SELECT dependents.[Dependent_name],
"Child of " + employee.[Lname] + "," + employee.[Fname] AS Dependence
FROM dependents, employees AS employee
WHERE employee.[Lname] LIKE 'W%'
AND employee.Ssn = dependents.Essn
AND NOT dependents.Relationship = "Spouse"
ORDER BY employee.[Lname], dependents.[Dependent_name];
I'm attempting to create a query that will return a table with 2 fields. Those being dependent_name and Dependence. The only thing that is not properly functioning is the LIKE condition and I do not know why. It causes the whole table to not return anything. It should return 2 entries
MS Access uses * as the wildcard in LIKE, not %. So, try this WHERE condition:
WHERE employee.[Lname] LIKE 'W*' AND
. . .
Related
I have the following select statement in ABAP:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN EVER AS EV on
MUNIC~POD = EV~VREFER(9).
"where EV~BSTATUS = '14' or EV~BSTATUS = '32'.
My problem with the above statement is that does not recognize the substring/offset operation on the 'ON' clause. If i remove the '(9) then
it recognizes the field, otherwise it gives error:
Field ev~refer is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables
nor defined by a "DATA" statement. I have also tried doing something similar in the 'Where' clause, receiving a similar error:
LOOP AT gt_instmunic.
clear wa_gt_instmunic_f.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-mandt = gt_instmunic-mandt.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-bis = gt_instmunic-bis.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ab = gt_instmunic-ab.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-zzelecdate = gt_instmunic-zzelecdate.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZCERTDATE = gt_instmunic-ZZCERTDATE.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-CONSYEAR = gt_instmunic-CONSYEAR.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZDIMO = gt_instmunic-ZDIMO.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_M = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_T = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_T.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_M = gt_instmunic-USAGE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_T = gt_instmunic-USAGE_T.
temp_pod = gt_instmunic-pod.
SELECT vrefer
FROM ever
INTO wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer
WHERE ( vrefer(9) LIKE temp_pod ). " PROBLEM WITH SUBSTRING
"AND ( BSTATUS = '14' OR BSTATUS = '32' ).
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / sy-dbcnt.
WRITE: / 'wa is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / 'wa-ever is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
APPEND wa_gt_instmunic_f TO gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
ENDLOOP.
itab_size = lines( gt_instmunic_f ).
WRITE: / 'Internal table populated with', itab_size, ' lines'.
The basic task i want to implement is to modify a specific field on one table,
pulling values from another. They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) ). Thanks in advance for your time.
If you are on a late enough NetWeaver version, it works on 7.51, you can use the OpenSQL function LEFT or SUBSTRING. Your query would look something like:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN ever AS ev
ON MUNIC~POD EQ LEFT( EV~VREFER, 9 )
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F.
Note that the INTO clause needs to move to the end of the command as well.
field(9) is a subset operation that is processed by the ABAP environment and can not be translated into a database-level SQL statement (at least not at the moment, but I'd be surprised if it ever will be). Your best bet is either to select the datasets separately and merge them manually (if both are approximately equally large) or pre-select one and use a FAE/IN clause.
They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) )
This is a wrong assumption, because they both are not fields, but a field an other thing.
If you really need to do that task through SQL, I'll suggest you to check native SQL sentences like SUBSTRING and check if you can manage to use them within an EXEC_SQL or (better) the CL_SQL* classes.
I am starting out at Hibernate. I am at the point, where I try out SQL in HQL.
I saw a code example which I wanted to recreate, but my output ended up being different.
To use SQL in HQL, that person said, if you want to only use a couple of columns, you need to use a Map to get certain columns (So I can´t simply use addEntity here).
My Student table got sId, sName, sMarks. Now I want to retrieve only the Students names (sName) and their marks (sMarks).
The Problem is, that I only get "null" as values for the names and marks whilst the object shows me the proper values:
Console Output:
Hibernate: SELECT sName,sMarks FROM student
{SNAME=Nameless fool number 1, SMARKS=65}
null : null
The Code:
NativeQuery querySQL2 = session.createNativeQuery("SELECT sName,sMarks "
+ "FROM student");
querySQL2.setResultTransformer(Criteria.ALIAS_TO_ENTITY_MAP);
List students = querySQL2.getResultList();
for (Object o : students)
{
System.out.println(o);
Map m = (Map)o;
System.out.println(m.get("sName") + " : " + m.get("sMarks"));
}
Why do I get the proper Object with Syso(o) and just null with Syso(m.get("..."))?
