JSONSchema validation failure with $ref (Draft v3) - jsonschema

I have created a JSON schema following the draft v3 specifications. Schema looks like this:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-03/schema#",
"additionalProperties": false,
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"ExecutionPlanList": {
"type": "array",
"items": [{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"model": {
"required": true,
"properties": {
"featureList": {
"required": true,
"items": {
"properties": {
"featureName": {
"type": ["string", "null"]
},
"featureType": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"type": "array"
},
"modelId": {
"required": true,
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"cascadeSteps": {
"required": false,
"items": {
"properties": {
"binaryModel": {
"$ref": "#/properties/ExecutionPlanList/items/properties/model",
"required": true
},
"threshold": {
"required": true,
"default": "0.0",
"maximum": 100.0,
"type": "number"
},
"backupModel": {
"$ref": "#/properties/ExecutionPlanList/items/properties/model",
"required": true
}
}
},
"type": "array"
},
"marketplaceId": {
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
}
}
}]
}
},
"required": true
}
Essentially, executionPlanList contains list of model and cascadeStep, and each cascadeStep contains two models with a number. So I'm trying to re-use the schema for model in cascadeStep, but validation (https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/) is failing with Could not resolve schema reference '#/properties/ExecutionPlanList/items/properties/model'.
Would appreciate any pointers on what's wrong with this schema.

what about adding a 'definitions' and refer like this:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-03/schema#",
"additionalProperties": false,
"type": "object",
"definitions": {
"model": {
"required": true,
"properties": {
"featureList": {
"required": true,
"items": {
"properties": {
"featureName": {
"type": ["string", "null"]
},
"featureType": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
},
"type": "array"
},
"modelId": {
"required": true,
"type": "string"
}
},
"type": "object"
}
},
"properties": {
"ExecutionPlanList": {
"type": "array",
"items": [{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"model": {
"$ref" : "#/definitions/model"
},
"cascadeSteps": {
"required": false,
"items": {
"properties": {
"binaryModel": {
"$ref" : "#/definitions/model",
"required": true
},
"threshold": {
"required": true,
"default": "0.0",
"maximum": 100.0,
"type": "number"
},
"backupModel": {
"$ref" : "#/definitions/model",
"required": true
}
}
},
"type": "array"
},
"marketplaceId": {
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
}
}
}]
}
},
"required": true
}

It should be '#/properties/ExecutionPlanList/items/0/properties/model'
The schema validates only the first item, by the way.

Related

Easy way to group custom defined types to use for reference?

How to reference types by group instead of doing it individually?
For example here, I want "sum" and "subtract" types to accept types that are "number"-related types only("number", "sum", "subtract"). While "concatenate" can accept both "number" and "string"-related types. Including their selves. This will be really helpful for me if in case I added more types and want them to be automatically included.
"sum": {
"title": "sum",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"values": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"anyOf": [
{
"type": "number"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/sum"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/subtract"
}
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"values"
]
},
"subtract": {
"title": "subtract",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"minuend": {
"type": "number"
},
"subtrahend": {
"type": "number"
}
},
"required": [
"minuend",
"subtrahend"
]
},
"concatenate": {
"title": "concatenate",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"strings": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"anyOf": [
{
"type": "number"
},
{
"type": "string"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/sum"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/subtract"
}
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"strings"
]
}
}
Here's the full schema:
{
"definitions": {
"sum": {
"title": "sum",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"values": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"anyOf": [
{
"type": "number"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/sum"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/subtract"
}
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"values"
]
},
"subtract": {
"title": "subtract",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"minuend": {
"type": "number"
},
"subtrahend": {
"type": "number"
}
},
"required": [
"minuend",
"subtrahend"
]
},
"concatenate": {
"title": "concatenate",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"strings": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"anyOf": [
{
"type": "number"
},
{
"type": "string"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/sum"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/subtract"
}
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"strings"
]
}
},
"title": "Step",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"value": {
"oneOf": [
{
"type": "number",
"minimum": 0
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/sum"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/subtract"
}
]
}
}
}

