I have a fucntion pb(IDCODE,0) running it with IDCODE=320 gives this sample data:
select *
from pb(320,0)
logid entrydate qty
1 1.10.17 5
2 1.10.17 6
3 1.10.17 5
4 1.10.17 -3
5 2.10.17 6
6 3.10.17 -100
*it actually gives more rows (like 20000) but I reduced it for the example
pb is a very heavy function but in simple terms it shows activities based on their order.
I want to find the entrydate of the first occurrences of qty<0 after the last row of qty>0.
In order to do that I need to do something like this:
Select Min(logid) where qty<0 and logid>(select max(logid) where qty>=0)
In the above sample the requested result is 3.10.17
Because:
logid=5 is max(logid) where qty>=0
and
logid=6 is Min(logid) where qty<0 and logid>(select max(logid) where qty>=0)
which in fact is : Select Min(logid) where qty<0 and logid>5
So I wrote the following query:
select entrydate
from pb(320,0)
where logid= ( SELECT min(logid)
FROM pb(320,0)
where qty<0 and logid>(SELECT coalesce(max(logid),0)
FROM pb(320,0)
WHERE qty >= 0))
This works great but it's 3 times that I call the function pb(320,0).
It's huge time consuming and needless to say that I actually run this query on many IDCODES (like 214) so pb(IDCODE,0) actually runs 214*3 this is horrible.
What can I do?
First, use a CTE, because Postgres might materialize the CTE.
However, you need only one table reference if you use window functions:
with t as (
select *
from pb(320,0)
)
select t.*
from (select t.*, max(case when qty > 0 then logid end) over () as last_poslogid
from t
) t
where id > last_poslogid and qty < 0
order by id
fetch first 1 row only;
More recent versions of Postgres support the filter clause which is a bit more efficient than the case.
Related
How to repeat rows based on column value in snowflake using sql.
I tried a few methods but not working such as dual and connect by.
I have two columns: Id and Quantity.
For each ID, there are different values of Quantity.
So if you have a count, you can use a generator:
with ten_rows as (
select row_number() over (order by null) as rn
from table(generator(ROWCOUNT=>10))
), data(id, count) as (
select * from values
(1,2),
(2,4)
)
SELECT
d.*
,r.rn
from data as d
join ten_rows as r
on d.count >= r.rn
order by 1,3;
ID
COUNT
RN
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
4
1
2
4
2
2
4
3
2
4
4
Ok let's start by generating some data. We will create 10 rows, with a QTY. The QTY will be randomly chosen as 1 or 2.
Next we want to duplicate the rows with a QTY of 2 and leave the QTY =1 as they are.
Obviously you can change all parameters above to suit your needs - this solution works super fast and in my opinion way better than table generation.
Simply stack SPLIT_TO_TABLE(), REPEAT() with a LATERAL() join and voila.
WITH TEN_ROWS AS (SELECT ROW_NUMBER()OVER(ORDER BY NULL)SOME_ID,UNIFORM(1,2,RANDOM())QTY FROM TABLE(GENERATOR(ROWCOUNT=>10)))
SELECT
TEN_ROWS.*
FROM
TEN_ROWS,LATERAL SPLIT_TO_TABLE(REPEAT('hire me $10/hour',QTY-1),'hire me $10/hour')ALTERNATIVE_APPROACH;
I have a problem that it's very easy to be solved in C# code for example, but I have no idea how to write in a SQL query with Recursive CTE-s or Sliding-Windows functions.
Here is the situation: let's say I have a table with 3 columns (ID, Date, Amount), and here is some data:
ID Date Amount
-----------------------
1 01.01.2016 -500
2 01.02.2016 1000
3 01.03.2016 -200
4 01.04.2016 300
5 01.05.2016 500
6 01.06.2016 1000
7 01.07.2016 -100
8 01.08.2016 200
The result I want to get from the table is this (ID, Amount .... Order By Date):
ID Amount
-----------------------
2 300
4 300
5 500
6 900
8 200
The idea is to distribute the amounts into installments, for each client separately, but the thing is when negative amount comes into play you need to remove amount from the last installment. I don't know how clear I am, so here is an example:
Let's say I have 3 Invoices for one client with amounts 500, 200, -300.
If i start distribute these Invoices, first i distribute the amount 500, then 200. But when i come to the third one -300, then i need to remove from the last Invoice. In other words 200 - 300 = -100, so the amount from second Invoice will disappear, but there are still -100 that needs to be substracted from first Invoice. So 500 - 100 = 400. The result i need is result with one row (first invoice with amount 400)
Another example when the first invoice is with negative amount (-500, 300, 500).
In this case, the first (-500) invoice will make the second disappear and another 200 will be substracted from the third. So the result will be: Third Invoice with amount 300.
This is something like Stack implementation in programming language, but i need to make it with sliding-window functions in SQL Server.
I need an implementation with Sliding Function or Recursive CTEs.
Not with cycles ...
Thanks.
