IBM Secure Gateway is a kind of VPN connectivity tool. I need to query an LDAP in an on-premise intranet network.
There is also an another VPN service offered by IBM Bluemix named IPSec.
Which of the two would be more feasible?
It depends on what kind of resources your application needs,
if you are using PaaS services (former Bluemix) you can use the Secure Gateway. If you are using IaaS services (baremetal or VMs) than I would suggest Vyatta rather than IPSec, because the latter doen't offer a connecction suitable for production, while Vyatta provides a lot of functionalities among which also an enterprise grade VPN termination bidirectional.
https://knowledgelayer.softlayer.com/topic/ipsec-vpn
https://knowledgelayer.softlayer.com/procedure/how-configure-ipsec-vyatta
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/bluemix/2015/03/bluemix-secure-gateway-yes-can-get/
I did connect my on-premise ldap to a service hosted on our dedicated instance. I configured destination to ldap server host and port. Our services are deployed on liberty profile so I had to change server.xml for that.
Configuring IPSec VPN is more complicated. I think you should be able to do it using secure gateway
Related
I have an Azure web app which talks to the Azure VMs via Azure Load balancer. The VMs have NSG rules setup. The VMs are also being used by other servers/web apps. How do I prevent someone impersonating the IP and trying to get access to the VMs? Or how do I add another layer of security other than whitelisting the client IPs in the NSG of the VMs?
To secure Azure VMs, please try the following workarounds:
Make use of Azure Bastion, to securely connect to virtual machines from Azure Portal over TLS. If you are using Azure Bastion there is no need to create public IP on the Azure VM.
Try creating DDoS protection plan and enable it to your virtual network. DDoS protection plan is a paid service that offers enhanced DDoS mitigation capabilities.
Make use of Azure Firewall which filters IPs by denying traffic from known malicious IP addresses.
Enable all the above options in your virtual network like below:
Otherwise,
Make use of JIT (just-in-time) VM access that allows only legitimate users to access the VM when necessary by reducing the attack.
Try using VPN gateways which send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks. Please note that each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway.
For more information, please refer below links:
How to secure a Windows Server virtual machine in Azure (microsoft.com).
Best practices for defending Azure Virtual Machines - Microsoft Security Blog.
I have a set up I would like to implement but just not sure on the details. As you can see in the image below I have a single VPS in the web which I would like to use as a gateway to a number of locally running web servers. Im using the VPN to hide the IP/location of the server farm while maintaining the ability to host locally.
What I am not sure on is the implementation as I have never used a VPN before. My understanding is that I can host the VPN server on the server farm, have the VPS connect to it which will give me another 'local' network interface which I can then use apache to proxy traffic through?
The server farm is basically a small Kubernetes cluster give or take a little.
Is my understanding correct and can you offer any advice on implementaion?
Thanks in advance!
server farm example image
The VPN server should have two network interfaces. The first is the public interface that connects to the Internet and the second is the local interface that connects to the server farm. All the servers in the farm should connect only to the local interface and have the gateway set as the VPN server.
You can use the Reverse Proxy functionality in Apache to route incoming traffic to the appropriate server. See Reverse Proxy Guide
I have a classic network setup in Azure, complete with VMs, vnets and site to site VPN.
I need to introduce a RM VM to integrate with this network. Are there any special considerations I need to make to ensure that the RM VM can integrate with the classic network?
Thanks
The only thing you have to do is to create a Vnet-Vnet connection between the ASM (Azure service manager or classic) and the ARM network. You can do this by creating a gateway and connect them . The only consideration is to use non overlapping subnets. The same consideration you have when creating a vpn between on-premise and Azure.
The problem I have is that we're trying to use our WebApp in Microsoft Azure to connect to an external SQL-database (not our own) through a VPN. The SQL-database is only allowing connections from our local IP-addresses that we put up as a Network (for example 176.0.0.0/24).
We are now connected to the same virtual private network, and through our Azure-VM we can now connect to the SQL-Server through SQL Server Management Studio.
Now we want to do the same with a WebApp, but we're not getting through to the server. It gets "Not authenticated" before reaching the SQL-Server (probably the server isn't accepting our IP from the WebApp).
The different problems I have tried to look through is:
Do we only try to connect through our Outbound IPs?
Is the WebApp not connected to the VPN?
I have unfortunatley not found any real answers, and neither any solutions to my problem. If you have any ideas of how to solve our problem, or maybe know how I could tunnel all of the SQL-calls through the VM, the help would be very much appreciated!
Hybrid connection is one option. What you can also do is enable point-to-site in your VPN. Once you do that, you can directly integrate your web app to the vnet and your connections will work. (Go to your web app -> Settings -> Networking -> VNet Integration)
If your Vnet is V1(older way of creating VNs) then enabling point to site is very straightforward. You can do it through portal. For V2 Vnets you have to do it through powershell commands.
Here is a link for the documentation which explains both the options.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/documentation/articles/web-sites-integrate-with-vnet/
There's a way to "tunnel all of the SQL-calls through the VM". You may want to use hybrid connections (cf https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/integration-hybrid-connection-overview/).
The principle is to have an agent installed on the VM that can access the database with the correct IP address.
Suppose you can access the SQL DB as mysqldbsrv from the VM. You add an hybrid connection associated to your web app, you install the agent on the VM. Then, when you connect to mysqldbsrv from the Web App, you go through the VM.
Summary:
Does anybody know if there are known issues or configuration gotchas with an IIS service connecting to an Azure based service?
Scenario:
I currently have a scenario that requires me to host two web-services, one in Azure, and one on a server running IIS. The IIS hosted service (a WCF service) connects to the Azure hosted service (actually the Azure storage API) in order to fetch certain information. This information is manipulated and returned to the client.
Client -> IIS Service -> Azure Storage Service
Issue:
I'm running into issues with the IIS service connecting to the Azure Service. The hostname cannot be resolved. I'm using the Azure Storage client from my code, but have actually tried this using the azure API calls, and they also do not work from IIS. I captured the requests using Fiddler (on a different machine), they match the azure REST API calls, as expected. These requests, when made outside of IIS on the host machine execute properly. It is only when they are issued by the IIS service that they fail.
In my research other people have been running into this issue when there's a firewall problem, but since I can hit the service properly from the machine, that doesn't seem to fit the bill. My hunch is that there's a configuration issue I need to sort out in IIS, but I've failed to find anything useful with my searches.
Does anyone have any information on why this might be occuring (known bugs, gotchas etc)? Any workarounds? From a SOA perspective, this seems fairly critical to understand.
Any assitance anyone has would be helpful. Thank you.
Sounds like a proxy configuration issue. Check how your IIS server connected to Internet. If you are using some sort of proxy to get to Internet, that connection has to be configured correctly.
Specifically, if your proxy servers are Microsoft ISA server, or Microsoft Forefront TMG, then you need to check two things:
ISA server client or Forefront TMG client software is installed on the server
The account used by IIS application pool is domain user. ISA Server/TMG are designed to work only with user account, not service account. Alternative workaround for this limitation is using "defaultProxy" configuration in web.config, however it only wokrs for HTTP/HTTPS.
If you use different proxy server, then other issues might be involved, for example proxy might require authentication.