Not even sure if this possible with IntelliJ but I'd like to tie the vagrant up command to run automatically when I open an IntelliJ project. I've scoured the settings but haven't been able to find anything that gives me this functionality.
You can write a plugin.
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/plugin-development-guidelines.html
Define an application component in the plugin.xml
<application-components>
<component>
<implementation-class>com.steve.plugins.recentprojects.RecentProjects</implementation-class>
</component>
</application-components>
And then you implement ApplicationComponent, which defines these methods in a parent interface:
public interface BaseComponent extends com.intellij.openapi.components.NamedComponent {
default void initComponent() { /* compiled code */ }
default void disposeComponent() { /* compiled code */ }
}
It seems like initComponent() can be a nice place to insert a function to start vagrant.
Alternatively... externalise the startup, write a script that starts vagrant and then starts intellij...
Related
I am adding some changes to an intelij plugin that integrates with vault I have settings page that implements Configurable that has a form for credentials and then a "Test Login" button. On button click I want to spawn an asynchronous background task to test the credentials and then update the UI with either success or failure.
Here is a screenshot of my settings
As far as I can tell the correct way to do this would be to use a background task but that requires a "project" which as far as I can tell you have to get from an AnAction and I don't really see how that would work in this context. Here are a few approaches I've played around with
This still blocks the UI and spits out a warning about the UI being blocked for too long
ApplicationManager.getApplication().executeOnPooledThread(() ->
ApplicationManager.getApplication().invokeLaterOnWriteThread(() -> {
// async work
// repaint
}, ModalityState.stateForComponent(myMainPanel)));
// I don't know how to get the project or if I even should here.
ProgressManager.getInstance().run(new Task.Backgroundable(project, "Login"){
public void run(#NotNull ProgressIndicator progressIndicator) {
// async work
// repaint when done
}});
All of this is happening in my AppSettingsComponent button click addActionListener. Here is my complete source code on github
I had the same problem with the project instance required. But by looking at the Task.Backgroundable constructor you can pass a #Nullable project. So I just pass null and it works well for me.
ProgressManager.getInstance().run(new Task.Backgroundable(null, "Login") {
public void run(#NotNull ProgressIndicator progressIndicator) {
// your stuff
}
});
I would like to edit and add features to the prestashop Store Locator page.
Prestashop's documentation isn't really clear, and i would like to know if it's possible to implement a Controller in a custom module.
I would like to create a module which is able to extends StoreFrontController and it's features without starting from scratch.
Is it possible ? Have you some documentation for me ?
A beginner,
Best.
As you have many requirements, you will have to go with an override of class StoresController.php.
Your module folder should look like this:
/mymodule
/mymodule.php
/config.xml
/override
/controllers
/front
StoresController.php
/views
/templates
/front
stores.tpl
In StoresController.php you will have to override initContent():
<?php
class StoresController extends StoresControllerCore
{
/**
* Assign template vars related to page content
* #see FrontController::initContent()
*/
public function initContent()
{
parent::initContent();
// here add any smarty variables you want
$this->setTemplate(_PS_MODULE_DIR_.'mymodule/views/templates/front/stores.tpl');
}
}
Now you can add as many variables as you want in this controller and customized its template in your own module.
We you create an override in a module, it will be only parsed once at installation. If your module is already installed you will have to uninstall it and install it again. Then your override file will be copied to the root /override folder.
Any change made in your module override will not be reflected to the root override folder. So you will have to uninstall and install your module each time you want to make a change.
So I advise you to make all your changes directly in the root override folder, and when you're done copy this file back into your module folder. And if you don't want to uninstall your module and install it again to declare this file, you can put it directly in the root override folder and delete the file /cache/class_index.php so that Prestashop knows that an overrides has been added.
If you have any questions :)
You can start by overriding front controller like
`"/modules/mymodule/override/controllers/front/StoresController.php" and in this fine add class "class StoresControllerCore extends FrontController {
public function initContent()
{
parent::initContent();
//here do whatever you like
}
}"
though you must know coding to proceed further.
