Here's my table:
ID|2ndID|Value
1|ABC|103
2|ABC|102
3|DEF|103
4|XYZ|105
My query should return all instance of the ID that has only one Value=103 for the 2ndID. It shouldn't return Ids 1 and 2 because apart from 103, ABC has 102 too. 3|DEF on the other hand has only one Value = 103. And I need such rows back. I don't need the 4|XYZ also since value <> 103. Based on the above sample set my result should only be.
3|DEF|103
I can use a group by 2ndID having COUNT(*) =1 which will return all but I don't know how to filter it only to Value = 103.
Thanks in advance.
This should return all the row with a single 2ndId value
select * from
my_table where 2ndId in (
select 2ndId
from my_table
group by 2ndId
having count(*) =1
)
And if you need to enforce the filter for value 103
select * from
my_table where 2ndId in (
select 2ndId
from my_table
group by 2ndId
having count(*) =1
)
and value = 103
This is a standard application of the HAVING clause in aggregate queries. You want to group by the second id, and select only the groups that have only one row and where the min(value) is 103. MIN(value) will be the unique value in the unique row, in the groups that only have one row to begin with; and you don't care about any other groups.
COMMENT: This solution assumes that the combination (second_id, value) is unique - it can't appear in the table more than once, for different id's. I asked the OP in a Comment under the original question to clarify whether this is in fact the case.
with
mytable ( id, second_id, value ) as (
select 1, 'ABC', 103 from dual union all
select 2, 'ABC', 102 from dual union all
select 3, 'DEF', 103 from dual union all
select 4, 'XYZ', 105 from dual
)
-- End of SIMULATED inputs (for testing only, NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION).
-- SQL query begins BELOW THIS LINE. Use your actual table and column names.
select min(id) as id, second_id, min(value) as value
from mytable
group by second_id
having count(*) = 1 and min(value) = 103
;
ID SECOND_ID VALUE
-- --------- -----
3 DEF 103
Related
I’ve a table that looks like this:
Table A
Version,id
5060586,22285
5074515,22701
5074515,22285
7242751,22701
7242751,22285
I want to generate a new key called groupId that is inserted as my example below:
Table A
Version,id,groupId
5060586,22285,1
5074515,22701,2
5074515,22285,2
7242751,22701,2
7242751,22285,2
I want the groupId to be the same as long as the id's are the same in the different versions. So for example version 5074515 and 7242751 has the same id's so therefor the groupId will be the same. If all the id's aren't the same a new groupId should be added as it has in version 5060586.
How can i solve this specific problem in SQL oracle?
One approach is to create a unique value representing the set of ids in each version, then assign a groupid to the unique values of that, then join back to the original data.
INSERT ALL
INTO t (version,id) VALUES (5060586,22285)
INTO t (version,id) VALUES (5074515,22701)
INTO t (version,id) VALUES (5074515,22285)
INTO t (version,id) VALUES (7242751,22701)
INTO t (version,id) VALUES (7242751,22285)
SELECT 1 FROM dual;
WITH groups
AS
(
SELECT version
, LISTAGG(id,',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY id) AS group_text
FROM t
GROUP BY version
),
groupids
AS
(
SELECT group_text, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY group_text) AS groupid
FROM groups
GROUP BY group_text
)
SELECT t.*, groupids.groupid
FROM t
INNER JOIN groups ON t.version = groups.version
INNER JOIN groupids ON groups.group_text = groupids.group_text;
dbfiddle.uk
You can use:
UPDATE tableA t
SET group_id = ( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT id)
FROM TableA x
WHERE x.Version <= t.version );
Which, for the sample data:
CREATE TABLE TableA (
Version NUMBER,
id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
);
INSERT INTO TableA (Version, id)
SELECT 5060586,22285 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 5074515,22701 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 5074515,22285 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 7242751,22701 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
SELECT 7242751,22285 FROM DUAL;
Then, after the update:
SELECT * FROM tablea;
Outputs:
VERSION
ID
GROUP_ID
5060586
22285
1
5074515
22701
2
5074515
22285
2
7242751
22701
2
7242751
22285
2
db<>fiddle here
I have the following query in SQL Server. How do I get the number of rows of previous select query as following format?
Sample Query
select ID, Name FROM Branch
UNION ALL
SELECT ROWCOUNT_BIG(), ''
Sample Output
If you use a CTE you can count the rows and union all together:
with cte as (
select ID, [Name]
from dbo.Branch
)
select ID, [Name]
from cte
union all
select count(*) + 1, ''
from cte;
I think you want to see total count of the select statement. you can do this way.
CREATE TABLE #test (id int)
insert into #test(id)
SELECT 1
SELECT id from #test
union all
SELECT rowcount_big()
Note: Here, the ID will be implicitly converted to BIGINT datatype, based on the datatype precedence. Read more
Presumably, you are running this in some sort of application. So why not use ##ROWCOUNT?
select id, name
from . . .;
select ##rowcount_big; -- big if you want a bigint
I don't see value to including the value in the same query. However, if the underlying query is an aggregation query, there might be a way to do this using GROUPING SETS.
