I have captured network traffic on a router and I wanted to replay these packets on an OpenFlow simulator to understand flows behaviors. Is there any simulators/tools that will help me to achieve this?.
You can use mininet. It can create virtual openflow switches. construct virtual topologies. so you can simulate your tasks there.
Related
I can create a bridge on the OVS through ODL and ovsdb, but OpenFlow switch is not same as OVS, so I got a problem. When I send the configure through POSTMAN, I just get an echo packet with Wireshark. Does anybody know how to deal with this problem? My ODL version is Lithium sr2.
Which OpenFlow switch are you using? Does it support OVSDB? The switch needs to support some configuration protocol (OVSDB or NetConf) in order to configure bridges on the switch. As OpenFlow is used to program flows on the switches, we cannot create bridges using OpenFlow protocol.
I am working on indoor gps tracking and for this I need a wifi signal logger which can receive the signals from different smartphone(whose wifi is turned on) an send it to a remote server. I wanted to know, where I can get this kind of hardware, having capability to receive signals from different smartphones and log its signal strength and mac address in a remote server.
Please let me know the details.
Thank you in advance.
Pravin Prasad
In simple terms, Wifi clients(smartphones, notebooks etc.) send periodic Probe Request packets to actively seek wifi access points and Wifi APs(routers, gateways etc.) send periodic Beacon packets to advertise the presence of WLAN network.
You can use any wifi capable device like a smartphone or notebook to log the above packets.
Configure your wireless card in monitor mode.
Use a packet sniffer(for example, wireshark) to capture the traffic on the wireless interface or write your own with libpcap. You may filter on the packet type, source, destination etc.
we are currently considering whether ns3 satisfying our requirements, we're looking for a convenient tool to run in distributed devices in the real network (every kind of possible connections) and capture the network performance data (like a sniffer). I realize that the primary purpose of ns3 is to simulate network topology in a single machine, but its emu module sounds promising and the flow monitor can save our effort on data capture.
In the following link
http://www.nsnam.org/wiki/HOWTO_make_ns-3_interact_with_the_real_world
it is declared that NS-3 EMU can be applied to inject simulated nodes interacting with real live network, and 3 kinds of testbed are given. However the first solution, virtual machine vmware testbed is still woking within LAN -- in promiscuous mode the virtual machines network card are listening to all LAN broadcasts so that the emu-udp-echo server and client can find each other.
My question is, is it possible that the emu-udp-echo server/client running in different, physical systems from different positions in wide network?
e.g. in different cities or from different network providers, given ip address of the hardware where the other ns-3 node is running? if it is possible, how can i specify the "real" ip address and port for the node, instead of assign a virtual ipv4 address?
Thanks a lot.
Yes, while the documentation describes how to perform this using virtual machines, this can be done in general on real hardware. Since that HOWTO was written, there has been additional work on providing helpers for running this type of experiment, including running on PlanetLab testbed machines. This documentation describes the generalized file descriptor NetDevice, added to the ns-3.17 release: http://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.19/models/html/fd-net-device.html. A similar example to the one described in that HOWTO is found in the file fd-emu-udp-echo.cc.
When using emulation mode on real networks, configuration of the MAC addresses and IP addresses must be done carefully. First, the device must be able to be put into promiscuous mode. Second, the MAC address needs to be different than the hardware address of the NIC. If you intend to be riding on top of an active NIC with existing IP address (in use for other Internet traffic), you'll need to have another IP address for ns-3 that is within the right link subnet. If instead you want to dedicate the NIC to ns-3 use, then do not assign the IP address to the host NIC and just assign it to the ns-3 configuration.
The PlanetLab example also shows another configuration that uses Tap devices to send data to/from PlanetLab testbed nodes. Some of this configuration is specific to how PlanetLab works, but the use of Tap device bridged to an ns-3 device may also facilitate emulation.
I want to communication between two different android phone via USB. I look at Google SDK guide I don't know how can i do.Somebody can give me some suggests ? Thank you very much !
The USB-Standard requires to work as host-client-mechanism. This means in particular, that you usually have a host-controller (for example inside your PC) which a client (USB-drive, MP3-player, mobile phone) can connect to.
The host is responsible for negotiating and establishing a connection. If you want to connect two clients with each other, one of them must Support USB-On-The-Go to serve as a host with limited capabilities.
From Wikipedia
The design architecture of USB is asymmetrical in its topology, consisting of a host, a multitude of downstream USB ports, and multiple peripheral devices connected in a tiered-star topology. Additional USB hubs may be included in the tiers, allowing branching into a tree structure with up to five tier levels. A USB host may implement multiple host controllers and each host controller may provide one or more USB ports. Up to 127 devices, including hub devices if present, may be connected to a single host controller.[20][21] USB devices are linked in series through hubs. One hub—built into the host controller—is the root hub.
my problem is to connect two identical devices with OTG-capable USB interfaces. Is this a simple giveaway or do I have to start and stop host- and device-mode manually with an arbitrary timing pattern so that eventually one is hit in device mode when the other one is an OTG host? From skimming over the APIs of several USB-stack producers it is unclear to me if symmetrical connections are possible at all.
regards,
slarti
PS: the device is an AVR32
The official cable has a "jumper" in the A end that tells the device it is plugged into to be the host. The OTG Supplement also includes a Host Negotiation Protocol which allows the two dual-role devices to interchange roles.