I am developing an Eclipse plug-in which will be triggered by a specific pattern string found (e.g., stack trace) in the default console opened in Eclipse and will show some notification in a custom view. I know how add the listener to the available consoles.But I am not sure in which phase of Eclipse View life cycle I need to add the listener. Currently I am adding in createPartControl which is not what I want, because it forces to me to open the view manually to perform the binding the listener with the consoles.
public void createPartControl(Composite parent) {
//got the default console from ConsolePlugin
TextConsole tconsole=(TextConsole)defaultConsole;
tconsole.addPatternMatchListener(new IPatternMatchListener() {
// implementation codes goes here
}
}
Any help will be appreciated.
I am using Mvc 4 project from Internet Application template. Why bundle feature does not enabled by default or am I missing something?
There is no such methods like this in Mvc4 as mentioned by other post:
BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles();
BundleTable.Bundles.EnableDefaultBundles();
Update: This how to enable bundle in debug mode
BundleTable.EnableOptimizations = true;
after registering bundles.
Bundles are registered and enabled by default. When you run in Release mode (debug="false") in your web.config the #Script.Render helper will concatenate and minify the resources into a single file. If you run in Debug mode then each script will be rendered separately.
I run into a similiar issue and my solution is this:
public class bundleConfig
{
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
// bundle as usual
#if(!DEBUG)
BundleTable.EnableOptimizations = true;
#endif
}
}
This way, when I launch it in Release mode, it does minification and bundling but if I launch it in Debug mode, it doesn't.
I have an Adobe AIR ANE that builds and runs fine on iOS. I want to run this app in the AIR simulator, but with an actionscript version of the native ANE.
Reading the docs, it seems like a default profile would be perfect for this.
I added the default profile to the extension.xml file. I added a AS implementation of the native interface to every project in my workspace. I have made methods static/not static, etc. I have tried everything but I keep getting this error:
ArgumentError: Error #3500: The extension context does not have a method with the name
I am at a complete loss. Here are the relevant files:
extension.xml
<extension xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/extension/3.1">
<id>com.novel.analytics.ext.ApsalarNativeInterface</id>
<versionNumber>0.0.0</versionNumber>
<platforms>
<platform name="iPhone-ARM">
<applicationDeployment>
<nativeLibrary>libApsalarNativeInterface.a</nativeLibrary>
<initializer>ExtInitializer</initializer>
<finalizer>ExtFinalizer</finalizer>
</applicationDeployment>
</platform>
<platform name="default">
<applicationDeployment/>
</platform>
</platforms>
</extension>
My AS implementation:
package com.novel.analytics.ext
{
public class ApsalarNativeInterface
{
public function ApsalarNativeInterface()
{
}
private static function initExtension():void
{
}
public function initApsalar(apiKey:String, secret:String):void
{
}
}
}
my native interface:
package com.novel.analytics
{
import flash.external.ExtensionContext;
public class ApsalarInterface
{
private static const EXTENSION_ID : String = "com.novel.analytics.ext.ApsalarNativeInterface";
private var context : ExtensionContext;
public function ApsalarInterface()
{
this.context = ExtensionContext.createExtensionContext(EXTENSION_ID, null);
}
public function initApsalar(apiKey:String, secret:String):void
{
context.call("initApsalar", apiKey, secret);
}
}
}
Here is my adt command line (library.swf is the lib that contains the two above files:
/Applications/Adobe\ Flash\ Builder\ 4.6/sdks/4.6.0/bin/adt -package -target ane ../../$PRODUCT_NAME.ane extension.xml -swc NativeInterface.swc -platform iPhone-ARM -C . library.swf -platform default -C . library.swf
Like I said, I am at a complete loss on this one.
Sorry for the much delayed response, but I think you'd benefit from checking out this wonderful tutorial:
http://www.digitalprimates.net/author/nweber/2012/04/10/building-a-native-extension-part-3/
Based on your code snippets above, it looks like you're trying to define your pure-ActionScript implementation in a different package, with a different classname. Seems you actually want to use the same package+class+method names and just store it in a different library (so it's bundled as its own SWF). Then you tell ADT how to bundle things.