Is accessing the /parse/schemas endpoint the only way of defining a model with client class creation disabled? I wonder if there is a way to pre-populate the model on the server side?
You can also use the parse dashboard, or a Node.js client with the masterKey.
This way you can create / initialize your Models with the comfort of your browser or terminal.
Related
I need to create a way for anyone who visits my website to upload an image to an Azure Blob Container. The website will have input validations on the file.
I've considered using an Azure Function to write the validated file to the Blob Container, but I can't seem to find a way to do this without exposing the Function URL to the world (similar to this question.
I would use a System-Assigned Managed Identity (SAMI) to authenticate the Function to the Storage account, but because of this, anyone could take the Function URL and bypass the validations and upload.
How is this done in the real world?
If I understand correctly, the user uploads a file via an HTTP POST call to your server, which validates it. You would like to use an Azure Function to then upload the validated file to the Blob Storage.
In this case, you can restrict the access to the Azure Function; so that it can only be called from your server's IP. This way the users cannot reach that Function. This can be done via the networking settings, and is available on all Azure Function plans.
You could also consider implementing the validation logic within the Azure Function.
Finally (perhaps I should have started with this), if you are only considering writing an Azure Function to upload data to a Storage Account, you should perhaps first consider using the Blob Service REST API, specifically the PUT Blob endpoint. There are also official Storage Account SDKs for different languages/ecosystems that you could use to do this.
• Since, you are using an Azure function default generic URL on your website for uploading blobs with no authentication, I would suggest you to please create an ‘A’ host record for your function app. Considering that you have a website, you may be having a custom domain for your website to be unique and as you might be having a custom domain, the custom domain’s DNS records must be hosted on a public DNS server. Thus, similarly, on the same public DNS server, you will have to create an ‘A’ host record for the function app and assign it the same public IP address that is shown and assigned in Azure. This will ensure that your public DNS server has an active DNS resolver for the function app globally and then ensure to create a ‘CNAME’ record for your default generic Azure function app URL with the same URL as the alias in the DNS records and the ‘A’ host record as the assigned value in it.
In this way, whenever, any anonymous person visits your website and tries to upload an image, he will be shown the function app URL as ‘abc.xyz.com’ and not the generic Azure function app URL thus successfully ensuring that your objective is achieved.
• Once the above said has been done, then publish the new ‘CNAME’ record created in the public DNS server as your function app URL. This will not expose the generic Azure function app URL and mask it as well as ensure that it is secured since you will be uploading an SSL/TLS certificate for the website to be HTTPS protected in the function app workspace itself as shown below in the snapshot: -
For more information, kindly refer the below documentation link: -
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/dns-custom-domain
Am trying to hit my rest API in spring boot with the embeded server configured through browser and postman, but the request doesn't hit the server and am getting 404-not found am pretty new to springboot , please help me in this as in what to check further so that i can test my rest API
This could be due to couple of reasons
Try the following
Ensure the port you are specifying is correct
Ensure the end point you are specifying exist
Ensure the request you are sending is of correct REST action type (GET,POST etc)
Ensure your controller class is available in the same package in which Application class (with #SpringBootAnnotation) exists, else you will have to use #ComponentScan to make sure your controller class is scanned and endpoints available to receive traffic
Most likely, above should help :) If not, you'll need to describe what is done in the application so far
I am using Fusion Auth as an auth backend for my project.
After starting up the container as shown here(https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/installation-guide/docker), if we open the URL(Ex: http://localhost:9011) we need to create an admin user and then we will be able to create Application, API Key, Lambda.
As my project doesn't involve UI interaction, I wanted to create Application without involving UI interaction(i.e., setup-wizard).
I was unable to find an API that relates to setup-wizard.
As I saw Since this is your own private instance of FusionAuth, you need to create a new administrator account that you will use to log in to the FusionAuth web interface. in setup-wizard I thought this is required only for UI, So I tried to create Application using this(https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/apis/applications#create-an-application) API, but it is returning a 401(Unauthorized).
Can someone help me to either create an application without authentication or bypass setup-wizard?
The FusionAuth Kickstart does exactly what you need. It will allow you to pre-define the configuration that you require in a JSON file and then the system will bootstrap itself automatically.
The base use case it to provision an API key which would allow you to programmatically configure the rest of the system by using APIs after an API key has been created.
{
"apiKeys": [{
"key": "a super secret API key that nobody knows"
}]
}
You also have the option of building your entire configuration in the Kickstart definition. There are a bunch of examples and walk throughs on the Kickstart installation guide.
Good luck!
Relay.injectNetworkLayer(
new Relay.DefaultNetworkLayer(${GRAPHQL_SERVER}/graphql)
);
So How can I know graphql server has successfully injected this remote graphql server or not ?
You can check if there is a network layer implementation set via Relay.Store._storeData._networkLayer._implementation. If this is defined, your network layer has been injected. Fair warning, the underscore prefix tells me this is an undocumented API and is subject to change at any time.
I need to develop a bunch of my own web hooks (or services maybe) for auto deploy, report into project management systems, etc.
But data posted to web hook don't have much information to fill my needs.
For example, I've received simple push event, how can I know is it force push or not? Okay, I have 2 treeishes, let's look at repository and check this push — oops, need user token to do it. Sad.
What is the right method to access gitlab api from web hooks? Probably I've missed something important? I'm really confused.
Upd1:
Let's try to find a solution. Possibilities
Imagine we can have a user who can read all projects in gitlab. But
that user should be connected to each project to have an access. Ok
;-(
What about to read repo by pusher? We can't because we need to use his private token to do this.
Maybe some internal functionality to read all repos or something? Sure not.
So. Maybe database? Nope. Because we need to clone repo at first and can't save data in DB anyway with refreshing caches.
I think we need a security token and maybe many checkboxes with access permissions for each joined web hook or an app (service).
Please feel free to share your ideas.
I've remembered partial solution. So scenario will be like that:
Create web service with your web hook.
Create a ssh key on the same host for some special (usually owner of web hook service) user to have an access to repos.
Add ssh key created at previous step as deploy key.
Finally: Register your webhook and add your deploy key for that hook to project — repeat it for each project what need this hook.
You have event listener (your web hook service), and you have access to that repository (ssh/git).
But still that solution doesn't have access to API itself.
Probably, there is also an another solution.
Create custom admin user with a big random password and some synthetic name like HookBot or something, remember private_token of that user;
Register your web hook;
Use api access to add your deploy key with HookBot (untested);
Use sudo api to get sources or something else. Just mimicry to pusher's account (sudo -u {author_id}) and go on, read repo, work with it, etc.
Maybe some another solutions? More legit?