Thank you in advance!
Actually you already answered your question
{SNAME=Nameless fool number 1, SMARKS=65}. Hibernate convert column names to upper case.
I am on the 7th set of queries I have been working on and all of them have used SELECT * INTO some_table without an issue. For some reason tho the below query in SQL Server is throwing the error
An object or column name is missing or empty. For SELECT INTO
statements, verify each column has a name. For other statements, look
for empty alias names. Aliases defined as "" or [] are not allowed.
Change the alias to a valid name.
Any Idea on what it could be?
Note that running the query without the select into will result in data being returned and displayed as expected.
Select * into MYDB.MY_TBL
SELECT OT.U_ID AS "U_ID"
,R.E AS "E"
,R.IR AS "CKT"
,A.RI AS "OC"
,A.EQ AS "SEQ"
,A.HA AS "CHA"
,A.A_HA AS "ATE"
,A.BIL AS "BIL"
,A.CHA AS "CHAA"
,A.RAT AS "AMT"
,A.PRM AS "PREM"
,A.T_CHG AS "RAT"
,A.PER AS "LAS"
,A.S_BIL AS "BIL_A"
,A.CD AS "CDE"
,A.CBIL_J AS "BIL_J"
,A.AMT_D AS "TB"
,A.CRY AS "CTRY"
,A.RVW AS "RVW"
FROM MYDB.OTHER_TBL OT
JOIN [LINKEDSERVER\INST,0000].FE.dbo.tblR R
ON OT.E = R.E
JOIN [LINKEDSERVER\INST,0000].FE.dbo.tblA A
ON R.IR = A.IR
WHERE OT.U_ID = 'TEST'
You have two selects. I think you just want:
SELECT OT.U_ID AS "U_ID",
. . .
INTO MYDB.MY_TBL
FROM . . .
The INTO should follow the SELECT column list.
Or alternatively, you could use a subquery, but that does not seem necessary.
Where #GordonLinoff example works I realized what I forgot and it was my FROM () sub-query setup I normally use.
I will provide an example in contrast to Gordon's method.
IE:
Select * into MYDB.MY_TBL
FROM(
SELECT OT.U_ID AS "U_ID"
...
FROM MYDB.OTHER_TBL OT
WHERE OT.U_ID = 'TEST'
) SUB
Please note these two points:
1.You have two columns with given "CHA" alias
2.It Seems you need to rewrite the query as:
SELECT OT.U_ID AS "U_ID"
,R.E AS "E"
,R.IR AS "CKT"
,A.RI AS "OC"
,A.EQ AS "SEQ"
,A.HA AS "CHA_DUPLICATE"
,A.A_HA AS "ATE"
,A.BIL AS "BIL"
,A.CHA AS "CHA_DUPLICATE2"
,A.RAT AS "AMT"
,A.PRM AS "PREM"
,A.T_CHG AS "RAT"
,A.PER AS "LAS"
,A.S_BIL AS "BIL_A"
,A.CD AS "CDE"
,A.CBIL_J AS "BIL_J"
,A.AMT_D AS "TB"
,A.CRY AS "CTRY"
,A.RVW AS "RVW"
INTO MYDB.MY_TBL -- <<<<<<< NOTE
FROM MYDB.OTHER_TBL OT
JOIN [LINKEDSERVER\INST,0000].FE.dbo.tblR R
ON OT.E = R.E
JOIN [LINKEDSERVER\INST,0000].FE.dbo.tblA A
ON R.IR = A.IR
WHERE OT.U_ID = 'TEST'
I have several OR in my SQL statement so I want to save a chuck of it in a cfsavecontent. Here is that part:
<cfsavecontent variable="checkDepartment">
<cfif #wrkDept# EQ #dept[2][1]#>
Department = 'Health' AND
<cfelse>
Department = '#wrkDept#' AND
</cfif>
</cfsavecontent>
But the error I get on the page shows 2 sets of apostrophes around the word Health.
SQL
SELECT COUNT(*) AS numItems
FROM IT_PROJECTS
WHERE
Department = ''Health'' AND
status = 'Cancelled'
Can anyone help me to only get a single apostrophe? Thanks
So this answer seems a lot more complicated than it really is. And without knowing specifically what your query looks like (re:OR conditions), I'm not really sure how to structure it. It can be better. The goal should be to make one single trip to your SQL server with the query that makes the most sense for the data you're trying to get. I'm not sure what you are trying to do with cfsavecontent, but I don't think you need it.
