I have 3 tables like follows：
Table1
BusinessId | CustomerName
Table2
BusinessId | Product Name
Table3
Product Name | Price
and I try to write a query which should count the total cost of every single customer：
SELECT Table1.CustomerName, COUNT(Table2.Product Name) * Table3.Price
FROM Table1, Table2, Table3
WHERE Table1.BusinessId = Table2.BusinessId AND
Table2.Product Name = Table3.Product Name
GROUP BY SERVICE_NAME
But that doesn't work:(
Any help appreciated!
Never use commas in the FROM clause. Always use proper, explicit JOIN syntax.
The following should be much closer to what you need. It as least fixes a bunch of problems in the query:
SELECT t1.CustomerName, SUM(t3.Price) -- use the right aggregation function
FROM Table1 t1 JOIN
Table2 t2
ON t1.BusinessId = t2.BusinessId JOIN -- column name spelled correctly
Table3 t3
ON t1.BusinessId = t2.BusinessId AND
t2.ProductName = t3.ProductName -- if the column has a space, you need to escape it
GROUP BY t1.CustomerName -- aggregate by the right column
COUNT(Table2.Product Name)
no allowed space here
yor query may look as
SELECT Table1.CustomerName, COUNT(Table2.ProductName) * Table3.Price
FROM Table1, Table2, Table3
WHERE Table1.BusinessId = Table2.BusinessId AND
Table2.ProductName = Table3.ProductName
GROUP BY Table1.CustomerName,Table3.Price
Related
I have two tables.
Table1 is 1591 rows. Table2 is 270 rows.
I want to fetch specific column data from Table2 based on some condition between them and also exclude duplicates which are in Table2. Which I mean to join the tables but get only one value from Table2 even if the condition has occurred more than time. The result should be exactly 1591 rows.
I tried to make Left,Right, Inner joins but the data comes more than or less 1591.
Example
Table1
type,address,name
40,blabla,Adam
20,blablabla,Joe
Table2
type,currency
40,usd
40,gbp
40,omr
Joining on 'type'
Result
type,address,name,currency
40,blabla,name,usd
20,blblbla,Joe,null
try this it has to work
select *
from
Table1 h
inner join
(select type,currency,ROW_NUMBER()over (partition by type order by
currency) as rn
from
Table2
) sr on
sr.type=h.type
and rn=1
Try this. It's standard SQL, therefore, it should work on your rdbms system.
select * from Table1 AS t
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 AS y ON t.[type] = y.[type] and y.currency IN (SELECT MAX(currency) FROM Table2 GROUP BY [type])
If you want to control which currency is joined, consider altering Table2 by adding a new column active/non active and modifying accordingly the JOIN clause.
You can use outer apply if it's supported.
select a.type, a.address, a.name, b.currency
from Table1 a
outer apply (
select top 1 currency
from Table2
where Table2.type = a.type
) b
I typical way to do this uses a correlated subquery. This guarantees that all rows in the first table are kept. And it generates an error if more than one row is returned from the second.
So:
select t1.*,
(select t2.currency
from table2 t2
where t2.type = t1.type
fetch first 1 row only
) as currency
from table1 t1;
You don't specify what database you are using, so this uses standard syntax for returning one row. Some databases use limit or top instead.
Heyy I'm new to sql and I'd just like to know if there's a way to retrieve select statements with conditions from other tables.
I want to select all name values that have a number that identifies that they have committed a crime. I only want to select a name once.
"SELECT distinct * FROM Table1 WHERE number LIKE table2.number "
Are you looking for IN?
SELECT t1.*
FROM Table1 t1
WHERE t1.number IN (SELECT t2.number FROM table2 t2 t2.number);
Under most circumstances, the rows in a table should be unique. So, you don't need SELECT DISTINCT. The DISTINCT can add a considerable amount of overhead to such a query.
You can able to use INNER JOIN like below,
select tbl1.Name from tableOne tbl1
inner join tableTwo tbl2 ON tbl1.commonKey = tbl2.commonKey
where tbl1.columnName = 'any value'
table1 (id, name)
table2 (id, name)
Query:
SELECT name
FROM table2
-- that are not in table1 already
SELECT t1.name
FROM table1 t1
LEFT JOIN table2 t2 ON t2.name = t1.name
WHERE t2.name IS NULL
Q: What is happening here?
