I am installing a package manually on my own system because I need to make some changes to it that aren't available in the basic version in my package manager. I also am trying to keep packages installed locally if possible, so I'm installing it with prefix=$HOME/.local instead of the more common prefix=/usr/local.
When I do this, I have no problem executing the program from my terminal, because I added ~/.local/bin to my PATH and the package was installed with relative paths to its shared libraries (i.e. ~/.local/lib/<package>). Executing from the command line is no problem, but I want to be able to access it from the favorites menu in gnome, and for that I need to make use of the <package>.desktop file.
I could hard-code the path to the executable in the .desktop file itself, but when I pull a later version down and re-install it, I'll have to redo those steps. I was wondering if there's a way to avoid that.
I've tried symlinking the executable to a directory where .desktop files do have included in their path, and the application is correctly treated as a GUI option, but launching the executable results in an error trying to find a shared library. I think this has to do with how cmake handles rpaths, which to my understanding is a way of relatively linking executables with their required libraries.
I think what I want to do is have PATH inside a .desktop file include ~/.local/bin, without changing the .desktop file itself. Can I alter the 'default' path used in accessing a .desktop file?
The answer to my question was found in the Archwiki:
Specifically, I needed to add ~/.local/bin to my path in ~/.xinitrc. Now my graphical programs work as expected.
Related
we working on a C++/CMake project, that needs to run in both Windows and Linux. On Windows, we have to work with a number Visual Studio versions, both in 32- and 64 bit. In order to alleviate dependency issues in our team, we have manually compiled a number of dependencies for each configuration(vs2013_x64, vs2013_x86, vs2012_x64, vs2013_x86...) and installed them (using make install or similar commands) to a common folder for each configuration. Now we have a folder called "vs2013_x64" for example, that contains similar folders as /usr would on linux: CMake, include, lib, share, ...
Now my question is: How do I have to set up CMake, so that it treats this vs2013_x64 folder just like it does /usr on Linux?
I found a number of variables that seem related, for example
CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH and CMAKE_SYSROOT. However, setting them to my vs2013_x64 folder for example does not work: FindXXX.cmake files in the vs2013_x64/CMake folder are not found, and even when I manually set the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to that CMake folder, the Find* scripts are unable to find the include they are looking for, because the vs2013_x64/include folder does not appear to be searched.
A solution that did work was to set the CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH. This is nice and almost what I need, but lets say that on Linux, I would not want it to look at /usr at all under any circumstances. This would not be possible using the PREFIX_PATH solution if I understand it correctly.
From what I understood from the documentation,
CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH is more configurable and has a number of additional variables such as CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_PROGRAM, CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY and CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_INCLUDE. This makes me believe that FIND_ROOT_PATH is what I actually SHOULD be doing - yet I am unable to make it work
Does what I am trying to do make sense? Can anyone clarify when and how to use what? Ideally, I would like a solution that allows me to set the search path to my vs2013_x64 folder on Windows, that defaults to /usr on Linux, but can optionally also be set to another directory containing lib/include/cmake folders. In addition, it would be nice if searching ONLY occurred in the configured path and nowhere else (to avoid mistakenly picking a library that was installed system-wide).
Thanks!
According to Apple's Developer Docs the Library global allows one to import compiled scripts so they can be used as a library in one's current script. This works just fine if you were to do something like the below code with myLibName.scpt located at ~/Library/Script Libraries:
myLib = Library('myLibName');
myLib.myLibMethod() // Works just fine
But, the docs also claim that one can export an environment variable — OSA_LIBRARY_PATH containing a string of : delimited paths — and Library() would then defer to that list of paths before proceeding to it's default path: ~/Library/Script Libraries. Ya know, like the bash environment variable Path. Here's the relevant piece of documentation below; it describes the path hierarchy:
The basic requirement for a script to be a script
library is its location: it must be a script document in a “Script
Libraries” folder in one of the following folders. When searching for
a library, the locations are searched in the order listed, and the
first matching script is used:
If the script that references the library is a bundle, the script’s
bundle Resources directory. This means that scripts may be packaged
and distributed with the libraries they use.
If the application running the script is a bundle, the application’s bundle Resources
directory. This means that script applications (“applets” and
“droplets”) may be packaged and distributed with the libraries they
use. It also enables applications that run scripts to provide
libraries for use by those scripts.
Any folders specified in the environment variable OSA_LIBRARY_PATH. This allows using a library
without installing it in one of the usual locations. The value of this
variable is a colon-separated list of paths, such as /opt/local/Script
Libraries:/usr/local/Script Libraries. Unlike the other library
locations, paths specified in OSA_LIBRARY_PATH are used exactly as-is,
without appending “Script Libraries”. Supported in OS X v10.11 and
later.
The Library folder in the user’s home directory, ~/Library.
This is the location to install libraries for use by a single user,
and is the recommended location during library development.
The
computer Library folder, /Library. Libraries located here are
available to all users of the computer.
The network Library folder,
/Network/Library. Libraries located here are available to multiple
computers on a network.
The system Library folder, /System/Library.
These are libraries provided by OS X.
Any installed application
bundle, in the application’s bundle Library directory. This allows
distributing libraries that are associated with an application, or
creating applications that exist solely to distribute libraries.
Supported in OS X v10.11 and later.