The bulk of my example query (https://trycf.com/gist/4e1f46bfa84a6748aced0f9ee8221c6d/acf2016?theme=monokai) is setup. I chose to go with a cfscript format, because as Redtopia said, I also find it much easier to build a dynamic query in cfscript.
After initial setup, I basically just script out the variables I'll use in my final queryExecute().
// Base query.
qry = "SELECT count(*) AS theCount FROM IT_PROJECTS WHERE 1=1 " ;
// This is our dynamic filter that we build below.
qfilter = {} ;
// Query options.
opts = { "dbtype":"query" } ;
After we have our base, I build up the dynamic part of the query. This is the part that will likely change quite a bit depending on your current needs and setup.
For the first part, I basically replaced your cfif with a ternary evaluation. I'm not sure how your data plays into the evaluation of dept or where that array comes from. But from there I build a basic included statement of the query and set up the queryparam values for it. Then I add a second check that will pick a different set of values for the query (currently based on even/odd seconds). Again, I'm not sure of the intent of your query here, so I just made something dynamic.
//////////// BUILD DYNAMIC FILTER ////////////
qdept = ( wrkDept == dept[2][1] ) ? 'Health' : wrkDept ;
/// This one is an included filter:
qry &= " AND department = :dpt AND status = :sts " ;
qfilter.dpt = {"value":qdept,"cfsqltype":"CFSQLVARCHAR"} ;
qfilter.sts = {"value":"Cancelled","cfsqltype":"CFSQLVARCHAR"} ;
/// Adding Dynamic ORs
// Dynamically set status based on even/odd seconds.
qStatus = ( now().second()%2==0) ? "Cancelled" : "Active" ;
qry &= " OR ( department = :dpt2 AND status = :sts2 ) " ;
qfilter.dpt2 = {value:"IT",cfsqltype:"CFSQLVARCHAR"} ;
qfilter.sts2 = {value:qStatus,cfsqltype:"CFSQLVARCHAR"} ;
This gives us a SQL string that looks like:
SELECT count(*) AS theCount
FROM IT_PROJECTS
WHERE 1=1
AND department = :dpt AND status = :sts
OR
( department = :dpt2 AND status = :sts2 )
With a SQL statement, the placement of AND and OR conditions can greatly impact the results. Use parenthesis to group conditions how you need them.
After we've built the query string, we just have to plug it and our queryparams into the queryExecute().
result = queryExecute( qry , qfilter , opts ) ;
And if we want to output our data, we can go:
writeOutput("There are " & result.theCount & " records." ) ;
Which gives us:
There are 8 records.
Again, I don't know what your main conditions look like. If you can give me an example of a query with a bunch of ORs and ANDs, I'll try to modify this for you.
I have been trying out some LINQ query can someone please show how to convert the following SQL query to LINQ:
SELECT *, firstname+' '+lastname AS FullName FROM Client WHERE age > 25;
Don't worry about the where part (put it in for completeness) more wandering how to achieve that first part.
Now I have come across something like this:
from c in dc.Clients select new {FullName = c.firstname + " "+c.lastname}
But i don't know how to get it to select everything else without specifying it ie:
{firstname = c.firstname, id = c.id ..... etc}
But I was hoping for another way of achieving that.
So I'm just wandering if someone could show me the right or another way of accomplishing this :)
Thanks All :)
You have to select the actual item then refer to its properties. There's no way to expand the individual columns into the anonymous type.
var query = from c in dc.Clients
where c.Age > 25
select new
{
Client = c,
FullName = c.firstname + " " + c.lastname
};
foreach (var item in query)
{
// item.Client.Id
// item.FullName
// item.Client.FirstName
}
Selecting the actual item gives you access to the same properties you were using to construct the anonymous type. It's not a complete waste though if the query had more going on, such as a join with another table and including fields from that result in the anonymous type, along with the entire Client object.
You can can't autogenerate every column with Linq2Sql or EF (you can however find a way to mimic this behavior with micro-orms like Dapper and massive).
More conveniently, you can just select a new anonymous type with 3 fields, firstname, lastname and a client like:
from c in dc.Clients
select new
{
FullName = c.firstname + " "+c.lastname,
Client = c
}
I would however recommend to select just those properties that you really need. This forces you to think about how to compose your query and what the query is intended to do (and hence, select). Alternatively, you can just select the client, and use some extension methods to select full names. like:
public static string GetFullName(this Client client){ return client.firstname + " " + client.lastname; }