JSON Schema - How to narrow down possible array object values

How can the following requirements be configured in a JSON schema.
I have the following JSON
{
"orderMethods": [
{
"requestType": "some service",
"deployType": "MANUAL",
"deployLabel": "some label"
},
{
"requestType": "some service",
"deployType": "MANUAL",
"deployLabel": "some label"
},
{
"requestType": "some service",
"deployType": "AUTO",
"deploySubType": "REST",
"deployLabel": "some label",
"deployConfig": "some config"
},
{
"requestType": "some service",
"deployType": "AUTO",
"deploySubType": "DB",
"deployLabel": "some label",
"deployConfig": "some config"
}
]
}
Requirements:
only one deployType = "MANUAL" is allowed
only one deployType = "AUTO" is allowed
additionally, only one deploySubType = "REST or "DB" is allowed
Currently I have the following JSON schema. Unfortunately the above JSON is valid. How can the above requirements be addressed?
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"orderMethods": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethods"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false,
"definitions": {
"OrderMethods": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethod"
}
},
"OrderMethod": {
"oneOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethodManualDeploy"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethodAutoDeploy"
}
],
"uniqueItems": true
},
"OrderMethodAutoDeploy": {
"oneOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethodAutoRestDeploy"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/OrderMethodAutoDBDeploy"
}
],
"uniqueItems": true
},
"OrderMethodManualDeploy": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requestType": {
"type": "string"
},
"deployType": {
"const": "MANUAL"
},
"deployLabel": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"requestType",
"deployType",
"deployLabel"
],
"additionalProperties": false
},
"OrderMethodAutoRestDeploy": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requestType": {
"type": "string"
},
"deployType": {
"const": "AUTO"
},
"deploySubType": {
"const": "REST"
},
"deployLabel": {
"type": "string"
},
"deployConfig": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"requestType",
"deployType",
"deploySubType",
"deployLabel",
"deployConfig"
]
},
"OrderMethodAutoDBDeploy": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requestType": {
"type": "string"
},
"deployType": {
"const": "AUTO"
},
"deploySubType": {
"const": "DB"
},
"deployConfig": {
"type": "string"
},
"deployLabel": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"requestType",
"deployType",
"deploySubType",
"deployLabel",
"deployConfig"
]
}
}
}
Thanks for your help/ideas.

json schema validation: a string field required if another array field contains specific value

cant build validation for simple case:
if sources field contains "OTHER" in values then "sourceOtherDescription" must be required.
Shall pass validation
{
"sources": ["RENTS"]
}
{
"sources": ["RENTS", "OTHER"],
"sourceOtherDescription": "other income"
}
This should not pass validation since sources contains "OTHER"
{
"sources": ["RENTS", "OTHER"]
}
The schema that I was able to produce. Does not really work
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"$id": "money-sources",
"title": "Money Sources",
"description": "Money Sources definitions",
"type": "object",
"required": ["sources"],
"properties": {
"sources": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"RENTS",
"MEMBER_FEES",
"PROFIT",
"SALES_SECURITIES",
"INTERNAL_GROUP_TRANSFERS",
"OTHER"
]
},
"uniqueItems": true
},
"sourceOtherDescription": { "type": "string", "minLength": 3}
},
"additionalProperties": false,
"oneOf": [
{
"properties": {
"sources": {
"type": "array",
"contains": {"const": "OTHER"}
}
},
"required": ["sourceOtherDescription"]
},
{
"properties": {
"sources": {
"type": "array",
"contains": {
"enum": [
"RENTS",
"MEMBER_FEES",
"PROFIT",
"SALES_SECURITIES"
]
}
}
}
}
, false
]
}
Using if-then it works for me this way:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"$id": "money-sources",
"title": "Money Sources",
"description": "Money Sources definitions",
"type": "object",
"required": [ "sources" ],
"properties": {
"sources": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"RENTS",
"MEMBER_FEES",
"PROFIT",
"SALES_SECURITIES",
"INTERNAL_GROUP_TRANSFERS",
"OTHER"
]
},
"uniqueItems": true
},
"sourceOtherDescription": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 3
}
},
"additionalProperties": false,
"if": {
"properties": {
"sources": {
"type": "array",
"contains": {
"const": "OTHER"
}
}
}
},
"then": {
"required": [ "sourceOtherDescription" ]
}
}