Ok, think this is what you want. there are two recursive queries. One for upward propagation and the second one for the downward propagation.
with your_data_rn as
(
select *, row_number() over (order by date) rn
from your_data
), rcte_up(id, date, ammount, rn, running) as
(
select *, ammount as running
from your_data_rn
union all
select d.*,
d.ammount + rcte_up.running
from your_data_rn d
join rcte_up on rcte_up.running < 0 and d.rn = rcte_up.rn - 1
), data2 as
(
select id, date, min(running) ammount,
row_number() over (order by date) rn
from rcte_up
group by id, date, rn
having min(running) > 0 or rn = 1
), rcte_down(id, date, ammount, rn, running) as
(
select *, ammount as running
from data2
union all
select d.*, d.ammount + rcte_down.running
from data2 d
join rcte_down on rcte_down.running < 0 and d.rn = rcte_down.rn + 1
)
select id, date, min(running) ammount
from rcte_down
group by id, date
having min(running) > 0
demo
I can imagine that you use just the upward propagation and the downward propagation of the first row is done in some procedural language. Downward propagation is one scan through few first rows, therefore, the recursive query may be a hammer on a mosquito.
I add client ID in table for more general solution. Then I implemented the stack stored as XML in query field. And emulated a program cycle with Recursive-CTE:
with Data as( -- Numbering rows for iteration on CTE
select Client, id, Amount,
cast(row_number() over(partition by Client order by Date) as int) n
from TabW
),
CTE(Client, n, stack) as( -- Recursive CTE
select Client, 1, cast(NULL as xml) from Data where n=1
UNION ALL
select D.Client, D.n+1, (
-- Stack operations to process current row (D)
select row_number() over(order by n) n,
-- Use calculated amount in first positive and oldest stack cell
-- Else preserve value stored in stack
case when n=1 or (n=0 and last=1) then new else Amount end Amount,
-- Set ID in stack cell for positive and new data
case when n=1 and D.Amount>0 then D.id else id end id
from (
select Y.Amount, Y.id, new,
-- Count positive stack entries
sum(case when new<=0 or (n=0 and Amount<0) then 0 else 1 end) over (order by n) n,
row_number() over(order by n desc) last -- mark oldest stack cell by 1
from (
select X.*,sum(Amount) over(order by n) new
from (
select case when C.stack.value('(/row/#Amount)[1]','int')<0 then -1 else 0 end n,
D.Amount, D.id -- Data from new record
union all -- And expand current stack in XML to table
select node.value('#n','int') n, node.value('#Amount','int'), node.value('#id','int')
from C.stack.nodes('//row') N(node)
) X
) Y where n>=0 -- Suppress new cell if the stack contained a negative amount
) Z
where n>0 or (n=0 and last=1)
for xml raw, type
)
from Data D, CTE C
where D.n=C.n and D.Client=C.Client
) -- Expand stack into result table
select CTE.Client, node.value('#id','int') id, node.value('#Amount','int')
from CTE join (select Client, max(n) max_n from Data group by Client) X on CTE.Client=X.Client and CTE.n=X.max_n+1
cross apply stack.nodes('//row') N(node)
order by CTE.Client, node.value('#n','int') desc
Test on sqlfiddle.com
I think this method is slower than #RadimBača. And it is shown to demonstrate the possibilities of implementing a sequential algorithm on SQL.
I am planing an SQL Statement right now and would need someone to look over my thougts.
This is my Table:
id stat period
--- ------- --------
1 10 1/1/2008
2 25 2/1/2008
3 5 3/1/2008
4 15 4/1/2008
5 30 5/1/2008
6 9 6/1/2008
7 22 7/1/2008
8 29 8/1/2008
Create Table
CREATE TABLE tbstats
(
id INT IDENTITY(1, 1) PRIMARY KEY,
stat INT NOT NULL,
period DATETIME NOT NULL
)
go
INSERT INTO tbstats
(stat,period)
SELECT 10,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080101')
UNION ALL
SELECT 25,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080102')
UNION ALL
SELECT 5,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080103')
UNION ALL
SELECT 15,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080104')
UNION ALL
SELECT 30,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080105')
UNION ALL
SELECT 9,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080106')
UNION ALL
SELECT 22,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080107')
UNION ALL
SELECT 29,CONVERT(DATETIME, '20080108')
go
I want to calculate the difference between each statistic and the next, and then calculate the mean value of the 'gaps.'
Thougts:
I need to join each record with it's subsequent row. I can do that using the ever flexible joining syntax, thanks to the fact that I know the id field is an integer sequence with no gaps.
By aliasing the table I could incorporate it into the SQL query twice, then join them together in a staggered fashion by adding 1 to the id of the first aliased table. The first record in the table has an id of 1. 1 + 1 = 2 so it should join on the row with id of 2 in the second aliased table. And so on.
Now I would simply subtract one from the other.
Then I would use the ABS function to ensure that I always get positive integers as a result of the subtraction regardless of which side of the expression is the higher figure.
Is there an easier way to achieve what I want?
