angular 5 material MatTableDataSource - angular5

I updated from angular 4.4.6 and material beta 19 to angular 5 and material 5.0.0-rc0
The application compiles correctly, but executing on Chrome I get
"Uncaught Error: Unexpected value 'MatTable DataSource' imported by the module 'Material Modules'. Please add a #NgModule annotation."
Other material components work correctly, mat-icon, mat-card-content, mat-tab-group, mat-dialog-xxx ...
Could you help me?

MatTableDataSource, MatTable are already in MatTableModule, so no need to import it again in #NgModule.
Remove MatTableDataSource from your shared -> import
Only import it in your component as import { MatTableDataSource} from #angular/material;

Import the module and enter it in your #NgModule Imports section. This is probably in your something.module.ts.

I had similar issue after upgrading to Angular 5, updating all the dependency like typescript, corejs , angular-cli etc to latest version solved the problem.

MatTableDataSource is in the master branch but it isn't added to the current version.
I hope this link can help you to make your own data source with the Abstract class "DataSource" in the module "#angular/cdk/collections"
https://github.com/angular/material2/issues/6036

Related

ng-mocks giving error about imports with jest-preset-angular

Using ng-mocks 13.5.2 with jest-preset-angular 12 and #ngneat/spectator 11 I am getting the below error any time I try to use MockComponents or MockPipe in my spec file.
I'm not sure why this is happening.
Must use import to load ES Module: /Users/scott/ltr/ltr/node_modules/#angular/core/fesm2020/core.mjs.
at Runtime.requireModule (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1011:21)
at node_modules/ng-mocks/webpack:/ng-mocks/webpack/universalModuleDefinition:3:36
at Object.WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_MODULE__8900 (node_modules/ng-mocks/webpack:/ng-mocks/webpack/universalModuleDefinition:10:19)
The issue was reported and fixed, please use the latest version of ng-mocks: 14.0.1 or younger.
The problem was triggered by the node's flag: --experimental-vm-modules, which forces to use imports instead of require, whereas ng-mocks hadn't provided an esm build.
The fix was implemented here:
https://github.com/ike18t/ng-mocks/pull/2848
https://github.com/ike18t/ng-mocks/issues/2846

The 'graphlib' utility is a mandatory dependency

I am using joint js 3.1.1 version and graphlib 2.1.8 version.
I have a code in my app to check cyclic reference in graph. For that purpose I have written below code
graphlib.alg.findCycles(graph.toGraphLib())
This line gives following error
Uncaught Error: The the "graphlib" utility is a mandatory dependency.
at Object.toGraphLib (joint.min.js?de6d:8)
at child.He.toGraphLib (joint.min.js?de6d:8)
at RestrictCyclicConnection (links.js?2d1e:46)
at child.eval (businessobjectdesigner.vue?b25b:856)
at triggerEvents (backbone.js?ab5c:338)
at triggerApi (backbone.js?ab5c:322)
at eventsApi (backbone.js?ab5c:110)
at child.Events.trigger (backbone.js?ab5c:312)
at child.notify (joint.min.js?de6d:8)
at child._notifyConnectEvent (joint.min.js?de6d:8)
I have imported graphlib in my file also. But still getting following error.
I have imported graphlib as
import graphlib from 'graphlib'
You can try by passing graphlib as a part of the options object, as follows-
graph.toGraphLib({graphlib: graphlib})

Require cycles are allowed, but can result in uninitialized values. Consider refactoring to remove the need for a cycle