The problem is that it doesn't work. I've tried exporting the OSA_LIBRARY_PATH variable — globally via my .zshrc file — and then running a sample script just like the one above via both the Script Editor and the osascript executable. Nothing works; I get a "file not found" error. I found this thread-where-the-participants-give-up-hope online; it doesn't explain much. Any thoughts?
On a somewhat related note, the Scripting Additions suite provides two other methods — loadScript and storeScript — that seem like they might be useful here. Unfortunately, when you try to use them, osascript gives you the finger. Though, I did manage to return what looked like a hexadecimal buffer from a compiled script using loadScript. Anyway, any insight you guys can shed on this would be much appreciated. Thanks.
The OSA_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable is ignored by restricted executables when running with System Integrity Protection enabled.
To workaround this limitation you can either turn off SIP, or you can use an unrestricted executable.
For instance, to make osascript unrestricted, you should first make a copy, and then re-sign it with an ad-hoc signature:
cp /usr/bin/osascript ./osascript
codesign -f -s - ./osascript
Once you have the unrestricted osascript, you can run it with the OSA_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set like this:
OSA_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libs" ./osascript path/to/script.scpt
As a lousy alternative, you can put a symlink at one of the "Script Libraries" folders that osascript would look at and point it to the folder you want. Note that the symlink must be a replacement for the entire folder, it can't just exist inside of it.
rm -rf ~/Library/Script\ Libraries
ln -s "/Your/Custom/Path/Goes/Here/" ~/Library/Script\ Libraries
Tested on 10.13.2
I have IntelliJ IDEA 13.1 running on a number of machines, all with identical paths for the project and modules but different local user names. The .idea directory gets committed to the git repo. When I make changes to my Global Libraries those are not reflected on the other machines because that info is in
C:\Users\user\.IdeaIC13\config\options\applicationLibraries.xml
I want changes to Global Library settings to be required only once and applied everywhere.
Should I tell IDEA to look for applicationLibraries.xml under the .idea directory instead of in the local user's directory which is not under version control? how?
Solution was to go into Project Structure, right click on each Global Library and choose "Copy To Project Libraries..." then remove the original from Global Libraries. Then in each project remove the old global library and add the newly created project library. This way library data is stored in the .idea dir and not the user's dir.
The applicationLibraries.xml file, among others, are stored in a platform-dependent folder in the repo, for example in _linux or _windows. If this is your problem, read on.
For things like keymaps this is wanted because things work differently after all, but for libraries which either only contain jars, or contain binaries (dll/so) for all platforms, this is unwanted.
On the PC with the global libraries (assuming linux for now):
Copy the file from config/settingsRepository/repository/_linux to _windows,
Execute git add _windows/applicationLibraries.xml from the command line,
Restart IntelliJ,
Merge repo (not Overwrite remote)
This solved it for me, and now I have global libraries on all my computers, and not just my linux computers.
I am developing a library which uses CMake to control it. It would be good to provide a "FindXXX.cmake" which locates the library and header files. This file would enable the users to use the command "find_package(XXX)" to find my library.
However, I don't know how to install my lib's "FindXXX.cmake" to an correct location. I failed to find a CMake's build-in mechanism to install a "FindXXX.cmake". In addition, CMake's variable "CMAKE_MODULE_PATH" is a list of directories, so I cannot install according to that vairable because I cannot decide which specific directory to use.
If the copy of CMake is installed to a standard location(i.e. use no prefix etc) then this can be done by placing the file in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ directory.
If you are going to supply a bundle probably you can add some commands to check if the cmake is available. if yes you can check for cmake --system-information|grep _INCLUDED_SYSTEM_INFO_FILE value from that to get modules directory.
Otherwise there's no way you can do that.
A workaround can be done i.e. if there is a binary in your bundle then you can add a command line option for placing this file.
If I try to build an application with the application class outside the default package, so the application file path is /app/AppClass.mxml instead of /AppClass.mxml (as would normally be the case), Flash builder cannot launch the application for debugging because it is looking for the SWF in debug/app/AppClass.swf and the SWF is being output to debug/AppClass.swf instead. Changing the output folder to debug/app makes it put the swf in debug/app, but then it puts the application configuration file "AppClass-app.xml" in /debug/app/app and then that can't be found.
Is there a way to change only the SWF output folder, or the location of the xml configuration file in the run-configuration?
You may use symbolic link to created swf file - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link
for example for Windows :
cd project/path/bin-debug/package/path/
MKLINK ClassName.swf project/path/bin-debug/ClassName.swf
and it's work
or you can use symbolic link for folder:
cd project/path/bin-debug/package/
MKLINK path project/path/bin-debug/ /D
I think I remember this worked for me. But it was long time ago. And, yes, it is a known problem, I also recall Adobe people mentioning it as a limitation of FB.
In my Ant script, you'll need to do the adjustments to reflect your actual file names and directory structure. Also note that it will make it more cumbersome to debug it from FB. You'll need to use the debugging target in Ant, and then connect the debugger to the running application (so that some info, especially on the startup) will be lost. The only way you would be able to debug it, though I've never tried it, is with the commandline tools (I'm not sure of adl syntax for breakpoints / printing / stack frames, so idk how to do it.
Also, for the released application you will probably want to change the signing mechanism.