A: Conceptually, we select all rows from table1 and for each row we attempt to find a row in table2 with the same value for the name column. If there is no such row, we just leave the table2 portion of our result empty for that row. Then we constrain our selection by picking only those rows in the result where the matching row does not exist. Finally, We ignore all fields from our result except for the name column (the one we are sure that exists, from table1).
While it may not be the most performant method possible in all cases, it should work in basically every database engine ever that attempts to implement ANSI 92 SQL
You can either do
SELECT name
FROM table2
WHERE name NOT IN
(SELECT name
FROM table1)
or
SELECT name
FROM table2
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT *
FROM table1
WHERE table1.name = table2.name)
See this question for 3 techniques to accomplish this
I don't have enough rep points to vote up froadie's answer. But I have to disagree with the comments on Kris's answer. The following answer:
SELECT name
FROM table2
WHERE name NOT IN
(SELECT name
FROM table1)
Is FAR more efficient in practice. I don't know why, but I'm running it against 800k+ records and the difference is tremendous with the advantage given to the 2nd answer posted above. Just my $0.02.
SELECT <column_list>
FROM TABLEA a
LEFTJOIN TABLEB b
ON a.Key = b.Key
WHERE b.Key IS NULL;
https://www.cloudways.com/blog/how-to-join-two-tables-mysql/
This is pure set theory which you can achieve with the minus operation.
select id, name from table1
minus
select id, name from table2
Here's what worked best for me.
SELECT *
FROM #T1
EXCEPT
SELECT a.*
FROM #T1 a
JOIN #T2 b ON a.ID = b.ID
This was more than twice as fast as any other method I tried.
Watch out for pitfalls. If the field Name in Table1 contain Nulls you are in for surprises.
Better is:
SELECT name
FROM table2
WHERE name NOT IN
(SELECT ISNULL(name ,'')
FROM table1)
You can use EXCEPT in mssql or MINUS in oracle, they are identical according to :
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/07/sql-server-except-clause-in-sql-server-is-similar-to-minus-clause-in-oracle/
That work sharp for me
SELECT *
FROM [dbo].[table1] t1
LEFT JOIN [dbo].[table2] t2 ON t1.[t1_ID] = t2.[t2_ID]
WHERE t2.[t2_ID] IS NULL
You can use following query structure :
SELECT t1.name FROM table1 t1 JOIN table2 t2 ON t2.fk_id != t1.id;
table1 :
id
name
1
Amit
2
Sagar
table2 :
id
fk_id
email
1
1
amit#ma.com
Output:
name
Sagar
All the above queries are incredibly slow on big tables. A change of strategy is needed. Here there is the code I used for a DB of mine, you can transliterate changing the fields and table names.
This is the strategy: you create two implicit temporary tables and make a union of them.
The first temporary table comes from a selection of all the rows of the first original table the fields of which you wanna control that are NOT present in the second original table.
The second implicit temporary table contains all the rows of the two original tables that have a match on identical values of the column/field you wanna control.
The result of the union is a table that has more than one row with the same control field value in case there is a match for that value on the two original tables (one coming from the first select, the second coming from the second select) and just one row with the control column value in case of the value of the first original table not matching any value of the second original table.
You group and count. When the count is 1 there is not match and, finally, you select just the rows with the count equal to 1.
Seems not elegant, but it is orders of magnitude faster than all the above solutions.
IMPORTANT NOTE: enable the INDEX on the columns to be checked.
SELECT name, source, id
FROM
(
SELECT name, "active_ingredients" as source, active_ingredients.id as id
FROM active_ingredients
UNION ALL
SELECT active_ingredients.name as name, "UNII_database" as source, temp_active_ingredients_aliases.id as id
FROM active_ingredients
INNER JOIN temp_active_ingredients_aliases ON temp_active_ingredients_aliases.alias_name = active_ingredients.name
) tbl
GROUP BY name
HAVING count(*) = 1
ORDER BY name
See query:
SELECT * FROM Table1 WHERE
id NOT IN (SELECT
e.id
FROM
Table1 e
INNER JOIN
Table2 s ON e.id = s.id);
Conceptually would be: Fetching the matching records in subquery and then in main query fetching the records which are not in subquery.