I am receiving this warning message in my chrome console for my react-native project. Do you have any idea why I am getting this?
This is the complete message:
Require cycle: node_modules/react-native-radio-buttons/lib/index.js ->
node_modules/react-native-radio-buttons/lib/segmented-controls.js ->
node_modules/react-native-radio-buttons/lib/index.js
Require cycles are allowed, but can result in uninitialized values.
Consider refactoring to remove the need for a cycle.
I appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks
TL;DR: You import module A into module B and module B into module A resulting in a cycle A → B → A → B → A ..., which can result in errors. Resolve that by restructuring your modules, so that the cycle breaks.
Detailed Answer
In javascript if you import different modules into other modules all this importing generates a dependency tree:
root_module
┌───────────┴───────────┐
sub_module_A sub_module_B
┌────────┴────────┐
sub_module_C sub_module_D
When you run your code, all modules will be evaluated from bottom to top or from leaves to the trunk, so that for example if you import modules C and D into module B all exports of C and D are already evaluated and not undefined anymore. If module B would be evaluated before C and D, module B would be not working, because all exports from C and D would be undefined, since they have not been evaluated yet.
Still, it can be possible to form cycles in your dependency tree (this is what you got a warning for):
root_module
┌───────────┴───────────┐
sub_module_A sub_module_B
↑ ↓
sub_module_C
Problem: Let's say the evaluation starts now with module C. Since it imports something from module B and it has not been evaluated yet, module C is not working correctly. All imported stuff from B is undefined. This actually is not that bad, since in the end module C is evaluated once again when everything else has been evaluated, so that also C is working. The same goes if evaluation starts with module B.
BUT: If your code relies on a working module C from the very beginning, this will result in very hard to find errors. Therefore you get this error.
How to solve: In your case the warning also gives a detailed explanation, where the cycle emerges. You import native-radio-buttons/lib/segmented-controls.js in node_modules/react-native-radio-buttons/lib/index.js and node_modules/react-native-radio-buttons/lib/index.js in native-radio-buttons/lib/segmented-controls.js. It seems like the cycle is placed inside some of your node modules. In this case there is unfortunately no way you could solve that by yourself.
If the cycle is in your own code, you have to extract some exports into a third module / file, from which you import the code into both modules previously forming the cycle.
You are probably importing something from "file A" into "file B", then importing something again from "file B" into "file A" .
Examine all the imports from both the files and see if there's any such cycle.
To prevent from having to write multiple lines of
import SomeComponent from "../components"
import AnotherComponent from "../components"
import AndAnotherComponent from "../components"
import AndOneMoreComponent from "../components"
I created a comp.js file where I could import the components as they are created and export them as modules.
All components are then able to be reached from one place.
So you can then have something like this in some place...
import { SomeComponent, AnotherComponent, AndAnotherComponent, AndOneMoreComponent} from './comp'
Now what happens in the renderer for example when SomeComponent is rendered....
import * as React from "react";
import { AnotherComponent} from '../comps';
import { View, Text } from "react-native";
function SomeComponent() {
return (
<>
<AnotherComponent />
<View><Text>EXAMPLE OF SOMECOMPONENT</Text></View>
</>
)
}
export default SomeComponent;
In the example, SomeComponent could be called in the main App, and when it renders it also asks for a component from the comp.js
This is what triggers the Require cycle warning because a module that was imported from one place, is then rendering and asking to import another module from the same place it was rendered from.
What are your thoughts on this, should I revert back to using single import statements or do you think there is a danger in using the module export as it is currently setup?
I my case, I have sold the same problem in react-native navgiation.
What I did ?
Already I was using react-navigation like below
export const containerRef = createRef();
function App(){
return (
<NavigationContainer ref={containerRef}>
....
<NavigationContainer>
);
}
and then I was consuming it like:
import {containerRef} from 'filename';
onPress = ()=> containerRef.current.navigate('Chat');
But I updated like below and warning has gone.
function App(){
return (
<NavigationContainer> // removed ref
....
<NavigationContainer>
);
}
and then I was consuming it like:
import { useNavigation } from '#react-navigation/native';
onPress = ()=> useNavigation.navigate('Chat');
This occurs if your code contains cyclic dependencies. If these dependencies exist within your own libraries, you can easily fix them. But if this is happening in 3rd party libraries, you can't do much except waiting for the developers to fix these.
Another reason might be this: Some imports cause this warning if they're done through the require keyword. Replace these with import statements and you might be good to go. For example,
const abc = require("example"); // Don't use this syntax
import abc from "example" // Use this syntax instead
NOTE: This might vary from project to project. For a detailed understanding of require vs import, refer to this link.
In my case the warning was like this;
Require cycle: src\views\TeamVerification.js -> src\components\TeamVerificationListItem.js ->
src\views\TeamVerification.js Require cycles are allowed, but can result in uninitialized values. Consider refactoring to remove the need for a cycle.
As it indicates, TeamVerification was importing TeamVerificationListItem and TeamVerificationListItem was also importing TeamVerification. It was an unused import but after I remove it the warning gone.
As others have already mentioned, for your own packages
Move things required within two modules by each other into a third module
Avoid imports from barrel-files (index.ts/js) or aliases (#mycompany/my-module) if you are within the same "my-module"
What others have not mentioned (and which seems to be the problem for OP), for packages not within your responsibility (eg node_modules from NPM), the only thing you can do is
Disable the warning. It will still show up in metro console, but no more yellow warning snackbar: import { LogBox } from 'react-native'; LogBox.ignoreLogs(['Require cycle: node_modules/']); You can place the code in App.tsx, for example.
Modify the package contents of the node_modules itself and patch the package contents after every npm install via patch-package => I think this is an overkill if the circular imports don't produce actual errors
You should use the Relation wrapper type in relation properties in ES Modules projects to avoid circular dependency issues, just click here: https://typeorm.io/#relations-in-esm-projects
In my case, i had the same warning after the installation of a 'package'
and in their documentation, it was import SomeFunc from 'package'
and instantly the warning showed up
Require cycles are allowed but can result in uninitialized values. Consider refactoring to remove the need for a cycle.
but as soon as I destructure the SomeFunc there was no more warning
import {SomeFunc} from 'package'
please look at the destructuring
I used react-native-maps in my project and I got the same error.
Just upgraded from 0.27.1 -> 0.28.0.
I can confirm that this issue is fixed.
Thank you
if use NavigationContainer in #react-navigation/native
import {createRef} from 'react';
<NavigationContainer ref={createRef()}>
Please check whether you have imported same details within that file.
(i.e)
your file being as a actions/meals.js and you have added the line in the same file like
import { Something } from './actions/meals.js'