The lead analytic function should do the trick:
SELECT period, stat, stat - LEAD(stat) OVER (ORDER BY period) AS gap
FROM tbstats
The average value of the gaps can be done by calculating the difference between the first value and the last value and dividing by one less than the number of elements:
select sum(case when seqnum = num then stat else - stat end) / (max(num) - 1);
from (select period, row_number() over (order by period) as seqnum,
count(*) over () as num
from tbstats
) t
where seqnum = num or seqnum = 1;
Of course, you can also do the calculation using lead(), but this will also work in SQL Server 2005 and 2008.
By using Join also you achieve this
SELECT t1.period,
t1.stat,
t1.stat - t2.stat gap
FROM #tbstats t1
LEFT JOIN #tbstats t2
ON t1.id + 1 = t2.id
To calculate the difference between each statistic and the next, LEAD() and LAG() may be the simplest option. You provide an ORDER BY, and LEAD(something) returns the next something and LAG(something) returns the previous something in the given order.
select
x.id thisStatId,
LAG(x.id) OVER (ORDER BY x.id) lastStatId,
x.stat thisStatValue,
LAG(x.stat) OVER (ORDER BY x.id) lastStatValue,
x.stat - LAG(x.stat) OVER (ORDER BY x.id) diff
from tbStats x
I want to make a specific counter which will raise by one after a specific record is found in a row.
time event revenue counter
13.37 START 20 1
13.38 action A 10 1
13.40 action B 5 1
13.42 end 1
14.15 START 20 2
14.16 action B 5 2
14.18 end 2
15.10 START 20 3
15.12 end 3
I need to find out total revenue for every visit (actions between START and END). I was thinking the best way would be to set a counter like this:
so I could group events. But if you have a better solution, I would be grateful.
You can use a query similar to the following:
with StartTimes as
(
select time,
startRank = row_number() over (order by time)
from events
where event = 'START'
)
select e.*, counter = st.startRank
from events e
outer apply
(
select top 1 st.startRank
from StartTimes st
where e.time >= st.time
order by st.time desc
) st
SQL Fiddle with demo.
May need to be updated based on the particular characteristics of the actual data, things like duplicate times, missing events, etc. But it works for the sample data.
SQL Server 2012 supports an OVER clause for aggregates, so if you're up to date on version, this will give you the counter you want:
count(case when eventname='START' then 1 end) over (order by eventtime)
You could also use the latest START time instead of a counter to group by, like this:
with t as (
select
*,
max(case when eventname='START' then eventtime end)
over (order by eventtime) as timeStart
from YourTable
)
select
timeStart,
max(eventtime) as timeEnd,
sum(revenue) as totalRevenue
from t
group by timeStart;
Here's a SQL Fiddle demo using the schema Ian posted for his solution.
This is the opposite of reducing repeating records.
SQL query to create physical inventory checklists
If widget-xyz has a qty of 1 item return 1 row, but if it has 5, return 5 rows etc.
For all widgets in a particular warehouse.
Previously this was handled with a macro working through a range in excel, checking the qty column. Is there a way to make a single query instead?
The tables are FoxPro dbf files generated by an application and I am outputting this into html
Instead of generating an xml string and using xml parsing functions to generate a counter as Nestor has suggested, you might consider joining on a recursive CTE as a counter, as LukLed has hinted to:
WITH Counter AS
(
SELECT 0 i
UNION ALL
SELECT i + 1
FROM Counter
WHERE i < 100
),
Data AS
(
SELECT 'A' sku, 1 qty
UNION
SELECT 'B', 2
UNION
SELECT 'C', 3
)
SELECT *
FROM Data
INNER JOIN Counter ON i < qty
According to query analyzer, this query is much faster than the xml pseudo-table. This approach also gives you a recordset with a natural key (sku, i).
There is a default recursion limit of 100 in MSSQL that will restrict your counter. If you have quantities > 100, you can either increase this limit, use nested counters, or create a physical table for counting.
For SQL 2005/2008, take a look at
CROSS APPLY
What I would do is CROSS APPLY each row with a sub table with as many rows as qty has. A secondary question is how to create that sub table (I'd suggest to create an xml string and then parse it with the xml operators)
I hope this gives you a starting pointer....
Starting with
declare #table table (sku int, qty int);
insert into #table values (1, 5), (2,4), (3,2);
select * from #table;
sku qty
----------- -----------
1 5
2 4
3 2
You can generate:
with MainT as (
select *, convert(xml,'<table>'+REPLICATE('<r></r>',qty)+'</table>') as pseudo_table
from #table
)
select p.sku, p.qty
from MainT p
CROSS APPLY
(
select p.sku from p.pseudo_table.nodes('/table/r') T(row)
) crossT
sku qty
----------- -----------
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
2 4
2 4
2 4
2 4
3 2
3 2
Is that what you want?
Seriously dude... next time put more effort writing your question. It's impossible to know exactly what you are looking for.
You can use table with number from 1 to max(quantity) and join your table by quantity <= number. You can do it in many ways, but it depends on sql engine.
You can do this using dynamic sql.