Here are two ways. It's better to use a CTE to define the row set so further table inserts don't interfere with the count. Since you're using ROWCOUNT_BIG() these queries use COUNT_BIG() (which also returns bigint) to count the inserted rows. In order to make sure the total always appears as the last row an 'order_num' column was added to the SELECT list and ORDER BY clause.
drop table if exists #tTest;
go
create table #tTest(
ID int not null,
[Name] varchar(10) not null);
insert into #tTest values
(115, 'Joe'),
(116, 'Jon'),
(117, 'Ron');
/* better to use a CTE to define the row set */
with t_cte as (
select *
from #tTest)
select 1 as order_num, ID, [Name]
from t_cte
union all
select 2 as order_num, count_big(*), ''
from t_cte
order by order_num, ID;
/* 2 separate queries could give inconsistent result if table is inserted into */
select 1 as order_num, ID, [Name]
from #tTest
union all
select 2 as order_num, count_big(*), ''
from #tTest
order by order_num, ID;
Both return
order_num ID Name
1 115 Joe
1 116 Jon
1 117 Ron
2 3
i'm working with oracle, plSql, i need to query a table and select the max id where a key is matched, now i have this query
select t.* from (
select distinct (TO_CHAR(I.DATE, 'YYMMDD') || I.AUTH_CODE || I.AMOUNT || I.CARD_NUMBER) as kies, I.SID as ids
from transactions I) t group by kies, ids order by ids desc;
It's displaying this data
If i remove the ID from the query, it displays the distinct keys (in the query i use the alias KIES because keys was in blue, so i thought it might be a reserved word)
How can i display the max id (last one inserted) for every different key without displaying all the data like in the first image??
greetings.
Do you just want aggregation?
select thekey, max(sid)
from (select t.*,
(TO_CHAR(t.DATE, 'YYMMDD') || t.AUTH_CODE || t.AMOUNT || t.CARD_NUMBER) as thekey,
t.SID
from transactions t
) t
group by thekey
order by max(ids) desc;
Since you haven't provided data in text format, its difficult to type such long numbers and recreated the data.
However I think you can simply use the MAX analytical function to achieve your results.
with data as (
select 1111 keys,1 id from dual
union
select 2222, 1 from dual
union
select 1111, 2 from dual
union
select 2222,3 from dual
union
select 9999, 1 from dual
union
select 1111, 5 from dual
)
select distinct keys, max(id) over( partition by (keys)) from data
This query returns -
KEYS MAX(ID)OVER(PARTITIONBY(KEYS))
1111 5
9999 1
2222 3
I have two tables
Table 1
ID NAME
1 Person1
2 Person2
3 Person3
Table 2
ID GROUP_ID
1 1
2 2,3
The IDs in all the columns above refer to the same ID (Example - a Department)
My Expected output (by joining both the tables)
GROUP_ID NAME
1 Person1
2,3 Person2,Person3
Is there a query with which I can achieve this.
It can be done. You shouldn't do it, but perhaps you don't have the power to change the world. (If you have a say in it, you should normalize your table design - in your case, both the input and the output fail the first normal form).
Answering more as good practice for myself... This solution guarantees that the names will be listed in the same order as the id's. It is not the most efficient, and it doesn't deal with id's in the list that are not found in the first table (it simply discards them instead of leaving a marker of some sort).
with
table_1 ( id, name ) as (
select 1, 'Person1' from dual union all
select 2, 'Person2' from dual union all
select 3, 'Person3' from dual
),
table_2 ( id, group_id ) as (
select 1, '1' from dual union all
select 2, '2,3' from dual
),
prep ( id, lvl, token ) as (
select id, level, regexp_substr(group_id, '[^,]', 1, level)
from table_2
connect by level <= regexp_count(group_id, ',') + 1
and prior id = id
and prior sys_guid() is not null
)
select p.id, listagg(t1.name, ',') within group (order by p.lvl) as group_names
from table_1 t1 inner join prep p on t1.id = p.token
group by p.id;
ID GROUP_NAMES
---- --------------------
1 Person1
2 Person2,Person3
select t2.group_id, listagg(t1.name,',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY 1)
from table2 t2, table1 t1
where ','||t2.group_id||',' like '%,'||t1.id||',%'
group by t2.id, t2.group_id
Normalize you data model, this perversion !!! Сomma separated list should not exist in database. Only individual rows per data unit.
I am using a select count distinct to count the number of records in a column. However, I only want to count the records where the value of a different column is 1.
So my table looks a bit like this:
Name------Type
abc---------1
def----------2
ghi----------2
jkl-----------1
mno--------1
and I want the query only to count abc, jkl and mno and thus return '3'.
I wasn't able to do this with the CASE function, because this only seems to work with conditions in the same column.
EDIT: Sorry, I should have added, I want to make a query that counts both types.
So the result should look more like:
1---3
2---2
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.[table name]
WHERE [type] = 1;
If you want to return the counts by type:
SELECT [type], COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.[table name]
GROUP BY [type]
ORDER BY [type];
You should avoid using keywords like type as column names - you can avoid a lot of square brackets if you use a more specific, non-reserved word.
I think you'll want (assuming that you wouldn't want to count ('abc',1) twice if it is in your table twice):
select count(distinct name)
from mytable
where type = 1
EDIT: for getting all types
select type, count(distinct name)
from mytable
group by type
order by type
select count(1) from tbl where type = 1
;WITH MyTable (Name, [Type]) AS
(
SELECT 'abc', 1
UNION
SELECT 'def', 2
UNION
SELECT 'ghi', 2
UNION
SELECT 'jkl', 1
UNION
SELECT 'mno', 1
)
SELECT COUNT( DISTINCT Name)
FROM MyTable
WHERE [Type] = 1