How to import ErrorUtils in React Native

RN version: 0.50
Testing on Android, haven't tested on iOS
I am trying to use ErrorUtils.setGlobalHandler as described in this github issue: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1194
However, what is not clear from the issue is how to import ErrorUtils. It's not in the react documentation: https://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/0.50/getting-started.html
Previously, in RN 0.41, I was able to import ErrorUtils with import ErrorUtils from "ErrorUtils"; However, in 0.50 I am getting a red react popup with the following message when I try to import ErrorUtils like this:
com.facebook.react.common.JavascriptException: Failed to execute 'importScripts' on 'WorkerGlobalScope': The script at 'http://localhost:8081/index.bundle?platform=android&dev=true&minify=false' failed to load.
I've also tried import { ErrorUtils } from 'react-native'; but it doesn't seem to exist there. The error is:
Cannot read property 'setGlobalHandler' of undefined
How do I properly import ErrorUtils in RN 0.50?
ErrorUtils is a global variable, therfore it doesn't need to be imported. You can verify this with console.log(global.ErrorUtils)
However it is exported as module anyways (here). The comment there also has more information why it is done this way.
You can import the module like this:
import ErrorUtils from 'ErrorUtils';
For anyone on RN61+, you should no longer import the module as you will experience the following error in the running metro bundler:
Error: Unable to resolve module `ErrorUtils`
Instead, just use the module without importing as this is a global variable, as stated by leo
I did created a global.d.ts to define a global variable,
interface Global {
ErrorUtils: {
setGlobalHandler: any
reportFatalError: any
getGlobalHandler: any
}
}
declare var global: Global
then, at where you are trying to use it, simply
global.ErrorUtils.setGlobalHandler(xxxx)

From Odoo8 to Odoo11: rmanage report_sxw

I update my Odoo8 to an Odoo11. Then I try to reinstall a custom module named probespoke ( https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tcmjwWvigBeVd6yWUHO3-2u0Ane24xvz/view?usp=sharing ) that I sent to you to reproduce the issue. This module use an old module named report which was use until Odoo10.
You can see in probespoke.py that it is import line 2
from openerp.report import report_sxw
and then use line 292
class pb_orders_products_report_parser(report_sxw.rml_parse):
I don't find much information about how to get around this issue.
Maybe there is a solution here (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/24798) but as I am still a beginner in Odoo developpement, I don't really understand what they are doing.
Does someone has an idea?
Thank you very much.