Generic json schema for two condition based responses

I have an API returning response based on input type.
For a single filter I get
{
"intervalData": [
{
"timestamp": "2021-05-25T06:00:00.000Z",
"result": {
"Attempts": 309194
}
}
],
"intervalTotals": {
"Attempts": 4719471
}
}
For multiple filter I get
{
"multiFilterData": [
{
"filter": {
"id": 111111
},
"intervalData": {
"timestamp": "2021-05-25T20:41:39.000Z",
"result": {
"Attempts": 7902
}
}
},
{...}
]
}
That means the response will either have (intervalData,intervalTotals) OR multiFilterData.
Question:
Is it possible to have a generic schema to handle this or must I have two separate schemas?
How to make sure that if one combination is present other should not be there?
I tried with below schema on https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/. The validation fails if there is some other keys listed under the required, unfortunately the validation succeeds if one of the entry from oneOf is missing. EDIT1 below
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"type": "object",
"oneOf": [
{
"required": [
"intervalData",
"intervalTotals",
]
},
{
"required": [
"multiFilterData",
]
}
],
"properties": {
"intervalData": {
"type": "array",
"additionalItems": false,
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"timestamp",
"result"
],
"properties": {
...
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
},
"intervalTotals": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"Attempts"
],
"properties": {
"Attempts": {
"type": "integer"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
},
"multiFilterData": {
"type": "array",
"additionalItems": false,
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"filter",
"intervalData"
],
"properties": {
"filter": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"id"
],
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "integer"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
},
"intervalData": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"timestamp",
"result"
],
"properties": {
"timestamp": {
"type": "string"
},
"result": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"Attempts"
],
"properties": {
...
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
EDIT 1: This schema also passes even though the first required is missing an element on the list.
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"type": "object",
"oneOf": [
{
"required": [
"intervalData"
]
},
{
"required": [
"multiFilterData",
]
}
],
"properties": {
"intervalData": {...},
"intervalTotals": {...},
"multiFilterData": {...}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}

JSON schema for object with either A and B or C required properties

I have two possible JSON objects for one request:
{
"from": "string",
"to": "string",
"text": "string"
}
or
{
"number": "integer",
"text": "string"
}
In both cases "text" property is optional. Other properties are required (either "number, or both "from" and "to").
What will be the correct JSON schema to validate this?
Here is another solution that I think is a bit more clear. The dependencies clause ensures that "from" and "to" always come as a pair. Then the oneOf clause can be really simple and avoid the not-required boilerplate.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"from": { "type": "string" },
"to": { "type": "string" },
"number": { "type": "integer" },
"text": { "type": "string" }
},
"dependencies": {
"from": ["to"],
"to": ["from"]
},
"oneOf": [
{ "required": ["from"] },
{ "required": ["number"] }
]
}
Finally managed to build the correct scheme.
{
"definitions": {
"interval": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"from": {
"type": "string"
},
"to": {
"type": "string"
},
"text": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": ["from", "to"],
"not": {
"required": ["number"]
}
},
"top": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"number": {
"type": "integer"
},
"text": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": ["number"],
"allOf": [
{
"not": {
"required": ["from"]
}
},
{
"not": {
"required": ["to"]
}
}
]
}
},
"type": "object",
"oneOf": [
{"$ref": "#/definitions/interval"},
{"$ref": "#/definitions/top"}
]
}