First define alias of table like t1 and t2.
After that get record of second table.
After that match that record using where condition:
SELECT name FROM table2 as t2
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM table1 as t1 WHERE t1.name = t2.name)
I'm going to repost (since I'm not cool enough yet to comment) in the correct answer....in case anyone else thought it needed better explaining.
SELECT temp_table_1.name
FROM original_table_1 temp_table_1
LEFT JOIN original_table_2 temp_table_2 ON temp_table_2.name = temp_table_1.name
WHERE temp_table_2.name IS NULL
And I've seen syntax in FROM needing commas between table names in mySQL but in sqlLite it seemed to prefer the space.
The bottom line is when you use bad variable names it leaves questions. My variables should make more sense. And someone should explain why we need a comma or no comma.
I tried all solutions above but they did not work in my case. The following query worked for me.
SELECT NAME
FROM table_1
WHERE NAME NOT IN
(SELECT a.NAME
FROM table_1 AS a
LEFT JOIN table_2 AS b
ON a.NAME = b.NAME
WHERE any further condition);
I have two tables in my database, one holds the names of files, and other holds records of information described in them, inincluding sizes of sections. it can be descrived as:
Table1: id as integer, name as varchar
Table2: recid as integer primary key, file_id as integer, score as float
Between the tables there is an one-to-many link, from Table1.id to table2.file_id. What i need is for every file which name matches a certain pattern retrieve the id of the linked record with the maximum score and the score itself.
So far i have used:
SELECT name,MAX(score)
FROM Table1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 ON Table2.file_id=Table1.id
WHERE name LIKE :pattern
GROUP BY name
but i cannot retrieve the id of the record in Table2 this way.
The dialect i am using is Sqlite.
What query should be used to retrieve data on the record that has maximum score for every file?
Update:
With this query, i am getting close to what i want:
SELECT name,score,recid
FROM Table1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 ON file_id=id
WHERE name LIKE :pattern
GROUP BY name
HAVING score=MAX(score)
However, this leaves out the entries in the first table that have no corresponding entries in the second table out. How can i ensure they are in the end result anyway? Should i use UNION, and if so - how?
This can actually be achieved without a GROUP BY by using a brilliantly simple technique described by #billkarwin here:
SELECT name, t2.score
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 t2 ON t2.file_id = t1.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 t2copy ON t2copy.file_id = t2.file_id
AND t2.score < t2copy.score
WHERE name LIKE :pattern
AND t2copy.score IS NULL
See SQL Fiddle demo.
I think that you must use a subquery
SELECT name, recid, score
FROM Table1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 ON Table2.file_id=Table1.id
WHERE name LIKE :pattern AND score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM Table2.score)
I think the easiest way to do this is with a correlated subquery:
SELECT name, recid, score
FROM Table1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2
ON Table2.file_id=Table1.id
WHERE name LIKE :pattern AND
score = (SELECT MAX(t2.score)
FROM Table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 t2
ON t2.file_id=t1.id
where t1.name = table1.name
);
Note that you need table aliases to distinguish the tables in the inner query from the outer query. I am guessing which tables the columns are actually coming from.
In postgresql I can use subquery in join condition
SELECT *
FROM table1 LEFT JOIN table2
ON table1.id1 = (SELECT id2 FROM table2 LIMIT 1);
But when I try to use it in Access
SELECT *
FROM table1 LEFT JOIN table2
ON table1.id1 = (SELECT TOP 1 id2 FROM table2);
I get syntax error. Is it actually impossible in Access or just my mistake?
I know that I can get the same result with WHERE, but my question is about possibilities of JOIN in Access.
It's not possible, per the MSDN documentation:
Syntax
FROM table1 [ LEFT | RIGHT ] JOIN table2 ON table1.field1 compopr table2.field2
And (emphasis mine):
field1, field2: The names of the fields that are joined. The fields must be of the same data type and contain the same kind of data, but they do not need to have the same name.
It appears you can't even have hard-coded values in your join; you must specify the column name to join against.
In your case, you would want:
SELECT *
FROM Table1
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT DISTINCT TOP 1 ID
FROM Table2
ORDER BY ID
) Table2Derived ON Table1.ID = Table2Derived.ID