be aware of two special factors here:
A PDF signature field contains the information of the byte ranges signed. Obviously not the whole file can be signed as the signature itself is embedded and cannot be part of the signed bytes. Thus, the signed bytes ranges need to be recorded somewhere. Cf. this answer on Information Security Stack Exchange:
Additions to a PDF can be made by appending to the existing document, a process called an incremental update. These updates can again be signed etc., also cf. the answer referenced above:
Thus, making changes to a PDF by means of an incremental update, the existing integrated signatures in the document still correctly sign their respective signed by range. They still are mathematically valid in spite of the added changes.
Furthermore the current contents of a PDF are defined in particular by the newest incremental update, so when you open the document it shows the content including the last changes, not the signed one.
Now, while this sounds like PDF signatures have no meaning, this is not the case. The specification ISO 32000-1 clearly defines which changes are allowed to be made in an incremental update to a certified (= signed with some special flags) base version of a document, and Adobe in their Acrobat and Reader software have extrapolated restrictions from this for signed but not certified documents, cf. this answer on stack overflow.
In particular at most the following changes are allowed:
Adding signature fields
Adding or editing annotations
Supplying form field values
Digitally signing
If this is a defined behaviour, how do you deal with it?
As the documents originate from you, you can start by applying a certificate signature to the document which only allows as little changes as possible in your use case.
Then you can define signature lock information for the signature fields your users are to sign. In these lock information you can e.g. prescribe that after signing the given signature field, a number of form fields shall be read-only.
Finally you only accept back PDFs which still contain your certification signature and to which no disallowed changes were added.
There actually are numerous PDFs which are certified and contain a number of fields for additional approval signatures, and each of the approval signature fields is coupled with some form fields which will not be editable anymore after signing. After all the signature fields are signed, all fields are read-only.
There is any place where info on the matter can be found? (google keeps redirecting me once and again to "how to sign a PDF" articles).
You should in particular look at the PDF specification ISO 32000-1 and some Adobe documents on the behavior of their software. You'll find links at the bottom of the stack overflow documentation page the above mentioned links point to.
I am developing an archiving system that stores documents in a database and provides various functionalities to the user. I have added a part to sign and verify any document in the database. However, I am stuck with the logic and wondering where should I place the signing function.
Hints about my aims:
No document should be uploaded on the database without a signatureIf a document is not changed it should retain its signatureIf the document does not own a signature .. it should be signed with uploader's signatureThe signature will not encrypt the file so it will still be readable after the signing process is applied
The initial solution I have used is to place the signing procedure in in the form that is called by the Upload button and store the signature of the file in a separate column in the Documents table in the database. However, that solution turned out to be invalid for my scenario as if an employee downloaded a file and then uploaded it again, then it will be signed by him and thus, the original signature will be lost. Also, the signature will be with no significance out side the system.
My main question:
Is there a way to store the signature inside the documents?
Hint: My system will deal only with PDF, JPEG, Tiff, MS Office and TXT Documents.
Subsidiary Request: It would be awesome if there's a way to store the signature in any type of files!
Is there a way to store the signature inside the documents?
A digital signature must be built using a hash of the document that is being signed. Since adding a signature to a document modifies the document (which invalidates the hash), there is no general solution to storing a digital signature inside a document.
Some document formats allow for digital signing and define what portion is to be excluded from the hash, but those formats that were listed—as far as I know—are not among them. (Though PGP could be used on TXT documents.)
Since signatures sign the hash of a document, you could simply create a table mapping hashes to signatures. Thus, downloading and re-uploading a document will not remove existing signatures, since the hash will remain the same. The usefulness of this approach depends, of course, on the semantic meaning of a signature in your system.